8A - Monday, November 16, 2009 The Michigan Daily - michigandzily.com Concerns abound for DPS Oversight Committee . From Page 1A mittee's meetings and the number of grievances reviewed each year. This catalog of systemic prob- lems calls into question whether a committee tasked with holding the campus police accountable has ful- filled that role and whether it even can. A LACK OF STUDENT REPRESENTATION Many of the most serious con- cerns about the DPS Oversight Committee rest with the two seats devoted to students. Sometimes vacant for months at a time and arguably filled in a way that violates the provisions of the state law, the two student seats on the committee have historically been mishandled by the commit- tee and by the Michigan Student Assembly, which has been tasked with filling the seats. Since the committee's establish- ment, a formal election involving all students at the University has never occurred, according to MSA Presi- dent Abhishek Mahanti. Instead, already-elected MSA representa- tives are appointed to the commit- tee based on an internal application process and assembly-wide confir- mation. Stephen Hipkiss, chair of the DPS Oversight Committee and facil- ity manager at the Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library, said this is war- ranted because the student body elects MSA representatives. "The thought there is that they are in fact elected," Hipkiss said. "They're elected to MSA, and MSA selects them from there." When presented with the state statute and a description of the Uni- versity's current practices, inde- pendent attorneys The Michigan Daily spoke with disagreed with this theory. According to David Einstandig, an attorney for Thav, Gross, Stein- way & Bennett P.C. in Bingham Farms, Mich., the practice of MSA representatives electing the com- mittee members doesn't comply with the state statute. "(The statute) doesn't say elected by the 'student representatives,' it says the 'students,"' Einstandig said. "it appears that the law is not being complied with. The statute appears not to give the right to elect to MSA. The right is given to the student body. MSA is not the stu- dent body." Jonathan Jones, an attorney who practices in Southfield, Mich., had a similar stance. He said that state law dictates that all students participate in the election and that the appoint- ment of representatives by MSA denies students their right to vote. "Unless it's placed in a formal bal- lotwhere the entire student body has an opportunity to nominate some- one and/or vote for nominated can- didates, then the students are being deprived of the voice that the statute gives them," Jones said. Currently, student body-wide elections for MSA happen twice a year. Einstandig said the University could solve the student voting issue by creating a similar process to elect student representatives on the DPS Oversight Committee. Mahanti disagreed with the fea- sibility of holding an election spe- cifically for representatives to the DPS Oversight Committee. If MSA were to do this, he said, it would also have to organize an election for representatives serving on other University committees and that the election would not generate many votes. "We have enough problems as it is getting voter turnout and enough candidates to fill our slates," Mah- RATKOWIAK From Page 1A field garbage this week. There's not room for that in Ann Arbor, espe- cially not now. Former coach Lloyd Carr largely refused to address those controver- sies - he would just say the mat- ter was being handled internally. Carr's intimidating staredowns with reporters and his refusal to answer off-the-field questions may have been frustrating for the media, but it sure kept the focus on the field. Last year, during Ohio State week, Rodriguez announced Zion Babb and Jason Kates had left the team. Artis Chambers broke the news via Facebook that he was "no longer a Wolverine," and it was heavily rumored Sam McGuffie was close behind. That kind of dis- traction duringthe biggest week of the season is ridiculous. Even more disturbingly, it seems like Rodriguez still hasn't learned to control that. This season, in addition to hav- anti sa to the a But, body-w the tru on the c the gr tives in appoint commit sentatio Form Chanes mittee chaired Commi Decemb on the than fo Feldma sentativ that po there w mittee. In at assemb student Heman ing sopi Chap was not represe previou dent vo accurat when d DPS. t re Beca cess to dent re whethe mittee making a result often s periods In a before were at tive Co liams s student Willi istrativ Oversig MSA th resenta had no said is vacant. "If t would the DP not inf seat M commi d of the election of members issue." ssembly itself. Yet two grievances did appear while the lack of student before the committee during the ide elections compromises six months when both student posi- e representation of students tions were vacant. Since there were ommittee, the gap between no alternate student representa- aduation of representa- tives, Hipkiss said the committee a particular year and the met with only four members to dis- ment of new students to the cuss the grievances. tee eliminates that repre- Einstandig said the University n altogether. appears to be violating state law by er MSA representative Bret having only four members serve on s was a DPS Oversight Com- the committee for half a year. representative who also "It appears then that the require- the MSA Campus Safety ment of the committee - (the stat- ssion. He graduated last ute) says 'shall,' and shall means it er, leaving one student seat must - include two students, and committee vacant for more therefore the committee is func- 'ur months - until Cassie tioningcontrary to the requirement n, the other student repre- in the statute," he said. 