Uit C NVTCTIO' 4 ~11iR 3, -1, and : ie Michigan VoLxXIV, No 26. ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1913. PRICE FIVE (I - , ISSUES FINAL SPACE RESTRICTION PROGRAM FOR HUGE MEETING, Number of Noted Spealers Will Speak lRefere faninmoth Teachers' Con ven tion Tomorrow a-l Friday. PRESIDENT It,, Ii hUTCHINS TO UIVE OPENING ADDRESS Plans for the mammoth teachers' convention are now completed, and the final program has been issued. The conrvention will open officially tomorrow afternoon, in Hill audito- rium, when President H. B. Hutchins .ill deliver the address of welcome. Mr. Earl Barnes, late professor at Cornell University, will also speak at- this meeting. His topic will be "Nine- ty Years of Life and How to Use Them." lenry Lane Wilson, ex-ambassador to Mexico will speak Friday morning at 9:00 o'clock in hill auditorium, and Friday afternoon at 2:15 o'clock in University Hall on "The Mexican Sit- uation." Mrs. Ella Flagg Young, su- perintendent of Public Schools of Chi- cago, will speak before the reunion of the county normal schools, at the Union this evening. Dean James R. Angell, of the University of Chicago, will address the meeting of the col- lege section of the convention Fridayr morning in the Presbyterian church.1 The general meetings of the Con-l vention are open to students of the e*ucational department. Education-x al students wishing to attend any ofz the meetings, must obtain admission tickets from the office of the appoint-r ment committee in Tappan hall. l Because of the great number of communications, that practically re- peat points that have already been made and the lack of space in The Michigan 'Daily, the following agree- ment has been entered into between The Daily editor and Maurice Myers, the representative of the anti-Confer- ence side. Mr. Myers will edit and select the material that is to run on the anti- Conference side and the editor of The Daily, a pro-conference advocate, will edit the material that is to appear on the Conference side. The anti-Conference side is to have the pirvilege of one column and a half, if the editor so desires each day. The pro-Conference side is to have the use of one column and the editorial cdl- umn. The editorial is never to run more than one half a column, unless it runs in the news space allotted to the pro-Conference side. We have been compelled to restrict the communications because we are unable to give any other campus news. MAURICE MYERS, MAURICE TOULME. '03 I TTTEE TO CHOOSE NEW CHEERS THIS AFTERNOON, - - - Great interest has been manifested among students and alumni of the university in the new cheers competi- tion which has been conducted by The Michigan Daily.t Many new cheers have been receiv- ed and' the committee will meet this afternoon at 4:30 o'clock in the ora- tory room in north wing of University1 hall to choose the new yells, At thatc time those who have turned in new yells should appear before the con-f mittee to demonstrate their yells. s All new yells must be in the hands of the Cheer Editor, care The MichiganQ Daily by 2:30 o'clock this afternoon. WESTERN CONFERENCE IUESTION BOXo (Editor's Note-In order to avoid any possible criticism which may arise as to the non-partisanship of the answers given in this Question Box, two replies to each query will be given. One will be given by T. Hawley Tap- ping, '11-'16L, a member of The Michigan Daily force, who will represent the Pro-Conference side of the dispute. The other answer will be given by an Anti-Conference representative. The questions should be addressed to the Question Box Editor and should be short. The queries must be signed with the name of the author, although upon request editors will sign the questions with the initials and class num- erals.) CONFERENCE C (The Michigan Daily assumes no re sponsibility for sentiments express- ed in communications.) Editor, the Michigan Daily:- Through your courtesy and spirit of fairness in dealing with the Con- ference discussion, I hope to be al- lowed to ask the voters a few per- tinent questions. Do you know, you now reading this communication, that if we return to the Conference, we can no lnger de- velop a strong and experienced fresh- man team from which Varsity men can be recruited? The Conference rule is "Freshman football teams and second elevens shall play only with teams from their own institutions." Do you know that college football and track teams positively require careful and thorough conditioning at a training table such as we now have at Michigan at an actual cost of more than nine dollars a week for each athlete, and that Conference teams must resort to "clubs" in which the members being forced to pay for their own board, cannot afford the proper care and as a result often show the effect of poor conditioning? Do you know that your entire scheme of athletic management must be changed to "full and complete facultyt control?" No one knows exactly howf that clause in the Conference code should be interpreted for the method varies in each