OPINION The Michigan Daily Sefitrigan al Vol. XCV, No. 17-S 95 Years of Editorial Freedom Managed and Edited by Students at The University of Michigan Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily Editorial Board Sign of hope P RESIDENT Reagan has announced that he will "go the extra mile" as proof of his genuine commitment to world peace. Despite allegations that the Soviet Union has violated the strategic arms limitation treaty of 1979, the president has decided that the United States will observe the agreement. SALT II was signed by Jimmy Carter but was never ratified by the Senate. Yet both the Soviet Union and the United States vowed to honor the treaty which limits the number of missiles with multiple warheads to 1,200. Reagan has decided to deactivate and dismantle a Poseidon-class submarine so that the new Trident sub- marine Alaska can be deployed without passing the treaty limit. Although Reagan has agreed to observe the treaty, he has made it clear that he will not tolerate any further violations. The United States, he assures, will be influen- ced by Soviet behavior and will continue to work on the Midgetman, a second new type of land based intercon- tinental missile. President Reagan's decision to observe the treaty, es- pecially as it affects the Geneva arms talks, is a respon- sible move toward peace. By keeping within the boun- daries of the treaty, the United States demonstrates a serious desire to negotiate. Now if the Soviet Union acknowledges U.S. efforts perhaps some real communication will flow. As things stand now, the imposed limitations are too lenient. Clearly, this arms build-up has to stop. Instead of spen- ding national resources on costly weapon systems, both countries must work toward developing a better line of communication. The United States has taken a step toward reaching that rational goal. How far either side is willing to go beyond that remains to be seen. The Michigan Daily encourages input from our readers. Letters should be typed, triple spaced, and sent to the Daily Opinion Page, 420 Maynard, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. Wednesday, June 12, 1985 Page 5 A great march for peace By Karen Litfin The Great Peace March may sound like pie in the sky, but organizers from PRO-Peace, the sponsoring organization, believe they can make it a reality. They plan to have 5,000 people walk from LostAngeles to Washington, D.C. beginning March 1, 1986. The sacrifice of the marchers will be great: nine months away from friends, family, schools and careers. But their goal is equally lofty: to move the people of the world to say to their leaders, "Take the nuclear weapons down so that we and our children may live." PRO-Peace organizers believe that such a monumental goal requires thousands of people to make a major sacrifice. They hope to capture the imagination of the world when 5,000 people leave their homes to walk through desert heat, blizzards and rain to ensure that we will have a future. IF THE GREAT Peace March is beginning to sound naive and gran- BLOOM COUNTY diose, a look at PRO-Peace staff will dispel any doubts. PRO-Peace Executive Director, David Mixner, is a veteran political organizer and fun- draiser with a 25-year career going back to the Civil Rights movement. He was one of the four organizers of the Vietnam War Moratorium, and has recently transferred his P.R. firm to his employees to devote himself fully to PRO-Peace. His staff of professionals have suspended their careers to guarantee the success of the organization. The cynic may still wonder what is unique about PRO-Peace. How can this movement achieve actual disar- mament where other groups have succeeded only in raising the issue? PRO - Peace says that theirnine-month march will keep the issue alive in a dramatic way, unlike large done-day rallies. Moreover, they have a four- part international strategy to involve citizens in Western and Eastern Europe. They agree with President governments will get out of their way and let them have it." PRO-Peace is different from past efforts simply because of its size and scope. But it's also different for another reason: it offers a message of hope and optimism rather than one of doom and gloom. STUDENTS WILL be a crucial part of the effort; march organizers ex- pect that half the marchers willahe students. One of. PRO-Peace's main objectives is to break the image that students are apathetic and fatalistic about the prospect of nuclear war by offering an alternative: a means wherehy students can make a dif- ference today. We all know what a one-megaton bomb can do if it falls on the student union building. What we need to know is that we can do something now so that this will never happen. PRO- Peace affirms our belief that we can shape our destiny. Eisenhower's stag want peace so mu TMAacYWl m$t'7 CHAIR M(5$ION 66011 NASA -n wa~, r'M HAPPivO Remk OR sl1r7.5 ALL 60#* Y5M 71'50ftY UP 7 .4?6! ,A-AWAYl, 4U~ NO ement, "The people Litfin is the campus coordinator ch that one day the for PRO-Peace. by Berke Breathed ctCr, cM, X, AT 4 lf P OMt-o WITH lE MEM? WAVY. aE S? FACtrrEt N(ASA'%