'e, graduated in May. From Mahanti said what occurred this int until Nov. 3 of this year, summer was a "special case" and ere no students on the com- that in the past, both members have not graduated in the same year. But n MSA meeting Nov. 3, the Mahanti said he understands the ly voted to approve two new concern about not having students representatives: LSA junior on the committee. t Chaparala and Engineer- "In this special case, I do think homore Prithvi Murthy. it's kind of inappropriate to not 'arala said last week that he have student representation on a aware there was no student committee that does need student ntation on the committee in representation," he said. .s months. He said the stu- He added that MSA would try ice is "critical" to achieve to amend the problem so it doesn't e representation of opinions continue to occur. iscussing grievances against University spokesman Rick Fitzgerald said he didn't know there was a period in the year during which students were not serving on the committee. He said it's MSA's responsibility to solve the problem The statute) because the University doesn't deal with the student election process. doesnt say "It's really up to MSA to make those selections for the student rep- resentatives," Fitzgerald said. he 'student Fitzgerald also had a different perspective on the legality of the resentatives' process than Einstandig and Jones. I He said that the law doesn't spell it says the out a specific process for how to nominate or elect student represen- students."' tatives. Therefore, the University has let MSA handle elections since MSA has an established process for selecting representatives to serve on various committees. use there is no formal pro- "The University's position is that replace graduating stu- that makes MSA's process consis- presentatives, it is not clear tent with the state law that says r the DPS Oversight Com- 'nominated and elected,"' Fitzger- or MSA is responsible for ald said. sure the seats are filled. As The most recent committee of that confusion, the seats meeting was last August, at the tay unfilled for extended request of someone who filed a of time. complaint. Hipkiss said the com- n interview late last month mittee offered the complainant an the new representatives opportunity to wait for two student ppointed, MSA Administra- representatives to be seated on the ordinator Anika Awai-Wil- committee before the complaint aid she didn't know if the was reviewed, but the complain- positions had been filled. ant wanted to settle the dispute as ams said University admin- quickly as possible, and the Univer- e committees - like DPS sity's General Counsel allowed the ht - sometimes inform complaint to proceed. tat they are in need of rep- "General Counsel advised that tives. But the committee if the remaining four could meet, it t done so, which Williams would be OK," he said. why the seats may have been But Einstandig said under the statute, the committee cannot hese seats are vacant ... I make decisions without the student say it's most likely because representatives. S Oversight Committee has "The committee must have those ormed us that we need to representatives as stated," he said. SA representatives for their "Without them, I don't see how it ttee," she said. could proceed." Committee on University Affairs and executive committees of the College of Literature, Science and the Arts, the College of Engineer- ing, the Medical School and the School of Education. Once elected, each faculty committee member is supposed to serve a two-year term. However, according to a Uni- versity response to a Freedom of Information Act request on July 17 that was obtained by The Michigan Daily, the last faculty member to be elected to the committee was in April 2000. SACUA chair and Engineering Prof. Michael Thouless admitted in an e-mail interview that SACUA has not held an election for the DPS Oversight Committee since 2000. "It appears that the DPS Over- sight Committee simply fell off the radar screen of SACUA, its previ- ous chairs and the four college executive committees that are also charged with overseeing the nomi- nation process," Thouless wrote. He wrote that the terms of office are not clearly stated in the pro- cedures and that since the same elected faculty members are. still serving on the committee, "nothing triggered another election or the attention of SACUA." Thouless first found out about the election violations in May, when he became chair of SACUA and after he worked on an audit of all the committees SACUA is responsible for. "When we found the current procedures, I was concerned by the fact that they are vague in places, and the election rules are rather cumbersome," he wrote. "(They) do not clearly define terms of office and do not make it clear how to ensure all members of the UM community get a voice in the elections." Thouless wrote that he has been communicating with the Univer- sity's Human Resources Office to rewrite some of the procedures in order to solve some of the problems. Tim Wood, senior director of Human Resources, said his office is mainly in charge of elections for staff representatives on the com- mittee, but that he didn't know why there has not been an election for faculty representatives since 2000. "I don't know if it's a lack of inter- est in people participating or they just haven't done it," Wood said. Thouless wrote that drafting a new procedure may "take some time" and that SACUA may hold an election despite the unclear procedures. "If it looks like the re-drafting process is going to take too long, and SACUA decides holding a new election is more urgent than clean- ing up the rules that govern the DPS