8C - New Student Edition . s. The Michigan Daily - michigarndaily.com 0 is for macabre By Paul Tassi Daily Staff Reporter Z < D t L Y 4 4 4 CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: FILE PHOTO, COURTESY OF THE BENTLEY HISTORICAL LIBRARY, AP PHOTO, COURTESY OF THE MICHIGANENSIAN, FILE PHOTO Oct. 10, 2007- Sure, Yale has produced a record number of Supreme Court justices, Princeton and Harvard a multitude of senators and governors. But when I'm showing off, who do I point to among the Universi- ty's alumni? Besides Darth Vader and O-Ren Ishii, the answer is Dr. Death and the Unabomber. That's right, there have been a lot of crazy people who have stepped on the "M" over the past 100 years or so. This legacy of bloodshed is mostly glossed over, as you won't see anything renamed the Kevork- ian School of Medicine anytime soon, but the University has to acknowledge its offspring none- theless. TED KACZYNSKI CHARLES GUITEAU JACK KEVORKIAN NATHAN LEOPOLD & RICHARD EBIF Oh Teddy, couldn't you have just gone to MIT? Perhaps the most notorious character on the list, Ted Kaczyn- ski, more commonly known as the Unabomber, received a Ph.D. in mathematics from the University back in 1967. A decade later, he began to soil the names of eccentric loners in the woods everywhere by mailing bombs across the country for 15 years. He killed three people and injured 23, leaving the world to wonder why he couldn't have just channeled his tormented bril- liance into something more typi- cal, like wearing tinfoil clothes or having an unnatural affinity for cats. You might not have heard of the man who assassinated President James Garfield in 1881. Although Guiteau didn't actu- ally attend the University, he's worth including because he lived with his uncle, the mayor of Ann Arbor, for a while and applied to the University multiple times, only to be rejected. A blatant plagiarist, half-assed lawyer and all-around insane person, Guiteau shot Gar- field twice because he felt the commander in chief hadn't prop- erly recognized his contributions to his campaign. Garfield died 11 weeks later as a result of the infec- tions, that developed when the doctors treated his wounds with unwashed hands and unsterilized instruments. Dr. Death, or as he probably likes to think of himself, Dr. Angel of Sweet Mercy and Relief, gradu- ated from the University's Medical School in 1952. He began a practice so unusual it was granted its own term, medi- cide, in which he would physically assist chronically ill patients with their deaths. At one point in 1998, he even showed a lethal injection on "60 Minutes," daring his critics to arrest him. They were more than happy to oblige, and he was impris- oned for second-degree homicide up until June of this year. Now released, Kevorkian plans to move to Mexico, relax on the beach and maybe open up a little surf shop. The first truly sensationalized mass mediamurder, these two teens killed a 14-year-old boy in what became one of the most famous crimes of the 1920s. Having read far too much Dostoyevsky,-the two brilliant men (Leopold spoke five languages; Loeb was Michigan's youngest graduate ever) thought themselves Nietzschean supermen, above the moral codes of man and able to commit perfect crimes after which they would feel no remorse. Subsequently, the two broke down immediately when questioned and blamed each other for the killing, not reali4iog the irony of the situ- ation, because they apparently had only read the firstuthree-quarters of "Crime and Punishment." BILL AYERS The ultimate Diag protester, Ayers attended the University In the sixties. But he wasn't content with holding signs and handing out pamphlets - he blew things up. He bombed the Capitol build- ing, the Pentagon and the State Department. He also killed two of his friends and his girlfriend when a future liberty-dispensing device explod- ed in his hideout. Posthumously, he preaches his message of progressive education through non-detonatingbooks and a website, www.billayers.org. 4 4 Even a good university has its bad spots A LOOK AT THE DARKEST MOMENTS IN UNIVERSITY HISTORY By Brian Tengel I Daily Staff Reporter 1 Oct. 31, 2007- Many of us like to imagine the University as a beacon of progress. We see it as a place where ideas are expounded and values debated. We envision an institution devoted to the education and advancement of its students, a forum where diver- sity and academic freedom reign. We assume that whatever the University does - whether it's erecting new facilities or imposing new rules and codes - is intended to efficiently and productively serve its community. And when we fork over our tuition dollars, even if we aren't under the impression that the University is an infallible bastion of progress, we imagine that, at the very least, it's not an impediment to it. Most of the time, it doesn't disappoint - but only most of the time. Over the course of its 190-year history, there. have been quite a few instances where the University failed to live upto itscreed of liberty and equality. The following are just a few events that you probably won't hear Campus Day leaders describ- ing to prospective freshmen and their parents. BREACHES OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM In the 1930s and '40s, campus was teeming with political activ- ity. Major world events - the Great Depression,the NewDealandWorld War II,to name a few - were fueling a national debate in which students