The Michigan Daily - michigandailycom Friday, September 7, 2007 - 9 Oregon poses test for Blue Senior defensive tackle Will Johnson will help anchor the defensive line against Oregon tomorrow, The Ducks run a similar spread offense to Appalachian State.v I'M' looks to bounce back By KEVIN WRIGHT Daily Sports Editor Tomorrow can't come soon enough for Michigan defensive tackle Will Johnson. The senior didn't have a chance to watch the national reaction to Appalachian State's upset vic- tory last weekend - but it wasn't because he refused to turn on the TV. Cable wasn't installed in his apartment until Tuesday. If Johnson had watched TV, he would've seen replays and analysis of last Saturday's 34-32 loss, Michi- gan's fall from the Associated Press Top 25 poll and calls for Michigan coach Lloyd Carr's head. He fielded questions on some of those topics Monday, but the quiet guy from Oakland would rather talk about the next opponent: Ore- gon. "Sure, we had a loss," Johnson said. "But we have to go forward, we have to get ready for Oregon, and that's what we're concentrat- ing on." Michigan may be the team with a clear motive heading into Saturday's game, but the Ducks come into Ann Arbor looking to prove a point of their own. Last season, Oregon lost its final four games, including a 38-3 Las Vegas Bowl thrashing at the hands of Brigham Young. In this year's season opener, the Ducks took care of Houston, 48-27. Oregon and the Wolverines last met in 2003 in Eugene, Ore., with the Ducks pulling out a 31-27 win. The good news for the Wolver- ines is Oregon runs the spread offense, just like Appalachian State. The bad news is Michigan strug- gled to stop the Mountaineers and their five-wide offensive sets. "Because of the formations you get (with the spread offense), you're spread out," Michigan coach Lloyd Carr said. "And if you don't spread out, if you don't line up over those receivers, then you create serious mismatches on the perimeter." Similar to Appalachian State, Oregon's offense startswith the legs of quarterback - Dennis Dixon. The senior has 625 career yards on the ground and complements his speed by completing around 60 percent of his passes. Against Houston, Dixon ran for 141 yards - highlighted by an 80- yard touchdown scramble - and threw for 134 yards and two touch- downs. "He's a great athlete and he's a guy that it starts, I think, with his mobility," Carr said. "He has, I think, excellent vision. He has a knack for finding the open receiver. But when you look at what he did on Saturday against Houston in terms of the yards that he produced either throwing or running, he can do them both." Even though Michigan's defense struggled in the first half against AppalachianState,theunitappeared to settle down in the second frame, limiting the Mountaineers to two field goals. And linebacker Chris Graham knows the defense needs a good showing for the Wolverines to reach a few of their remaining season goals. "You just pick yourself up, because it is the first game," Gra- ham said. "We have plenty of games to go, so how are you going to adjust from there? You get your team together and get guys moti- vated, get guys to be more leaders out there, get guys to really buy in and work together." By DANIEL BROMWICH and JACK HERMAN Daily Sports Editors For everyone still complaining about the scheduling of Appala- chian State, or teams like Eastern Michigan and Toledo (next year), this game is what you want. A Pac- 10 tea, comes to the Big House to give Michigan a stern test just one week after the Wolverines suf- fered a mortifying defeat to the Mountaineers. Will Michigan bounce back? Or will the Ducks be too much? We'll break it down the matchups for you here: Michigan running offense vs. Oregon running defense: It's a shame we even have to waste the space and ink to break this one down. Last week, Michi- gan running back Mike Hart car- ried the ball 23 times for 188 yards - all while battling an injury to his thigh. Oregon, on the other hand, allowed 315 yards on the ground ... at home ... to Houston. The Ducks struggled to stop Houston's Anthony Alridge in the backfield, and