4A - Friday, September 11, 2009 The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com E-MAIL BELLA AT BELLZ@UMICH.EDU I I e firIC4,&pan:43a*lu BELLA SHAH Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890. 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedaily@umich.edu ROBERT SOAVE COURTNEY RATKOWIAK EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR MANAGING EDITOR GARY GRACA EDITOR IN CHIEF Unsigned editorials reflect the official position oftthe Daily's editorial board. All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views ofttheir authors. A promise is a promise Michigan legislature should protect state merit scholarship Most children learn in preschool that it's important to keep promises. But state legislators- who are poised to cut the Michigan Promise Scholarship - seem to have forgotten this lesson. Facing a $2.8 billion deficit in nextyear's bud- get, the state Senate has voted to eliminate funding for the schol- arship. What legislators don't understand is that many Michigan students are counting on the scholarship to help pay for tuition in the state. If members of Congress want to restore any measure of faith in their ability to keep their promises - and in their sup- posed commitment to higher education - they will restore fund- ow T~ir eseM'iS ta { i My fS eap la Qt e ve The fight ofjhis lfe S enator Ted Kennedy's pass- reform as a rallying point for Demo- favor of public health insurance, ing marks the end of an era in crats. But what they are conveniently needs to ask themselves two impor- Washington. The man called ignoringis howKennedy'sownactions tant questions. Would Kennedy, if the Liberal Lion completely undermine a premise that he were a private citizen of average was one of the few is vital to the left's argument for a pub- income under Obama's public plan, remaining links lic health care option. have been able to pursue these life- to a time when Kennedy was diagnosed with extending procedures, given his age the Kennedy fam- malignant glioma on May 20, 2008. and condition? Would Obama have ily was American Only 50 percent of patients survive been willing to look Kennedy in the royalty. Kenne- one year after diagnosis, and that eye and tell him he would be better dy's public image drops to 25 percent after two years, off taking the painkiller in order to was torn between according to the Washington Post save the system money? glossy-eyed nos- CHRIS (Kennedy's Cancer is Highly Lethal, talgi and the ROSLOWSKI 85/21/2008). Kennedy, a fighter all recollection of an his life, decided against throwing in unfortunate event the towel. Instead, he endured brain Kennedy didn't on Chappaquid- surgery, intensive radiation and che- dick Island, but nevertheless, Ken- motherapy treatments, procedures Want to just "take nedy never allowed his detractors to which cost thousands of dollars. p i~ 1 e. prevent him from fighting tooth and Luckily, Congress is famous for offer- the painkiller." nail for his political causes. ing top notch health care. Members In his historic career in Washing- have a choice of several private insur- ton, health care was Kennedy's sig- ers and plans based on their health nature issue. Writing for Newsweek needs. The Senator's dogged perse- As the days progress, liberal poli- just a month before his passing, Ken- verance to extend his life by utiliz- ticians will use the memory of Ted nedy called it "the cause of my life." ing all possible options is admirable, Kennedy to sell public health insur- Now that the senator has died and but it is also a prime example of what ance. What they will universally the public health insurance option is simply couldn't happen under Presi- omit, however, is how lucky the sena- still lingering on the Congressional dent Barack Obama's proposed insur- tor was not to have been covered by table, Democrats are using Kennedy ance plan. that plan. It should come as no sur- as a symbol of reform. Robert Byrd, Obama has said again and again prise, though, that this discrepancy the only living senator to serve lon- that a major factor behind the failure between rhetoric and action means ger than Kennedy, wants to rename of the current health care system is nothing to Washington Democrats. the health care bill in honor of the the execution of needless or futile They will continue to push a public fallen lion. Last month, Speaker of medical procedures. Among these insurance plan that they wouldn't the House Nancy Pelosi promised procedurs, Obama specifically men- be caught dead joining themselves. reporters, "Ted Kennedy's dream tioned surgeries for terminally ill When Byrd and Pelosi invoke Ted of quality health care for all Ameri- patients. During a primetime ABC Kennedy and his soaring rhetoric to cans will be made real this year." broadcast from the White House this sell their plan, they should instead Undoubtedly an effort to counteract summer, he said, "Maybe you're bet- look at audacious steps Kennedy took the influence of town-hall protestors ter off not having the surgery, but to extend his life. and appeal to the fiscally conserva- taking the painkiller." Obama's plan After all, Kennedy was a survivor. tive "Blue Dog" Democrats, leaders aims to cut health care costs by elim- And despite Obama's attempts to con- of Kennedy's party hope the sena- inating operations that have a very vince us all to "take the painkiller" tor's death will rally support for the low chance of actually improving a instead of fighting back, surviving is foundering bill. patient's life - just the kind of pro- still what health care is all about. It makes sense that Byrd and Pelosi cedures that Senator Kennedy chose would use the death of a