The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Thursday, March 15, 2012 - 3B The Michigan Daily - michigandailycom Thursday, March 15, 2012 - 3B Battle o the mac his week, it's all about mac. If I had to describe the mac & cheese - the bowl in one word, I would offer classic combo that for "warm." The heartening South- decades has served as a staple west seasonings, beautiful, for childhood summertime deep-orange cheese sauce and lunches, subdued earth-tone ingredients "fend for transport me back home, next yourself to the fireplace, where I sit, eat night" din- and watch snow fall through ners and the picture window. The first broke college few bites are exquisite and truly students' powerful, but the flavors soon pantries collide, lose momentum and fall everywhere. NATHAN flat. Again, this dish is too salty. It's cheap, WOOD The tomatoes are still colder and easy, deli- sparser than I would like, and the cious and starchy kidney beans are really ingeniously engineered. Think overabundant. The cheddar-jack about it: What better way to cheese sauce is tasty, but spooned deliver copious amounts of on too stingily to satisfy my creamy, cheesy goodness than requirement for such an essen- with hollow pasta that lends tial ingredient. Moreover, I see itself to being stuffed with and the absence of an authentically totally enveloped in sauce? I'll Mexican cheese, like Manchego, give you a hint: There isn't a bet- as a missed opportunity to really ter way. make this dish something spe- Given my maybe all-too- cial. obvious love of cheese and carbs, I nearly had a coronary when I heard Noodles & Com- -Noodles resunp pany's grown-up mac is back by revs popular demand. Bacon, mac & a classic. cheeseburger; chili mac; truffle mac with baby portabellas; and the standard Wisconsin mac & cheese sound like foolproof In second place, we have ways to get through a week jam- the everyday Wisconsin mac & packed with impossible mid- cheese, a pleasingly good mac terms. Notebook in hand, I take it by any standard. For starters, a upon myself to bust into Noodles base of thickened heavy cream and pit their dishes against one and cheddar cheese sauce is another in a battle of the mac. spooned into the bottom of a May the best pasta win. shallow bowl. A ladle of per- Coming in last is the sur- fectly al dente elbow noodles prisingly awful bacon, mac & made from amber durum wheat cheeseburger. Though it sounds is layered in next, followed by a good in theory, the execution small handful of mild Monterey is embarrassing in reality. The and cheddar-jack cheeses. You meat, which one would think is are obligated to stir the pasta crucially important to a cheese- yourself, allowing your mouth burger mac, is nearly nonexis- time to water in anticipation as tent in the dish - that is, unless the shredded cheese becomes you order a few expensive meat- stringy, melting right before balls on top. And despite their your eyes. Each bite tastes like price, the beef is tough, reheated mac & cheese should, the way and how I imagine overcooked, it did before the advent of pro- freezer-burnt breakfast sausage cessed cheeses, ila Velveeta. would taste. Chunks of cold The dish is uncomplicated, Roma tomato cool the dish to a hearty, warm and rich. No need displeasinglukewarm tempera- to bother with protein add-ons ture, and the bacon crumbles here; just savor the simplicity. are chewier than dehydrated And the winner is ... truffle jerky, ensuring my next visit to mac! For those of you wondering the dentist will be an expen- what a truffle is, it's a glorified sive one. Each bite proves to be mushroom common in haute oversalted, and the cheddar-jack cuisine that can sell for up to cheese sauce does little to save $100,000 per pound (but usually the dish. For a more sincere ode closer to $1,000 to $2,500 per to the cheeseburger, I would pound). Noodles economically have also liked to see a teaspoon sneaks the ingredient into this of dill-pickle relish and some fancy-pants dish by infusing caramelized onion mixed in. But its classic cheese sauce with alas, the scallions dressing the some white truffle-oil, which mac will have to suffice as my is then added to a hearty cup of only consolation. macaroni, thickly sliced baby Taking the bronze is the portabella mushrooms, nutty bacon, mac & cheeseburger's Parmesan cheese and homemade slightly superior cousin: chili See MAC BATTLE, Page 45 STEP INTO THE SALON 'SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE' (1998), MIRAMAX Loving, hating on the Bard Like in the salons of 17th and 18th century France, this weekly installment will feature two Daily Arts writers discussing the finer points of arts mediums from at least 10 years ago. Shall I compare thee to 1998's other BestPicture nominees? Thou art trite and utterly unmoving. Weinstein's bribes did shake the Academy's fickle temperament, For what else could explain Gwyneth Paltrow's Oscar? That's all loosely paraphrased from the Bard himself - loosely to the point when it's no longer really poetry. But then again, nei- ther is "Shakespeare in Love," no matter how many flowery roman- tic clichs its characters spew in cloyingly delivered Early Modern English. In case you can't decipher the pillaged sonnet in the article's lead, here's some background. "Shakespeare in Love" - part of a slew of overrated Best Pic- ture winners that includes over- sentimental saccharine such as "Crash," "Titanic" and "The King's Speech" - took home seven trophies at the 1998 Oscars, including, as previously stated, dubiously awarded honors for Best Picture and Best Actress. The film's producer, the notori- ous Harvey Weinstein, famously spent millions giving the movie a last-minute advertising push, which somehow enabled the film to sneak by Steven Spielberg's timeless and powerful "Saving Private Ryan" for the top spot. The spending drive also managed to sneak a weakly mustachioed Paltrow past Cate Blanchett's regal (literally!) performance in "Elizabeth" and a hackneyed, ironically unoriginal script past the diabolically plotted "Truman Show." But the film isn't just bad because of the hardware it man- aged to undeservedly win. It also happens to be a really bad movie. Swordfights are "West Side Story"-esque, in the sense that they evoke a universal "nobody actually fights like that" reac- tion. There's a Ben Affleck char- acter also, who, for all intents and purposes, is just Affleck phon- ing in a cringe-worthy "British" accent. And those are just a few small, technical things that suck. There's also the acting, which is universally overexaggerated and hamfisted with the small "We think we're the shit." exception of Judi Dench's Queen Elizabeth, whose massive screen presence is pitifully underuti- lized. The script, full of not only the aforementioned romantic cli- ches but also cheap, unbelievably serendipitous coincidence, could have used a rewrite, or five, or a shredder. But none of these compare to the utter derision reserved for. Joseph Fiennes's William Shake- speare. Fiennes plays Shake- speare as an immature dolt in love with his own voice, a high school student who thinks over- emphasized line delivery means the greatest performance ever. This only emphasizes the easy- to-hate elements of the script's take on Shakespeare, an unstable, wildly irresponsible man-child. This man-child is supposedly the romantic lightning rod, who fans of the film defend to this day, but somehow they forget that he's a philanderer who we see patron- izing prostitutes. The entire plot involves him using his honeyed tongue to seduce Paltrow's vir- gin (again, literally!) character. Today, that'd be called creepy and pedophilic. In the end, it's not artificially generated hype or meaningless trophies that determine a film's legacy, but how the public looks at it and its cast and crew years after its release. "Saving Pri- vate Ryan" continues to be cited years later as a true masterpiece, while "Shakespeare in Love" has faded into obscurity. While his older brother went on to transfix audiences in "In Bruges," "The Constant Gardener" and "Harry Potter," Fiennes's last leading role was as a cop on the ABC drama "FiashForward," which slowly hemorrhaged viewers until the network finally deliv- ered the coup de grace. Paltrow has, as "30 Rock" derisively put it, "gone country," famously record- ing the most whitewashed Cee- Lo cover ever performed. And Affleck? He's back now, and if you haven't seen "The Town," go see it. But immediately after "Shake- speare"? Well, one word: "Gigli." Advantage: Spielberg. -DAVID TAO It's hard not to have a soft spot for "movie" movies. Films that are unashamedly, one could argue, the platonic ideal of the artistic platform: good fun. These are the movies filled to the brim with vil- lains menacing dames, infinitely quotable dialogue, recognizable faces, comedy, tragedy, love, heartbreak and swashbuckling fights - films that make it onto the everyman's favorite movie list. After all, people don't love "Casablanca" because it captures the gritty realism of German- occupied Morocco, or "The Prin- cess Bride" because it accurately delves into the morality of killing the man who killed your father. We love those films because they teach us that art can be fun. Even when it's sad, or dark, or cheesy, art (especially film) can be full of a life that makes you want to jump up and kiss someone. Speaking of kissing, consider "Shakespeare in Love," the tale of how the story of theater and literature's most famous lovers came to be. The movie offers us a profoundly watchable glimpse into a "fake" (but isn't it fun to believe it could be true?) slice of the life of William Shakespeare, played with an almost uncontain- able artistic energy by Joseph Fiennes. An example of this fer- vor shows up when Shakespeare finishes a play and declares, "God I'm good!" It's this exasperated cockiness that makes the charac- ter so electric, so likeable. He is also a sort of rogue, using