The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Friday, December 5, 2014 - 5A The Michigan Daily - michigandailycom Friday, December 5, 2014 - 5A Let's talk about Ferguson Police cases across nation inspire host of protests ts now been a week and a half since the Ferguson ruling. The issue has been dis- cussed by a variety of peo- ple from mul- tiple angles, but I want us to have one final' discussion. We won't turn this into a heated debate or a hos- tile environ- MCHE ment. Instead, SCHRAMM I want every- one to have one calm, cool and collected opportu- nity to hear why so many believe the case is racially driven and .speaks volumes about racism in America. If you can't fathom why the case is racist, just keep an open mind in thinking through some of the points I want to make. First, let's talk about Ferguson itself. It's a predominantly Black citywithtwo-thirds of the town's population being African Ameri- can. While that's 66 percent of the population, only one member out of six on the city council is Black. Three Black police officers serve on'a 53-person staff, and Blacks account for 86 percent of vehicle stops in the town. Now, let's talk about police officer Darren Wilson's recount- ing of the story. He starts by say- ing he heard about a robbery of cigarillos from a store. Later, he sees Michael Brown and a friend walking in the road, asks him to walk on the sidewalk, and Brown replies "fuck what you have to say." Wilson proceeds to stop the car, asks Brown to come over, and Brown heads to the car. But he doesn't simply head to the car - Brown then slams the door shut on Wilson and begins punching him through the open driver's window. Then, mid-fight, Brown proceeds to stop punching Wil- son to hand over the stolen ciga- rillos that Wilson heard were previously stolen. Using this time to recover, Wilson grabs his gun, points it at Brown, and Brown replies "You're too much of a fucking pussy to shoot me;" After fighting for control over the gun, Wilson fires a shbt that sends Brown running. After this, Brown comes charging back to Wilson, puts his right hand into his waistband (implying Wil- son believes Brown had a gun), and refuses to get on the ground per Wilson's instructions. This causes Wilson to fire six shots into Brown. Doesn't this story sound a little strange to you? I'll highlight some commen- tary made in a Vox article. Why would Brown, someone who recently stole cigarillos from a store, act so aggressively non- compliant with a police officer wanting him to simply walk on the sidewalk? Why does Brown - mid-fight - decide that it's a wise decision to stop fighting to hand his friend the stolen ciga- rillos in front of a police officer? Why would Brown antagonize an intimidated officer to shoot him? Why would Brown reach into his waistband to pull out a gun when evidence indicated that Brown never had a gun? It almost seems that Wilson is trying to connect Brown with the theft and frame him as particularly dangerous in an attempt to justify his actions. Furthermore, numerous eye- witness accounts contradict Wil- son's claims - including whether Brown charged Wilson when the gun was fired. Let's also not forget that there's evidence directly con- tradicting Wilson's statements. Brown was shot 150 feet from the car as opposed to the 10-foot dis- tance Wilson claimed separated them. Brown's DNA was also dis- covered in Wilson's car, contra- dictingthe testimony thatWilson and Brown's altercation occurred with Brown outside the car. Does any of this definitively prove that Wilson shot Brown due to race? No. But let's think things through. This is a town where a few whites rule a major- ity of Blacks. Wilson is a man who previously belonged to a police force disbanded for racial tension. His recounting of events is bizarre at best, and evidence directly contradicts his claims. Given the facts, it certainly seems likely that race played a factor. Notice how I'm not saying rac- ism was the sole factor. I'm not asserting Wilson thought "I'm going to shoot this man because he's Black." However, lying somewhere between Brown's conscious and subconscious lays our society's purported notion that Blacks are more threaten- ing than whites. I believe that if we could repeat the situation with 50 Michael Browns and 50 white counterparts, more of the Black men would be dead than the whites. I'm not unsupported in believ- ing this. In America, young Black men are 21 times more likely to be shot dead by police officers than youngwhite men. That's an indicator of institu- tionalized racism - subtle racism that's facilitated by policies and practices that are particularly harmful to minorities. Institu- tional racism happens all around us. The same applies to the Fer- guson case. The police system isn't intended to harm African Americans more, but statistically, it does. We also see evidence of insti- tutional racism in the judicial proceedings of this case. Despite evidence contradicting Wil- son's statement, he wasn't even tried because the court failed to indict him - something that happened in only 11 cases out of 162,000 in 2010. Wilson didn't need to be poven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for an indict- ment. All that's needed to be indicted is a legal threshold of probable cause. Given this, in a public statement, the National Bar Association couldn't under- stand how a jury couldn't indict Wilson. The details behind the case don't