0 le V IM Septeber- - - -ay "Can female students have it all after graduating from the University?" Estatement SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 with Associate Prof. Elizabeth Armstrong and Business junior Sumana Palle .. r -. , . - _ ._ _ y .^ . r C r1. T x r W Sumana Palle, a Business junior and executive board member for What the F feminist magazine, and Associate Prof. Elizabeth Armstrong, a sociologist who specializes in gender and higher education research, met at The Michigan Daily newsroom to discuss this question. Below are selected excerpts from their con- versation. Sumana Palle: I mean, I know the intention wasn't bad, but when I first read the question I was kind of offended, I felt like it was a bit sexist. It was such a gendered question as if something different is expected of male students than female students. Which it is, in reality, but I feel like at this point we should try and combat that as opposed to asking if it is possible for females to have the same qual- ity of life - I felt that the question was implying - as males. Prof. Elizabeth Armstrong: That's interesting. I guess the way to rephrase the question ... is how do both men and women kind of build lives out of college where they can combine work and fam- ily, personal and professional suc- cess, and what are the conditions for that? SP: Right, and I felt like the ques- tion should more be what can we do to make sure that female stu- dents can have it all, as vague as that is. What can we do to make sure everyone regardless of race, gender, sexuality, whatever can have whatever they want to have, and that should be the question. EA: Expanding the options. ,,,SP: Right. EA: But, then of course, that immediately leads to what are some of the things that tend to reduce those options for people. And of course, that would vary depending on what kind of group they're in whether it's gender or race or disability or sexual orien- know, one of the things graduat- ing from the University of Michi- gan will buy most people, is the opportunity to have the kind of quality of work where they'll have the flexibility where they will be able to leave work to go to the doctors appointment where- as other people aren't going to be able to have that if they're going to get fired by taking the time. SP: Which, going back to what you were saying about the man having to sacrifice, that's the other problem I had with the question that it kind of made it seem like only females have to face this choice but men do too. EA: Well there's just a lot of things that it's possible to want. So, I mean, in that sense there it comes to a kind of value-based thing. There's the issue of what kind of structural arrangements can be set up to make it possible for people to have lots of differ- ent things that they value in their life but then it's also the case that it probably isn't possible for any- body - man or woman - to really fully engage in the nurturing of, like, five children and have a super, super amazingly ambitious career. I mean, they may be able to have five children and do that if they don't actually fully par- ticipate themselves in the process of nurturing them, but there is a finite quality of life. I mean, we're not going to all climb Mt. Everest and be president and have ten children. People are always going to have to make choices about what things they care about, and that's men and women. It's just women are usually put in that sit- uation of having to make harder choices. SP: I completely agree! ... And I do see where the question was coming from, I don't want to completely bash the question, but in society, like you said, women do have to make harder choices and for us, I feel like it's always a fight. Are we, sending foreign talent back home? tation, so, I don't know. making hard choices. So, it shouldn't be a kind of dichotomy. SP: Exactly. SP: I feel like a lot of our conver- sation about strong women tends EA: Yeah, bu to surround, well, either you're and it's oft this way or this way. The conver- often put in sation tends to be divisive. You're put on the i either the woman who chooses women who to have the career and you're the she opting o bitch and you're the one who sac- her career"v rifices what is "important." And of circumsta you have the women who choose are placed a the family home, and, you know hard decisio you're the weak link who went against everything strong women SP: Exactly. have fought for in history and, I don't know, I think the question EA: So it's n implies there's a black and white ferent so mi when really ... push people ut it often gets pushed en assumed and it's a situation where it's ndividual, where it's are deciding, "Oh, is ut or is she pursuing when, in fact, the sort nces in which people re sort of forcing the ins ... ot the people are dif- Lch as the decisions really in a dramatic no longer in traditional gender roles where the guy's the one who kind of can have it all - he has the wife who chooses to stay home with the family. That's no longer in existence. EA: No, and I think it's still pos- sible for some men, but I think that people miss out. When men are in a situation, or women, where their work demands are such where they can't partici- pate in the kind of meaning- ful moments in the lives of the people they care about, whether it's children or other loved ones, where their at work and can't leave when there's a school play or a major hospital thing going on or a doctor's appointment. It's painful, it's not really human if people can't have the sort of flex- ibility to do the things they need to do to take care of the people in their lives. And that has a real kind of class component to it too, because it's likely that, you 0 U a a Ed a a 'I 70 c EA: Well, it's usually both "and" when people really want it all. They want to be able to be nurtur- ing and professionally successful. And both strong and vulnerable and not have to be forced into way, either one way or the other. SP: Right. And I feel like we're kind of in a changing environ- ment where it's not just female students who have to choose this, it's also the male. We're