The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Wednesday, March 20, 2013 - 5A Ken Burns brings documentary to 'U' Fa A Th Series filmm igan this Burns iel O forme of TI gan I show film c discus in th States that signifi the U studen where legal 1 York r tary ' Burns Bur stretch ty of h with n War" The R while Statue use rac to vie larger. Burns part o almos film al "Me ier to have Burns ed be scratc mous filmmaker history, you touch a question of race." talks race, Burns's films, dealing largely hsoy with historical subject matter, tend merican history to look backward rather than for- ward. But in looking backward, one By MAX RADWIN can more clearly see the issues at Daily Fine Arts Editor hand in the present day. "A hugely important under- e Penny W. Stamps Speaker standing that I arrived at fairly welcomes documentary early in my professional life is aker Ken Burnsto the Mich- that human nature remains the Theater same," Burns said. "In times when Thursday. Penny W. we've lost the ability to have a civil and Dan- discourse ... the value of history krent (a Stamps increases because history is still a r editor Lecture table around which we can agree he Michi- to cohere." Daily) will Series: Ken Burns's most recent film, "The a series of Burns Central Park Five," which screens lips while on Saturday during the 51st Ann sing race Thursday Arbor Film Festival, became a e United at 5 p.m. strange joining of historical and a topic Atithe Michigan current events in a different way. remains New York City subpoenaed Burns cant to Free as well as co-directors Sarah niversity's Burns and David McMahon for the nt body, to Americans every- project's unused footage, thinking and, especially after recent that it would help defend against battles with the city of New the still-ongoing, $250-million egardingthe 2012 documen- civil rights lawsuit that the five The Central Park Five," to men filed after being exonerated and Florentine Films. from the 1989 rape of Trisha Meili. ns will use clips from films In addition to chroniclingthose hing across almost the entire- 1989 events, the film attempts to lis career. Some of them deal uncover the identities of the five ace head-on like "The Civil men involved (four of whom were and "Unforgivable Blackness: black, the other Hispanic and ise and Fall ofJack Johnson," all under 17 years of age) whose the other two films - "The humanity was seemingly taken of Liberty" and "Jazz" - from them at the time. ice as a lens through which "The language of a liberal pro- w, and better understand, a gressive city at the end of the 20th American phenomenon. For century was the language of Jim the subject is an integral Crow's southern newspapers of f the American identity and is the late 19th century," Burns said. t unavoidably relevant in any "That's what's chilling - is that bout its history. these same racial tropes, these ore often than not, it's eas- same racial stereotypes, these count the films that don't same racial codes and phrases can any relationship to race," be used a century later in what said. "(Race is) only includ- would seemingly be a place of for- cause it's there. When you giveness." h the surface of American The city of New York justified its subpoena on the grounds that the film was a one-sided advocacy piece. Burns and his co-directors disagreed - as did a federal judge, who blocked the city's subpoena on Feb. 19. "It's a victory for journalists and filmmakers everywhere," Burns said, "because it does add an extra layer of protection in an area where the courts have been more often disposed to prying into journalists' notes." While the court's decision is a victory for documentarians every- where, Burns recognizes the more pressingmatters athand. "It's sort of heroic that filmmak- ers are subpoenaed and I suppose even more heroic that they have at least temporarily prevailed," he said. "But the most important story is that we are approaching the 10-year mark on the civil suit for five young men ... and still, there is this gigantic, gaping hole in their childhood that hasn't, in some ways, been resolved." Even though their own minor trials have come to a close, Burns and Florentine Films are as busy as ever, working on a 14-hour, seven- part history of the Roosevelt fam- ily to be released in 2014, a one-off story about Jackie Robinson for their "Baseball" series in 2015 and a documentary about the Viet- nam War set for 2016. As for how Florentine Films will approach documentingthesethree historical events, Burns said, "You can believe that race is an integral part." Burns has also been in dis- cussion