OP/ED The Michigan Daily - Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 5A LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Send all letters to the editor to tothedaily@nmichigandaily.com. VIEWPOINT Coke restored behind students' backs Name change does not make up for racist past TO THE DAILY: I find it absurd that the University would consider recognizing Michigamua as an offi- cial student group (Michigamua commits to reforms, 04/12/2006). Any group that has a history of mocking my people and culture, such as this group, does not have a place in the University. Racism is racism, no matter what the name. I also find it absurd that the members of Michigamua would willingly make their names public. I guess it is good for all of us to know the names of racists on campus. Wyaudtnoong Adams LSA junior Eicke's column 'shows the true definition of frankness' To THE DAILY: David R. Eicke's The old man and the V (04/12/2006) was the best thing I've read in The Michigan Daily for a while. One reason why struck me hardest. It may be the obvi- ous aspect of the article (being that I am a female), but I have yet to recover from its effect, nonetheless. The record Eicke has created of the separation between Ameri- can society's image of "man" and his own self shows the true definition of frankness. This quality is rare. I can attest, as a single gal, that this is especially rare among the college dudes I roam campus with. To dis- tinguish oneself from what many men have spent and will spend their entire lives seek- ing to be a part of shows maturity, hones- ty, strength and balls. Eicke's friend has it wrong - he is the one lacking a pair. Eicke just spread the black and white version of his all over the Daily. Katie Miller LSA first-year 'U' decision on Coca-Cola goes against free market To THE DAILY: The decision to reinstate the Coca-Cola contract with the University is anti-free market on a number of fronts, but I will only address the philosophical, not the procedural. Coke is a corporation with the bottom line as its only guiding principle. The University is a more pluralistic institution that has a wider range of interests, and it has a code of conduct it expects business partners to follow. The University takes into account fiscal, human, social and natural capital when it looks for business partners. When the University is talking about a free market, it means a mar- ketplace of ideas, too. If Coke doubled its prices tomorrow, we would drop its contract in a second and move over to another vendor, and no one would complain. That's the nature of free markets. In that vein, the University administration needs to listen to students and tell Coke it is too far in the red when it comes to social and natural capital to do business with. Coke doesn't think about those forms of capital, but the University does, and there is nothing wrong with the University act- ing in its own self-interest. We don't need to wait for Coke to prove itself a worthy partner even it as it continues to perpetrate environmental and social crimes in coun- tries not even currently part of agreed-to investigations. Instead, the University should move to a vendor that has a more holistic portfolio of assets to share with our globally recog- nized University, and let Coke sort out its charts. When Coke is ready and is in the black socially and environmentally, maybe the University can work with it again - and at lower costs. There is no innocent-until-proven-guilty in the marketplace, and Coke should be treated like any bad business partner - dropped until it looks more lucrative for our University fiscally, socially and envi- ronmentally. Zack Denfeld School of Art & Design The letter writer is a former Daily columnist. Coke Coalition 'needs to just grow up or get out' To THE DAILY: The Coalition to Cut Contracts with Coca- Cola needs to just grow up or get out (Coke to return to campus, 04/12/2006). Its demand for the investigation of alle- gations against vendors has been met with more than the bare minimum, from what has been reported on the Vendor Code of Conduct. Two respected third-party organi- zations have been brought in to figure out if the allegations are true, but apparently this is not enough. The Coke Coalition's members are obviously so self-absorbed and egotistical that they believe their organization should have put some type of seal of approval on the deal. This hypocritical group was absolutely pleased when the University cut Coke during semester break, thus leaving out students, but when the administration left Coke activists out of "their" business, they get all upset. The Coalition has done what it set out to do, and now it is time to grow up and let the proper people deal with it - or get out. Matthew Lewis LSA sophomore Freedom and equality for American citizens, not illegal immigrants TO THE DAILY: I am writing in response to the front- page article, On Diag and across nation, immigration laws protested (04/11/2006) and in particular the source cited, Julia Malette. Malette claims that "no human is illegal." This will lead to open borders between the United States and Mexico and will become an open invitation for the disruption of our security and for more acts of terrorism on American soil. It is a shame to see that she is willing to let ille- gal immigrants be equated to American citizens ("they deserve to have rights as much as the next person") while millions of American citizens have fought and died - and thousands more are currently fight- ing and dying - to keep her freedom. A strong border policy not only ensures greater American security; it also grants greater and fairer economic, social and political opportunity to legal immigrants. Malette called such legislation inhumane and basically equated anyone who sup- ports strict border regulation to a racist. My patriotism and trust in America has led me to support a strict border policy, not some convoluted "inhumane" ideol- ogy against illegal immigrants. To fix the problem at its root, people must not become so enamored with wide- spread calls for freedom and equality of illegal immigrants. Rather they must remember that our Constitution provides legal American citizens with "liberty and justice for all." Bryan Harrison LSA junior Letters Policy All readers are encouraged to submit let- ters to the Daily. Letters should include the writer's name, college and class standing or other University affiliation. Letters should