Student housin .is apniority for U7 The roof is on fire BY ALAN LEVY What is the proper role for the University with regard to its role in influencing or contributing to the off-campus student housing environ- ment? The Michigan Daily has been editorializing on this topic for many years, as has the Ann Arbor News. It is probably safe to say that there still remains no clear consensus on how that role should be defined, but we can offer some summary and insights as to how the University has offered support to its students, as well as identify a new effort recently underway. The University houses about 30 per- cent of the student body (undergraduate and graduate) in on-campus residence halls and apartments; this percentage has stayed consistent since the early 1970s. The availability of on-campus housing will not change substantially in the foreseeable future, even with the recently announced plans for a new residence hall. Consequently, off-cam- pus hsing w2 iyain s comonen of nivrsit stdentlif the Off-Campus Housing Program have very knowledgeable staff read- ily available to students with regard to their rights and responsibilities as a tenant, making good decisions prior to signing any lease agreement, as well as advice and guidance once they experi- ence difficulties either with their land- lord or, as is frequently the case, with another student-tenant. It is the case, as both the Daily and the Michigan Student Assembly have argued, that neither entity plays the same primary advocacy role for student-tenants as did the Ann Arbor Tenants Union until it stopped providing service for students in 2003. But the AATU, for a variety of reasons, had not been effec- tive for students for a number of years prior to the cessation of its availability to students. About a year ago, the Office of Community Affairs, University Hous- ing and Student Affairs began an ini- tiative to bring together on a regular basis historically adversarial groups gor groups that worked hard not to face-to-face conversations with done er. This initiative, Campus N ehbo olves representatives from students, nly MSA repre- sentatives involved' ng-related commissions)l andlords rty BY JASON MIRONOv In 1958, University officials and The Michigan Daily acknowledged an impending housing crisis. It was A widely known that enrollment was going to increase through the '70s (and further), and Ann Arbor simply did not have the capacity to handle such a A i l$.l fdramatic influx of students. Residence S W EA hall living, while appealing for first- AE and second-year students, had fallen out of favor with upperclassman. At one point, the University planned for N 5 incredible growth on North Campus, even attempting to create a Fraternity Row. So the University administrators did what they thought was best: They . A stopped building residence hall living that appealed to the student body, leav- ing Ann Arbor's brightest to defend . - *' themselves in the jungle that is off- campus housing. So with that background, many of our classmates now live in sub-standard shelter - which, naturally, is three S $times the cost of an apartment at any other college town in Michigan. Hor- ror stories of black mold, leaky ceilings and electrical conditions that could make a mother cry are as common- place as blue books and hangovers. In the past few months, three fires ravaged housing all over campus, threatening AA Fthe very lives of Michigan's students. So the city of Ann Arbor took action against the obvious culprits: our uphol- stered acquaintances which adorn our ever-crumbling porches. Unfortunately, it's not just students directly affected by this blatant disrespect " ,for the quality of living. One landlord in Ann Arbor allegedly poses as a devoted Al O' i.i Shusband in order to purchase housing zoned, but not yet converted, for student living. After purchasing the unit, some- F for your ghts times deeply entrenched in a residential neighborhood, it is then converted into tenement-style housing and packed chock full o' students. What better way to endear yourself to the neighbors then to offer them the "welcome to the neighborhood" beer bong? As your elected student representa- tives, the responsibility to organize around tenant issues falls upon us. In the past, the Michigan Student Assem- bly "outsourced" this responsibility to the Ann Arbor Tenants Union. At first, the relationship was kismet, but accord- ing to my predecessors, the service at the turn of this century left much to be desired. There are a few things you can do to ensure that you have the best tenant experience possible. First, utilize the new Housing Review website at www. msa.umich.edu. By posting feedback on your current landlord and searching feedback on one's potential property owner, the loop of communication will encourage rental from only the most attentive landlords. Next, take advantage of the resources currently in place. Student Legal Services offers free legal counseling for every- thing from abusive contracts to mold, and is conveniently located on the second floor of the Union. MSA is also proud to announce its plan to work with SLS Director Doug Lewis to increase the staff to include a dedicated housing attorney. Such a program derives from a '70s initia- tive that influenced local housing legisla- tion. Expect further updates in upcoming weeks on how to encourage this change. Lastly, MSA is going to unveil a "housing hotline" that will be staffed during normal business hours and will help students unlock the abun- dant resources recently available, This housing hotline will also help students file complaints with the city and will record statistics on specific landlords that will be featured on the website. This pilot should hopefully be avail- able at the beginning of next semester. The overriding theme is that the tools for successful landlord/tenant relationships are snowballing - increased through the efforts of MSA and various members of the admin- istrative community. Coalitions of residents, students and landlords are working through the multi-stake- holder "Campus Neighbors" group to develop programming and resources for all the residents of Ann Arbor. Furthermore, this means that students need to make an effort to integrate into their communities,, specifically if there is a large percentage of non- students. Knock on your neighbors' doors and introduce yourself, offer to rake the leaves or mow the lawn (if you're ambitious). At the very least, please be respectful of the needs of your neighborhood. MSA shares the excitement about the new residence hall replacing the decrepit Frieze Building, and applauds the University for the preservation of the Carnegie Library. Gradually, it seems, the University is recognizing the need for cheap, effective and quality student housing both on and off campus. Have a question or suggestion? Want to be a member of the newly formed Stu- dent Legal Services Oversight Commit- tee? Want to get involved? E-mail msa. housing@umich.edu. MSA: We've got you covered. Check out our meetings at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesdays on the third floor of the Union. Mironov is a Business School senior and president of the Michigan Student Assembly. hOf f o Pg The - i gram, p f tfora Office, h be assistan . and sup t s stutoden' populatio or years, one of the old programs of its