The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Monday, November 22, 2010 - 5A On hallowed ground We are all Potter's pals 'Part 1' pleases Potterheads by preserving the plot By KAVI SHEKHAR PANDEY Daily Film Editor "This is too scary for me," whis- pered a woman seated at a matinee screening of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hal- lows: Part 1" ** as Dementors rushed our Harry Potter heroes within and the the chambers of the Minis- Deathly try of Magic. Hallows: Part1 Her statement may have At Quality16 referred to the and Rave film's thun- Warner Bros. derous levels of suspense, but for a student newspaper film critic, it also alluded to the prospect of writing an acceptable assess- ment of a "Harry Potter" movie. After all, the current undergradu- ate student body is considered the "Harry Potter Generation" - those who matured alongside Harry & Friends - and will undoubtedly read a review with intense scruti- ny, making composing a successful one a daunting prospect. But with the force of a bludgeon cracking the cranium, the realiza- tion occurs that the filmmakers were probably experiencing the exact same fear - the fear of disap- pointing the hordes of Potterheads who have devoted so much of their life reading, re-reading, watching and re-watching the books and movies; knowing that they deserve to be satisfied, as their passion is what made Potter a phenomenon. So the decision to split the final book, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," into two films was definitely a positive one for fans who were tired of seeing their favorite subplots and crucial char- acter developments excised from the film - most notably the pen- sieve trips in "Half-Blood Prince" "If you say vampires are better than werewolves one more time... that examined the transformation of Tom Riddle into Lord Volde- mort. As the final entry in the "Harry Potter" journey, the film- makers understandably wanted to send the fans off with the grand- est experience they could possibly muster. . And "Deathly Hallows: Part 1," at least for the first half, is tre- mendously grand. The film quickly establishes the somber tone that pervaded the book, leading to a succession of intensely entertain- ing, surprisingly violent action sequences and an infiltration of the Ministry of Magic that's equally tense and comical. Director David Yates, who has helmed the series since "Order of the Phoenix," began teasing his tal- ent for staging spectacular wand duels with the marvelous battle at the climax of "Phoenix." A few short battles popped up in "Half- Blood Prince," but in "Deathly Hallows: Part 1," Yates Hulks out, unleashing his directorial exper- tise and technical wizardry (ha!) at full force with several fierce, exciting set pieces within the first act alone. All is well until the infamous "camping in the woods" segment, an unrelenting barrage of teen angst and plot stagnation that's the entertainment equivalent of a Crutacious curse. The sequence of Harry, Ron and Hermione hiding out in the woods was one of the most mundane parts of the book, if not the entire series, and is equally dull in the film - which exposes the issue of dividing the book into two movies. If "Deathly Hallows" were a single movie, such lengthy, kind- of-unnecessary sequences would have been trimmed out. But by fol- lowing the plot of the book very closely and minimizing cuts from the story, the film also inherits the flaws of the book, such as the aforementioned camping sequence and narrative non sequitors that feel uncomfortably out of place - in particular, the events that tran- spire at Godric's Hollow. Aside from that, "Deathly Hal- lows: Part 1" brings back all the lit- tle things that have made the Harry Potter movies so enjoyable. The cast, made up of the cream-of-the- crop of British actors, is as great as ever and even brings Bill Nighy ("Love Actually") along for the ride as the new Minister of Magic. The film's really dark subject matter is nicely matched bythe cinematogra- phy - it's as if a Deluminator sucked the light out of every scene - but there's an appropriate amount of humor delivered as always by Ron (Rupert Grint) and the Weasley twins. Lastly Dobby (Toby Jones), once the Jar JarBinks of the "Harry Potter" films, rips out the best role in the movie as the heroic, hilarious house elf who saves the day - like a G6. Perhaps the most understat- ed quality of the films has been the evolution of the chemistry between Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron and Hermione (Emma Wat- son). As the characters they played grew up together, so did Radcliffe, Grint and Watson - their interac- tions in "Deathly Hallows: Part 1" are extremely organic, and it's wondrous to see the love they have for each other and their bond that transcends friendship. It's these quiet characterizations that have helped us in the Harry Potter Gen- eration mature ourselves. That's why, for us, "Harry Potter" is not just a book or a movie. Itris part of who we are. 