famous sena- to undergo. - Chris Koslowski can be tor who continually pushed for health Obama, and everyone who is in reached at cskoslow@umich.edu. The Daily is looking for a diverse group of strong, informed writers to be columnists during the fall semester. Columnists write 750 words on a topic of their choice every other week. E-MAIL ROBERT SOAVE AT RSOAVE@UMICH.EDU FOR MORE INFORMATION. Racism remains in A2 ing to the Promise Scholarship. The Promise Scholarship is a state- sponsored merit scholarship that awards between $500 and $4,000 to students who score well on the Michigan Merit Exam. This semester, more than 5,000 University students and 96,000 students across the state were expected to receive aid from the grant. But in June, the state Senate voted to cut the scholarship's funding, which should save the state $140 million. Thousands of students have received notice from the University that this semester's allotment of aid won't be coming unless the legislature changes its mind before approving the next fiscal year's budget. While the irony of having cut a tuition aid program named the Promise Scholar- ship is somewhat funny, the result is any- thing but. For students who were counting on the money, a college education became much less affordable. And as tuition rates have continued to skyrocket over the years, dependence on financial aid is the situation facing many Michigan students. More than individual losses, cutting the scholarship indicates that the legislature doesn't understand the economic impor- tance of affordable higher education in Michigan's dismal economy. The future of the state's economy lies in new industries that rely heavily on innovation, science and technology, but only a well-educated workforce will be able to accommodate this demand. Michigan's workforce will never become educated if high school students can't afford college tuition. The University, at least, wants to help. It has notified recipients that it will try to foot the bill in the event that the cut is final, and it won't charge late fees on tuition bills until the fate of the scholarship has been decid- ed. This is admirable, but it camouflages the University's culpability in the problem. Tuition at the University has increased 52.6 percent since 2002. While some of this can be attributed to unsteady state funding, it is ultimately the University's responsibility to control its own costs. Admittedly, the state will need to make budget cuts, but funding for higher educa- tion should not be the recipient of those cuts. The state needs to protect scholar- ships, not slash them. Instead, the state should look at scaling back bloated pro- grams like the corrections budget; which accounts for more than 20 percent of the general fund each year. The state made a promise to scholarship recipients. It even went so far as to name the scholarship the "Promise." It can't break its word now, with so many students depend- ing on it. JASON MAHAK-AN E-MAIL JASON AT MAHAKIAJ@UMICH.EDU 'IP mI t- ew 5Est- 4Z, -a: -r T.... ' r1 SEND LETTERS TO: TOTHEDAILY@UMICH.EDU 4 U' smoking ban is a smart policy for students' health TO THE DAILY: The two examples provided by Harsha Pan- duranga in his column against the smoking ban don't serve as exact analogies to the circum- stances behind the move toward the smoking ban (Keep smoking on campus, 09/10/2009). The ban serves to prevent smoking in public places, where people who choose not to smoke maybe exposed to secondhand smoke. It doesn't ban smoking in all places, nor does it take away the right of smokers to chain smoke in the pri- vacy of their homes. In regards to Pandaranga's arguments, an obese person eating cake doesn't adversely affect his neighbor's health. And talking loudly on a cell phone doesn't pose a health hazard to the public. The University's general smoking ban is good for the public health. Smokers should be given designated smoking areas where they can smoke away from home. An example would be smoking rooms with independent air systems, like those found in Japan. Eugene Kheng Engineeringgraduate student Viewpoint ignores value of UMMA's modern design TO THE DAILY: collection, seeing as they couldn't even cor- rectly identify the museum by its name, The University of Michigan Museum of Art (Adding color to UMMA, 9/9/09). To his credit, Johnson does rightly point out the addition lay in contrast to its surrounding, but fails to recognize the intent of this move beyond another University attempt to, "classify whatever it likes as art." Rather than being a bi-product of aberrant modern design as suggested, the shell of the building appropriately compliments its con- tents. As the collection of the University grew more expansive, it began to outgrow its place, physically and ideologically. The architect's design reflects this change by bridging more modern work with the historical vocabulary of the old building, and the location of work with- in further observes this distinction. Though more modern, it's not radically disparate from other buildings in the area, like the Ross School of Business. Additionally, the recommendation that stu- dent art should be used as a plug to fill John- son's aesthetic void is insulting, not flattering. Artists are not the purveyors of crafty, visu- ally pleasing projects, devoid of context or sub- stance to be used in a rotational playlist on the side of a building. The writer should recognize the building itself is someone's work of art, and his sug- gestion is analogous to holding a competition to spray paint over one of the works inside he surely holds equal disdain for. Perhaps next time Johnson should view UMMA in its entirety, rather than passing