5 - Tuesday, March 11, 2014 The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.% Giving up ownership offine art Turn up for Christ. No0ho Overdramatic portrayal of Christ fizzles away ByCONRAD FOREMAN DailyArts Writer Jesus is back. And he's white. Again. Yes, Jesus Christ has once again made his way to the sil- F ver screen with "Son of God," Son of God this time por- trayed by Por- At Quality 16 tuguese actor and Rave Diogo Morgado - best known FOX for playing the same role on History Channel's "The Bible." Though there is a mix of ethnici- ties throughout the film, almost all of the important characters are white. It's apparent that people (specifically, Christians) still cling to the idea of a white messiah, when it seems pretty obvious that the actual Jesuswas some shade of brown. John, one of Jesus's apostles, tells the story through a flashback. He gives a quick recap of history pe (Adam and Eve, Noah, etc.), dis cusses Jesus's birth, then (jus like "The Bible") flashes forwari to Jesus as a man, leaving out an mention of his developmenta years. Throughout the film, John' voiceovers are few, but when pres ent they serve as a crutch for th. filmmakers, simplifying the story telling of already straightforwarc material. There is no originality. There i no creativity. Nothing about "Sot of God" offers any value except fo someone seeking to mix and masl Jesus's greatest hits. He heal a cripple, feeds the masses an( walks on water, but at the end o the day, there is no exploration o Jesus's character, and everythin feels very surface-level. The trutl isthatsomecharacters are tooper fect to be interesting; that's wh they introduced Kryptonite to th Superman universe. While Marti; Scorsese's "The Last Temptatio; of Christ" may have been contro versial, its refreshing portrayal o Jesus as a man with doubts, con cerns and fear, without questiot makes it a better film. There simply is no saving grac for "Son of God." Even the aes thetics aren't high quality in thi adaptation. Every establishin shot looks like bad CGI and th 'God' - makeup department apparently t did everything in their power to d provide perfect teeth for all. Veri- y similitude can'talwaysbethemea- l suring stick for qualifying movies, s but it's distracting and annoying - that these characters, supposedly e living in poverty over 2000 years - ago, all have pearly whites. d The heaviness of the music may be appropriate, given that this is s indeed a tale of biblical propor- n tions. However, working along- r side acting and directing like this, h the score actually adds humor to s a movie that doesn't justify how d seriously it takes itself. Imagine a f swooping camera, shooting Jesus f and his disciples walking in slow g motion, as if away from an explo- h sion in an action movie, accom- - panied by the most dramatic y orchestral arrangement you can e imagine. You've just visualized n multiple scenes from "Son of God." n Roma Downey ("Touched by an - Angel") clearly has passion for her f religion, as well as for monetizing - that passion. As the Virgin Mary, n she acts and serves as primary producer for both this film and the e aforementioned "Bible" minise- - ries, from which comes most of the s footage for "Son ofGod." Unfortu- g nately, passion and religion do not e an enjoyable film make. When I was little and didn't want the apple offered to me as a snack, I'd sneak into the kitchen and slide across the floor to the pantry where I'd eat every apple Chupa Chups. IfI was bored of the classical music CD my grand- ANNA mother was SAOVSKA3A playing, I'd flip to an FM station and dance around to Hoku. We're taught to take things - to make the world our oyster, to find our niche, to hold on to things that matter. This intangible need to continuously achieve maxi- mum gratification prompted everyone to go out into the wild and bring back things like music, TV, film, video games, Monopoly and Beethoven. And while musicals and novels have cultivated an immense following, the stiff upper-browed sisters sym- phony concerts, museum exhibitions and theater per- formances have been labelled stand-offish - meant only for the sophisticated social- ites who attend the Whitney Biennial, or something you go to when you want to impress someone with your knowl- edge of culture. You can't hold a paint- ing the same way you can a book. You can't sing