arts.michigandaily. com artseditor@michigandaily.com Ufe£iigau Oak ARTS 5 By Alex Wolsky Daily Arts Editor RAQUEL LANERI The story of the Walkmen, humble purveyors of some of New York City and Washington's finest rock'n'roll, is chronicled by three distinct phases. Phase one: disintegration. At the height of the alternative-rock phase of the mid-'90s, salivating disc jockeys and unkempt record clerks were shouting their praises on high for NYC's Jonathan Fire*Eater. After a successful debut, the band inked a remarkable deal with DreamWorks upon which they would release its raw, biting second album. However, a year later, Jonathan Fire*Eater was a no-name band that got lost amidst the hype and hyperbole of its peers. Their match burned bright during its tenure but was blown out hastily. Enter phase two: reanimation. Taking whatever large sum was left on their tab from their DreamWorks days, the members of the now-defunct Jonathan Fire*Eater regrouped sans Corporatization of the sk8r lead singer Stewart Lupton and invested in their own Harlem recording space, Mar- cata. From that empty space evolved the Walkmen. Their debut album, Every- one Who Pretended to Like me is Gone, was a sprawling, dis- oriented album that took the The Walkmen Bows and Arrows Record Collection roots of garage-pop and brought them together to form an album absent of any cohesive statement or idea. The critically acclaimed LP struck many as the finest work to emerge from the New York Renais- sance at the start of the 21st century. Yet, the Walk- men were still spotty at times and were too caught up in the spontaneity of Marcata to have created a vision as pure as people proclaiming. With their latest record, Bows and Arrows, the Walkmen cross over into phase three: resilience. Warding off demons, such as the sophomore slump, their haunting past and critical ambivalence, the Walkmen have returned stronger and more con- fident than ever before. "What's in it for Me?" opens the album with a swirling wall of reverb as vocalist Hamilton Leithauser hovers over the microphone with a burning sense of urgency underlying his deliv- ery. He hazily spouts, "what's in it for me? / I came here for a good time / you're tearing me apart." In fact, the most noticeable difference the Walkmen incurred between recording ses- sions is the confidence and exuberance dis- played by Leithauser. His virtually timid nature on "Everyone ..." is all but forgotten by his charismatic display on Bows. In arguably the Walkmen's finest moment, "The Rat" is a pounding, fist-to-the-wall confessional that's brimming with anxiety and electricity. The guitars build like nothing the Walkmen have have come across the most ridicu- lous, horribly maddening news ever: Marc Jacobs now designs skateboards. Okay, so it's not a life-and-death matter. But for a fashion-obsessed, pop culture-savvy person like me, this is highly disillusioning. I have always regarded Marc Jacobs as an enlightened fashion pio- neer. While most designers have either opted for the highly sophisti- cated, classic look (like Ralph Lauren or Calvin Klein) or the outrageous, feathers-and-sequins-clad, scary look (like John Galliano), Marc Jacobs' expert blend of quirkiness, feminini- ty, and '60s-retro throwbacks has made him the designer for hip youth culture (or at least rich, hip youth culture - he is a high-profile design- er. after all). But now Jacobs has made the mistake that so many designers are guilty of - he has tried too hard to appear "hip" to our disaf- fected, rebellious youth. He's like my Psych 111 professor who continuous- ly references "Joe Millionaire" in lec- ture in an attempt to show that she understands pop culture. I guess it's like any counter-cultural trend that some ambitious designer adopts and molds into a staple of mainstream culture. I feel bad for punks, who try so hard to shock and rebel through their fashion,-only to later see their fishnet stockings - sans holes - worn by 40-year-old businesswomen under their knee- length pencil-skirts, or their Doc Martens worn by preppy, Abercrom- bie-clad high schoolers. I mean, Marc Jacobs' isn't totally off on his decision to introduce skateboards to the affluent main- stream. Admittedly, the skateboard is all about conveying a certain image and attitude, as are designer labels. The image of the skateboard- er has changed over the years-hip- sters sporting tight T-shirts underneath tweed jackets and wax- ing poetic about Sofia Coppola or Death Cab for Cutie have some- what, though not entirely, replaced the junior-high Jnco-jeans-wearing misfits with the ball-chains around their necks. These new skateboard- ers (not to be confused with the now lame "skaters") may even know of Marc Jacobs. Crazy. And maybe these new skateboard- ers will embrace these skateboards - which aren't even cool by the way, they are plain white and say "Marc Jacobs" on the backside. If Jacobs is trying to redefine himself as the token hipster/slacker of the fashion world, maybe his target audience will buy into the image and purchase his stuff. I guarantee you, however, these newer, "more respectable" skate- boarders will not be the