be no longer than 300 words. The Michigan Daily reserves the right to edit for length, clarity and accu- racy. Letters will be run according to timeli- ness, order received and the amount of space available. Letters should be sent to tothedaily@michigandaily.com. Edi- tors can be reached at editpage.editors @umich.edu. BY ADRI MILLER, LINDSEY ROGERS AND JASON BATES The University's decision to immediately rein- state the Coca-Cola contracts is nothing short of an affront to democracy,justice and accountability. Not only was the decision made without the consent of students as required by the Dispute Review Board recommendation, but by making this decision with a complete lack of transparency, the administra- tion violated its own established due process. The homepage of our University states, "Give It, Get It, Expect Respect." Yet the University administration went out of its way to disrespect students, workers and community members when it engaged in a secretive closed-door process to bring Coca-Cola back to campus. It deliberately refused to consult with students and blatantly dis- regarded the DRB process to which it agreed to abide. In fact, the DRB recommendation explicit- ly stipulates that any investigation must be accept- able to all parties - specifically students. University President Mary Sue Coleman has said: "It is everyone's responsibility to create a welcoming community." With this move, the administration has shattered any notion of a wel- coming or inclusive community that values stu- dent opinion. It is now clearer than ever that the University administration is accountable to cor- porate money - not to its obligations to respect human rights, worker rights or the student body. On Monday, April 10, the Coca-Cola Com- pany announced in a letter to the University that the International Labor Organization, a United Nations agency, agreed to conduct an investigation and evaluation of Coca-Cola bottling operations in Colombia. The letter also stated that the Coca-Cola Company was in "active dialogue" with TERI, an Indian corporate responsibility organization. In return, the administration reinstated the contracts in less than 24 hours. This action is unacceptable. Coca-Cola has had to do nothing to get this contract back, aside from calling its friends at the International Labor Organization to create the fagade of an independent investigation. Ed Potter, Coke's director of global labor relations and author of the full-page ads placed (at great expense) in The Michigan Daily, is a longtime employer-rep- resentative to the ILO. He has worked for the ILO for decades. This personal and financial relation- ship alone completely erases any possibility for a truly independent investigation on the part of the ILO. Even if the investigation uncovers Coke's true crimes, bringing back Coke's contract before an investigation is even formulated provides Coke with absolutely no incentive to take any corrective action. The administration has been made aware of the conflict of interest between Ed Potter and the ILO. The members of the Coalition to Cut Contracts with Coca-Cola have engaged constructively with the administration on this issue for over a year. In our most recent meeting on March 31, students were assured that: I.) No action would be taken regarding the Coca-Cola Company without first consulting with students, in accordance with the Dispute Review Board recommendation; 2.) The administration would outline in writing the pro- cedure by which Coca-Cola would be eligible for renewing its contract with the University; 3.) That the University would not renew the contract unless plans were formulated and implemented for investigations into both Colombia and India. No such plans exist. "Active dialogue" does not constitute a meaningful commitment to a comprehensive, independent investigation or by any stretch of the imagination meet the require- ments set by the University's own Dispute Review Board. As students, we trusted the administration to engage with us in good faith and keep us informed and involved in the process. We furthermore expected the University to uphold its own rules and regulations. We were repeatedly assured by top administration officials that student concerns were taken seriously. It is appalling that the Uni- versity would now choose to be completely unac- countable and go behind students' backs while they are studying for exams. The University fur- thermore is disregarding the recommendation of the DRB, which is composed of highly quali- fied students and faculty who spent innumerable hours establishing a process for remediation. President Coleman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Tim Slottow, Assistant Vice President for Finance Peggy Norgren and Deputy General Counsel Dan Sharphorn should be ashamed of their actions in this matter. The Coke Coalition shall not rest until Coca-Cola demonstrates full compliance with the Vendor Code of Conduct and the University upholds its own standards of due process, ethical purchasing and a commitment to accountability, democracy and social justice. Miller is an RC sophomore, Rogers is an LSA sophomore and Bates is an RC sophomore. They are writing on behalfof the Coalition to Cut Contracts with Coca-Cola Viewpoint Policy The Daily welcomes viewpoints from its readers Viewpoints have one or several authors, though preference will be given to pieces writ- ten on behalf of individuals rather than an organization. Editors will run viewpoints according to timeliness, order received and available space. Viewpoints should be no longer than 700 words. The Daily reserves the right to edit for length, clarity and accuracy. Send viewpoint submissions to editpage. editors@umich.edu, or contact the editors at that address to arrange one in advance. &4 . Twenty-one U-M students are vying to be named Michigan Apprentices and will experience one-day shadowing opportunities with these high-profile alumni: David Brandon, '74, CEO, Domino's Pizza Inc. Randy and Jason Sklar, '94, comedians, hosts of ESPN Classic's "Cheap Seats" Joe Schwarz, '59, HLLD'03, member of United States House of Representatives, representing 7th district of Michigan Aaron Dworkin, '97, MMUS'98, founder and president of Sphinx Organization for minorities in the classical arts Harvey Briggs, '82, executive vice president and director of innovation for Lindsay, Stone & Briggs inr MrFll. '52Q cninr ritnr of Mira Rnnk- (a rivicinn nf arIcnuin hnnk\