were actively engaged. Radical stu- dent groups abounded. Controver- sial speakers frequented campus. But while the students were making good use of their youthful exuber- ance and First Amendment rights, it didn't mean administrators were happy about it. President Alexander Ruthven was less than overjoyed. In June 1935, Ruthven requested that four students not return to the University for the following aca- demic year. He declared that their "pervasive activities" were unac- ceptable and obstructed the Univer- sity's work. In "The Making of The Univer- sity of Michigan 1817-1992," some of Ruthven's original statements about the dismissals are downright alarming. "Attendance at the University of Michigan is a privilege and not a right," Ruthven wrote in an annual report fromthe fallof1935."Inorder to safeguard its ideals of scholar- ship, character, and personality the University reserves the right, and the student concedes to the Univer- sity the right, to require withdrawal of any student at any time for any reason deemed sufficientto it." In June 1940, Ruthven continued his "purge"ofstudents. He informed nine more that they would not be readmitted in the fall on charges of disruptingthe "University's work.", Clearly, by today's standards, the idea that the University might strip you of your constitutional rights in return for the right to attend seems crass, but even at the time it was shocking to hear the president of a prestigious university refer to freedom of the press and freedom of speech as "sophistries" in a com- mencement address. High-handed dismissals were not confined to the Ruthven administra- tion, though. DuringPresident Har- lan Hatcher's tenure, the University Lecture Committee in 1952 tempo- rarily prohibited two men, who were allegedly affiliated with dis- sident organizations, from speaking on campus. According to an article in The Michigan Daily on May 20, 1952, the committee was concerned the two might promote overthrow- ing the government. Hatcher also ignited, protest in May 1954 when he suspended three faculty members who had been ordered to appear before the House Committee on Un-AmericanActivi- ties. The faculty members were called to testify by Michigan Con- gressman Kit Clardy, who wanted to investigate their alleged ties to communist organizations. Hatcher dismissed two of the members but only reprimanded the third. In September 1969, things got particularly ugly. University Presi- dent Robben Fleming, who had pre- viously dealt with student activism in a composed manner, lost it. Students were demanding the creation of a student-run bookstore on campus, and they wouldn't take no for an answer. The University Board of Regents agreed to finance the venture, but it refused to cede control of the store to the students. In response, Stu- dents for a Democratic Society, a radical activist group, barricaded themselves inside the LSA Building. Six hundred students protested inside, while 1,000 people showed their support by gathering outside. The students had locked the doors. Faced with a potentially hazardous situation, Fleming ordered about 250 city and state policemen to forcibly evacuate the building. The result? One hundred and seven stu- dents were arrested. Afterward, Fleming remarked that the mass arrests "let students know that there were some things we would not let them do." BAD BLUEPRINTS The year 1967 was not a particu- larly good one for University build- ing projects. In addition to using $2 million of students' tuition to financea dubiously popular plan for the Power Center which required three times as much money as was allotted for the construction, part of the Intramural Sports Building ceil- ing caved and then plummeted into the pool area. The collapse was caused by rain and snow, which had damaged the building's beam structure. This frail infrastructure wasn't anything new, though. The IM Building was supposed to have been renovated five years prior, but the University couldn'tget its acttogether.Accord- ing to a story in The Michigan Daily on Sept. 15, 1967, "a frustrating maze of bureaucratic red tape and an administration that appears to be deaf to the entire IM problem" were hindering any progress on the building. Luckily, there were no casualties in the accident.. Perhaps two of the most memo- rable building-related blunders have occurred in the past decade. They're fresh in our memories, and, there- fore, all the more stinging. In 1998, there was the "halo": the gaudy yellow and white steel band that lined the exterior bowl of Michigan Stadium. Decorated with University icons like the winged hel- met and lyrics from "The Victors," the "halo" was met with immediate disapproval from fans, who called it tacky and defiantof the traditional style of Michigan Stadium. Two years later, the halo was removed - at the cost of $100,000. As far as fan disapproval goes, though, the halo is no match for the University's plan to add luxury boxes to the stadium. The $226 million project, which includes the boxes, wider aisles and more con- cessions and restrooms, has drawn the ire of many fans who say it will separate the wealthy from the great. unwashed in the rest of the stadi- um. But there's more. The Univer- sity is entangled in a lawsuit with the Michigan- Paralyzed Veterans of America, which charges that the renovation plans aren't in compli- ance with the Americans With Dis- abilities Act of 1990. Last April the group filed the