he compiled 205 yards. As the Oregonian pointed out, it's probably not a good sign when your free safety - in this case, Matt Harper - records 15 tackles. This might as well be Michigan run offense vs. thin air. Edge: Michigan Michigan passing offense vs. Oregon passing defense: Chad Henne. Mario Manning- ham. Adrian Arrington. On paper, few teams have the ability to stop the Wolverines potent passing attack. But on Sat- urday, we discovered one of them: Michigan. On a number of plays, Manning- ham beat his receiver by multiple steps on a deep route. Fourth-year starter Henne over- or underthrew the ball on each of them. Worse, Henne made a number of (high school) freshman mis- takes. Throwing across his body, he tossed a crucial interception as Michigan drove in the fourth quar- ter. He also took a delay of game, instead of calling a timeout, with about two minutes remaining in the game. And Oregon's pass defense proved passable last weekend, fort- ing two interceptions. Still, if Henne regains his con- trol, it shouldn't be an issue. Edge: Michigan Oregon run offense vs. Michi- ganrundefense: Oregon runs a very similar offensive scheme to Appalachian State, which should worry Wolver- ine fans. Quarterback Dennis Dixon rushed for 141 yards - including an 80-yard touchdown - against Houston last week. He's the leader oftherushingattack,butthe Ducks ran for 339 yards against the Cou- gars, so Dixon isn't the only threat. Running backs Jeremiah Johnson and Jonathan Stewart combined for 137 yards and two touchdowns as well. But the news isn't all bad - Michigan made some key adjust- ments against Appalachian State in the second half and appeared to improve significantly. The problem is, Oregon has much better athletes than the Mountaineers, and that starts with Dixon. Expect tons of quarterback draws and tons of seven, eight- and nine-yard gains. Edge: Oregon Oregon passing offense vs. Michigan pass defense: The similarities continue here. Oregon doesn't appear to throw any more than Mountaineers did - Dixon attempted just 15 passes against Houston. But he complet- ed nine of those and two were for touchdowns. Michigan struggled some in cov- erage lastweek,givingtoo muchof a cushion to the Mountaineer receiv- ers and allowing them to turn short passes into long gains via missed tackles and bad angles. But with the key substitutions of cornerback Donovan Warren for Johnny Sears and safety Brandent Englemon for Stevie Brown, the coverage and tackling should improve, as it did in the second half on Saturday. Edge: Push Special Teams: Both teams had questions about their special teams heading into the season. Probably just one is happy with the answers. Michigan fans need no remind- ers of the Wolverines' problems this weekend. Dropped returns, missed blocking assignments and even forgetting to go onto the field were all problems that plagued Michigan. The ultimate proof: the game's final play. But Oregon impressed with its special teams. It blocked a punt and made both of its field goals - can't ask for much more. Edge: Oregon Intangibles: Pretty easy to figure this one out. Michigan is coming off the big- gest upset in college football his- tory and wants to prove itself. Oregon is probably wary of that, butprobablyalsoconfidanttheWol- verines aren't as good as they were expected to be before the season. The crowd might not be enthused after last week, and the Big House's slight home-field advantage should be pretty negligible. But, the team will want to come back strong after last week and prove it's still a con- tender. After all, there's no motiva- tion like humiliation. Edge: Michigan Prediction: Michigan 31, Oregon 27 Procrastination station After historic upset, AP adjusts Top 25 rules Oregon 28 Michigan 23 Before every football game tunately for coach Scott Bell, this season, two of the Daily's TE #83 dropped the sure touch- football writers will take the down pass and Oregon held on weekend's matchup to the Play- for a 28-23 win. Station 2 and then let you know " Player of the game - QB what happened. #10 did it with his arm and not his legs. Coach Bell held QB " Play