Page 10-Wddnesday, July 30,1980-The Michigan Daily Ambience and ambivalence I Flesh and Blood Roy Music Atco SD-32-102 Plateaux ofMirror BrianE Enomarold Budd EG Editions AMB 002 By MARK DIGHTON Well, it's time to put Roxy Music out of its misery again. Let's hope that it's for good this time. When Bryan Ferry revived the group last year and released Manifesto there was some hope that they could continue to produce at leastacceptable albums for awhile, even if they could never again attain the innovative level of their previous work. Unfortunately, Flesh and Blood is not only an unacceptable album, but may signal the irretrievably final creative death of this group. I don't care if Ferry continues to put out solo albums as uneventful, derivative, and forced as Flesh and Blood (Hell! he's even made pretense into its own ob- scure art form), but I, won't have the good name of this once daring leader of the pack besmirched with the kind of drivel that this album contains. The bottom line on this album is that it is little more than a compendium of effortless and thoughtless disco cliches. Sure, it's a "nice" album, but if you think "nice" is a compliment, then you don't understand the importance of early Roxy Music. Olivia Newton-John is "nice." The Starland Vocal Band was "nice.' Who needs "nice"? Not me, and certainly not Roxy Music. FERRY'S schmaltzy-crooner vocals have always been pretentious, but that was okay balanced against the hard edge of Roxy's music. This time out even the music is lifeless and unin- teresting. And the vocals, ho boy ! If this Roxy reincarnation doesn't work out, Ferry can certainly turn to writing songs for Mister Rodgers. Most of this album sounds like material Paul Mc- Cartney rejected as too sappy. And Ferry sings like he's trying to become the Robert Goulet of disco! I say "Most of this album is this" and "Most of this album is that" because there are a few redeeming moments on Flesh and Blood (though proverbially few and far apart they may be). In fact, you can count the good songs from this disc on one hand . .. even if you lost a few fingers in a bandsaw accident in high school shop. The first worthwhile tune is the by-now-obligatory Motown remake, Wilson Pickett's "The Mid- night Hour," in this case. The sad thing about this pleasantly funky-but rather unremarkable-version is that you know before long someone else is going to come along and do it much better. The nice thing is that whoever that might be is going to have to try harder to beat this particular cover than Talking Heads had to work to beat Ferry's dry and lackluster revision of "Take Me to the River." "Over You," which begins the op- posite side of the album, is another memorable song. This powerfully up- dated '50's tear-jerker even contains a nice lyrical twist and some great sax- work by Andy Mackay, two Roxy traditions noticably absent from the rest of Flesh and Blood. This is the only song on the album where the players are able to escape Ferry's binds of pretense and deliver solos worth noting. THE REAL surprise of the album, though, is "Same Old Scene," a disco tune with all the synthesized fire and immediacy of Tangerine Dream at their wildest. Some people unfor- tunately will dismiss this song simply because it is "disco." I refuse to be that narrow-minded and will instead con- tinue to assert that this is a powerful and engaging tune, even if it's context does bother me somewhat philosophically. The only part of this album that ad- mirably carries forth the Roxy tradition is the cover, which has to be one of their most powerfully and alluringly sensual covers since Stran- ded. Other than that, you would never know that this is a Roxy Music album. It is almost uniformly lifeless and one dimensional. As it is, there are only three of the original members left (Paul Thompson having dropped out af- ter Manifesto) and one has to wonder why Phil Manzanera and Andy Mackay consented to being part of this travesty. Surely they won't make the same mistake twice. It would be truly sad-but not unexpected-for Bryan Ferry to continue to exploit the good name of this group in increasingly self- indulgent and asphyxiatingly stylized music. Perhaps we should just put Bryan Ferry out of his misery and save the rest of us all that aggravation. It is also sad that I think we must begin to ask the same questions we asked about Roxy Music of their most creative expatriate, Brian Eno. On his first two solo albums, Eno continued to experiment with the wildly furious and idiosyncrataic pop that Roxy Music had first pioneered and then forsaken. From there Eno's work became "nicer" and "nicer," though he cer- tainly did it with much more thought and integrity than Roxy could ever muster. His first three albums represented an almost schizophrenic