The Michigan Daily - michigandaily.com Monday, September 15, 2008 -5A This show will soon be outsourced to cut costs. A tough 'Job'market "This is the shit, like, the total government shit." Fire, but no spark Star-studded cast r fails to energize the Coen brothers' latest political jaunt By ANNIE LEVENE DailyArts Writer with an election year such as this, there's bound to be an increased interest in all things political. As People Magazine and US Weekly ditch Brange- **' lina for McCain and Obama, and Bum After with Bristol Reading Palin becoming this year's Jamie At the Michigan Lynn Spears, Theater, Quality Washington has 16 and Showcase become the new Focus Features Tinseltown. And not sur- prisingly, Hollywood has found a way to capitalize on politics with upcoming films such as "Frost/ Nixon" and "W." While "Burn After Reading" isn't a full blown political film, both its setting and plot (which revolves around a bunch of interconnected individuals who think they're in the know of how the political power game is played) suggest that the film is intended as a critique of today's state of affairs. With the current administration's bumbling response to national disasters still fresh in ourminds, it's easytobe skeptical of how things get done in D.C. The film illustrates just how easily idiocy can run wild, thanks in no small part to the power of suggestion. The film's large cast lends a feeling of mass anarchy. Each character is equally moti- vated by ambitions of varying sorts. Whether it's raising money for plastic surgery, divorcing a spouse or just finding someone to have sex with, the motivations all seem trivial. Most unfortunately, despite their plans of grandness, none of the characters really have the brains to pull off their selfish schemes. The film, which was heav- ily hyped leading up to its release, follows Joel and Ethan Coen's equally hyped "No Country for Old Men." However, while "No Country" gained attention despite relatively low star power Tommy Lee Jones isn't exactly a guaranteed box-office draw - "Burn After Reading" relies heav- ily on the bold-faced names. Brad Pitt ("Ocean's Thirteen"), George Clooney ("Michael Clayton"), John Malkovich ("Beowulf"), Frances McDormand ("North Country"), Tilda Swenton ("Michael Clay- ton") - they're all great actors, but they're also A-list celebs. It's hard to pass up a movie that has such outstanding talent to burn. Ultimately, the choice of actors was a wise one. Clooney does his usual "schmooze 'em or loose 'em" to varying degrees of suc- cess. He's basically playing him- self, right down to the slightly self-deprecating charm, but it's generally appealing as always. The one true standout is Pitt, who goes against typecasting with his performance as a bike- riding fitness instructor with terribly highlighted hair. Having six children running around his French villa has taken its toll, as Pitt looks a little weary. Still, with every victory dance he performs - and there are several - he man- ages to steal every scene in a way that's similar to his last great role in 2000's "Snatch." He's a lovable lunkhead. Surprisingly, the film's faults point to the Coen brothers. Obvi- ously talented writers and direc- tors, they let the movie run away with itself. The film's final third is quickly paced, entertaining and at some points, awesomely surpris- ing, but the rest is a whole lot of time-consuming nothing. In the end, the film seems to be reaching to make some sort of political comment, but the ideas aren't fully developed. By follow- ing "No Country" - a film that succeeded based on its own merit - with a film seeking recogni- tion through star power, the Coen brothers ended up with a film that isn'tnecessarilybad,butcouldhave been better. "Burn After Reading" can be viewed as a victim of sib- ling rivalry with its older brother, "No Country:" You can tell the two are related, but the youngest just can't live up to the greatness of its senior. By JOHN DAAVETTILA Daily Arts Writer What's more difficult: work- ing on a crab boat or watching people work on a crab boat? NBC's "America's Toughest Jobs" centers on 13 contestants competing for a growing pot of money while working some of the most grueling jobs America's in the United TnUghest States. Hosted by Josh Temple Jobs ("Curb YourM Enthusiasm") Mondays - the new Joe a Rogan - the NBC show seems to be operating under the guise of informing the public about these dangerous jobs. In reality, it's nothing more than obvious, spoon-fed drama. For their first task, the 13 men and women traveled to Dutch Harbor, Alaska, to go crab fish- ing. (It turns out that their main activities were vomiting and proclaiming the difficulty of their job as they tried to maneu- ver cumbersome crab.catchers) But as dangerous as crab fishing may be, it doesn't make for good television. If you wouldn't want to work the job, why would you want to watch it? The contestants on "Toughest Jobs" are a pretty eclectic bunch, ranging from the hippie carpen- ter with dreadlocks to a wimpy Wall Street executive who can't lift 40 pounds of bait, yet signed up for the show anyway. Why would anyone who isn't in peak physical condition agree to do this show when it's obvious the younger, stronger contestants will be victorious? Maybe the older contestants feel the need to test their boundaries, but haven't they heard of skydiving lessons? Then again, there's no money- making opportunity in skydiv- ing. Despite the fact that both men and women compete on the show, "Toughest Jobs" makes no effort to make the genders equal. In fact, the idea of women being weaker than men is rather unabashed. For example, in the second episode, Temple asks with a sneer how the two female competitors driving freight trucks (or "Team Lady Truck") performed. The pace of the show is entire- ly too fast. In the first three min- utes of the pilot, Temple explains the premise and dumps the audi- ence in the middle of the Ber- ing Sea with the 13 contestants, leaving little time to hear the contestants' backgrounds or get a feel for the show. The result is a rushed, contrived episode which leaves the audience stranded. The prizesystemof"Toughest Jobs" isn't 'anything we've seen before: Instead of a set amount of money awaiting the winner at the end of the series, the money the contestants "earn" on the job goes into an account which grows with every episode. This - - * a 1 f. begs the question: How cheap is NBC that they're making the job sites provide prize money? Many will call this a rip-off of "Dirty Jobs," but the two shows shouldn't be compared. There's a light-hearted approach to "Dirty Jobs" which "Toughest. Jobs" clearly lacks. "Toughest Jobs" is an hour of non-stop stress and Nope - crab fishing is never interesting. anxiety, which makes it exhaust- ing to watch with little reward for the viewer. The spectacle of public physical struggle is only fresh for so long. The vibe of "Toughest Jobs" is one in which drama and excite- ment are anything but subtle, and yet still not enough to hold an audience's attention. The escapism and easy entertain- ment craved on a Monday night isn't found here, making "Tough- est Jobs" the last thing anyone wants to watch after a long day. Pursue Your Research interests At Mainstream Engineering, 66% of our engineers direct a project within their first two years with the company. Over % of these engineers are under 30 years old. We listen to new ideas, an r ith advanced innovations. Princeton Review Register for any Princeton Review course starting in 2008 by October 17"' and receive: $200 OFF the course cost FREE admissions counsing. 800-2Review (PrincetonReview.com S U DO Experience All Aspe of Applied R & D " Work in a hands-on environmen' " Build and test prototypes " See your concepts become prod. Solutions ThPough Advanced i MAINS TRE Engineering Corporation Work in a Great Environment > Located five miles from FL beaches Paid training & continuing education Stable company in business for over 20 years " Revenue has grown 107% in the last five years Thermal Control D.Energy Conversion corn NO-Turbomachinery e Chemical Technology Materials Science a