0 0 0 0 ment to Michigan even after Tate Forcier had a dominant freshman season and later, when Denard Robinson became a national name. Gardner thought about transferring after former Michigan coach Rich Rodri- guez was fired, especially after new coach Brady Hoke arrived and brought in a new pro-style offense that would seemingly take away the dual-threat part of the dual-threat quarterback. When Rodriguez was hired by Arizona the following sea- son, Gardner had conversa- tions with Carter about leaving Michigan to follow the man who originally recruited him. That inner faith kicked in, though. If any dual-threat quar- terback could make a pro-style offense work, it was Gardner. So he stayed. He's a hyper athlete capable of doing almost anything he wants on the field, but he knows that. He's Michigan's best offen- sive player, but he also leads the nation in turnovers. He has the ability to change the game in a snap, but sometimes that's for the worse and not for the better. From Carter to Hoke to for- mer high-school teammates - they all say he just needs more time and experience to figure out the turnover issue. Still, at what point do Steu- benville and Notre Dame stop melding into what Gardner still is today? At what point does he forget how easy he made it look at Inkster as the No. 1 dual- threat quarterback prospect in the country? When does Devin Gardner's future escape his past? Carter, who is now the athlet- ic director and football coach at Oak Park High School in metro Detroit, started as an assistant coach at Detroit St. Martin de Porres, where he spent 17 years before becoming the head coach there for another 10. He won three state championships. The school closed in 2005, so he went to Inkster, a program that had never made the playoffs. During his first year as the head coach, Inkster made the playoffs and reached three state championships before Carter left in 2011. He's been successful not just because of the Xs and Os, but because he has a system that requires even the toughest kids to buy into it. Players in Carter's program rent jerseys from him weekly. Every week he washes them, and every week, the players are required to give him progress reports from their teachers, complete with grades and com- ments. If the reports aren't up to Carter's standards, then the players don't get a jersey that week. When Gardner's coach at University of Detroit Jesuit High School left the program, Gardner's grades plummeted. He had wanted to go to St. Mar- tin de Porres, but the school closed down the year before he graduated from middle school. So in November of his sopho- more year, Gardner transferred to Inkster. A year older, Gor- don came in at the same time. As soon as they arrived in his office, Carter sent both of them to the academic counselor to see if they were even eligible to graduate in four years. He knew they were going to be incredible football players, but he didn't want football to overtake the academics. They both bought into the system right away. Gardner, who declined mul- tiple interview requests for this story, told CBSSports.com last month, "My grades were really, really bad at U of D. I wouldn't have been able to go to college had I not straightened up. Iowe a lot to coach Carter." He wasn't eligible to finish the football season or play bas- ketball in the winter, so Gard- ner did nothing but schoolwork for the first couple months of his Inkster career. Carter had a vision that Gardner was a much better student than his grades at Detroit Jesuit implied and that he should be able to choose what college he wanted to attend regardless of admissions standards. "He came over, and we pro- vided him some direction in terms of what he needed to do academically," Carter said. "We always taught the kids that we want them to use football. We don't want football to use them." Gardner reached two state championships in his two years as quarterback for the Vikings. Both times, they lost. Both times, he was injured in the semifinal game and wasn't at 100 percent. But it was about more than that - it still is about more than that, more than just the foot- ball field. Gardner always knew what he was doing as an athlete, but that wasn't important for Carter. . Last spring, Gardner gradu- ated inthreeyearswith adegree in Afro-American and African studies and is now a first-year Masters in Social Work student. "(Gardner and Gordon) grad- uated together last spring, and that was one of my proudest days," Carter said. "Notso much their ability to play football, but to see them develop into young men and be able to handle all the rigors of that kind of sched- ule. Every one of the coaches I've worked with in the past are so proud of those guys. "To have a chance to com- plete his Masters by the time he graduated ... you never would have thought that when he popped his head into Inkster as a sophomore." Without a doubt, Gardner and Carter had a strong bond. Jnkster still meant something. In January of his senior year of high school, Gardner was set to graduate early from Ink- ster and begin practicing in the spring with Michigan. It was all set up with the previous school administration, everything good to go. But in a period of transition for Inkster - which is a big rea- son why Carter left the school - there were two interim district superintendents in two years. Carter can't count how many principals were there in his six years, and it got to be too much to handle. Carter left Inkster in 2011, and the entire Inkster school district closed two years later. The high school had less than 300 kids when Carter first started. He left a school with an enrollment of over 1,300 kids. Inkster - like so many other high schools in metro Detroit - closed because of budget cuts. Almost 1,000 students thought they were going one place in June 2013 but were forced to relocate in August. The rise was fast and power- ful, but so was the demise. "I don't want to trash any- one because it serves no pur- pose right now," Carter said. "Everyone knew I wanted to be there, it just didn't work out. I was hopeful that I could end my career there, but I took this What to Watch for: Minnesota By ZACH HELFAND Daily Sports Editor Four games through