his heavenly gift with words to pilfer to pockets of theater own- ers looking for banal comedies and pop the corsets of the sultry muses who warm his bed. But because this is a "movie" movie, his promiscuous ways cannot continue, and he soon finds true love in the form of Viola, played by Gwyneth Paltrow. Paltrow won an Oscar for this performance, perhaps deserv- edly. It's hard to argue against her charm and her almost angelic belief in the power of theater. Also, the few moments of serious- ness she does provide (namely, her readings of Shakespeare's work) are sure to produce shud- dering and possibly tears. The two do not stand alone though, as the cast is full of famil- iar faces: Ben Affleck appropri- ately hamming it up, Colin Firth scheming for love in all the wrong places, Tom Wilkinson as the producer who realizes the art is more important than the money, and of course Dame Judi Dench, regal and commanding as Queen Elizabeth. "Shakespeare in Love" won't give you any new insight into the world. You're unlikely to learn some deep, dark secret of human- ity, and you certainly won't finish it feeling depressed. It's not that sort of movie. It's the sort that makes you believe in those tales of star-crossed lovers, that makes you want to write poetry (it will be bad, but who cares?), thatquite simply makes you full of feeling. And that's why I adore it. -MATT EASTON NEW MEDIA From Page 1B this and working with people who manage the networks so we can allow certain protocols to occur." The student perspective is also one that DMC staff find particu- larly important. Instead of push- ing decisions through a crowded bureaucracy, they actively seek out student input as they build new initiatives to further improve the experience. "We are really close to the ground in the sense that we want to know what students are inter- ested in and what they want to do," Fessahazion said. "(The building process) is not driven from some administrator some- where saying this is the kind of stuff we should do. We talk to people who say, 'it would be awe- some if I could do this,' and if we can do it, we make it happen." Nor is the facility's develop- ment process driven purely by engineeringstudents. Through an atypical arrangement, all Univer- sity students can and do use the facilities on a regular basis. "Because (the DMC is) part of the library, arts students have access to these facilities," said Ted Hall, advanced visualiza- tion specialist at the Duderstadt Center. "Other universities would have similar facilities, but rarely would arts students have access to them." es that move with the technical zeitgeist aren't enough. As tech- nology progresses and new media development filters into class- rooms and onto students' iPads, keeping up with trends requires an attitude that promotes coop- eration. "We're trying to make the IT environment support the act of collaboration," Atkins said. "It's the collaboration, both on campus and across the world, that moves us to action." Added Soloway: "When I was at Yale, talking to colleagues was forbidden ... but here at Michigan, it's all about people working with each other." While Atkins and Soloway aren't the only members of the University who think Michigan's large community inspires inno- vation through communication and teamwork, there's no denying that widespread new-mediaavail- ability will permanently alter the learning environment inside and outside the classroom. "More and more of our learn- ing experiences are not just classroom based, they involve producing tangible objects," Atkins said. With learning becoming more about doing and experimenting, the University's cyber-infrastruc- ture has to support the technical demands of students and classes. This infrastructure supports computing, wireless networking and the University's mobile ser- that we have bigger collections of data and new, powerful ways of extracting knowledge from the database," Atkins said. "Our goal is to figure out how to harness all that ... to help the Michigan com- munity carry out our mission of learning, discovery and social engagement more effectively." But improving infrastructure and supporting new innovation is not simply about replacing old machines. With an increasing demand for storage capability, higher-bandwidth networks and IT support for staff, the Univer- sity has had to devise an IT-ser- vicing program called NextGen Michigan. The program is essentially a strategy the University uses to find and eliminate redundant, sub-par machines campus-wide and develop ways of sharing information over mobile services. Atkins hopes that these infra- structural changes will help the University continue to foster research and innovation. "As culture and technology platform evolves in Michigan, it will reinforce the conditions for innovation and leadership," he said. Others see larger, more long- term implications for the Uni- versity and higher education as a whole. Duderstadt sees today's new-media