8A - The Michigan Daily - Monday, January 10, 2005 ARTS Naipaul loses his 'Magic' in new work I 0 By Melissa Runstrom Daily Books Editor As the recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature for 2001, V.S. Naipaul is a well respected and notable author. Yet his latest work, "Magic Seeds," will leave readers Magic Seeds By V.S. Naipaul Knopf wondering what all the hype is about. This novel chronicles the second half of Willie Chandran's life. The character was first introduced in "Half a Life," a standout novel in Naipaul's career. Willie's passive nature allows his fate to be determined by others. He travels to India, for example, simply because his sister arranges everything for him. The story ultimately is about Willie's interpretation of this life. Willie spends seven years in the jungles of India doing work for a post- colonial revolution he never really understands. Afterwards, the middle- aged man finds himself in jail before he is ultimately released to London and a life he describes as "an endless prison sentence." As an aging man approaching the end of his writing career, Naipaul had a wonderful opportunity to create a story that could have made a lasting impact on his audience. Instead, his writing lacks clarity and focus, failing to live up to its potential. Throughout most of the story, the main character and the reader wander a seemingly aimless path. This could have been used as an effective device, but Naipaul fails to fashion Willie's drifting into anything meaningful. At the end of the story only a single quote points to the direction the novel should have taken some 80 pages before. "It is wrong to have an ideal view of the world. That is where the mischief starts." Most of the supporting personalities in the book develop slowly, and with the exception of Willie's sister and his lover in England, they do not improve the story much. The last 100 pages of the novel seem to drag on, and don't do the main character justice. Also in these last flawed pages there is a point- less and lengthy chapter about a poorly developed but intriguing character, Roger. This chapter ultimately falls short because Naipaul doe. '-elia nate the distance between Roger and the reader. Roger's side-story could have been a powerful addition to Willie's development, but instead his affair with a lower-class women manages to miss something critical and comes across as unnecessary. Naipaul doesn't fail entirely with "Magic Seeds," though. He manages to create some memorable imagery and beautiful prose at parts. The author also does an excellent job illustrating the differences between the intent and result of one's actions. Willie and the members of his revolution end up dis- regarding the needs of the peasants, even though it is supposed to be their movement. Along the same lines, he successfully and subtly illuminates the hypocrisy of leaders who only want control but spout utopian ideals. Willie is a fully fleshed-out character, and despite some difficulty getting the reader there, his time in India is some of the best drawn in the novel. As he enters into the revolution, readers see Willie's motivations. Unfortunately as he begins a new life in London, there are few such insights. Overall, "Magic Seeds" is a disap- pointing adventure. Nearing the end of his career, it is unfortunate that Naipaul couldn't expand upon his past success to create a memorable story about discovering the meaning of one's life. Readers will end up disap- pointed with a long, rather pointless story. The novel truly had potential, which is regrettably the most stirring aspect about "Magic . "You wanna beer?" EWHITECTRASH KEATON SLUMS IN POORLY EXECUTED THRILLER By Karl Stampfl Daily Arts Writer If nothing else, the tepid horror film "White Noise" proves that the supernatural does exist and is currently running ram- pant in Hollywood, because nothing in the real world could have persuaded talent like Michael Keaton ("Bat- man") to make this movie. "White Noise" is based on a relatively fresh idea, Elec- White Noise At the Showcase and Quality 16 Universal throw in a few jumps, a couple gallons of blood and a basic twist ending and you've got yourself a respectable horror movie. No one's expecting the second coming of "The Exorcist." But about the only scary thing about this film is the immense amount of talent and energy wasted by director Geoffrey Sax ("Sleepers"). One of the film's only redeeming qualities is Keaton's performance as a grieving husband who's driven to contact his recently-deceased wife. Swimming in an ocean of bad lines, he keeps his head above water with a halfway com- pelling effort. Another high point is the respect- able cinematography, which has an oddly jarring effect that could have been scary if the film had any substance. Most of all, the pacing is off. The first three- quarters of the movie are void of chills and thrills, probably because they're all packed into the last 20 minutes. The filmmakers were clever enough to include a twist at the end, but unfortunately the twist is mundane and predicable. When the credits roll, the first reaction by some may be that the ill-conceived ending ruined the movie. By the time the lights come up, it's obvious that the film had already ruined itself long before the ending. Part of the movie's aim is to convince view- ers that EVP is legit. Of course, like just about everything else, it doesn't work. And after this movie, even if EVP is real and currently being practiced in the basements of America, no one will care. Despite all the evil electronics, "White Noise" wouldn't be frightening even if watched in a Radio Shack. The film pales in comparison to horror classics like "The Shining," falling to establish any true terror. If there had been more jumpy moments, maybe something would have been salvaged - at least you would have a reason to grab the hand of the girl next to you. tronic Voice Phenomena (EVP), which affirms the ability of the dead to communicate with the living by speaking through the static of televi- sions and radios. It shouldn't be hard to craft an exciting thriller from such a novel premise - just 6 : .. . . . 0 0 6 6