of the game - It looked #10 to negative rushing yards like Michigan would come back but couldn't stop him for torch- despite losing QB #7 and WR ing the Wolverines through the #86 when QB #15 lofted the air with 284 yards and two ball to an open TE #83. Unfor- touchdowns. (AP) - After pulling off one of the greatest upsets in college foot- ball history, Appalachian State is still shaking things up. The Associated Press said yes- terday that lower-division schools - that means you, Mountaineers - are now eligible for its 71-year- old poll. "It's great they opened the door," Appalachian State coach Jerry Moore said from his office in Boone, N.C. "Certainly we're not going to be the No. 1 team in the country. We know that. We're not even going to be in the top 10. But if you have a win over a nice football team, I like that it's not out of the realm of possibility for a school like us tobe one of the top 20 or 25 teams in the country." Several AP voters expressed interest in putting Appalachian State on their ballots after a shocking 34-32 upset at then-No. 5 Michigan last weekend. But the poll guidelines, which mirrored the coaches' rankings conducted by USA Today, limited eligibility to teams competing in the former NCAA Division I-A, now known as the Football Bowl Subdivision. The Mountaineers compete in the Football Championship Sub- division, known before this season as Division I-AA. STAFF PICKS The Daily football writers battle each other and against the year's first guest picker - LSA senior Todd Karazim - with their picks against the spread. Scott DanlI Bell Bromwich Herman Karazim Michigan (-8) vs. Oregon No. 2 LSU (-12.5) vs. No. 9 Virginia Tech No. 3 West Virginia (-24) vs. MARSHALLI No. 4 FLORIDA (-26.5) vs. Troy No. 5 OKLAHOMA (-0.5) vs. Miami No. 6 Wisconsin (-25.5) vs. UNLV No. 7 TEXAS (-9) vs. No.19 Texas Christian No. 8 LOUISVILLE (-41) vs. Mid. Tenn. St. No._10 California (-t4) vs. COLORADO ST. No. 11 GEORGIA (-4.5) vs. South Carolina No.12 OHIO STATE (-29) vs. Akron No.13 UCLA (-7.5) vs. Brigham Young No.14 PENN STATE (-t7.5) vs. Notre Dame No. 1S RUTGtRS (-7) on. Navp No. t6 Nebraska (-8) vs.WAKE FOREST No. 17 AUBURN (-7) vs. South Florida No. 20 Hawaii (-27.5) vs. LOUISIANA TECH} No. 21 GEORGIA TECH vs. Samford No. 22 Boise St. (-3) vs. WASHINGTON No. 23 TEXAS A&M (-7.5) vs. Fresno St.__ No. 24 TENNESSEE (-10.5) vs. Southern Miss No. 25 CLEMSON (-27) vs. Louisiana-Monroe NORTHWESTERN (-10) vs. Nevada MINNESOTA (-8.5) vs. Miami (OH) MICHIGAN STATE 18) on. Bowling Green IOWA (-22) vs. Syracuse Indiana (0) vs. WESTERN MICHIGAN ILLINOIS (-22) vs. Western Illinois PURDUE (-29.5) vs. Eastern Illinois Best Bet Oregon Virginia Tech West Virginia Florida Oklahoma UNLV- Texas Middle Tennessee State California Georgia Ohio State UCLA Penn State Rutgers Nehraska South Florida Hawaii Georgia Tech Boise State Texas A&M Tennessee Clemson Northwestern Miami Michigan State Iowa Indiana Illinois Purdue California Michigan Virginia Tech West Virginia Florida Oklahoma UNLV Texas Louisville California Georgia Ohio State UCLA Penn State Rutgers Wake Forest Auburn Hawaii Georgia Tech Boise State Fresno State Tennessee Clemson Nevada Miami Michigan State Iowa Indiana Illinois Purdue Florida Michigan Louisiana State West Virginia Florida Oklahoma UNLV_ Texas Christian Louisville California Georgia Akron Brigham Young Notre Dame Rutgers Nehraska Auburn Louisiana Tech Georgia Tech Boise State Fresno State Tennessee Clemson Nevada Miami Bowling Green Oregon Virginia Tech West Virginia Florida Miami UNLV Texas Christian Middle Tennessee St California Georgia Ohio State UCLA Penn State Navy Michigan Louisiana State West Virginia Florida Oklahoma UNLV Texas ate Louisville California South Carolina Ohio State UCLA Penn State Rutgers Nebraska Auburn Hawaii Georgia Tech Boise State Fresno State Tennessee Clemson Nevada Miami Bowling Green Iowa Western Michigan Illinois Purdue California Nebraska South Florida Hawaii Georgia Tech Washington Texas A&M Tennessee Louisiana-Monroe Nevada Minnesota Bowling Green Iowa Western Michigan Iowa Indiana Illinois Purdue Indiana Illinois Purdue UCLA