4A - Wednesday, November 20, 2013 The Michigan Daily - michigandailyxorm 4A - Wednesday, November 20, 2013 The Michigan Daily - michigandailycom 0 Michinan l PETE WANGWONGWIROJ I Victors for whom? Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890. 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedaily@michigandaily.com MELANIE KRUVELIS and ADRIENNE ROBERTS MATT SLOVIN EDITORIAL PAGE EDITORS MANAGING EDITOR ANDREW WEINER EDITOR IN CHIEF Unsigned editorials reflect the official position of the Daily's editorial board. All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors. FROM THE DAILY Smarter streets Local ordinance dangerous to both drivers and pedestrians n Nov. 19, Ann Arbor City Council voted 8-3 in favor of repeal- ing the city's contentious crosswalk ordinance. Under the ordi- nance, drivers had to stop whenever a pedestrian was at or approaching a crosswalk - regardless of what traffic signs and lights were signaling. While the ordinance attempted to improve pedestrian safety in a town that increasingly pushes drivers to "share the road," the law has put both walkers and drivers in danger. Though the city council's decision to overturn this dangerous law is in the best interest of all Ann Arbor's travelers, it must be followed with substantial improvements to the city's crosswalks. 0 0 A banner for the Victors for Michigan campaign hanging outside Hill Auditorium Nov. 13. The fundraising campa $4 billion for the University, with $1 billion directed towards student support. In July 2010, the city's crosswalk ordinance went into effect, stating, "When traffic-control signals are not in place or are not in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall stop and yield the right-of-way to every pedestrian approach- ing or within a crosswalk." Prior to the ordi- nance, the city followed state law, which calls on drivers to yield to pedestrians walking through crosswalk on the driver's side of the road. While the distinction between the local and state laws seem slight, supporters of the ordinance argued that the law, supported by Ann Arbor Mayor John Hiefjte, would give the city's pedestrians the upper-hand. But in the three years following the ordi- nance's passage, there hasn't been a sig- nificant reduction of pedestrian-vehicle accidents - in 2012, 60 accidents occurred in the city, compared to the 36 accidents in 2006. While it's not clear if those numbers reflect a more dangerous environment for drivers and pedestrians or simply a rise in commuters, they do suggest that Ann Arbor hasn't become safe, despite the promises of the ordinances' proponents. The language of the ordinance may, in fact, lend itself to more distracted drivers. Under the ordinances, drivers have to watch for pedestrians in a wider area as well as check their rear-view mirrors to make sure they would not be rear-ended should they stop abruptly for a pedestrian crossing the street. Perhaps most importantly, the lack of public- ity surrounding the ordinance diminished its potential benefits. Just one year after the law's passage, Erica Briggs, a city planning commis- sioner and board member for the Washtenaw Bicycling and Walking Coalition, argued most people are unaware that they're supposed to stop at crosswalks. The lack of information surrounding the ordinance is an especially dangerous element when out-of-towners are considered. Without clear, uniform signage around all the city's crosswalks, tourists com- ing into Ann Arbor are likely to not know about their responsibilities as a driver. If the city council passes ordinances to improve safety, the dissemination of infor- mation is crucial to go along with the passing of these ordinances. City council should also consider improving the existing crosswalks before implementing further pedestrian regu- lations. Many of Ann Arbor's crosswalks are poorly lit, if at all, and have limited signage to alert drivers to pedestrian crossings. Increas- ing lighting, signs and roadway stripes will improve pedestrian safety and alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians. In December, the city council will bring the ordinance to a vote once again, due to a law that mandates two rounds of voting to overturn a city ordinance. The council should continue to stand against the ordinance while bringing in new safety features for the city. On Nov. 18, a group of faith lead- ers on campus issued a statement contending that a T-shirt of a Vic- tors for Michigan attendee which read "Victors for Moral Antigayism" is not a sentiment shared by all faith communities. "The Victors event was about showcasing 'the Leaders and the Best' that this campus offers," the authors wrote. "The presence of an anti-gay message had no place at the event or on this campus." The incident got me thinking about the identity of the Victors for Michigan campaign. Who can call themselves victors? Who - and what - are we fundraising for? I went back to watch the campaign promotional videos in my attempt to answer these questions. The videos are what you'd expect from fundrais- ing campaign marketing materials - inspiring and convincing. The videos highlight the accomplishments and opportunities that the University offers: cutting-edge research, proj- ects in developing countries, a vast selection of study abroad programs and, last but not least, phenomenal students. I felt proud. However, after my initial sense of pride subsided, I felt angry. The videos only told