4A -Wednesday, Novembier 6, 2013 The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com tieCktiigan :ail Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890. 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedailyiemttichigandaily.com MELANIE KRUVELIS ANDREW WEINER zind ADRIENNE ROBERTS MATT SLOVIN ETO 0 l IN 01E] E[)IEfORI L I TRlil I MANAGING EDITOK Unsigned editorils reflect tl e ofcial position of the Daily's editorial board. Ah other siged articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors. Kepyour head- in the game Neurologists sholtId be on st iiWby for all NCAA football games s more studies reveal the devastating effects of concussions, the pressure on football teams to provide effective healthcare for head injuries has increased significantly. With the University football team facing off against Michigan State University this past week- end, The New York Times highlighted the efforts of both schools' extra safety precautions for its players. Unlike (ather Big 10 conference schools, both schools have neurologists on the sidelines for both home and away games. Because of the frequency of concussions and other head injuries that occur during football games, both universities deserve praise for The rise of the non-apology e live in an age of non- apologies, where celeb- rities, politicians and community lead- ers screw up regularly and then craft clever "apologies" that actually aren't apologies at all and aren't all that clever. Recent examples of such non-apologies include the man ZEINAB KHALIL pened, so take accountability for your behavior and apologize for your role in making someone feel offended, angry, marginalized, etc. Apologizefor whatyou did - notfor getting caught. Saying something like "I'm sorry I said this - it was insen- sitive to our diverse staff members," implies that what you did was wrong not because it was actually wrong, but because the person you wronged was there to witness it. This sort of apology suggests that in a different context, where said person wasn't there or said "diverse" identities were absent, your words and behav- ior would have been OK. This is not an apology. This is you saying you're sorry you got caught and will try harder to get away with it next time - perhaps by being more "politically correct" or making sure that some of the comments you make are "off the radar." Apologize to all those affected explicitly or indirectly. If your mis- take affected certain individuals spe- ing in your intentions. An apology should be able to stand on its own without prefaces, explanations, or qualifiers. One common way apolo- gies are spoiled into non-apologies is through justifying your mistakes by pointingto your non-malicious inten- tions. It's OK to give some motiva- tional context to your mistake, saying somethinglike, "I meant tobe funny, but I clearly failed and hurt you. I apologize for my poor judgment," but explaining your motivations should in no way attempt to change how your comments or behavior are interpreted by others. It doesn't mat- ter if you had good or bad intentions - the impact you caused remains the same, and that's ultimately whatyou have to answer to. Don't suggest your mistake is sim- ply the result of a slip in word choice or poor framing. Non-apologizers will often try to lessen the weight of their mistake by framing it asa mere problem of diction, saying things like, "I need to be much more tact- their leadership osl the issue. the University's resident neurologist, Dr. Jeff Kutcher, has attended every home and away ;ate' since 2011. Kutcher is responsilble for ' ltching the gns closely and evaluating players that the athllett itrainer thinks could have suffered a head injury. According to an article trom M ichigan Radio, Kutcher also stups l practices to check on injured players and help monitor their progress. The University's decision to have a neurolo- gist ot tthe sidelines shows its commitment to player s .ety. Accord ing to the NCA A, "Dur. ing the 2011 foot ball season, 2.5 Cotsessions were reported for eery 1.000 gaie-related explttes i the periods of athletics-rclat- ed actv ity It, , injuries can oceUr." Antd acCerhditto tt:ti article froctt Al tazeer-a Attet- iCa, there litre eett2en re'orted tcneeUssions across college football as o f Nov. 4 t owever, since there's no requirement for a concussion report, there could be more ltft tttreported. Given the number of concussions being so high and the constant risk of their occur- rence, there's clearly a demonstrated need for lead-injury-specialized health professionals, and having a neurologist on the sideline is a an investment in student-athlete health. However, this policy shouldn't just be the e'eeption within college football. The NFL has a protocol that requires teams to have neurologists on the sidelines, according to a video from ESPN about concussions in col- lege football. It's time for the NCAA to adopt a similar policy. The University has taken the lead to ensure effeetive player safety. Kutcher has been a necessary addition to the sidelines and is an The New York Times reported. Ford previously denied smoking crack cocaine. clear message being sent to Michi- ganders: Pick a side - either you're pro-hunting rights or against them. But such a division between pro- and anti-hunting proponents is not so clean cut. Standing in opposition to a seasonal Michigan wolf hunt doesn't indicate an opposition to all hunting, nor does it mean that anti- wolf hunting campaigns are geared towards the destruction of hunters' rights. I learned as a kid that respecting the animal is the most important thing you can do as a hunter. You never take a shot unless it's a clean kill, and you never let anything go to waste - never should you kill for simple pleasure and never should a life be taken without purpose. But wolf hunting is a practice done for little more than trophies ists out there because hunters, for the most part, spend a good deal of time actually interacting with the natural world. So why has the issue become so polarized? Why are those against the wolf hunt seen as so radically "environmental" to pro-hunting groups, and why, in many cases, are hunters seen as cruel killers to those who have never been exposed to hunting? These questions are important to answer as we, as a state, strive to lay down a legacy of conservation while at the same time carrying on a long hunting tra- dition. It's important to remember that there are not only two sides of 0 this debate, but a large gray area in between - I myself can testify. .- Kate Laramie can be reached at laramiek@umich.edu. I 4' 6