'm 20 years old and two and a half years through col- lege, and somehow I remain captivated by the adventures of a fictional boy wizard. L There I was, with some of you, catching "Harry Pot- ter and the Deathly Hal- lows: Part 1" ANKUR on Thursday SOHONI night - ahem, Friday morn- ing. Don't get me wrong: As films, the quality has been up and down - I'm a film person, and my rela- tionship with "Harry Potter" over the last decade has been love-hate - but there's no mistaking the lasting power of J.K. Rowling's saga and how vital the film series's careful execution has been to the perpetual obsession that hits our generation every year and a half. We all grew up reading the books; if you didn'tcgrow up read- ing them, then you grew up with people who grew up reading them. First published in June 1997 in the U.K. and about a year later in the U.S., the "Harry Potter" series had a good three to four years before its inevitable cinematic adapta- tion. After that, those who had been content to live on in blissful ignorance of the escalating profile of The Boy Who Lived suddenly didn't stand a chance. Everybody - Harry, Ron, Hermione, Dumbledore, Hagrid, Malfoy, even Dobby - they all got faces. Concrete, bankable faces you could put on a poster. Nine years ago, Warner Bros. released "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" with a huge production budget and even more colossal box office gross. From the very beginning it was clear, if perhaps too clear, that the studio and major players were dedicated to faithfully adapting the novel to the screen. That dedication, even though the quality of adaptation has been muddled by complaints from both book-obsessed fans and unfa- miliar filmgoers, has never faded from what is now the biggest film series of all time. No "Harry Potter" film has reached - nor will the yet-to-be- released "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" ever live up to - the fantasy adaptation standard set by "Lord of the Rings" earlier this decade. But "Harry Potter" has faced an entirely unique challenge and fit- fully lived up to its reputation as the most universal story of the millennial generation. When each "HP" film promises to show viewers their favorite scenes from the book while keep- ing the humor and youth of the text alive, fans flock to the theater: somewhat-underwhelming sequel after somewhat-underwhelming sequel, the saga is not only toler- ated, but celebrated by diehard fans for at least mostly sticking to the script. I have never personally been a huge fan of the films, and I'm not especially obsessed with the story as a whole. My interest in the films has always been in the films themselves and not the adapta- tion therein - I cringe to hear the minor complaints over changes and gaps in the storyline. But despite any frustration different sets of viewers have found in the films, there's no denying that the entire franchise has been an utter success beyond most realistic viewers' hopes and expectations. Part of that success is due to a consistent creative evolution as the films have progressed - from the bright, young and immature direction of the first two films by Chris Columbus to the more advanced, visually daring presen- tation of the last three by David Yates. The scripts, save for the fifth installment, have been writ- ten by screenwriter Steve Roves with a consistent personality, and have progressed from far-too- juvenile to sufficiently PG-13. Like the characters, the creative efforts have become more mature with each film to suit the series's aging audience. All the while, the most impor- tant keys in all of this - the faces onscreen - have remained and grown with us. Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson are all household names in our generation, and our connection with them will last beyond the "HP" films. They've not only aged in front of our eyes, but matured in talent and ability to appropriately inhabit their roles. They have been the most tangible sign of progres- sion and the most solid connection to its prime viewer base. And that brings me to us. College-aged viewers - the ones old enough to remember every moment of the last 12 years of"Harry Potter" but young enough to relate to the boy-wiz- ard's plight - are the lifeblood of Growing up with The Boy Who Lived. the series, no matter how many times older generationsachastise us for obsessing over "a kids' book." Some (older) peoplereally just don't get it. I'm not obsessed, but I fully understand that "Harry Potter" is our story - we grew up with it, and we're seeing it reach a fittingly epic end with its seventh and eighth films. That's why, if you were lucky enough to catch "Deathly Hal- lows" at midnight, you likely saw a lot of 20-year-olds like me. The books aren't children's books, just as the films aren't children's films - at least not anymore. What started with children has followed those children into adulthood and itself grown along the way. It's hard to know how we'll see "Harry Potter" when the films are complete. The range of fandom, from casual viewer to Potterhead, will always have variable opinions of how well the screen fits the story. We imagined Hogwarts before Warner Bros. constructed it, and saw Harry, Ron and Herm- ione in our minds before Daniel, Rupert and Emma came along. While some people find that the films conflict with their imagina- tion, others revel in the contrast and enjoy the connection the story weaves through its fans. Beyond any divisions, the saga is ours. "Harry Potter" will always be ingrained in our generation - and even more important, our generation will forever be a fun- damental part of "Harry Potter." Sohoni wants to show you his Patronus. To find out its size and shape, e-mail asohoni@umich.edu. "Cass is straight awful m 2 tb c si c to m st u a tb a H tb f ar m m of nE fa a sp to Yc tb be By EMMA GASE ladies always be in my face / But Daily Arts Writer don't believe what they be put- tin' on their Twitter or their Perhaps best known for his MySpace") or guest vocalist Mya's inor 2007 hit "My Drink N' My complete irrelevance to modern Step," Philly native Cassidy is hip hop. he archetypal The decidedly un-gangster ocky rapper * - "Paper Up," Cassidy's most hose relatively redeeming moment, features an mall sip of suc- CM* old-school soul sample of horns ess has led him and guitars underneath a bass-y o think he is the C.A.S.H.