half the story of the University - one that I don't com- pletely relate to. What was left unspoken infuri- ated me. The University experience is not all positive. The videos weren't talking about those who struggle with mental health on a daily basis, members of the LGBTQ community who still feel unsafe on campus, stu- dents who have to work 40 hours a week just to make ends meet or sexual assault survivors whose jus- tice the University has not fought for. The videos do not discuss how we often have to make the choice between coursework and our well- being, and that our society pressures us to choose the former over the lat- ter. The videos do not explain why a student with a disability recently informed me that he felt like the Uni- versity does not adequately address his needs and only goes as far as offi- cial policies require of it. In sum, the campaign's videos made me feel like I don't count. It's truly a privilege to be here at the University where I've come to embrace our legacy and our public mission. But the University is not adequately representing all its stu- dents and it can do better. Let me be clear: I am not adver- sarial to the University or the Victors for Michigan campaign. What I am against is false advertising, elitism and injustice. I'm against the Univer- sity broadcasting that it has a public mission without the public mission being embedded in the campaign. Yes, capital campaigns are meant to raise money. But beyond the $4 bil- lion target, capital campaigns should be an opportunity for disruptive innovation, for change and for all of us to feel like we're together and working towards a brighter future. The campaign needs to tackle those egregious cracks in our system more than the cracks in our buildings. What about a different kind of video? One that says: "Yes, we struggle with social jus- tice. Yes, we struggle with LGBTQ inclusion. Yes, we are aware of stu- dents who struggle with mental health and disability issues. We do care about these people and we really need your contribution to create new programs that address these issues. "Look, these may not sound great, but all higher-education institutions face the same challenges we do. We want to truly embody the slogan 'Victors for Michigan' and make sure that we represent all our students, so we're highlightingthese issues today. "We need your help more than ever to change the system." Now, this video would be one hell of a fundraising tool. The big question remains: Is the University willing to take a risk and spread this message? In the spirit of our public mission, I sure hope the answer isyes. Pete Wangwongwiroj isan Engineering graduate student. 0 KATIE PARENT | Teaching is a profession, not a stepping stone EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Kaan Avdan, Sharik Bashir, Barry Belmont, James Brennan, Eric Ferguson, Jordyn Kay, Jesse Klein, Melanie Kruvelis, Maura Levine, Aarica Marsh, Megan McDonald, Victoria Noble, Adrienne Roberts, Paul Sherman, Daniel Wang, Derek Wolfe DAVID WEINFELD Aheartfel On Nov. 13, on the top floor of C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, I spent the evening exam- ining the dozens of heartwarming, telling pho- tographs that filled the room for the Save A Child's Heart Photo Exhibition. So often, Israel is associated with conflict, but the exhibition highlights one of the most successful humani- tarian efforts in Israel beyond the conflict. The photographs, taken by diverse and acclaimed photographers, tell the story of the work done by Save a Child's Heart, an Israeli- based international humanitarian project that aims to improve pediatric cardiac care for children in developing countries. Each picture told a story, aiming to capture the emotions, the patients and the doctors associated with SACH's wide-reaching efforts. Each picture was tastefully well done, and I felt the impact that SACH has had on children in need of car- diac care. The photographs depicted the emotions felt by the SACH patients. In some pictures, chil- dren looked somber and afraid. In others, the children looked relieved and happy. It was pow- erful to see glimpses of the humanitarian work of Israelis. At the same time, the photo exhibition sad- dened me. It's unsettling to know that so many children in underprivileged areas suffer and that so many don't have a resource like SACH available. Despite all of their success, SACH will never be able to cure everyailment, but the lives they change daily putthings into perspec- tive: Not only are we incredibly lucky to have these resources availabletous,butwe also have an opportunity to help. Luckily, those in Israel and even some here in Ann Arbor have found a way to help with SACH. One of those people hereinAnn Arbor is the rt message world-renowned surgeon, Edward Bove, chair of Cardiac Surgery at the University Hospital, who was also at the exhibition. Bove worked with Save a Child's Heart as he trained Leor Sasoon from 1998 to 2000 at Mott. Sasoon is now chief of the entire cardiothoracic depart- ment for SACH. Bove spoke about how touching it is to know that his teachings have helped positively impact lives all around the world. It reminded me that if you give a mana fish, he will eat for a day, but if you teach a man to fish, he will eat for a lifetime. I guessthe same can be said for heart surgery: Give a child a heart surgery; their life will be saved. Teach a man to perform life-sav- ing surgeries, and perhaps they