oversight committee, we may decide that we need to try and organize one using the existing, but somewhat unsatisfactory proce- dures," he wrote. SELECTIVE STAFF VOTING Some concerns - including legal concerns - surround the process by which staff members elect rep- resentatives to the DPS Oversight Committee. Though staff members have been elected to the committee on a regular basis, voting restric- tions and low election participation underscore how staff representa- tion on the committee suffers from flaws similar to those of the student and faculty representation. The DPS Oversight Committee bylaws mandate that both union and non-union staff members nominate their peers. From there, the University's Office of Human Resources conducts staff elections for one position each year - alter- nating between union and non- union groups. The concerns arise, though, from the fact that only members in each group may vote for their respective labor representative. Jones said this election policy also appears to violate the state statute because different members of the staff are excluded from exer- cising their right to vote each year. But Wood said the election pro- cedure does not breach the law. "I think we're confident that it's appropriate that it's just a split between the unionversus non-union seat," Wood said. "Each employee has the right to vote. It's just which election they're voting in." The last staff election was held in June 2009 to elect a union repre- sentative. While elections are con- ducted in a timely manner, there has been a great deal of variation in voter participation during the last few years. The FOIA response from the Uni- versity on July 17 reveals that there were 84 votes in the 2009 election for a union representative. How- ever, in2008, there were 1,521 votes for a non-union representative. Hipkiss said he didn't know why there was such a large difference in the votes. "The election for the (non-union) position seems much more straight- forward, and to my knowledge the only one that is announced in the University Record priorto the actu- al soliciting of votes," he said. Wood also did not know why there was a disparity of more than 1,400 votes. He said one explanation may be the difference in the amount ofeli- gible voters. But numbers from a July 2009 Human Capital report show thatthousandsofmorestaffmembers could be voting in each election. According to the report, the University's Ann Arbor campus employs 27,464 staff members. About 6,982 staff members belong to a union, and 20,482 do not belong to a union. These numbers demonstrate a very low voter turnout. And though the number of union and non-union staff fluctuates from year-to-year, there was similarly low turnout in each election. For non-union staff only 1,521 votes were cast in 2008 out of a potential voter pool similar to the staff's current size of 20,482. And for union staff, only 84 votes were cast in 2009 out of a potential voter pool similar to the staff's cur- rent size of 6,982. Though these numbers do not violate the state law or the commit- tee's bylaws, they raise concerns about how aware staff members are of the committee's existence and how well the votingprocess reflects the concerns of its constituents. Fitzgerald admitted that the University may need to look into restructuring the election process for students, faculty and staff. "Maybe it's time to kind of look at those established processes and review whether they need some updating or changing," he said. SPORADIC MEETINGS Compoundingthe problems with elections and representation are concerns about the body's everyday functioning. Infrequent meetings, an agenda thinned out by DPS's internal com- plaint processes and little aware- ness of the body have limited the DPS Oversight Committee's role as a check on the campus police. According to the committee's bylaws, the DPS Oversight Com- mittee must meet monthly unless otherwise determined by the com- mittee chair. Hipkiss said the com- mittee meets "as needed" - when a complaint is filed. He added that it's not unusual for the committee to meet only once a year. "If there are no complaints filed with us, there's not much more for us to discuss," he said. Chaness said that durirg his time on the committee, he attended one meeting per semester, which he thought was sufficient. "It's overkill if we're constantly asking (DPS) for clarificatim on things,"-he said. "As long as ve're satisfied with what they're coing then there really isn't any nee for us to step on their feet and get in the middle of their work." Other than presenting infosma- tion as requested, DPS spokeswom- an Diane Brown said DPS doesnot play a role in the decisions of the committee. "We're only requested to corte at their request - whenever that is - to discuss whatever it is that they are asking for, and that changes all the time," she said. "Not that they meet all that often, but we are at their bidding." Most of the time, Chaness said the committee heard complaints from people who said they were mistreated by a police officer at a traffic stop or didn't like the way they were treated while issued a minor in possession. But in the past, the committee has received more delicate griev- ances. After four years of inactiv- ity, the committee received its first grievances in 1996. One of those grievances received in 196, came after John Matlock, assitant vice provost and director of tle Office of Academic and Multicultral Initia- tives, was arrested. Matlock was chaged with assaulting a DPS officert the Cen- tral Campus Recreation Building, where he was officiatirg a basket- ball game sponsored b the Black Volunteer Network - aUniversity student group. Matlocli contended that the officers treatd