Monday * October 31, 2005 arts. michigandaily. com artspage@michigandaily.com R TSe irhigan til 5A . . ........... . . ... ..... ....... The evolution of horror girl makes out with the cap- tain of a nameless sport on her parents' couch, but she hears a sound and freaks out and he gets pissed. So he goes outside to shake it off, but then the girl goes out too and finds her letter- jacket sweetheart inside out, if you get my drift. She frantically runs inside but doesn't think to lock the door - so in comes the guy with the butcher knife and mask he picked up at the party store on the way over. She glides up the stairs and locks herself in her bedroom and waits until the coast is clear - whoops, he's still there, SLICE, she's dead, strung up for her parents to find her with something written in JEF blood nearby, like "this is BL what happens when you don't FF 001 Courtesy of Warner Independent They sure lowered the requirements for the new Bond. T HE TRUMAN SHOW ACCLAIMED AUTHOR'S LIFE BROUGHT TO BIG SCREEN By Kristin MacDonald Daily Arts Writer FIL M RE V IE W Much critical praise has already been lavished upon Philip Seymour Hoffman's striking turn as famed author Truman Capote. The fey wrist, the strange lisp, the effeminate hip Capote sway - Hoffman melds all of the celebrated Capote's famous quirks At the Showcase into one cohesive, decadently self- and Michigan centered whole. Theater Capote bucks the current trend Sony Pictures Classic in Hollywood biopics, "Capote" wisely focuses on only a small slice of its subject's life, though it presents a fairly well- rounded portrait all the same. The year is 1959; some- where out in the flat prairie of Kansas, an entire family has just been ruthlessly slaughtered, each shotgunned in the face. Capote, already an established author mak- ing the rounds of New York high society, spies the story as a brief front page newspaper blurb and finds it so strangely compelling that he promptly jumps aboard the next heartland-bound train to investigate. Originally, Capote intends merely to study the mas- sacre's effect on its quiet town. But Capote is drawn with much greater passion to the perpetrators - spe- cifically, Perry Smith (Clifton Collins Jr., "Traffic"), whose contradictory character makes up the heart of Capote's signature work, "In Cold Blood." "Capote" moves at a brisk place, yet it achieves a nice balance between Capote's work and his personal life. The ever-dependable Catherine Keener ("Being John Malkovich") joins his inquiry as fellow author Harper Lee, of "To Kill a Mockingbird" fame, who agrees to serve as a research assistant for Capote's project. She's an old friend of Capote's, able even to finish his sen- tences, and perhaps the character most sadly aware of his unrepentant ego. In fact, it's Lee who lays down the guiding principle of the movie's second half - "Tru- man," she observes, watching him gallivant about a cocktail party, "is in love with Truman." "Capote" and its star don't soften many blows in presenting Capote as a man of near hubris. He never seems more at home than when he charms onlookers at some cocktail party and shamelessly proclaims his as-yet-unstarted work a masterpiece. He also gleefully drops the era's celebrity names with great offhand-flair (at one point describing director John Huston and icon Humphrey Bogart as heavy drinkers with the thirst of "ravenous water buffalo"). Whether Capote is aware of his self-absorption is unclear; though he is certainly unabashed in demonstrating it, particularly in his calcu- lated, almost heartless manipulation of Smith. Smith, albeit an admitted killer, is a sadly lonely man, accepting with puppy-dog eagerness Capote's professed friendship. Capote visits him, listens to him, even hires him new lawyers for a round of fur- ther appeals. But when asked whether he respects his subject, Capote answers tellingly, with typical breathy excitement - Smith is simply "a goldmine." Capote provides those lawyers merely to keep the condemned man alive long enough for his story to be extracted. When that execution is successfully delayed for another few years, Capote becomes coldly despondent - he now needs Smith to die for his book's ending. "Capote" never cloaks Truman's manipulation of Smith in any high, moral explanation, and therein lies its strength. While a little long and often slow, it stud- ies rather than lionizes its subject, leaving behind more lingering questions than solid character summations. For instance, did Capote empathize with the killer or did he merely use him? And the question remains, which is worse? talk to your kids about premarital sex." God I love horror movies. There's nothing like sitting among a big crowd on a Friday night as the girl looks behind the door and under the bed but doesn't think to check the closet, where, of course, we saw the hooded assailant go. It's a dif- ferent kind of experience; yes, the post- "Scream" slasher has a subversive comic edge and recent ghost stories such as "The Sixth Sense" sentimentalize as much as scare us, but the bottom line has remained the same since horror's inception: collec- tive social fears weaved into a dark narra- tive, mercilessly, almost contemptuously digging their way under our skin. Granted, it's been a while since the genre really meant something. The target audience of today's Hollywood horror is young teenagers with attention spans that run more or less shorter than most of the films' running times - more if the lead is someone like Sarah Michelle Gellar and there is a shower scene involved, less if it veers too far off from genre conventions. But before the bulk of its modern fan base was even born, social apprehensions vented themselves in the genre, and real classics were born. In "The Exorcist," a mother lost control of her child to a mani- acal outside force - in her case Satan, in the real world social activism. In "Hal- loween," it was the false complacency of post-Vietnam suburbia, as we learned that yes, in fact, long-thought-lost menaces could and would return. "Halloween" also marked the beginning of a new trend: Of all the characters, only Laurie Strode, the steadfast virgin who babysat while her friends shacked up, managed to survive. From this template came the slasher genre, popularized by films such as "Fri- day the 13th" and "A Nightmare on Elm Street," where teenagers drank, did drugs, had sex and were (consequently) killed in increasingly lurid fashion. Alas, it's long since been lost on us. We grew up on the "Scream" movies, Wes Craven's ingenious trilogy in which the characters knew they were in a horror movie and acted accordingly - before promptly drinking, doing drugs, having sex and getting killed. This had a curious effect on horror subjects: Slasher today has much the REY same cautionary ideology as )MER it did in the '80s, but modern characters think their aware- ness of this somehow cancels it out. In "I Know What You Did Last Summer," Julie James cynically laughs off urban legends about premarital sex but doesn't suspect a thing when, after sleeping with her boy- friend on a beach, she gets chased around by a guy wielding a giant fishhook. Self-aware or not, today's horror has grown into a full slate of remakes, a trend constantly under critical fire - some of it deserved, some of it not. They don't lack quality production so much as context; the original "Dawn of the Dead" attacked consumerism, while the 2004 remake had a comparable body count but a whole lot less going on under the surface. If there is an egregious flaw in hor- ror today, it's the belief that graphic violence is inherently scary, which it's not. "Saw," a surprise hit last Halloween (sequel now in theaters), thought of doz- ens of mildly derivative ways to torture and kill people but didn't have a single thing to say about any of them. It's been all but forgotten that horror can be taken seriously, and was once one of the most effective genres of film. In the meantime, we digress, because it's hard to deny the pop-culture value of a genre that gives us a movie where Paris Hilton is impaled wearing red lingerie. But with nearly three horror movies every month, it's hard not to wonder when Hol- lywood will rediscover the power of one of its most profitable exploitation indus- tries, and what will happen when it does. - Bloomer cries when watching "Scary Movie 3." E-mail bloomerj@umich.edu. __j m -I a