along to Chopin's piano concertos. You can't dance with Diana Vishneva. It'sr interac that pa things orches moshF sided e fine ar lack of the poi someti you ca "Th every; Som ing ou INTEl ing at there's asserti painte more t dance or wat on rep each li upper reach The I exj not only the lack of stand and admire each paint ction. Though it's true ing the same. aintings don't say sassy My grandma doesn't agree is la Harry Potter, and She asserts her passion with tras don't encourage vigor, attending every exhi- pits, it's not the one- bition opening and gallery xperience that ruins show with enthusiasm, so as ts for some. It's the to show everyone just how ownership - what's much she loves the fine arts. int of appreciating "This is so my genre of hing you can't touch, art," said my grandma every nt own. day of her life. is is my song," said But that's not ownership. girl at every party. It's a following, a need to ething about scream- keep up with the ever-chang- t "I LOVE THIS ing world, digesting every bit RLUDE" isn't as appeal- of art possible. a symphony concert - It's obsessive, and yet it something stagnant in doesn't hold the same value ing your passion for a as reading and re-reading the r. You can love Picasso first book that made you real- han Dali, but you can't ize that nothing in the world faster or sing louder matters. ch the same painting And yet, this lack of own- eat until you know ership grants a momentary ne by heart. There's an reprieve from the day-to-day bound - a ceiling you world. Standing in front of with your appreciation. Van Gogh's Starry Night and desire for owner- realizing you'll never see anything else like it is hum- bling. It's clarity that's hard to achieve elsewhere. Anyone don't owe can own a copy of "Harry Potter"; the same's not true anyone an for Van Gogh's work. I go to museums so I don't planation for have to vie for attention - I mytaste. don't have to feel like I need to prove my love for a certain painting over the other or how well I know an artist. I don't own anything at a hard to suppress - symphony concert except my bserve when you can ticket - I don't owe anyone The inherent style an explanation of why each ticipating in the fine piece is exactly like my life. ship is why of covet? of par arts is removed, requiring a passive participation that doesn't allow you to make it your own. There's no way to express youtr favoritism; you Sadovskaya is eating apple Chupa Chups. To join her, email asado@umich.edu. Do films cause cancer? By ZACHARY WHITUS For the Daily The "sexiness" of cigarettes confuses me. On the one hand, cigarettes aren't cool anymore. Teachers spanked their positive propagandaintomygenerationand we accepted it: "Smoking causes cancer." On the other hand, many more (myself included) find ciga- rette smoking strangely attractive. Howisthispossible?Despiteallmy science-based stigma induced by grade-school propaganda, some- thing somewhere in my upbring- ing must still be pressing me to smoke cigarettes. There is no more Joe Camel or Marlboro Man (does anyone even know these names anymore?). There are no more cig- arette TV commercials. But there are still many films, old and new, that depict, celebrate and/or sexu- alize smoking. Cinema seems to be apre-carcinogen. I want to look at one scene from one film in particular: Woody Allen's "Manhattan." "Manhattan" depicts the psy- chological conflict between our understanding that smoking causes cancer and the self-reflec- tive aesthetic pleasure of smoking a cigarette; in short, it depicts the absurdity of the modern American attitude toward smoking. In this scene, earlyon inthe film, Woody's character, Isaac, pulls out a ciga- rette and lights it. "Mmmm,"hesays,melodramat- icallypuffing. "Thatis so great." "You don't smoke," Tracy (Mari- el Hem says wi comic S1 "No, inhale,I But I lo with ac one." dan This mon A cigarett doublet cigarett but stra to smol This so focuses smokin ization( "Mmm doesn't ing - a: he's no; cigarett a self-re the acts ly desir smokin "hands( ingway), Isaac's girlfriend, did Isaac and the rest of us 'learn' th a laugh, amused by his that smoking/holding a cigarette moking display. makes us look handsome? I don't smoke. I don't Look at the nature of the con- because it gives you cancer. flict. It's a conflict between our ok so incredibly handsome rational mind (our