(CasS East Coast beat. Ironically, Cas- ost deserving, A Straight sidy's best moment here isn't his treet-savvy and Hustla) rapping. On the chorus, he sings nderappreci- Kross Over surprisingly well: "I'm on the ted rapper out come-up butI'm still climbin'/ I'm here. Cass's new getting money but I'm still grin- lbum, C.A.S.H. (Cass A Straight din' / Cause I gotta get my paper ustla), does nothing to warrant up." Though Cassidy's vocabu- he titanic amounts of narcissism lary is no match for the acerbic nd cockiness. For all of Cass's wordplay of mush-mouthed Gucci isdirected, supercilious verses Mane or the slick sophistication of which there are many), few of Drake, you have to admit Cass ioments actually merit it. does have his moments: "I play "Face 2 Face" is a laundry list with them Knicks like Gallinari / f Cassidy's ideal rap battle oppo- I went from ordering onion rings ents, as Cass name drops every to calamari." amous rapper who has ever spit Nevertheless, Cass doesn't verse. The song begins with a capitalize. Unlike more success- ped-up chipmunk voice singing ful rappers *(TI., Eminem) who o the tune of Barney's "I Love have learned that rap without ou, You Love Me" about battling, hooks does not sell, Cassidy either hen segues to the barely-there doesn't have the melodic chops eat with melodramatic synth to pull it off, or just doesn't give a crap enough to consistently try. In "I'm a G Boy," Cass lets lis- teners know that he "Ain't in no Lie thinks he's motherfucking gang / But I'm a motherfucking gangster." Accord- a total gangsta, ing to Cassidy, all other rappers are but he's not, poseurs: "They act gangsta / But really do no gangsta shit." Exactly what this "gangsta shit" is, how- ever, remains a mystery. Instead, hat spikes randomly over Cass's we're merely informed (over and wkward flow. Cass then chal- over and over) that Cassidy is a "G enges his own rap rivals: "Don't Boy." And in case we still aren't o on the Internet / Talkin' all grasping the message, let us not ndirect / Battle me / Face to forget that C.A.S.H. stands for ace." Suffice it to say 99 percent "Cass A Straight Hustla." f the rappers he names in the What Cassidy really needs is a ong (Drake, Eminem, Kanye and large slice of humble pie. For the tas among them) could probably storm of shit he talks up, he has ap the McDonald's Dollar Menu very little with which to back nd still beat Cass in a battle. it up. His flow is stumbling and In the rare moments Cass drops mediocre, his boastful verses are he street-hardened hoodlum act, outlandish and nonsensical (but e succeeds in pulling off semi- not in a so-vulgar-it's-hilarious iemorable songs. "Girl Like Her" Lil Wayne way) and his beats are eatures danceable beats and forgettable and outdated. Who atisfying hooks, hard to come knows, maybe Cass actually is a y on the rest of the album. The Straight Hustla :n real life. But &B melody can't distract from no amount of hustlin' can save assidy's lame lyrics about how C.A.S.H. from its sure descent e didn't cheat on his girl ("The into obscurity. It's getting old in hun', Nelly By CASSIE BALFOUR DailyArts Writer One would think that at 36 years old, Nelly would have evolved not just as an artist, but as a person. But he's still '* almost solely concerned with Nely money, chicks 5.0 and slick club beats. His latest Universal Motown hip-pop album 5.0 is a vapid mess of attempted nightclub bangers and rehash- ings of the rapper's older work. While Nelly occasionally ven- tures into the pop music realm on 5.0, his clever rhyming and South- ern twang are noticeably absent in an album populated with lazy hooks and inane rhymes about money. While Nelly's contempo- raries have branched out from simply imploring women (or "shawtys") to shake their respec- tive moneymakers, Nelly tragi- cally never recovered from, as he puts it, "get-money syndrome." The hypnotically repetitive "Move That Body" features lots of finger snapping and guest We get it: You like sex and money. appearances by hip-hop main- stays T-Pain and Akon (who spends most of the track admir- ing some girl's ass in typical Akon fashion). This wannabe club hit's one redeeming fac- tor is Nelly's ability to spit his game faster and with more energy than almost any rapper out there. However, it ends up being a tiring, forgettable song destined only to get play at the clubs after everyone is too drunk to notice the sheer dullness of the track. The worst part of the album is Nelly's campy, soft rhyming. On "Broke," Nelly claims that "My crib is plush, plush / I'm talking elevator / So don't you touch, touch." Sophie Greene has a grat- ing guest appearance, singing: "If you ain't got no money then you can't do nothing for me / In Vegas, L.A., Miami and New York / Yeah I like shopping." Maybe if Nelly met a nice, unmaterialistic girl, he could write a hit about something other than banging a ho and gettin' dough (see Nelly, rhyming isn't that hard). Despite its exhaustive lyrics, "Broke" at least has a solid hook and some dance-party appeal due to tight production and a hard-hitting back beat. On the radio-ready hit "Just a Dream," Nelly drops the rapper fagade and makes himself vulner- able for the epic track. He switch- es between rapping and singing about a girl who left him heart- broken. Nelly isn't afraid to cross over to sugary, inoffensive pop and the result is a decent track See NELLY, Page 6A t - eJAMEST * Live Concerts .VIP Parties -Beautiful Beaches " etacua rSunsets SmmERVICE$ 1,S00.648.4849 th a le gc in fa of s N ra ar th hE is m fn sa b R C h Learnmr ur aout uteoenems T rve aceucps ser vice. Information Session: for Masters Studentsintersted in Peace Corps Tuesday, Nov.23 at 6:30 p.m. International Center, Rm 9 Apply by year-end for added programs leaving in 2011 --Peace Corps'50th Anniversary Year! 800.424.85801 peacecorps.gov/application