Conference college, but it means at least final power in thet hands of men who are often openlyr opposed to intercollegiate competitionF in athletics. That is the state of af- fairs in at least three Conferencev schools today.t Do you know that the appointmentt of our coaches must be "h universityv governing bodies on the recommenda-h ion of the faculty or prsident in thec regular way and at a moderate sala- o ry?" Do you think it likely that suchZ i coach as Yost would be engaged byv the faculty committee, a man paid twoe r three times as much for his ser-a rices as the majority of the members1 >f the committee?C Do you know that we should have :o give up our eastern baseball tripu .nd since that is true, could no longer f xpect Syracuse, Cornell and Penn-e ylvania to come west to meet us ons he diamond? p Do you know that we could not take t art in both the eastern Intercollegi- b te and western Conference track 1 neets? Even assuming that the dates I hould not conflict, which they do of- a en, it is a fact that the track team s ould not be trained to take part in m wo such meets within a week of each g ther. Do you know that a football team d iust be developed and "hardened" lowly, .that not more than two or t ossibly three "big games" can be e easonably scheduled, that they must 0 mne at the close of the season and t hat football relations cannot there- t >re be retained with Pennsylvania B nd Cornell and still play Wisconsin, t linnesota and other "Big Nine" elev- ns with a view to the Conference w iampionship? B Do you know that the football cen- s r of this country, is without question p t the east, that competition with c istern teams is necessary to secure ational recognition, that though we D ere repeatedly western champions g ith our splendid point-a-minute W ams before leaving the Conference, t e were unknown as football factrs i the east and though our fortunes s i football have been much less spec- joi icular in our contests with Syracuse, a] ornell and Pennsylvania, we are at ul ast recognized and given credit when sa e deserve credit as witness the fact P at we have had four All-American "s lections since leaving the Confer- ce and could boast of only one be- dr re that time? ta Do you know that Michigan was th thout a real rival in track athletics the west, winning nine first places tic the fourteen events at the Confer- wE ce meet of 1906, the last in which la e participated, and yet we were nev- es recognized nationally until we at- in ided the Pennsylvania relays and sit e eastern Intercollegiate meet? no nnsylvania and Cornell are the on- go teams that have scored more points, I OMMUNICATIONS than we have in the Intercollegiate so that we rank above such colleges as Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Dartmouth. Do you 'not think it possible and even probable that more boycott rules will follow our return to the Confer- ence, that more unreasonabl reg- ulations will be passed such as for- bidding a Conference team from tak- ing part in the eastern Intercollegiate. Remember that it has been done be- fore an'd that a simple majority can do it again. And now that you have answered these questions for yourself, I ask you if you can consistently and reas- onably say "Yes, let us petition for readmission to the Conference even though it be at the sacrifice of the principles we have maintained for years. Let us meekly submit and humbly beg for forgiveness." I think not and I believe the majority of those . who really understand and appreci- ate the Conference situation will agree with me. MAURICE C. MYERS, '11-'14L. Editor, The Michigan Daily:- We read in the Daily that "Disgrace does not lie in making mistakes but in retrieving mistakes." We do not admit that Michigan made any mis- take. Let us examine briefly the his- tory of our break from the Confer- ence. When we left that or- i ganiaztion the men who prac- g tically decided the issue for Michigan were the Regents. The Senate and g Faculty and Board in Control were slow to leave the Conference, not- e withstanding the fact that the Student Council, students, and 95 per cent of n the athletes and captains of teams a voted for it. The powers at that time a had already looked into the future and concluded that Michigan's place was a outside the Conference, independent. s The Board of Control gradually gave a way to the Conference in everything except the five-game clause and retro- active feature. Then on April 11, h 1907, in The Michigan Daily appeared t- Coach Stagg's ultimatum to Michigan: "That all relations between the two s univeristies were off if Michigan re- g fused to abide by the Conference rul- a es." "Michigan stands pat" became a cr sort of slogan and no games were h played with the Conference. Finally he five-game schedule was repealed fo by the Conference. Then on October r 2, 1907, the Board in Control of Ath- n etics voted away the training table 3( t Michigan. The Board of Control 9, eemed to be slipping right here, for w in October 22, 1907, the