)URL THE MICHIXN .,DAILY TUESDAY, MAY 7, 193 THE MICHIGAN DAILY '1tI . 7 I f '- I Pubihaied every morning except Monday during the University year and Summer Session by the Board in Con- trol of Student Publications. Member of the Western Conference Editorial Association and the Big Ten News Service. MEMBER s5odated (gollegiate Ilion 1 934 (jitf Yi][) d1935 e MAMiROWwisCONS$ MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this paper and the local news published herein. All rights of republication of special dis- patches are reserved. Entered at the Post Office at Ann Arbor, Michigan, as second class matter. Special rate of postage granted by Third Assistant Postmaster-General Subscription duing summer by Barrier, $1.00; by mail, $1.50. During regular school year by carrier, $4.00; by mail, $4.50. Offices: Student Publications Building, Maynard Street. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Phone: 2-1214. Representatives: National Advertising Service, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. - 400 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, Il. EDITORIAI STAFF Telephone 4925 MANAGING EDITOR ................WILLIAM G. FERRIS CITY EDITOR..:....................... JOHN HEALEY ITORIAL DIRECTOR...........RALPH G. COULTER SPORTS EDITOR ....................ARTHUR CARSTENS WOMEN'S EDITOR ......................EIANOR BLUM NIGHT EDITORS: Courtney A. Evans, John J. Flaherty, Thomas E. Groehn, Thomas F. Kleene, David G. Mac- donald, John M. O'Connell, Arthur M. Taub. SPORTS ASSISTANTS: Marjorie Western, Kenneth Parker, William Reed, Arthur Settle. WOMEN'S ASSISTANTS: Barbara L. Bates, Dorothy Gies, Florence Harper, 'leanor Johnson, Josephine McLean, Margaret D. Phalan, Rosalie Resnick, Jane Schneide, Marie Murphy. BEPORTERS: Rex Lee Beach, Robert B. Brown Clinton B. Conger, Sheldon M. Ellis, William H. Fleming, Richard G. Hershey, Ralph W. Hurd, Bernard Levick, Fred W. Neal, Robert Pulver, Lloyd S. Reich, Jacob C. Seidel, MarshallD. Shulman, Donald Smith, Wayne H. Stewart, Bernard Weissman, George Andros, Fred Buesser, Rob- ert Cummins, Fred Delano, Robert J. Friedman Ray- mond Goodman, Keith H. Tustison, Joseph Yager. Dorothy Briscoe, Florence Davies, Helen Diefendorf, laine Goldberg, Betty Goldstein, Olive Griffith. Har- riet Hathaway, Marion Holden, Lois King, Selma Levin, Elizabeth Miller, Melba Morrison, Elsie Pierce, Charlotte Mueger. Dorothy Shappell, Molly Solomon, Laura Wino- grad, Jewel Wuerfel. BUSINESS STAFF Telephone 2-1214 BUSINESS MANAGER...............RUSSELL B. READ CREDIT MANAGER ..........ROBERT S. WARD WOMEN'S BUSINESS MANAGER .......JANE BASSETT DEPARTMENT MANAGERS: Local Advertising, John Og- den; Service Department. Bernard Rosenthal; Contracts, Joseph Rothbard; Accounts, Cameron Hall; Circulation and National Advertising, David Winkworth; Classified Advertising and Publications, George Atherton. BUSINESS ASSISTANTS: William Jackson, William Barndt, Ted Wohgemuith, Lyman Bittman, John Park, F. Allen Upson, Willis Tomlinson, Homer Lathrop, Tom Clarke, Gordon Cohn. Stanley Joffe, Jerome I. Balas, Charles W. Barkdull, Daniel C. Beisel, Lewis E. Bulkeley, John C. Clark, Robert J. Cooper, Richard L. Croushore, Herbert D. Fallender, John T. Guernsey, Jack R. Gustaf- son, Morton Jacobs, Ernest A. Jones, Marvin Kay, Henry J. Klose, Donald R. Knapp, William C. Knecht, R. A. Kronenberger, William D. Loose, William 0. Mann, Lawrence Mayerfeld, John F. McLean, Jr., Lawrence M. Roth,Richard M. Samuels, John D. Staple, Lawrence A. Starsky, Nathan B. Steinberg. WOMEN'S BUSINESS STAFF: Betty Cavender, Margaret Cowie, Bernadine Field, Betty Greve, Mary Lou Hooker, Helen Shapland, Betty Simonds, Grace Snyder, Betsy Baxter, Margaret Bentley, Mary McCord. NIGHT EDITOR: DAVID G. MACDONALD Conflict And Understanding... j RIDAY NIGHT the world began to crumble; Saturday night it was ut- terly destroyed; Sunday morning reconstruction was in order. That is the story of the 1935 Spring Parley. Never was a name more apt than the title of the Parley, "Social Conflict at the University of Michigan." Those three days, which were packed with all the drama of youth crying out the eternal questions and experience confessing that it didn't know all the answers, saw the emergence of that conflict in stark detail. It was a conflict between the ideas of students and faculty, of the conservative and the radical, and, most important, the old way and the new. No one expected solutions to result from the Par- ley. There weren't any. But something more pre- cious did result - understanding. For the first time in as long as we can remember the constructive and liberal students listened with- out interruption to the communist and socialist in a non-partisan forum. They were not converted to Marxism by the process, but they did see that the so-called "perversive" elements were of flesh and blood, had sincere and honest convictions, and were, like themselves, looking for an answer. The communist and socialist students were also exposed - to the exposition of the democratic means of getting the answer. They were not con- verted by the process either, but they did see that the so-called "reactionary" elements were of flesh and blood, had sincere and honest convictions, and