with HBO through Tom Hanks's company Playtone to produce a dramatic series about the life of the boxer Jack Johnson, which, after the success of the 2005 documentary, Burns sees as "ripe for dramatic treatment." Concerninghis role inthe actual filming of the series, Burns only said laughingly, "I'm keeping my day job." MIRAMAX So' do you want to go see 'Spring Breakers' with me?" Mila Kunis capitalizes on her charisma Bringing TV back to life with fan-funded projects By KELLY ETZ DailyArts Writer TV fandom has hit an all-time high. Eloquently exemplified by the superfan who pledged $10,000 to the we're-pretty-sure-it's-real- ly-happening "Veronica Mars" movie, series cancellation isn't a death sentence anymore: It's an opportunity. Far from the days of sending angry, passionate letters (or bot- tles of Tabasco sauce) in an effort to reinvigorate weary produc- ers of cult-status series, the new reality might only require dip- ping into your wallet. It certainly worked for Rob Thomas, creator of "Veronica Mars," who launched a Kickstarter campaign to (partly) fund a six-years-in-the-making movie. Twelve hours later, the proj- ect reached its goal of $2 million. With 24 days left, over $3 million has been pledged, from as little as a dollar to the whopping $10,000 someone pledged for a speaking role in the film. What seemed like a crazy pipe dream destined to die on thousands of Internet mes- sage boards is now within reach. Which begs the question: How far can we take this? With the possibility open, will other gone-too-soon series clamor for their own kickstarted dreams? Some have already succeeded without asking fans to shell out half the proceeds - series like "Community," "Arrested Develop- ment" and "Family Guy" have all managed to drag themselves out of the coffin and back into the spot- light. It's a different story when attempting to make the leap to the silver screen, but "Veronica Mars" fans seem to have no problem pay- ing for the we-hope-we-can-keep- it promise of a nostal- First seen on gia-filled - the filter reunion. By ALEC STERN Daily Arts Writer Earlier this month, Mila Kunis appeared on BBC Radio l's "The Scott Mills Show" to promote her new movie, "Oz the Great and Powerful." Though Kunis has been on a press junket for the past few weeks, I think she'll remem- ber this interview in particular - after all, it has amassed closetos 11-million views injusttwo weeks. Chris Stark, the first-time interviewer, was vocal about his extreme anxiety from the begin- ning. After one question about the film, he digressed, detail- ing his and his buddies' favorite drinks and nighttime hangouts. Though his bosses were clearly not impressed, Kunis was having what she called the best inter- view she'd had all day. The interview, which might be a bump in the road for Stark's early career, has done wonders for Kunis, who came off as incred- ibly funny and down to earth. At one point, the top comment for the video on YouTube is "such an awesome chick." Other com- ments range from "Mila Kunis is the best" to "bestninterview ever!" When celebrities embark on weeks-long promotional tours, what's most important is that they come off as likeable and human - so that we can watch them and say, "Hey! You're just like the rest of us!" And what's more "regular" than Kunis enjoy- ing a cold Blue Moon, fried chick- en, soccer and a few Jgerbombs every now and then? Kunis's "Oz" interview hasB propelled her to the top tier of celebrity interviewees. By avoiding the same wrought and boring questions, these actors are able to connect much bet- ter with audiences and emit a down-to-earth energy that's necessary to sell yourself and your film. Nobody has done this bet- ter than Jennifer Lawrence, the ultra-likeable "Silver Lin- ings Playbook" Oscar winner. Lawrence succeeds because she never takes herself too serious- ly. She's able to laugh at herself, even after tripping on her walk up to accept the award for Best Actress. Mila Kunis's "Oz" interview is essentially Lawrence's post- Oscars press video, which is currently at over five million views. Much like Kunis, Law- rence laughs off the boring, seemingly necessary questions. "What was your process this morning?" asks one reporter, to which Lawrence replies, "What was my process? I don't know, I just woke up ... I took a shower I got my hair and makeup done, and then (with a mocking tone) I came to the Oscars." She then apologizes and blames her behavior on the shot she took before coming out. This is precisely how fellow Oscar winner Anne Hathaway has failed. Whereas Lawrence isn't concerned at all about being