match the indictment decision - something that could be explained by the rejection that institutional racism exists. Let's just assume Wilson was indicted and the case did go to court. Does evidence exist to declare Wilson as guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? Honestly, I don't know, and I could very well see there not being evidence to prove murder. " Institutional racism is one of the hardest things to prove, but does that make the situation any better? Enough evidence exists to believe Brown's death was influenced by race. It speaks to how easily racism can occur in our society with almost no reper- cussions, and that in itself is dis- heartening. But let's take this further. Let's assume the evidence indicating this case as racist isn't actually pertinent. What if Wilson wasn't being racist? It doesn't matter. Because this case didn't occur in a vacuum. It fits under the enormous umbrella of cases where race could have been a factor in a shooting. Remember Trayvon Martin? Cases where death is potentially race-driven happen frequently (remember that Black men are 21 times more likely to be shot dead than white men?) It doesn't matter whether Wilson definitively shot Brown due to racism; it just matters that there's a reasonable possibility. If it didn't happen in this case, there are hundreds of others, and it is happening in some of them. What's worse is that this form of injustice is designed to go unpunished. This case speaks to the larger societal problem that Blacks encounter more frequent and horrific police encounters, which speaks to the even larger problem that racist undertones exist in our society. That's why this case is so important: not only does it reveal fundamental flaws on a micro level, but it's a huge problem on a macro level revealing the exis- tence of institutional racism. I make absolutely no claims that I can understand the hard- ships that Blacks are experienc- ingwhile mourningthe Ferguson case. However, from observ- ing the pain, riots and injustice felt in the community, I feel the responsibility lies on more than just African Americans to speak on this case. - Michael Schramm can be reached at mschramm@umich.edu. Police brutality, racial profiling topics of concern NEW YORK (AP) - From the White House to the streets of some of America's biggest cities, the New York chokehold case converged with the Ferguson shooting and investigations out of South Carolina and Cleveland to stir a national conversation Thursday about racial justice and police use of force. A day after a grand jury cleared a white New York City officer in the death of a black man, civil rights leaders pinned their hopes on a promised fed- eral investigation. Demonstra- tors protested for a second night in New York, carrying replicas of coffins across the Brooklyn Bridge, and turned out in such cities as Denver, Detroit and Minneapolis. And politicians and others talked about the need for better police training, body cam- eras and changes in the grand jury process to restore faith in the legal system. "A whole generation of officers will be trained in a new way," New York Mayor Bill de Blasio vowed as he and his police com- missioner outlined previously announced plans to teach officers how to communicate better with people on the street. President Barack Obama weighed in, saying one of the chief issues at stake is "making sure that people have confidence that police and law enforcement and prosecutors are serving everybody equally." Even before the decision in the Eric Garner case came down, racial tensionswere runninghigh because of last week's grand jury decision not to charge a white officer in the shooting death of black 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Other cases were added to the mix on Thursday: - In the tiny South Carolina town of Eutawville, a white for- mer police chief was charged with murder in the 2011 shoot- ing of an unarmed black man. Richards Combs' lawyer accused prosecutors of taking advantage of national outrage toward police to obtain the indictment more than three years after the killing. - InCleveland,theU.S.Justice Department and the city reached an agreement to overhaul the police department after federal investigators found that officers use excessive force far too often, causing deep mistrust, especially among blacks. The investigation was prompted chiefly by a 2012 police ar chase that ended in the deaths of two unarmed people in alhail of137bullets. Just last week, protesters took to the streets of Cleveland after a white police officer shot and killed a black 12-year-old boy carrying what turned out to be pellet gun. At a news conference in New York after a night of protests led to 83 arrests, the Rev. Al Sharp- ton called the state-level grand jury system "broken" when it comes to police brutality cases and urged federal authorities to fix it. % "The federal government must do in the 21st century what it did in the mid-20th century," he said. "Federal intervention must come now and protect people from state grand juries." Still, federal civil rights cases against police officers are exceedingly rare. In the past two decades, only a few such cases have reached trial in New York - most notably the one involving Abner Loui- ma, who was sodomized with a broom handle in a police station in 1997. Several other high-profile cases didn't come together. That's largely because federal prosecutors must meet a high