the 2013 season, the No. 19 Michigan football team is still the same riddle it was when it began the year. The Wolverines, it seems, are not as good as they showed in impressive early wins over Central Michigan and Notre Dame. Two subsequent ugly wins proved that. But, they're also not quite as bad as their performances against Akron and Connecti- cut would suggest, either. That leaves them somewhere in between. Michigan is still unde- feated and, in a wide-open Legends Division, remains a viable contender. Whether it can push for the division title largely depends on just a few moving pieces, mostly on the offensive side of the ball. An early test against an improved Minnesota team should provide some more clarity. Here's what to watch for on Saturday: 1. Can Devin Gardner pro- tect the ball? This, of course, is the most important question for Michigan entering Big Ten play. When Gardner doesn't turn the ball over, he is one of the best offensive weap- ons in the conference. When he does, he is the Wolverines' biggest liability. The turnover bug has been maddening - last season, Gardner never threw more than one interception in his six games as the starter. This year, he has thrown multiple interceptions in three out of four games. In three straight games, he has had a turnover returned for a touchdown. The frustrating part for Gardner and his coaches is that he hasn't repeated his mistakes. He- has found new ways to give the ball away. At first, he found trouble when he tried to throw the ball rather than accept a sack. But since, he has exhibited poor reads, or even throws lacking his typical accuracy. PATRICK BARRO/Dai The interior of the Michigan offensive line has been reshuffled during the two-week off period. Previously, it had struggled to establish the line of scrimmage in two close wins Whether because of the run of turnovers or some- thing else, Gardner's throws were off against UConn. For the first time, he completed fewer than half his passes. The good news for Michi- gan is that he has performed up to his ability in the past. Last year, Gardner threw for 1,319 yards, completed 59.5 percent of his passes and scored 16 total touchdowns. It all started with a start against Minnesota with just one week to prepare at quarterback. In that game, Gardner was 12-for-18 for 234 yards and three total touchdowns. If he can use this year's game to right the ship, the Wolverines will be just fine. If not, it could be a long Big Ten season. 2. Will changes on the offensive line make a differ- ence? Behind Gardner, the offensive line has been the most troubling part of the Michigan offense. The tack- les have been as advertised. But inside of fifth-year seniors Michael Schofield and Taylor Lewan, the inte- rior has been overpowered by weaker opponents. That prompted Michigan coach Brady Hoke to make a change duringthe two weeks in between games. Red- shirt sophomore Jack Miller has been pulled at center, replaced by redshirt sopho- more Graham Glasgow, who shifts over from left guard. Chris Bryant, another red- shirt sophomore, will take Glasgow's place at guard. Before the game against UConn, fifth-year senior Fitzgerald Toussaint strug- gled on the ground. When he finally broke out two weeks ago, he found room only on the outside of the line. Some of Gardner's strug- gles, too, can be linked to the line. He has been sacked nine times and hurried another 11 times. At 6-foot-4, 314 pounds, Bryant has the size and strength but has been bat- teredbyleginjuries. Glasgow worked at the center position during camp and has played. significantly better than the other two interior linemen so far. And Kalis has been unspectacular but shows the most potential. This week will be a useful barometer for the re-tooled interior. Ra'Shede Hageman is arguably the best nose tackle in the conference. 3. Which offense will we see? A long four weeks ago, against Notre Dame, the Michigan offense looked like it had finally fulfilled the vision of offensive coor- dinator Al Borges. Michi- gan totaled 460 yards in that game. The offense had 25 first downs and scored 41 points against the feared Notre Dame defense. Series after series, the Wolverines showed new, dangerous looks: the tradi- tional power-I formation, shotgun, pistol, read option, quick pitches, stretch runs, defense-stretching throws over the top. Gardner was precise enough with his arm to keep the secondary back. But he was dangerous enough with his legs to force the defense to respect. the quarterback run. In the red zone, Michi- gan was near unstoppable. But there were cracks in the offense, even if they weren't apparent at the time. Notre Dame shut down the interior run, so Borg- es attacked the edge. The offense required Gardner to make the correct decisions. Later, against Akron and UConn, those problems bit the Wolverines. Without effective inside rushing, the ground game became one-dimensional. Gardner faltered. Suddenly, Michi- gan looked flat. At times, it looked helpless. Borges, who found a rhythm against Notre Dame, couldn't against Akron or UConn. When Michigan's offense clicks, it has the talent to run Minnesota off the field. But when it's off, the result is ugly. 4. Will Michigan need the defense to save it again? For all the problems on the offensive side of the ball, the defense has been encourag- ingly steady. Against UConn, the defense allowed just one touchdown on a full drive. (UConn's offense scored once more after a turnover in the red zone.) The Gophers shouldn't provide much more of a test. They rank 10th in the Big Ten in total offense, ahead of lowly Michigan State and Purdue. Michigan's defense has been vulnerable in the area behind the linebackers and in front of the safeties, but Minnesota hasn't shown an ability to throw the ball: it ranks last in the conference in passing yards. The Wolverines need- ed the- defense to bail out the offense against Akron, with a late goal-line stand. Against UConn, junior line- backer Desmond Morgan's one-handed interception helped save the game. The defense should be able to smother Minnesota. But Michigan can't rely on it to save the day every game. 6 1 FootballSaturday - October 4, 2013 TheMichiganDaily - www.michigandaily.com13