mainstays as compo- nents that continue to virtualize higher education, citing Wikipe- dia, Google and artificial intelli- gence as the triumvirate behind it all. "Wikipedia has the capacity to build communities of people try- ing to learn things," Duderstadt said. "Google is just a term now for 'all knowledge is digitized and available.' (Artificial intelligence) is the increasing use of analyt- ics that can scroll through this huge amount of knowledge ... and extract information." Together, Duderstadt believes that this combination can even- tually fulfill the same role as modern universities. "(Wikipe- dia) is the learning community; (Google is) knowledge, like the library of Alexandria times bil- lions; and (artificial intelligence) is the capacity to authenticate knowledge and certify learning," Duderstadt explained. "This is a university ... I think that's your future." The facilities and the students must conjoin But not everybody looks at the University's future with the same amount of optimism. University professor John Holland, known as the father of genetic algorithms, believes that recent growth in class sizes and the depersonali- zation of education has compro- mised the University's affinity for research and innovation. "The University has become more and more a factory," he said. "It's about how efficient we are at cranking out students, and that goes partly against the notion of research." And despite attempts at adding to available facilities and rein- vesting in new technology, Hol- land also sees some limits in the overall vision of the University. "You're not going to be doing any long-range stuff unless it has something that you can deliver in less than three years. Funding for anything longer keeps getting cut," Holland said. But large incoming classes and decreased state funding hasn't stopped the University from investing in technology and improving facilities available to students. For the 'U,' providing and building a cutting-edge tech- nological platform is a work-in- progress. For the DMC, for example, funding has been plentiful. In order to improve access to tech- nology, the University spends upward of $20,000 dollars for software packages, including pro- grams needed to run the record- ing studios and 3-D labs. On top of that, the technology is constantly being updated to correlate with the current media environment. "We just remodeled two of our audio studios, which cost about $800,000 ... they're some of the best recording facilities in North America," said John Williams, director of the Duderstadt Center. Ample money is also available to indulge student curiosity and facilitate their experimentation with new, powerful and obscure software. "You have an idea ... we will work with you and help your vision come to life" Fessahazion said. "Within what resources we have, we'll buy the package, and you can play with it, use it and develop your project." This leads to a technical eco- system in constant flux, as updat- ed additions are integrated. "Every year, the infrastruc- ture gets better ... they have new, unbelievable resources. We keep investing in the future," Soloway said. "Is Michigan up to the chal- lenge of change? I think it is." Added Atkins: "Building infra- structure is not something you do once, it's an organic process. We have put together a new organi- zational structure and new policy that will keep that organic pro- cess going." With all these available resources, it's up to students to take the initiative and use the services the University has put at their disposal. Facilities like the DMC offer millions of dollars worth of equipment free of charge to anyone who wants to use it. And since the DMC first opened, it has attracted people from all fields who come to the facility to bringtheir bold new ideas to life. "A cardiologist ... used the (recording) studio to determine whether or not you could hear the blood flow in the veins to deter- mine if there was a lower-cost way to do early detection of arte- rial chlorosis," Williams said. Art & Design senior Danielle Battaglia envisioned the universe for her senior design project; she didn't want to model the universe using plastic, she didn't want to draw it out - she wanted to walk through the idea in her head. "I wanted to model the uni- verse. I did a lot of research on it because I was curious about black holes," Battaglia said. "I kind of said that the Big Bang could be at the center of the black hole. I told my professor I was interested in this, and she pointed me to the DMC (Virtual Reality Lab)." Added Atkins: "For students, there's an unlimited amount of opportunity, but you have to take the initiative to find out and pur- sue it." vices. Academia online "Technology today is social, collaborative and ... increasingly In today's rapidly chang- mobile, with a whole host of Inter ing technological environment, net appliances that people carry futuristic new facilities and class- with them. Cloud services mean