4B - Thursday, December 4, 2008 The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Misguided memories Recent Holocaust films pay tribute, but not necessarily in the right ways By SHERI JANKELOVITZ Daily Arts Writer In a recent article called "Never Forget. You're Reminded," New York Times writer A.O. Scott wrote of the sudden influx of Holo- caust films in Hollywood, He claimed these films were only made to be awards fodder, rather than pay tribute to the Holocaust itself. This is an issue I have long had a problem with myself. I am the grandchild of Holocaust survivors. I always believed that because of this, I've grown up with a far greater awareness of this historical atrocitythan most other children my age and a deeper sensitivity to the subject. Within the next month, three Holocaust- themed movies are being released: "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas," "Defiance" and "The Reader." This seems awfully coincidental, especially considering it's so close to award season. The Holocaust is one of those "serious" sub- jects that filmmakers attempt to grapple with in order to gain accolades from their peers. It may seem blunt to say so, but it's true. But, isn't gaining Academy Award recognition for the Holocaust on the same plane as someone portraying a mentally handicapped person for the same reason? It seems exploitative to gain prestige off of someone else's tragedy. This is not to suggest that films about the Holocaust are an abhorrence, or shouldn't be made. After all, as the generation of Holocaust survivors slowly begins to pass away, there is that lingering question of how the. stories of these survivors will be remembered after they're gone. Film is certainly an excellent medium to keep the stories alive, but there's a right and a wrong way to do it. First, the right way: "Schindler's List." This film manages to be gripping, tragic and infor- mative without veering off into actual false- ness. The film's greatest strength is its brutal honesty and unwillingness to portray the Holocaust as either an action-adventure tale or one full of schmaltz. Therefore, it's more than just a "Holocaust movie." It's a harrowing, emotional tale of the brutalities of humanity, made all the more horrifying because the story is true. Unfortunately, many other filmmakers haven't learned how to approach this subject in HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE From Page 1B "FROST/NIXON: THE ORIGINAL WATERGATE INTERVIEWS" Shaman Dram Bookshop, $14 Thinking about seeing Ron Howard's "Frost/Nixon" in the next month? Well, that's fine. But why take a risk on a phony Hollywood adaptation when you could watch the real thing? Anderson Cooper? Larry King? Forget about it. David Frost was an artist. A hard, pushy and brilliant telejournalist, Frost never settled for the easy questions. Perhaps the most notorious, but seemingly unknown dialogue of the last century, the interview deserves epic treatment. On Dec. 2, Liberation Entertainment will release the first part in a series of DVDs showing the real interview. A greatest hits set with over 28 hours of footage, this is easily more stimulating than that "Mamma Mia!" special edition you were eyeballing. "MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000: 20TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION" Borders, $46.79 "Mystery Science Theater 3000" - the funniest show in TV history after "The Simpsons" - would make a greatgift any time of the year, and this 20th anniversary box dropped right on time for the holiday season. It's a bit pricey, but it's worth it just to hear those riotous one-liners again as Mike Nelson, Joel Hodgson and their robot pals make wisecracks over four of the worst movies ever made. Especially hilarious in this set are "Werewolf" and the pathetic sci-fi thriller "Future War," where rubbery dinosaurs attack a cast of woefully inappropriate-looking "heroes" ("Is this a halfway house for fat people?" Mike asks at one point). Plus, it comes with a bust of Crow T. Robot. Now that's a gift. "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas" sacrifices realism for Oscar viability. the same honest way. "Life is Beautiful," the Holocaust-as-a- whimsical-comedy movie, falls into the second category. Here's the problem: While the great thing about Judaism is our culture's ability to find humor to mask pain, the Holocaust is sim- ply not funny. It never has been and never will be. Roberto Benigni made a misguided effort to inject romance and humor into the Holocaust. The problem is, once society begins to laugh at something, the seriousness is weakened. This cannot be allowed to happen. Filmmakers realized long ago that money and prizes could be gained fromthe re-telling of past tragedies. Yet it seems there are few filmmakers out there who have the talent to address the sub- ject of the Holocaust without, for lack of a better term, "Hollywood-izing" it. To imply that audi- ences today need action, as in "Defiance," or cute child stars and a complete lack of reality, as in "Boy in the Striped Pajamas," to view a Holo- caust film is insulting, to both the generations who actually survived the Holocaust and their children and grandchildren. The Holocaust as a subject is far more com- plicated than a Hollywood film can ever seek to capture. Yet the story must be told to ensure it will indeed never happen again. The prob- lem lies mainly with Hollywood and its need to glam up the story with unnecessary action, sappiness or comedy. To film the Holocaust, one must be prepared to be real. Filmmakers often seem afraid to approach the subject with- out masking it as something else altogether. The movies that can truly express even a slight hint of the horrors