kind in th United St s. Its mission is to encour age and h students to find and main tain a living environment conduciv and complimentary to their academic experience. More than 500 landlords and property managers are registered with the program, which requires them to use either a Housing-approved lease or a functional equivalent and to agree to participate in landlord-tenant dispute resolution before resorting to litigation in the courts. In addition, the program offers a large array of publications and handouts utilized by thousands of University students each year. It sponsors a housing fair (sched- uled for Monday) that gives students an opportunity to meet with dozens of property managers and comparatively shop for off-campus housing that best meets their needs. The staff of the Off-Campus Hous- ing Program sees many hundreds of students annually, providing one- on-one advice to conducting room- mate -matching sessions in August. Its professionally trained mediator conducts more than a 100 landlord- tenant mediations a year, many of which result in negotiated agree- ments between the parties that saves them from going to court and expen- sive litigation. The University is one of fewer than five U.S. campuses that offer this kind of conflict resolution service. Student Legal Services provides legal advice and representation to students involved in landlord-tenant disputes. Funded through student fees, there are no additional charges for consultation with attorneys. The four attorneys on the SLS staff can also assist students in avoiding contentious relations with landlords by providing advice and guidance in advance of signing binding leases. SLS and the OCH frequently col- laborate to keep landlord-student ten- ant situations from escalating from conflict to litigation. Both SLS and tives on these issues and taking initial steps at working collaboratively. Our goal for this academic year is to move to the next level by col- laborating more substantively on developing long-term strategies and practices to better deal with several of our identified critical issues. Spe- cifically, we hope to address ways to moderate and curtail the pressures of early leasing, which negatively impinge on both students and land- lords in ways that are not always readily apparent or appreciated. The University actually provides more direct service to the off-cam- pus student population than almost all of its peer institutions around the country. Is it enough or the right kind of service or support? The answer is very much in the eyes of the beholder, but the Campus Neighbors discus- sions are helping to shape new ways in which the University can construc- tively work with students, the city and the private sector in improving student neighborhoods. While there are some limitations as to how far the University can or should go to affect the activities of the private sector, we certainly have a strong interest in the quality of off-campus environments because of the impact they have on town-gown relations at the broader level as well as on the ability of Uni- versity students to live in a setting that facilitates their academic success and personal growth. NOTE: If you are interested in participating in the Campus Neigh- bors discussions, send an e-mail to housing@umich.edu, and we'll add your name to the e-mail group to receive notices about future meetings. Levy is the University Housing spokesman. BY JARED GOLDBERG I frequently get into political arguments with my one of my roommates. His political persuasion requires him to try and convince me that the federal govern- ment needs to be smaller and that people should trust corporations to do charity work and provide social services. But, when it comes to landlord-tenant rela- tions, this line of thinking is just downright silly. Stu- dents need to realize that landlords are corporations looking out for their interests and their interests only, and students need to be vigilant if they wish to protect their rights. The state of Michi- gan has some of the best landlord-tenant laws in the nation. To many, it does not seem that way, but accord- ing to the University's Student Legal Services For de- - which provides free legal services to stu- dents in landlord-tenant disputes - landlords 76 get away with so much because students just do not take the time to protect their rights. Accord- ing to the last count, there are complaints against every landlord in town. Among the worst, there are complaints consistently every year. Repeat offenders, just do not care about the complaints of their tenants because they do not fear the law. The tenants do not exploit the legal opportunities available to them. We always complain about how our landlords are slum- lords, yet we are simply too lazy to do anything about them. But, as much as SLS can help students - which in most cases is limited to only legal advice as initial disputes between a landlord and his tenants must be handled by the tenants themselves - they have a certain role. They do not advocate collectively for tenant rights in the absence of the courts. That's not their function. There was, however, one organization, that did represent students collectively against their landlords: the Ann Arbor Tenants Union. Because of a host of reasons, the AATU was shut down not too long ago by the Michigan Student Assembly. But, the void of a collective bargaining tool needs to be filled, as landlord-tenant relations have deteriorated. MSA President Jason Mironov is working to establish a new organization to protect students in landlord-tenant disputes (see The roof is on fire, above). It's about time. What Ann Arbor residents need here is an organization that can bring them together and get them some collective muscle against the all-power- ful landlords. Landlords have the audacity that they have because we do not collectively organize. It's high time they began to fear the power of the tenants rather than taken advantage of them. What we needed is more laws to protect the tenants. Michigan already does have some of the best laws in the country regarding ten- ant rights. In most states, for example, the security deposit is the property of the land- -ails c l lord. If a tenant has a dispute over a with- held security deposit, 24 5 9 he needs to prove that he deserves it back. Michigan law stipulates it belongs to the tenant. If a tenant has a dispute over a withheld security deposit, the landlord must prove why he can keep it. If he can- not, it needs to be returned. Nonetheless, more legislation is needed, laws that lead to a better efficiency in getting security deposits back. Laws that give stiffer penalties to criminal landlords, laws that prevent landlords from charging tenants for things those landlords should pay for, laws that favor arbitration and do not discourage ten- ants from suing landlords who do the wrong thing. Nothing is perfect as it stands. As the saying goes, change is good. When it comes to landlords and ten- ants in Ann Arbor, change is the best option we have. The status quo should be unacceptable. Tenants are not asking for more rights than landlords. Tenants should be asking for the same rights accorded to every other consumer in any other industry. And they should not stop until they have them. Goldberg is an LSA junior and a member of the Daily's editorial board. I