understand- igarette that I can't nothold ing that smoking causes cancer) and the irrational mind (smok- ing cigarettes looks cool). Ask- ing why Isaac thinks he looks "so incredibly handsome" smoking Sm oking a cigarette becomes a question of how his irrational, emotional in m ovies mind acquired that belief and the associated desire. And I believe )Jam orizeS the answer is in the power of film. Film and other media manage to gerous habit. subvert our rationality and appeal to something much deeper - a desire to stand out, to be the hero. The most important irony in this scene isn't that Isaac is smok- scene illustrates the com- ing a cigarette despite saying he merican attitude toward doesn't smoke. It's that, on a meta :e smoking - a kind of level, the fact of this scene being in hink. We recognize that a film ironically answers the ques- e smoking causes cancer, tion of how Isaac and the rest of us ngely, many of us still want "learned" that smoking/holding a ke, at least on some level. cigarette makes us look cool: We ene shows how our desire mimicked the actors and actresses on the image of cigarette we saw smokinginmovies. g; specifically, the actual- For me at least, the foundational of the self-image. Isaac says, level of absurdity depicted in this im ... that's so great," but he scene might be undermined, or seem to actually be inhal- complicated, because Isaac is right: t least he says he isn't - i.e., he looks cool smoking a cigarette. t getting pleasure from the All the vanity, gild and glamor of e's nicotine. His pleasure is cigarette smoking held critically eflective, narcissistic one - under comic lens in this scene ualization of the egotistical- mightlbe failing forthis simple rea- able self-image of cigarette son: Woodylooks too cool smoking g that makes him appear his cigarette while he's trying to oine." The question is: how make fun of it. SUNDANCE 'Remember when I was Denise? Tense, gripping Road By DREW MARON DailyArts Writer In Native American cul- ture, the "red road" is the path one follows to achieve an ele- vated level of spirituality. It's the ideal life path, Red Road achieved Thursdays through at 9 p.m. enlighten- ment, dis- Sundance cipline and sacrifice. It also conjures up images of a road stained red with blood. Media is saturated with images of the Native Ameri- can past, and with some of those images being Johnny Depp as Tonto in "The Lone Ranger," I think it's fair to say that we have a long way to go in terms of accurate representation. "The Red Road" is the sec- ond scripted drama from Sun- dance- and if the pilot is any indication, AMC and FX now have some stiff competition. The series takes place in the New Jersey town of Walpole. A college student has gone missing in the nearby woods, find out very early on what causing a massive manhunt. happened ... well almost. Like Meanwhile, tensions between all good small town myster- the citizens of Walpole and ies, everyone has a secret and the mountain-dwelling peo- as the end of the pilot sug- ple of the Ramapo are reach- gests, the fagade is about to ing a fever pitch. At the be lifted. center are two men: ex-con The performances are and Ramapo enforcer Phillip great all around, with Momoa Kopus (Jason Momoa, "Game stealing every scene he's in. of Thrones") and local cop Kopus is charismatic, badass Harold Jensen (Martin Hen- and potentially frightening. derson, "The Ring"). In fact, if there's one glar- ing complaint I have about the show it's that the Native American characters are New Sundance so interesting that some of the town characters pale in series driven comparison. Notably there's Martin Henderson as Sher- by strong iff Harold Jensen, the yin to Kopus's yang. Henderson does performances. a fine job but when compared to the towering Momoa, he's simply not as interesting. His prejudice against the Ramapo has yet to be explored, howev- "The Red Road" is some- er, and I'm much more willing thing of a small town noir in to give the series the benefit the same vein as "The Kill- of the doubt this early on. ing," "Twin Peaks" and, most Overall, "The Red Road" recently, "True Detective." promises to be a tense, grip- Yet the show doesn't focus on ping addition to an already the mystery surrounding the impressive line-up of great missing person. In fact, we TV currently out there. OUR TWEETS BE SO SWEET @aMICHIGANDAILY