were, like themselves, looking for an answer. There Was more than a general rapprochement between the student and faculty element, however. The understanding that was achieved here was of a different kind. It was the understanding of kin- dred souls, of men of 60 and boys of 20, whose confusion and lack of certainly of what the world must do to solve its problems made them one age. Last, but far from least, comes the greatest con- flict of the Parley - the old way and the new way. The faculty men represented the generation of the days of prosperity. The students spoke for the generation of the depression. The first said: Have patience. The second: We have had patience for six years now, but there hasn't been a change. How long must we wait? 1 Cooperation For Sanitation . . MMEDIATE ACTION taken by the managements of the Hut and Boesky's restaurants to correct the sanitary con- ditions which led to their being refused approval by the City Department of Health is conclusive proof of the willingness of most eating places in the city to cooperate the with health department in an effort to provide sanitary eating conditions. Their quick action was undoubtedly hastened by discrimination on the part of the student body. Similar discrimination in other instances where approval .is not granted will most certainly result in immediate compliance with the rulings of the department and enable them to keep a high sanitary standards without the expense and delay of recourse to the courts, The re-inspections promised by the department will probably result in frequent revision of the approved list. Immediate action by regular pa- trons of the restaurant thus losing its certificate of approval will force the proprietor into quickly com- plying with all requirements. The SOAP BOX Letters published in this column should not be construed as expressing the editorial opinion of The Daily. Anonymous contributions will be disregarded. The names of communicants will, however, be regarded as confidential upon request. Contributors are asked to be brief, the editor reserving the right to condense Defects And Discontent To the Editor: Through these years of depression and ter- rific economic and political changes there has ap- peared in this country a spread of radical propa- ganda and "red" fear. Our well-meaning legis- latures, scared by the blatant headlines of Hearst, fearing that "Joe College" of past years has meta- morphosed into a vicious Mr. Hyde with promi- nently revolutionary tendencies, have turned to in- vestigations and free speech legislation. The unemployed in the throes of economic de- spair, unable to comprehend the causes of our tumbling structure, and far from reassured while in the midst of these calamities, of the security of the future under our regime listens and is deep- ly impressed by the promises of a workman's heav- en under a communistic rule. The student, lingering on the margin of the group, listening to the grimy speaker tell of his hardships under the dole, and then to the com- munist, painting a rosy future for these "slaves of capitalism" if they will "only unite," realizes, if he thinks at all, that this is not the sputtering of a teapot, but the brewing of a storm ... There are defects in our present government, gross defects in our economic organization which this depression has delineated with a broad brush. With wheat, cotton and meat being destroyed in order to raise prices at the same time that men willing to work are on welfare being given $4 a week to feed a family of four it is apparent the demand-supply system of distribution has broken down.. It is also apparent that our present system throws the burden of depression on the working class. Interest on invested capital must be paid or the bondholders will foreclose. Dividends must be paid or the stockholders will vote in a new man- agement. Fixed overhead can't be reduced, but the father of four can be fired. The present pitiful condition of the working class, and the unemployed, played upon by the emotional promises of communistic spellbinders, heightened by the smug ranting of Coughlin, and the hooey of Long, have stimulated a great dis- content. If the depression lifts, prosperity may disperse it. But i it does not, we may be in for an emotional revolution throwing us into some sort of a Great Experiment. This is the "red" menace to fear. It can be met, adequately, not by legislative gag, but by plain common sense thinking. Drag this communistic bugbear into the open! The student of today is the voter of tomorrow. Get him think- ing. Let him hear lectures on communism; not emotional spellbindings, but logical weighing of advantage against disadvantage. If communism has something worthwhile, let him consider it, and see if it cannot be welded into our plastic democracy. Let him weigh carefully whether the temperament of our people, the history and char- acter of our country is fitted for such as Europe's experiment. Let him finally decide whether com- munism in correcting the defects of our system will still give 'us every freedom we now have under a democracy. -C.WS. Means And Martyrs To the Editor: There is hardly a person that would say there is no possible way to improve our government. To say such would be