suit, but the Univer- sity nonetheless approved the final component of the renovation plans in June. In recent weeks, Athletic Department officials have said the University will continue with the project - despite a trial date ten- tatively set for September 2008. It appears that the pleas of fans and disabled veterans have so far fallen on deaf ears. A PIONEER FOR EQUAL RIGHTS... MOST OF THE TIME Although the University admit- ted the first black student before slavery was abolished and was one of the first major universities to allow women to attend, its record of promoting equality is mixed. In 1969, a complaint was filed with the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare accusing the University of discriminating against women. To help the department with its investigation, some women formed a group on campus to col- lect more data on the University's employment of women. The results were discouraging. According to the group's report, the average woman's salary was much lower than that of men in every department; women were disproportionately concentrated in secretarial jobs; and they were often dissuaded from pursuing graduate degrees in particular dis- ciplines. After these findings were pub- lished, the government demanded that the University create an affir- mative action program to ensure that it was complying with federal guidelines on hiring minorities and women. One year later, there was another stiroversexistinstitutionaltenden- create segregated off-campus stu- cies. Prior to every home football dent housing for black women. The game, the Athletic Department venture was thwarted by protest- would host a dinner party for vis- ers, and the University's outlook on iting press members and coaches. race continued to progress, though Guests from the University includ- there were more hang-ups along ed regents, vice presidents and the the way. Daily's senior sports editors. In the 1940s and '50s, the Daily That is, unless they were conducted investigations that women. exposed a strainof racism plagu- The departmentmaintained that ing the University. One story noted because the "smokers" - as these that many talented and quali- gatherings were known - were pri- fied black people were not able .to vate parties, refusing to let women secure teaching positions .due to attend didn't constitute discrimi- race. When asked why no black nation. person had been offered a teach- The Daily reported that William ing job, faculty members suggested Mazer, president of the "M" Gradu- two reasons: concern about stu- ate Club, said his club had unani- dents', responses and the widely mously decided to bar women from held belief that higher-ups at the attending. University would never sanction a "We don't invite women fortlieir black person. own protection," he said. "When At the beginning of fraternity a group of men get together and rush week in 1954f evidence of rac- drink, the language gets a bitrough. ism on campus abounded. Thirteen Women should feel honored not to fraternities had constitutions con- be invited." taining clauses that prevented peo- Gaining equal treatment in the ple of specified races or religions Athletic Department wasn't the from rushing. The Daily printed the only challenge for female Univer- names of these fraternities. Alpha sity students at the time, though. Tau Omega, for example, banned The Michigan Union was original- blacks. Phi Delta Theta accepted ly an all-male building, and though only white Christians. Lambda Chi the construction of the Michigan Alpha prohibited Jews and non- League in 1929 as a meeting place Caucasians. for women was a marginal step Things improved only margin- forward, women weren't allowed ally over the next few decades. throughthe frontdoorofthe Union Throughout the 1970s, the Uni- until 1956 - an inexcusably late versity was engaged in disckssion date by any measure. with members of the Black Action Also in the '50s, women had to Movement, who were fighting to contend with curfews, dress codes get black enrollment up to 10 per- and broad University oversight cent from 3 percent by 1973. That into their personal lives. Then- didn'thappen, and BAM-organized Dean of Women Deborah Bacon strikes ensued. was ousted in 1961, largely because In the late '80s, the words of an she had a habit of doling out harsh LSA sophomore indicated that, in punishment if she detected inter- many ways, the situation for blacks racial dating. To the University's on campus was still far from ideal. credit, when she left, she was never On his radio show, the student replaced. employed a number of sexist and The University has a spotted' racist jokes, ostensibly to win over record of promoting racial equal- his fans. Needless to say, it didn't ity, too. Although a commitment to go over too well. The student was diversity on campus is now argu- promptly fired. ably one of the school's biggest The University still faces an achievements, it wasn't always that uphillbattle with the issue of diver- way. sity - especially given the passage In the late 1920s under then- of Proposal 2 last November, which University President C.O. Little - a effectively banned affirmative life-long eugenicist - several cam- action. The University's response to . pus institutions, like swimming this and other challenges truly will pools, were segregated. In 1928, determine how close it will come to the University actually sought to living up to its mighty ideals. 4 4 'I