progression, an insane willingness to challenge and master every possible sound. HOWEVER, SINCE then hi# albums have conisted almost exclusively of slight modifications of a few limited variables within one particular sound. And a fascinating undertaking this has been from the endlessly taped Philip Glass-like Discreet Music to the moodily random Music for Films to the symphonic pop of Before and After Science. Eno has always had this inex- plicable sense for music outside of its accepted boundaries. His work in the hands of anyone less talented would be meaningless self-indulgence. However, simply because he does it better than anyone else is no justification for doing it over and over again. For that matter he does just about everything better than most of his colleagues. Even the frighteningly adaptable and creative David Bowie has been absorbed into Eno's sound and philosophy. I sincerely fear that Eno's new Ambient series represents his creative death in that he seems to be experimenting with fewer and fewer variables in a more and more limited range. I wonder if the only difference between Ambient #47 and Ambient #48 is going to be one note, for which Eno believes it is intellectually challenging and philosophically valid to search. All in all, that may not be such a valid concern, as he seems to be very con- scious of incorporating other artists in- to the Ambient series in order to infuse new ideas into the system. Perhaps that is the source of my discontent with Ambient #2; The Plateaux of Mirror. Harold Budd, with whom Eno collaborated to produce this album, is a good composer and piano player, but not quite up to carrying a conceptually demanding work like an Ambient album alone. As Eno said in the liner notes to Ambient #1; Music for Air- ports: "Ambient Music must be able to accommodate many levels of listening attention without enforcing one in par- ticular; it must be as ignorable as it is interesting." IF WE CAN turn that last statement around and say "Ambient Music must be as interesting as it is ignorable" we can derive many of the problems with Ambient #2. Most of this album consists of solo piano compositions treated with a uniform echo effect. Someone has tried to make us believe that simply substituting an electrJc"piano for acoustic with'the same echo effect ac- tually constitutes enough variety to warrant our attention, but it doesn't quite work. The fault lies mostly in that Budd's compositions are fairly predictable and reminiscent of each other. Many of his melodies come from a relatively narrow middle-register range of the keyboard, adding to the impression that his themes are only slight variations of each other. Sometimes it sounds like half of this album was recorded in one long ram- bling session, which was later chopped into "songs" in order to make us think that someone had spent hours on each "composition." I can't help but think that Eno could have made this album more interesting if he had beenmore involved. Unless you count the constant echo effect as his hand in this album is hardly visible. His only obvious inputs are the over- whelming, breathy choir of "Not Yet Remernbered" (right off Ambient #1) and the occasional atmospheric, syn- thesized cricket or bird. Of course, even these effects are stolen from previous recordings. Mr. Budd certainly has a pleasing ability to create dreamy melodies at the touch of a piano key, but he lacks the sense of tension and melody that works so well for Eno. Witness the strong, memorable melodies that Eno fashioned on Ambient #1 from absurdly disparate noise and long periods of silence. Mr. Budd can achieve nothing comparable with his lone piano and echo effect. I hate to claim that this is a vacuous album, but it shows a disappointingly narrow range of emotion-all the way from pensive melancholy to disin- terested melancholy. In short, it was just made for one of those "interesting" black and white films that endlessly ponder rain dropping on a pond. Eno simply needs more interesting collaborators to challenge his creative potential. It is unavoidable that his best recent work has been inspired by his work with other artists of comparable talent, and although he claims to be bored with rock and roll there are several current groups (most especially The Slits) ripe for his production. Maybe his forthcoming album with David Byrne will be an an- swer. The small part of me that is only now beginning to question whether or not Eno really is God hopes that it is. Your apartment cramped? Read the Daily Classifieds for the latest 'For Rent' info I I 1q 4 0 GROUP SKILLS TRAINING FREE - AUGUST 1, 2,3-FOR LESBIANS AND GAY MALES INTERESTED IN DOING "GAY RAPS" AND DORM STAFF TRAINING CALL 763-4187 (for info) - ,THIS Mbh, Wed 1-3 and Tue,,Thur 11-3 I I