to admit total unconsciousness of existing conditions. We need changes in our social order, and there are some that feel this very acutely, too acutely perhaps. I am refering to those who advocate the overthrow of the govern- ment by force. I suppose they reason that things are now firmly in the hands of those who do not care to see the present order changed, and that force is necessary to dislodge them. They un- doubtedly picture the situation as being analogous to that which existed in France before the revolu- tion of 1789. There is a difference, however. We have means to institute laws which the people want, and no matter what they desire, if there are enough of them that desire it, and all of them sincere, they can get it through legislation. Surely it would take no fewer people, nor less activity on their part to successfully overthrow the government through violence. This Dunckel-Baldwin bill will do no good. Those who advocate violent overthrow of the gov- ernment are those who feel that the law of the land is wrong, and they will continue to talk and COL LEG IATE OBSERVER By BUD BERNARD BUD BERNARD'S LESSON NUMBER 5 ON GETTING A GIRL Upon deciding to pay her a visit Firmly massage the face for a minute. This is to bring out your finest smile, For she'll be late every once in a while. Shave your face until it is slick For scrawny chins will raise a kick. (She's creamed her complexion until it's sore And scratchy chins just dig the more.) Be sure your pants are firmly pressed, And your unruly hair is nicely dressed; ,It's a pain in the neck, in the end, 'tis true, But we can't go mussed like they used to do. Brush your teeth and gargle your throat, Scrub your neck and dust your coat - Become a lily - a sissy too, A slave to Love as all fools do! Feed 'em that bunk that they love to hear. And you'll be hooked within the year. Sing songs of mush - write poetry too Say, "Honey-bunch, how I love you!" For life begins in front of an altar Give 'em a ring and receive a halter. Then on this earth no more you'll roam - Think about this- then STAY AT HOME. * * * Flattery, says a co-ed at the University of California, is soft soap, and soft soap is 90 per cent lye. College students have been accused by many people of being inconsiderate. We submit proof to you who may have uttered such thoughts that they are not only considerate but that they have perhaps even greater respect for the feelings of others than some groups of society. At one of the well-known western schools a youth slept through his eight o'clock, through the 10 o'clock that came into the room next, and through the 11 o'clock sec- tion, and none of those other students awakened him. No doubt they shared a feeling of deep sym- pathy. *' , * * Maybe this will be a good lesson for you future salesmen: A little boy plumped down beside a Univer- sity of Chicago student in a street car. "Wanna buy a magazine?" "What magazines do you have?" "Oh, Saturday Evening Post, Ladies Home Journal. There's a swell story in the Post." "Got a Liberty?" "No, but I'll sell you a Post. Here the chubby jaws of the youngster chopped off words faster than the collegian could follow. "Hey," the student demanded, "what's the idea? How do you expect to sell magazines when people can't tell what you're talking about?" "Oh, said the boy, "that's my sales policy. You see I talk so fast they won't understand me. Then people don't close *the door in my face. They ask me what I said. I tell them, and boy, it sure works." 7 I" i I .- I RI A Washington BYSTANDER I] By KIRKE SIMPSON WASHINGTON, May 6. T HERE is no question that Senator Borah speaks with great authority in the Senate on consti- tutional questions. His views influence those of some of his colleagues. Yet, it would be a far stretch of fancy to imagine that it was merely Borah's challenge of the constitutionality of the Costigan-Wagner anti-lynching bill which ended victoriously the prolonged Southern filibuster against taking up the measure. It looked that way, admitted- ly. One moment the Senate was still locked as fast in the long- distance talking campaign of the Southerners as it had been for days. It still was in the legislative day of April 15 when WILLIAM E. BORAH the break came on May 1. Two solid weeks of time had been all but lost legis- latively in discussion of a measure that had little prospect of coming to a vote. THEN BORAH, prodded by Costigan, had his say. .The next minute the Senate voted 48 to 32 to do what it had repeatedly refused by a single vote margin to do in the preceding two weeks. It ditched the anti-lynching bill. Was it Borah's forcefully stated view that the bill was unconstitutional that switched half a dozen non-Southern - and one Southern - Dem- ocratic votes? It was not. It was his statement that he would not continue to vote "indefinitely" for the parliamentary procedure that kept the bill before the Senate. That was the crack-up for which Democratic leadership had been waiting. BORAH contributed even more to the cause against a Federal anti-lynching law when Costigan drew him into a first hand narration of what happened to the very similar Dyer bill passed by the House in 1922 only to be smothered also in a Southern Senate filibuster. The Idaho sen- I 11