politically correct or if people will like her, Hathaway is too conscious of how people perceive laugh a her ama question Fantine ter, hasi through Lawr a huged youngt program poweri Jimmyl mel hav next le' their ce Blu fri are 0::" Fallon," encoura other se through aren'tc desk-ch questioi able to persona join aud of Picti and Fal only mo remind: ties are Jimm become e her. Her inability to at knocking celebrities down a it herself, coupled with few pegs and humanizing them. azing skill of relating any His movie parody, "Movie: The n to the "misfortunes of Movie," pokes fun at the repeti- her "Les Mis" charac- tive and commercialized nature made her the anti-J-Law of the film business, all the while out the awards season. starring the actors who make up ence, Kunis & Co. owe the industry. Similarly, "Celeb- debt to the new legion of rities Read Mean Tweets," in talk show hosts, whose which stars read insulting tweets as have facilitated these about themselves, accomplishes mages. Most significantly, the same goal. By acknowledging Fallon and Jimmy Kim- us regular people and our criti- e taken talk shows to the cisms, celebrities gain an instant vel, and they've brought likeability. lebrity guests with them. When Kunis finally gives in to the producers of "The Scott Mills Show," she offers to quickly run te M oon and through the answers to the ques- tions she "already knows (Stark) Led chicken is gonna ask." She details her character's evolution throughout all you need. the film and how she approached her character and her relation- ship with the other actors on set before getting back to the good Late Night with Jimmy stuff: Will she or won't she be actors and singers are Stark's date at his friend's wed- iged to join Fallon in ding? :gments, clips and games Kunis's attitude toward the tout the episode. They questions about her movie was confined to the typical one of boredom, and it was also air setup or the usual the most boring minute of the ns. Consequently, they're interview. Audiences don't really showcase their actual care if Mila Kunis rooted her lities. Watching Tina Fey character in honesty; her pres- ience members in a game ence is promotion enough for the onary, or Justin Bieber film. When I'm most engaged is Ilon play basketball is not when I feel like Kunis (or Law- ore fun to watch, but it rence, or any other actor) could be s audiences that celebri- one of my best friends - and for people, too. a lot of people, that's going to be ny Kimmel has also reason enough to go see "Oz the somewhat of a master Great and Powerful." 0 Zsl IIAlSIX 01 IUt "Veronic As m ably pa dreams looking new, sh ined, of this is Literall R( I've pinning (and tl resusci finally ing. W and Co buried, was jus talk ab meltdou that m into th with on (enter I come ti There one pe audienc a Mars the Vampire Slayer." tuch as I'd love (and prob- Where was Deputy Leo?" y) for my own cancelled We can't ever return to that ("Pushing Daises," I'm perfect time in our lives that at you) to resurface - all made our favorite series so earth- iny and exactly as I imag- shatteringly important. My f course - I'm not so sure eighth-grade self is screaming for a trend worth buying into. a "Gilmore Girls" movie, but is y. nostalgia really a reason to drop $100 on the hopes that everything will turn out exactly like you ry and Jess thought you wanted (I don't care what you think, Rory and Jess forever, end up together) however many years ago? Despite the promise of the same cast, the same producer, been burned in the past, the same everything, it can't be g hopes on movie sequels helped. There are no guarantees. hose damn prequels) to And you can bet that your Kick- late a beloved franchise or starter campaign for "Veronica provide a satisfying end- Mars II" isn't going to cut it. Are e all wish Harrison Ford we prepared to unleash all our . had left "Indiana Jones" carefully preserved expectations as the fourth installment without the set-in-stone assur- t piteous, and I can't even ance that ruination isn't right out the recent "Die Hard" around the corner? Is what we wn. TV series have to work want really what we want? uch harder to transform Either way, I'm hauling ass eir movie counterparts - to the theater when (or if?) the tly an hour and a half, can "Veronica Mars" movie final- beloved series here) really ly hits the big screen. Fingers o a satisfying conclusion? crossed. will always be at least - The original version of this rson (probably me) in the article waspublished on TheFilter, ce going, "What the hell? the Daily Arts blog, on March 17. Wjf vorBES ZLAy.~ ES SA rUT KTS * A* I