Regents reor- anized it. The action of the Regents M was unanimous. (See Daily for that is ate.) d On October 24, 1907; we read: "Ac- w ion of Regents thought to tend toward ul strangement of Michigan from the H1 onference." Any one could see that e he Regents were not satisfied with v he slow and vacillating action of the a oard in Control. Later the duties of er his Board were defined. On December 20, 1907, Michigan "I as still in the Conference and Prof. w ates was our representative. The h even game schedule regulation barely B assed 5 to 4. Conference refused to ge onsider retroactive measure. On January 10, 1908, Pennsylvania, WE 'artmouth and Annapolis ask for fir ames. Complaints were frequent that wi Vesterners had "slapped our face and ild us to get out." th On January 11, 1908, Prof. Patterson wa ays "Let students decide." Big ma- tu rity everywhere, -except perhaps .mong Board in Control and the Fac- a lty, for leaving Conference. On this no ame date announcement is made by ge rot. Parker of Chicago that Chicago ni stood firm for five game schedule." January 14, 1908, Michigan with- w raws from Conference. The stand mi ken by Board of Control is shown by fie eir resolution: "While favoring= all proper regula- on on of Athletics, and as much as tai e would like to continue athletic re- for tions with other Conference colleg- un , the Board felt that it could not npose on the students of the Univer- th ty conditions which were thought big it warranted,- either as promoting ou od scholarship or purity in athletics a (Continued on page 4.) tw, ,_ _ _ I. In the light of the general af- Fection ,which the other members o the conference had for Michigan was not the "boycott" openly directed at Michigan? Marten Ten Hoor, '13. As has been often explained before, the boycott rule was passed for the sole purpose of depriving Michigan of Conference conpetition. No one ever denied its intention. Tapping-Myers. 2. What will be the difference in University Government between the present and under Conference Rules? C. L. T., '17E . PI'ro: It is presumed that athletic government is meant by this question. At Michigan all athletics are under the administration of a board in con- trol consisting of four faculty mem- hers, three alumni and three students. 'This acording to the Conference standards, does not constitute faculty control. In the Conference the fac-- ultics or their representatives, have either a sufficient majority on the boards in control or have a veto pow- er wide enough in scope to give to the faculty an absolute authority over all athletics. It is believed, according to the official sense of the Michigan board in control, that the giving to the pres- ident of the university a veto power would constitute a faculty control which would be satisfactory to the Conference. Tappin-. Ant i. According to the Conference code, no institution which does not have full and complete faculty control of athletics may retain its member- ship in the Conference." In the opin-' ion of the writer simply a veto power in the president would not be suffi- cient. In all Conference colleges but Minnesota, power is in a board made (p either entirely of faculty men as at Wisconsin, Northwestern, Purdue and Chicago, or in a board of which the majority of members are faculty men. At Minnesota, final control is - retained by the faculty through its f veto power. Myers. 3. Have we any guarantee that the day after we re-enter the Conference the other members will not attempt to interfere with our eastern relations? Marten Ten Hoor, '13. Pro: We have not. There is the consideration, however, that such uni- versities as Illinois and Wisconsin, the former with her track team and the latter with her crew, now main- tain eastern relations that are very dear to them. They would be just as chary of losing these as would Michi- gan of losing her games with her east- ern opponents. Tapping. Anti: If we returned to the Confer- ence, any five members could at any time pass a measure objectionable to, us and non-observance would result in immediate suspension. It is for that good reason that the Regents of 1this university have held out for a rule requiring a unanimous vote rath- er than a simple majority. 4. How did Michigan go out of the Western Conference? R. M. . '14L. Following a game with Illinois in the fall of 1906 Michigan ceased all Conference athletic relations. . Such action was brought on by the passage of certain rules, explained in a previ- ous issue of The Michigan Daily, which were disapproved of by Michigan. In 1908 Michigan by formal communica- tion, officially withdrew from the In- tercollegiate Conference. Tapping- Myers. 5. Were not the strained relations which existed between Michigan and Chicago responsible for much of the subsequent conference legislation so antagonistic to Michigan? (I refer here to the differences which Charles Baird had with the Chicago manage-1 ment relative to the place where Chi-1 cago-Michigan games were to be stag-1 (Continued on page 4.)1