him in a disrespectful manner because of his race. The charges egainst Mat- lock were eventually dopped. Following the Matlck incident, the committee looked nto why it had not received morezrievances. It found that DPS recived about 10 complaints each yer, none of which were filed as griences with the committee. In a 1996 Investigatnn of Poli- cies and Practices of Ie Depart- ment of Public Safety ad Security report, the DPS Oversigt Commit- tee recommended that he Univer- sity's Office of the Geneal Counsel hire an attorney to advie the com- mittee on legal issues ad that the committee receive all omplaints and grievances reported o DPS. Though an attorney as never been hired to provide dvice, the director of DPS gives n annual report of all complaints snt to the oversight committee. However, according ton Oct. 9 University response to aFreedom of Information Act requesthat was obtained by the Daily, IPS gave no annual complaint or Frievance reports for 2007 and 2008The last known report was for 200 Hipkiss confirmed DPShas not yet given a report for 2009. He added, though, thatPS fields about eight to 12 complains a year, and the committee deals vith an annual average of two gravances each year. He said the committeedoesn't hear more grievances becase peo- ple choose not to file them. "Why they do that is a mtter of speculation," he said. Chaness said the grivances brought to the committee se usu- ally from people who drectly contacted the committee trough e-mail or by phone, with te rest coming from DPS. "Typically, DPS took are of internal stuff, and we didn't lave to get involved because we wee sat- isfied with their investigatin and what they came to the concusion of," he said. However, Hipkiss - who has chaired the committee for the last 10 years - said late last month that the committee had been waiting to find out from MSA who the replace- ments would be weeks before the appointments occurred. Chaness said student vacancies on the committee don't cause a problem unless a major complaint is filed during the transition period. "I hope that somebody on MSA is getting word if there has been a complaint or anything, and I hope that they would ask for a student representative before they took further action," he said, "but unless something comes up, it's not an ing a coach who still laments about all the "drama" instead of simply refusing to address it, Michigan also has a publicity-happy quarter- back who is great at sending Wol- verine Nation into a frenzy. There's no reason for Forcier to text ESPN. com's Pat Forde on Friday night to say, "NO!", he's not transferring. It's also not appropriate for him to tell the world after Saturday's game about the details of a dis- agreement with his coaches. It's supposed to be about "the team, the team, the team," right? Well, the Wolverines' freshman quarterback definitely didn't sub- scribe to that this week, and that adds up to nothing but trouble for a Michigan team that desperately needs to focus. If Forcier really wants to lead his seniors to a bowl game, Rodriguez needs to manage the Tate Forcier sideshow much better than he has. "I've been herefor one ofthem. So that's the only one I can really com- ment on, They've got one in a row on MISSING FACULTY ELECTIONS Another key concern about the DPS Oversight Committee's prac- tices is the fact that the faculty seats have not been filled by election in nine years, which runs contrary to the bylaws' procedures. According to DPS Oversight Committee's bylaws, faculty mem- bers are supposed to vote for two representatives from a pool of four candidates. These candidates are chosen by a nominating committee of five faculty members appointed by the chair of the Senate Advisory us,from whatI've seen." - Rodriguez, talking about Michigan's five-game losing streak after last year's Ohio State game Rodriguez may continue to ignore history, but he'll continue to look ignorant. It doesn't matter if he wasn't here for the first four losses --he needs to stop discount- ing the fact that the Wolverines haven't won against the Buckeyes since 2003. Taking the approach that he has only "been there for one of them" is the wrong way to show his team how much this game really matters. After all, educating the team on the importance of series history has proven to be a difference- maker - at the expense of the Wol- verines. First-year Purdue coach Danny Hope was seven years old in 1966, the last time the Boiler- makers had won in the Big House. Even in a game that isn't a rivalry, he forced his players to look at the past. "We came here today to make history as a football team," Hope said after his team's comeback win. "What a great motivating factor for a football team, to know we were coming up here to Ann Arbor, to the Big House, to make history." Caring about games he didn't coach in worked pretty well for him, huh? This is Rodriguez's chance to prove he really gets the emotion of the rivalry, something he couldn't have possibly understood before last year's game. Saturday will be about re-invigorating a matchup that has fallen flat in recent years. It's about making sure the seniors aren't the third straight class to leave without a win against Ohio State. And, yes, it's about showing that Rodriguez's Wolverines can add a valuable chapter to the big- gest rivalry in sports. "I think everybody understands the importance of this game," quarterbacks coach Rod Smith said. "We're not idiots. We know exactly what's at stake and who we're playing. We understand." For the sake of the team, I hope that's truer than last year. - Ratkowiak can be reached at cratkowi@umich.edu. WANT TO WRITE FOR THE DAILY'S NEWS SECTION? Send an e-mail to smilovitz@michigandaily.corn to get started. n,