will save thou- sands of lives. Ashley Israel, a local attorney and prominent SACH supporter in Michigan, spoke while I was at the exhibition and he stressed the pro- found impact that the organization has made and continues to make on the doctors and vol- unteers who spend time at the Wolfson Medi- cal Center and the SACH home in Holon, Israel. The greatest success of the photo exhibition, other than its ability to tangibly display the work of SACH, is its ability to empower those in the room to improve themselves and the world we live in. The exhibition, which continues at the Uni- versity of Michigan Hillel, came to Ann Arbor thanks to the American Movement for Israel, a multi-opinioned, pro-Israel student group on campus. I'm thankful that AMI and SACH were able to bringthis exhibition toAnnArbor, and I encourage others to check out the photos as well. David Weinfeld is an LSA sophomore. The time has come where we are being asked by everyone around us, "So, what's next?" Many of us have just spent the past 17 years - 81 per- cent of a21-year-old's life - inschool. Many ofus have plans to attend grad- uate or post-graduate school, but the thought of immediately committing another two to 10 years to studying is, at the moment, unfathomable. Enter the gap year. Many people see the year or two between school- ing as an opportunity to travel or to do research that will bolster their resumes. Others, not knowing what to do, figure that despite their expe- riences (or lack thereof), they could always "just teach." After all, how hard could it be, right? Wrong. Teaching is one of the most mis- understood professions in our soci- ety. Movies such as "Bad Teacher" and "School of Rock" feed us pro- paganda that portrays teachers as nothing more than babysitting free- loaders. People who decide they'll just teach or fall back on teaching when they're at a crossroads in their lives further perpetuate this inaccurate stereotype. This representation could not be further from the truth. The best actualization I can provide of a teacher's job is this: Imagine you had to give a 20-minute presenta- tion for a course. You spend hours outside of class combing through research, going to office hours and gathering materials for your pre- sentation. Now imagine the prepa- ration that would be required if you had to give hour-long presentations five times a day, five days a week to an audience with varying cognitive abilities, attention spans and blad- der control. Welcome to the tip of the teaching iceberg. Numerous programs exist that will throw an intelligent, eager, wet-behind-the-ears, recent college graduate into an inner-city class- room with a mere two months' train- ing. To people who have dedicated their entire undergraduate careers to the study of education, this is nothing short of a slap in the face. Nearly every teacher in the nation is required to devote a given amount of credit hours in educational stud- ies and at least one full semester of student teaching, with many schools requiring an entire year. Despite this excessive preparation, almost all teachers look back at their first year on the job remembering a perpetual raincloud of assessments, 15-hour workdays and the reality that a bell dictates when they are allowed to urinate. If someone who has spent the last five years preparing for his or her job feels overwhelmed, how, then, can someone with zero teach- ing experience and two months of "training" expect to succeed? It's no coincidence that nearly 40 percent of teachers who enter programs such as Teach For Amer- ica and Teaching Fellows leave the classroom after a mere two years. The corps members enter the class- room, realize they're not equipped to teach, and only get it right after numerous attempts and failures. In some cases, the exhaustion that accompanies this unpreparedness can damage the mental health of a fellow. That's the catch of these programs: They recruit highly intelligent, successful students and set them up for massive and utter failure that they are not used to. While I'm a huge advocate for the personal growth that results from failure, I simply cannot condone it when it affects the education and wellbeing of children. So, to my fellow peers who are wondering what to do after gradu- ation, I cannot iterate enough that teaching is not a stepping-stone to the next phase of your life. Teaching is a career that nobody should enter unless they are deeply passionate and have extensive preparation and experience. If you plan on leaving education after a brief stint in the classroom, do your sanity and soci- ety a favor by using your gap year to fall back on a profession that doesn't affect our nation's future. Katie Parent is an Education and LSA senior. .01 Being Black at the University of Michigan has many shades and many levels to what some- one might want to speak on it. It can go from someone being the only Black person in their class to someone with no problems at all." - LSA senior Eric Gaver said in an interview with The Michigan Daily about the #BBUM campaign on Twitter. The campaign is aimed at raising awareness surrounding issues of diversity on campus. CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONVERSATION Readers are encouraged to submit letters to the editor and viewpoints. Letters should be fewer than 300 words while viewpoints should be 550-850 words. Send the writer's full name and University affiliation to tothedaily@michigandaily.com. a 4