PAGE FOUR THE MICHIGAN DAIL'Y'' ' THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1926 THF MICHIGAN DAILY Published evecry morning except Monday during the University year by the Board in Control of Student Publications. Members of Western Conference Editorial Association. The Associated Press is exclusively en- titled t. the tse for'republication of all news dispatches' ci edited to it or not otherwise ccite sd in this paper and the local news pu lished therein. Entered at the postoffice at Ann Arbor, Miciga n,as second class matter. Special rate of postage granted by Third Assistant Post- master General. Subscription by -carrier, $3.50; by mail, ~4.00- Ofices: Ann Arbor Press Building, May- nard Str eet. Phns: Ediorial, 4925; business 21214. EDITORIAL STAFF Telephone 4925 MANAGING EDITOR SMITH H. CADY, JR. Chairman, Edit. Board... W. Calvin Patterson City Editor.................Irwin A. Olian News Editor......... ........... Wtomen's Editor... .......Marion Kubik Sports Editor............,Wilton A. Simpson Telenraph Editor..................... . Music and Drama.......Vincent C. Wall, Jr. Assoc. News Editor..........Philip C. Brooks Night Editors Charles Behymer Ellis Merry Carleton Champe Stanford N. Phelps o Chamberlain Courtland C. Smith James Herald Cassam A. Wilson Assistant City Editors Douglas Doubleday Carl Burger Assistants Alex Bochnowski EdgatCartei ercn Caiopbell. waanuelat Cplan Windsor Davies Clarence 1delson William Emery John Friend Robert(Ge sner Elaine .ruber Marthn Icove Miles Kimball Paul Kern ' Milton IKir shbaunm Walter lleimann Garlaind Kellogg'. Hlariet L ey G. Thonias McKean Dorothy Morehouse Kingsley Moore Henry Marymont Martin Mol Adeline O'Brien, Kenneth Patrick Morris Quinn Sylvia Stone James Sheehan Henry Thurnau William Thurnau Milford Vanik Herbert Vedder Marian Welles Thaddeus Wasielewski Sherwood Winslow Morris Zwerdling r Y r BUSINESS STAFF Telephone 21214 BUSINESS MANAGER THOMAS D. OLMSTED, JR. Advertising.....Paul W. Arnold Advinrtisiiig ... .....William C. Pusch Advertis ig. .. .'..Thomas Sunderland .6lvertisin... .......George H. Annable, Jr. Publication...............John H. Bobrink Accounts...............Francis A. Norquist Assistants G. B. Ahn, Jr. T.T. Greil Jr. 1). M. Brown A. M. Hinkley M. 11. Cain E. L. Hulse -l arvey Carl S. Kerbaury Dorothy Carpenter R. A. Meyer Marion Daniels H. W. Rosenblum THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1926 Night Editor-AMES T. HERALD increased the output of his country by billions; he has fired his countrymen to an enthusiasm for the greatness of ancient Rome and has instilled an idealism with his stringent economic policy. Today Italy stands as one of the most stable of European gov- ernments, due to this man-Musso- lini. For this we must give the dictator credit which is justly his, but when his ambition reaches the point where it regards neither his neighbors nor the rights of mankind in general, then there is something wrong and then it is time that a larger force than Mus- solini take the reins of policy. When a man's thirst for influence reaches the point where a whole nation must alter its plan of mobilization, as France has been forced to alter its plan, then it is time that a greater power, the power of world public opinion, exert its influence to save for itself what has been won at so great a cost-its security from narrow minded nationalism. HOOVER'S ADVICE General development of the nation's waterways with particular emphasis upon the proposed Great Lakes-St. Lawrence route, is receiving valuable support from Herbert Hoover, secre- tary of state, who strongly advocates it as an aid to farmers in the middle West. With his usual thorough analysis, Mr. Hoover points out first that, since the price of farm products is deter- mined at the seacoast or abroad where the streams of competitive goods meet, transportation costs must be borne by the farmer; second, that r'ailway rate increases coupled with the stationary steamship charges paid by the foreign competitor have handi- capped the midwest farmer to the extent of six to twelve dents a bushel. In this situation, the development of a waterway whose power possibilities would repay the original investment and provide a cheap means of trans- portation should be welcomed gladly. Opposition, however, has risen in those sections, principally New York, where private interests would suffer by the diversion of traffic from the Empire state and its first metropolis. For the sake of, their argument, the objectors have advocated the use of the obselete New York barge canal in conjunction with the Great Lakes and the Hudson river. This route, however, involving 169 miles of canal and 130 additional miles of restricted waterways, is greatly inferior, and its construction would constitute an ever enlarging demand for government ap- propriations. National preparedness has also been dragged into the controversy with the argument that the St. Lawrence route would be a distinct handicap to the ,United States in case of war with Great Britain, while the New York scheme would provide an all-American en- trance to the Lakes. Aside from the obvious fact that there is very little possibility of such a conflict, the ob- jection falls down when the absolute unpreparedness of either route to aerial attack is considered. With national welfare