standard of proof in showing that police deliberately deprived vic- tims of their civil rights through excessive force, said Alan Vine- grad, who as a federal prosecutor handled the Louima case. Federal intervention "doesn't happen often and it shouldn't happen often," said James Jacobs, a constitutional law pro- fessor at New York University Law School. "They should only step in when the local prosecu- tion was a sham." Activists have claimed that the grand jury investigation of Gar- ner's death was indeed a sham. An amateur video showed Officer Daniel Pantaleo putting Garner in an apparent chokehold, and the medical examinersaidthe maneu- ver contributed to the death. But Pantaleo's attorney, Stuart London, expressed confidence Thursday that his client won't face federal prosecution. "There's very specific guide- lines that are not met in this case," London said. "This is a reg- ular street encounter. It doesn't fall into the parameters." Acting at the Staten Island dis- trict attorney's request, a judge released a few details Thursday from the grand jury proceedings - among other things, it watched four videos and heard from 50 wit- nesses,22ofthemcivilians.District Attorney DanielDonovandidn't ask for testimony, transcripts or exhib- its to be madepublic. But London offered some details, saying the officer's tes- timony focused on "his remorse and the fact that he never meant to harm Mr. Garner that day." Pantaleo admitted he heard Garner say, "I can't breathe," but believed that once he got him' down on the ground and put him on his side, he would be revived by paramedics, London said. The officer also testified that he "used atakedown moveand anycontact to the neck was incidental," the lawyer added. NEEL SWAMY I , The Team, the Team and a Victim When it comes to athletics, there's no denying that the Uni- versity of Michigan - a school known for the eardrum-shatter- ingscreams of its students during football games and the torrential sea of maize and blue that adorns our campus on a daily basis - is encompassed by a level of spirit that exceeds no bounds. Indeed, one hardly has to flutter an eyelid to find themselves surrounded by a highly pervasive and inclusive passion for the Big House and the Victors who proudly call it home. One only has to look around to see that at the University, athlet- ics are more than a form of relax- ation and entertainment. Here at the University, athletics - partic- ularly football - are worshipped, revered and glorified. And while I will be the first to admit that this level of passion marks one of the many allur- ing features of our university - because let's be honest, what's a college without its students - I cannot help but feel that our faithfulness to our athletic department and the individuals who compose it has the malig- nant potential to render us apa- thetic towards those who fall outside it or in some way chal- lenge it. On Nov. 16, newspapers and media companies all over the country entered a state of insa- tiable frenzy upon learning of the arrest of former defensive end player Frank Clark, who had been charged with domestic vio- lence and assault after report- edly beating his girlfriend in an Ohio hotel. Police reports indi- cate that Clark, a senior, spent the night behind bars until being arraigned on the morning of Nov. 17. Clark was suspended from the team that same day. Rightfully so. But despite the degree to which the legal reports cen- ter around the victim - who through her altercation with Clark was rendered unconscious and sustained several bruises on her face - the media coverage of the event has been overwhelm- ingly limited to the football team. As far as local newspapers are concerned, Clark's actions have affected nobody but his team- mates. As far as local newspapers are concerned, the victim of this altercation - who because of Clark will bear the rusty chains of self-blame and psychologi- cal trauma - represents nothing less than an additional obstacle for The Team to overcome. This news coverage indirectly and directly diminishes the sever- ity of Clark's crime, and propels the message that we, as students, should be concerned more about the team than our peers. The lessons taken away from domestic violence cases do not stpp being absorbed with the prosecution of the perpetrator. It's through the victim's experi- ences that we as a society can recognize the epidemic that is relationship violence, and it's through an analysis of our own values that we can propel for- ward and thus promote an envi- ronment that's intolerant of such hostilities. Clark's crime deserves attention not because of his status as a football player, but because of the pain it has trig- gered throughout our campus. Our actions are hardly justified by our position in society, and thus we must view Clark not as a god to be revered, but as a male figure who surrendered his mas- culinity by committing the worst of crimes. Football players - and all athletes for that matter - are not representative of our stu- dent body. This is not to say that we should boycott the sport or refuse to attend games because of this incident - this maneuver is both immature and deprecating to the entire university as a whole - but rather consider the degree to which we glorify the game and its players. It's important to rec- ognize that there's more to our campus than The Team. Neel Swamy is ans LSA freshman. BOW a BUSCH'S 1e 1Midii n Oi jSF1-El I 4