OPINION Page 6 Friday, August 7, 1987 The Michigan Daily .gW ik tgan r td m 97 Years of Editorial Freedam No. 12S Unsigned editorials represent the majority views of the Daily's Editorial Board. Cartoons and signed editorials do not necessarily reflect the Daily's opinion. Policing the police Voting: our voice in the choice THE POLICE BRUTALITY that occurred during this year's art fair was not a momentary deviation from discipline. Yet, the issue has only become prominent as white students have become the victims of abuse. There has been a racially- tinged series of documented incidents in which police power has been abused. The problem has been historical and must be treated as such. A positive response to the demands of Ann Arbor residents for full investigation of police behavior over recent years would be the first step towards mitigating the problem. But investigation without action is insufficient. Presently, the police department is only responsible to the city administrator. The department has been, undemocratically, charged with investigation of complaints against itself. This system certainly leaves something to be desired. What it leaves desired is a citizens oversight board. Even before the Art Fair incident, concerned individuals, such as councilmember Jeff Epton, had been developing plans for a citizens oversight board to monitor police behavior. In light of recent events, this plan has received support from many sectors of the community as well a s Democratic members of city council. As Democrats hold seven seats on city council, only the support of one Republican councilmember or Mayor Gerald Jernigan is necessary to establish an oversight board. A significant demonstration of citizen sentiment behind the proposal could be instrumental in securing Republican support for an oversight board. Next Monday, there will be an opportunity for constitutuents to communicate feelings about plans to control police behavior to their elected representatives. At seven in the evening, on the second floor of the city hall, an open forum will be held in which issues of police behavior will be addressed. Concerned individuals should attend the meeting and voice their support for a citizens oversight board. Proper action now could prevent future abuse and the need for such ad hoc procedures as hastily-called open foruns. THE SELECTION PROCESS that has been adopted to find a re- placement for outgoing University president Harold Shapiro provides a simple and disturbing model of intra-community relations at Mich- igan. The Board of Regents, after considering the depth and range of human resources at the University, has named itself as the presidential selection committee. With true graciousness and generosity, the re- gents have provided for the creation of student and faculty committees to offer their "advice." This system, we are told, is known and admired at other schools as the "Michigan system." We are told of the system's celebrated ef- fectiveness. Yet, it appears designed to effectively shut-out meaningful student and faculty participation while arriving at an arbitrary se- lection. Whatever the "system" is known as at other schools, it is known here as administrative dis- regard and disrespect for "external" input. Of course, the creation of ad- visory committees is pointed to as evidence of regental efforts to seek wide community input. Students are familiar with the "advisory" role. Regents meetings are a perfect example of how such input is welcomed. The regents allow a limited number of people a limited amount of time in which to address issues of concern. The regents tolerate this "advice" stoically and, then, proceed to do what they intended to do before they were so inconveniently interrupted: "Thank you for informing us of your views; now, if you'll excuse us, we must attend to business." If the regents are so enthusiastic about receiving student and faculty input on the selection of the next University president, why don't they provide for faculty and student positions on the presidential search committee? Why await the writing of collective reports from student and faculty members when you could have those same people sitting next to you interacting in the process of selection? Perhaps student/faculty input is something that looks good on paper, but is undesirable in practice. A The decision of who will preside over the University in coming years will profoundly affect the future of students and faculty members. One could persuasively argue that this decision will affect other sectors significantly more than it will the board of regents. It is not un- reasonable to expect that concerned representatives of all affected sectors be given a say in the final selection of President Shapiro's successor. Michigan State University, for instance, provides for student, faculty, and alumni representatives on the committee which selects its president. That seems a system more worthy of admiration than "our own." All sectors of the University community require'a vote, not just a voice, if their input is to be fully effective. Rich opportunity for the poor War and peace THE ARRIVAL OF THE Michigan Peace Marchers in Ann Arbor last Saturday made more people aware of what can be done to achieve peace. During the summer, the marchers have walked over 700 miles across the upper and lower peninsulas and have discussed disarmament, economic conversion and political activism with thousands of people. In addition to numerous public actions and rallies of supportive actions for those imprisoned for civil disobedience, the marchers are accomplishing the greater goal of planting seeds for action in the communities they pass through. People have joined the march as it has progressed and many non- marchers, met along the way, have thought of creative ways to carry on the message of peace brought to them. In Ann Arbor, a peace garden was planted by the community in commemoration of the marchers' advent. With each community the mar- chers visit, more and more people become organized around the issues of peace and nuclear disarmament. And more and more people begin to act against militarism in the United States and the world. Hopefully the marchers signify the end o f awakening and the beginning of action against a militarized economy and towards a nuclear-free world. A T A TIME WHEN federal appropriations for higher education are continually being slashed and the Secretary of Education's idea of education reform/enhancement is to preach sexual abstinence, it is heartening to discover that amidst such unenlightened policies, a commitment to education still exists in government. This com- mitment however is riot to be found in Washington, but rather in Lansing. Senator Dan DeGrow (R-Port Huron), chair of the Senate Ap- propriations Subcommittee dealing with education has initiated new legislation that warrants consid- erable commendation and support. Under the new program, welfare and poverty-level students who graduate from high school will receive free community college tuition. Those who graduate from community college will receive $2,000 toward a four-year degree. What is unique about DeGrow's initiative is that for the first time, those citizens most in need of edu- cational opportunities are targeted for real, tangible help. Students qualify for the new program by meeting two basic criteria: the income of the student's family must be below the poverty level in three of the four years prior to application for the program, and the studentmust graduate from high schobl before tWe age'of20 Itis hoped that the new legislation will break the welfare cycle by discouraging high school dropiouts, and encouraging escape from poverty via higher education. For students who have grown up in an environment of hopelessness and economic deprivation, graduation from high school often appears to be a wasted effort, and college, completely outside the realm of possibility. This program offers concrete incentives to likely drop- outs to finish their high school education and places before them a real opportunity to continue on to college. Another unique feature of the new program is its cost effectiveness. Initially funded at $2 million the first year, the program's annual budget will eventually reach $23 million when it is fully operational. Far from being more "welfare," this money is rather a sound investment in the future productivity of those whose economic future is appallingly dim, and will save additional millions in future welfare costs. The program's annual budget is sure to be far below the figure required were these prospective high school graduates abandoned to a future of poverty and welfare. This proposal, believed to be the first of its kind, warrants whole- hearted support and the legislature should now transform it into solid opportunities for disadvantaged young people - beginning with June 1988 graduates. It is an excellent approach to the problems of high school drop-outs, welfare, and poverty. It often appears that the Republican party views public ex- penditures to the less fortunate as money wasted on those unwilling to work. Senator DeGrow's legislation shows that'while this observation may be true of the GOP as a whole, there are those within the party who genuinely understand the complexities of poverty and are willing to take bold stands to combat it. A Photoon By T. Huet I I The Daily welcomes letters from its readers. Bringing in letters on personal computer disk is thefastest way to publish a letter in the Daily. It has been revealed that the surgery performed upon President Reagan's nose was not toremove cancerous materials, as announced. The true intent of the surgery was to control a condition known as "Pinocchioitis," enlargement of thenose due to excessive mendacity.