judgment after simply walking through the corridor the of museum. Something is dying within the black community. I first noticed this after a summer trip to plan- tation Georgia, where many still proudly wave the Confederate flag on their cars or on flagstaffs in front of their houses. It's a place where some black farm- ers still look to the floor from under- MATTHEW neath straw hats HUNTER when in the pres- ence of whites. It's a place that is still heavily segregated and where blacks keep civil rights complaints to a mini- mum - which is, in a way, similar to my experience of blacks in Michigan, pervasive even here on campus. But in Georgia, even in their quiescent activism, blacks feel and acknowledge their common hardship. It may be in passing, but if you are black, you are part of an extended family. But here, unlike in Georgia, most blacks do not acknowledge each other despite the, fact that we, as African Americans, share a common struggle. The images of blacks in the 1960s include Martin Luther King, the Mil- lion Man March,RosaParks,boycotts, Malcolm X and the Black Panthers. We can remember and identify blacks in the civil rights era who struggled together against oppression. In the 1970s and '80s'- and here at the University - images include Jesse Jackson leading the Black Action Movement in a successful strike for civil rights demands, which included 10 percent African-American enroll- ment. But even though the University approved BAM's requests and aware- ness increased, the University's Afri- can-American student population, almost forty years later, hovers near six percent. Even after the statewide abolition of affirmative action in 2006 and the atrocious state of minor- ity enrollment, the University hasn't seen rebellion or much active dis- sent for civil rights justice since. The progressive, protesting black campus movements of the past are now noth- ing but periodically active student groups available for the six percent to join so they can find other blacks. I have yet to see recruitment efforts by any activist civil rights groups in my time at the University. There are a number of factors silencing the movement. One preva- lent explanation claims that there is less to fight for because racial inequalities in education are on a sharp decline or non-existent, espe- cially if one considers the election of Obama, the first black U.S. president. But despite the University's stated commitment to equality and diver- sity, racial disparities among the top schools in the nation are vast. Jacques Steinberg, in a 2009 New York Times article, mentions the University of Michigan among schools with the highest graduation rates at 88 per- cent. But the University's African American graduation rates between 1995 and 2004 have been closer to Eastern Michigan University's over- all average of 39 percent, among the worst in the nation. In that time, the African American graduation rates range from 36 to 52 percent, which have improved over time but still do not compare with whites. The stagnant nature of black civil rights activism could also be a result of poor understanding of civil rights injustices. Activism of the past was a response to overt racism and bigotry. But today, racial appeals are often disguised as class appeals and rac- ism itself is inconspicuous. In a way, it is easier to perceive and then fight against the injustice in egregious cases like racial lynchings than it is to fight for equal opportunity in educa- tion. It's simply harder to understand that blacks are disadvantaged from birth than it is to understand that brutal violence is an injustice. Changing racial policy requires bureaucratic negotiations, law- yers and supportive constituents. The complex nature of this process can make fighting for racial policy changes obscure and confusing. 4t it is possible for change to occur. When, for example, the majority of our nation supports a black president, and his racial agenda includes having a diverse administration and nomi- nating the first Latina Supreme Court justice, some change is inevitable. But it's important to address racial policy locally since there is a danger- ous trend to equate racial change and exceptional minority success cases with racial justice. Obama's presiden- cy will not single-handedly change social injustices like that of the edu- cational disparities between blacks and whites. The struggle for racial equality is far from over. What we need first is a greater acceptance that the civil rights era is not over. Student organizations - white and black - should publicly challenge racial injustices through protests, forums and student publica- tions. We must begin with the truth that blacks are an oppressed group of people and must constantly consider their race and its function in society. Students should hold the University responsible to their commitment to racial justice, which should in turn encourage all students to engage in racial awareness and activism. We can then better understand and estab- lish that sense of a common struggle and sense of brother and sisterhood that still remains between blacks in rural Georgia, where it is essential for survival. - Matthew Hunter can be reached at majam@umich.edu. I A recent viewpoint by Eliot Johnson about UMMA made me wonder if either Johnson or Matt Hallock the Daily's editors even bothered to visit the Art £t Design senior EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Nina Amilineni, Emad Ansari, Emily Barton, Harun Buljina, Ben Caleca, Brian Flaherty, Emma Jeszke, Raghu Kainkaryam, Sutha K Kanagasingam, Erika Mayer, Edward McPhee, Asa Smith, Brittany Smith, Radhika Upadhyaya, Rachel Van Gilder, Laura Veith