of this tragedy are those that address it for what it is. It seems absurd that most filmmakers don't seem to recognize this, as the stories of the survivors are certain- ly amazing enough. CHOU From Page 3B In one scene, college boy Marcus marvels at Olivia's "darting, swabbing, glid- ing, teeth-licking tongue, the tongue, which is like the body stripped of its skin." I'll admit, I have a soft spot for the "Red Hot Reads" section. I love the premises of the select- ed novels: The private investiga- tor who falls for the woman he's supposed to be following; the hot-shot lawyer who seduces her possibly murderous client; the amusement park engineer and vacationing mom who embark on a torrid love affair. Most of the female characters, it seems, are always named Sum- mer or Heather or something like a Stevie Nicks song, and the men, more often than not, Dylan - always described as "strapping." But just as so much of the pleasure of reading fiction can be derived from its escapist qualities, one would think sex - even the most embarrass- ing, uncoordinated episodes - would be more elegantly, eloquently described. Or at the very least, make-more sense. (From Irvine Welsh's "The Bedroom Secrets of the Master Chefs": "Work it in, Mary urged, as Skinner took his thick green slime and spread it like a chef might glaze some pastry, at the same time slowly breaching and exploring." Cute.) But for budding writers with aspirations of badness, it may be encouraging to know that it's not necessary to script an entire sex scene, or even an entire novel, to win a cash prize. The Bulwer-Lytton Fic- tion Contest was established in 1982, named for the author of the introduction "it was a dark and stormy night," and gives a $250 award for the best submission of a worst first line. This year's winner, from a gentleman named Garrison Awarding the worst of erotic literature. Spik of Washington D.C., how- ever, shows that the power of impassioned, hot, breathy love still has a firm hold on inspir- ing bad writing. "Theirs was a New York love, a checkered taxi ride burning rubber, and like the city their passion was open 24/7, steam rising from their bodies like slick streets exhaling warm, moist, white breath through manhole covers stamped 'Forged by DeLaney Bros., Pis- cataway, N.J.' " Chou wants to read your wildest fantasies. E-mail her at kimberch@umich.edu. RANKIN/BASS From Page 3B from the success of Rankin/Bass's holiday productions by creating remakes, sequels and spin-offs. In 2001, Goodtimes Entertain- ment released a straight-to-DVD sequel of the beloved "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer." Though the sequel, which now runs each win- ter on ABC Family, stays true to the characters, has musical num- bers and uses the same general plot line, the show has received criticism for the computer-gener- ated style of the new "Rudolph." Abandoning the distinct Rankin/ Bass animation ruined any chance the movie had of appealing to fans of the original. This failure should've discour- aged further attempts at reviv- ing Rankin/Bass stories - but it didn't. In 2006, NBC premiered a remake of "The Year Without a Santa Claus." The film discarded the classic style, swapping stop- motion animation for live-action and eliminating the songs that made the original so appealing. Needless to say, this effort to revi- talize the story was unsuccessful, as the complete divergence from the original confused those famil- iar with Rankin/Bass style. After NBC's poor attempt at a revival, it would seem that "The Year Without a Santa Claus" had been subjected to enough anguish. But yet another spin-off will air on Dec. 13 on ABC Family: "A Miser Brothers' Christmas." Unlike the others before it, this Rankin/Bass revival may have hope. Itwill fol- low the popular characters, Snow and Heat Miser, who - as in most other specials - must over- come their differences to -save Christmas. But what makes this one different is that the "Miser Brothers' Christmas" anima- tion remains loyal to the classic stop-motion and was produced by Warner Brothers, who owns a large section of the Rankin/ Bass library. These factors will hopefully bring "Miser Brothers' Christmas" closer to emulating the classic aesthetic and give it an edge over other remakes. Whensiftingthroughthe usual holiday crap on television, it's easy to see that the stories have little purpose beyond capitaliz- ing on the Christmas season. But the original Rankin/Bass holiday specials are innocent and sincere. Their timeless animation makes TV watching during the holiday season enjoyable, and it's a shame that their sad revivals remain a large contributor to frustrating December television. Dodging bad Christmas shows is the newest holiday tradition. Despite the fact that these revivals are devoid of the integ- rity that made the originals so lov- able, it's unlikely that studios will stop trying to renew Rankin/Bass specials. No matter how awful the final product is, it will still be., associated with a holiday favorite and thus will always find an audi- ence. At least that will create a new tradition: Dodging mediocre Christmas programming and find- ing relief in Rankin/Bass's holiday specials. WANT TO GET CLOSE TO THE ACTION? JOIN DAILY PHOTO. Work for Daily photo staff. E-mail photo@mich igandaily.com. 0 0 W'WW.7:QMBTFOUTBRfEAK.NFT In a society dictated by money, class, andpretension, two young people rise above it all to find true love PI 1'1tP_ 1'i romps ral % " ri . rejuclice By Jane Austen Adapted for the stage by James Maxwell Directed by Timothy Douglas Dept. of Theatre & Drama December 4 - 7 . Power Center Tickets $24 & $18 - Students $9 w/ID League Ticket Office 734-764-2538 MuicThmare &Dance www.music.umich.edu