The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Monday, April 22, 2013 -- 7A Hypnotizing 'Trance' thrills with cerebral story FINE ARTSCOLUMN Confronting a fear offirst drafts A mesmerizing Rosario Dawson shines By ANDREW MCCLURE Daily Arts Writer The Psychological Thriller: an ambitious project for any filmmaker. Though most of them suck, and the label itself has B grown a shitty connotation, Trance they can com- pel if they're AtState resourceful Fox Searchlight with charac- ter depth, plot tangents and original insights. "Silence of the Lambs" (1991) and "Memento" (2000) embody this formula to perfection. They confound and trip you up with- out ever losing grip of your mini attention span. "Trance" follows the formula, too, but inflates its details to overcapacity. Director Danny Boyle ("127 Hours") is no stranger to the collective audience gasp and cringe - think of the dead baby crawling on the ceiling in his "Trainspotting." He disrupts any predictability in your emo- tions, as he did through his zom- bies in the scary-as-hell "28 Days Later" or the nerve-ripper, "127 Hours." If you consider yourself unfeeling, Boyle will quash your streak. "Trance" allows him to enter an increasingly perti- nent realm in these digital days: obsession. Simon is an art auctioneer (James McAvoy, "X-Men: First Class"), and his secrets used to haunt him. Now, he's golden and has forgotten the dirty past. In the event of a highly efficient heist to steal a priceless Goya painting, Simon's ready to dodge the bullet. During his getaway, he receives a hard bludgeon to the brainpan - effectively unerasing certain erased memo- ries. In other words, his brain goes berserk. Captured by the criminals, Simon is forced to sign up to see a shrink to hope- fully unearth where he hid the Goya. Immediately, Simon and his therapist Elizabeth (Rosario Dawson, "Zookeeper") share an inexplicable bond, as if they had once known each other. Eventually, Elizabeth catches on to the antics of Simon and confirms she "wants in" on the deal: extract the memory imag- es inside Simon to lead them to the painting. Simple, right? Simon's thought patterns inundate themselves with imag- es of Elizabeth, not the paint- about h years fo from w only to him wo upon hi return. was ble rhymed the assi ment ... was stil rible. I there w charact pose to sort of 1 "Glitter knew el ing that wrote a Like, takes ti writing ly, corr( takes ti and sty much la down t, myself, as muc all my n them. Nc dau b This Maybei zoningi way toi lems be terror. as "righ mistake ness. "I wr I got to I had to of thew good,": teacher We'd lis good ab writing yet terr writing gent dis other st Babi: experie versity and nai tiple En continu writing nce, I wrote this terrible slammed with four papers due story for my creative within a few days of each other, writing class. It was all seven-page monsters and, oh, ow a princess waited yeah, don't forget the chemistry r her prince to come back midterm! Everythingsucked, ar, and I didn't have time to focus find on "getting the bad writing out unded of the way," because I was too is busy sinking. It And so, the bad-writing hab- ak, it its began. I wrote defensively, , it fit preventing any wrong word gn- from slipping out - I didn't but it ANNA trust myself to write without 1 ter- S getting off-track, and so the mean, things I wrote were safe, boring as no and, sometimes, terrifying. er development, no pur- I was in my Upper-Level anyone's actions. It was Writing class, toiling away on ike muddling through my comparison of Dostoevsky ," only worse, because I and Tolstoy, when my friend ven before I started writ- first brought it up: "Do you ever it would be bad, butI get too scared to write?" At first nyway. I didn't understand the ques- any other skill, writing tion. It's not like essays were a me. Not even "good" dangerous mission - the worst - just writing succinct- thing that could happen was ectly, grammatically carpal tunnel. me. All the flourishes But soon, it started mak- listic touches come ing sense. Staring at an open ater. But every time I sit document, the single blank page o write, I don't really let waitingto be filled is daunting. practice. Rather, I spend Writing badly is intimidat- h time possible fixing ing. Filling up 20 pages with mistakes before I make excellent phrases like "his skin was like marble, only soft" is mortifying. And so, writing defensively and dispassionately )thin more is abetter alternative to finding enough time to weed through inting than a hours of poorly written plot and dialogue. ldank page. Perhaps the reason more people aren't writers is because no one has time to witness their stupidity over and over is not a good thing. again. Maybe there are few in any other pursuit, and far between courageous in on faults is a quick enough to spend the time identify the small prob- needed confronting their inner fore they erupt into writer. Even now, as I write this But writing isn't as easy column, I'm reminded of my it" and "wrong," and unedited draft waiting in my es can often lead to great- documents. It sends a shiver of panic down my spine: Do I ace rote like 20 pages before the paper, spending far more the good stuff. It's like time than I have on it, or do get the bad writing out I study for my midterm? Do I vay in order to reach the conquer my fear or doI cower, my high school English prolongingthe inevitable spew- would endlessly tell us. ing of shitty writing? Maybe I'll sten, engrossed, feeling start tackling the art of writing gout the importance of well this summer. Or, maybe . A simple concept, and not. The possibilities, though ibly deceiving: Though few, seem hard to accept. may benefit from dili- But somewhere, among the sappointment, not many archived essays and B+ papers, ubjects do. there's a document dedicated to ed by my high school the suckage that is my bad writ- nces, I reached the Uni- ing, and every once ina while, with high hopes. Young the number of pages grows. "What do you mean you haven't seen 'Atonement." ing. An obsession, a mania, is underway. Now they all must play against the clock to save what might be long gone. But Elizabeth's game of hypnosis distances them from reality, instead drifting into sub-reali- ties that mask truth and adorn lies. McAvoy essentially plays a toddler - always curious yet overwhelmingly ignorant of all actuality. He rarely pro- gresses with his objective, liter- ally freezing when he thinks of Elizabeth. One moment shows Simon getting electroshocked for every thought of Elizabeth; he convulses despite the nonex- istent electroshocks. Yeah, he's whipped. He wins the dual-role of maniac and mannequin, giv- ing his manipulators precisely what they need. Dawson tantalizes like that unattainable babysitter you crushed on in elementary school. She's too smart for us, and her stoic face trivializes every toothy smile we "think" means something. Her motives could be ulterior, superior or entirely predictable - we'll never know because she masters the art of "tease." Insisting, "We keep secrets from ourselves, and that's called forgetting," Eliza- beth doesn't let us forget her. "Trance" is a film about for- getting. Visually, Boyle ven- tures into a forgetful place, often revisiting unexplained dreamlike venues, blurring every other shot and flooding vivid rainbows into frames. The camera's eye prefers whirlwind speeds and constant discomfort to poetic air-gliding. We careen into inner projections before realizing where we were origi- nally. Boyle makes sure you're always a tad puzzled but still antsy to battle onward. Once the whodunit template tires out, the residue weighs more than three good actors in an OK movie tantamount to Soderbergh's recent "Side Effects." Rather, it corners us to entertain an everyday dilemma: Do you want to remember or forget? Both can hurt, but Boyle suggests thinking for yourself. 've, I signed up for mul- iglish courses, hoping to te on my self-righteous path. And then, I was Sadovskaya is working on a rewrite. To help, e-mail asado@umich.edu. Judging people based on the content of their TV characters By RADHIKA MENON Daily Arts Writer If within five minutes of meeting me you reveal that you love "Friday Night Lights," chances are I will pronounce you my newly christened BFF. The same goes for "30 Rock," "Breaking Bad" and "Lost," to name a few others. But if you even mention "Two and a Half Men" around me, you can get out of my face. I tend to judge people based on their taste in television. I don't even feel catty about doing it - it's my chosen win- dow into one's soul. Television is a growing medium that con- tinuously churns out some of the best visual content. So, if you're watching shitty televi- sion, that's your own fault. You will be scrutinized. It was a cold winter day last January when I was hanging out with my friend in his apart- ment. Bundled beneath blan- kets, he turned the TV on and his eyes lit up when they landed on the words "The Big Bang Theory" in the guide. My eyes rolled deeply within their sockets. What followed was the most boring 30 minutes of television I have ever had to endure, and I wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy. As that dull half hour dragged on, I found myself not laughing. That's fine - the show isn't for everyone. But I realized that every time he laughed, I scoffed and prayed for the show to end, both right now and per- manently. "How does he like this crap?" I wondered. And as his laughs piled up, my annoy- ance did, too. I left his apartment that day with uneasiness about the future of our friendship. If he could laugh at a Chuck Lorre creation, could I really continue to respect him? If he didn't find Jim Parsons to be the most irri- tating actor on television, how in God's name were we sup- posed to agree on anything? His i out to I acted n pens to site. I tI "losing based o it were inside o agree:N tennis 1 show yo friend Bang T favorite but lose him. I'm be) you and dea of "hilarious" turns always right. Two summers ago, be a poorly written and I tried watchingthe critical dar- erdy comedy. Mine hap- ling "Mad Men." I mean, I really be the complete oppo- tried. But damn, season one is hrow around the phrase about as dry as they come. So respect" for people I gave up and badmouthed the n their tastes, and I wish show to everyone who loved it, n't true. But something totally and completely judging f me cringes when I dis- them for loving this snoozefest. Wy eyes will get as big as But then I got to season two. balls, and I will kindly And then season three. Shit, I u the door. So, when my was hooked. Quickly my feel- claimed that "The Big ings toward those who had sung heory" was one of his its praises changed - I was shows, I couldn't help now one of them. Soon I began a tiny bit of respect for judging those who didn't watch it, even though I knew exactly where they were coming from. Right or wrong, in crowd or out not oing to crowd, I was still judging peo- notgoipe. rour friend if A person's television choices reflect his or her personality. watch 'Two The shows that I deem my favor- ites reflect my ideas of humor, a Half M en. crisp characters and storytell- ing, and overall quality produc- tion. I know that no one is right or wrong, but that doesn't mean that's not to say that I'm I'm not judging you. 500 DAYS OF SUMMER AT THE DAILY. IT'LL BE MORE FUN THAN YOU THINK. ... BUT IT'LL BE LESS ZOOEY DESCHANEL THAN YOU THINK. JOIN THE SUMMER DAILY ARTS STAFF! E-mail arts@michigandaily.com to request an application. Now,