main con- sumers of Marc Jacobs' new line of skateboards. His consumers will probably be the same girls who buy the torn-up Ramones T-shirts at Urban Outfitters without owning a single punk album. They probably won't even use them, just carry them in an attempt to attract cute skate- boarders - similar to how they wear Ramones T-shirts so they can attract cute, chic music-geeks. You think I'm exaggerating, but I overheard a girl once ask to borrow her friend's the Who shirt for a party so guys who like classic rock would want to talk to her. Girls will do anything to garner males' attention - and rich ones will have no moral qualms about spending $225 to do so. Marc, how could you! You were so cool before without resorting to pandering to disenchanted, hard-to- impress young hipsters in some effort to reclaim your diminishing youth. Please stop before your sta- tus as "innovator" fades and is replaced by "poser." - Laneri is a ballet dancer: If you 're her sk8r boi, drop her a line at rlaneri@umich.edu Phase one: collect underpants. Phase two ... Phase three: profit. attempted, the drumming is on-point like pre-calcu- lated thunder and Leithauser wraps it all together with his cathartic wail. "Can't you hear me? / I'm pounding on your door," he bellows. "The Rat" encompasses the growth and success with experimentation that the Walkmen have taken on in making Bows and Arrows. Drawing compar- isons to a more raucous, finely crafted U2, the Walkmen have finally defined themselves. One of the band's most drastic experiments while recording "Bows" is the song, "Hang on Siobhan." According to Leithauser, the band recorded a handful of tracks where they attempted to be as quiet as possible, barely touching their instruments. The result is a tranquil, brooding moment of lingering hope and distilled tension in direct contrast to the openness and audacity of other standout tracks on Bows. "New Year's Eve" is a beautiful piano-laden pop song that emanates through your headphones; yet, a pair of biting tracks defines the album's latter half - "The North Pole" with its jarring hustle and the title track, "Bows and Arrows," with its rushed delivery and swilling guitars. Bows captures the chaotic, garage-meets- post-punk sound made famous by the Smiths and Echo and the Bunnymen in the early '80s. It's a cohesive, unified statement of defiance that signals that the Walkmen have finally shak- en off any sonic dust from their former incarna- tion. And where their debut fell victim to its rambling nature, Bows and Arrows capitalizes as a focused, taut record of unabridged maturi- ty. It draws together every single loose thread Jonathan Fire*Eater left dangling in critics' psyches and burns them to the ground. reeman, Wilson flop in unfocused Leonard adaptation By Hussain Rahim Daily Arts Writer MOVIE REVIEW ** Being pretty can only do so much. In the latest Elmore Leonard book brought to screen, Owen Wil- son tries to carry a movie about pretty people doing naughty things on vacation in Hawaii. His oddly charming looks and disarming wit serve as inept tools to sustain inter- est over 90 minutes that end up seeming like a long, bad vacation. Jack Ryan (Wilson), small-time conman, flees to Hawaii in search of a new life or at least a new place on which to inflict his schemes. After being fired for breaking the jaw of his foreman in what turns out to be the film's best scene, he wanders aimlessly through Hawaii, never keeping the momentum of this initial scene. Ryan winds up picking up the loose and inexplica- ble pieces of the plot that later come together in one of the most underwhelming bait-and-switch endings in a heist film. Following his firing from the construction company, Jack is wel- depth behind it to back it up and make you believe in what is hap- pening. Little things, such as why Jack entrusts a man he specifically tells he doesn't trust to finish off a crime they did together, to larger issues, such as why everyone in the know ignores the fact that the head villain's girl is parading around the. island with Ray's known enemy, remain unexplained. Like a bored tourist, the film wanders aimlessly, and the feeling viewers are left with is one of watching someone else's vacation slideshow while receiving none of their excitement. Toward the end, an attempt is made to reel the audience back, but twisting endings .don't work if there was no engagement during the first two acts. It's obvi- ous that everyone involved had fun in making this movie, as the locales are shot beautifully and there is a cool tongue-in-cheek feel that never quite makes it off the screen. George Armitage, who directed the underrated "Grosse Pointe Blank," can do little to save the film, as there is just no story to direct. Viewers are better off going to Hawaii and making their own personal adventure. comed in by the town's district judge, Walter (Morgan Free- man) who gives him some work and a place to stay. He then ambles about The Big Bounce At Quality 16 and Showcase Warner Bros. I think I see ... a nipple. with adrenaline-junkie Nancy (impressive newcomer Sara Foster) who happens to be the mistress for the town's evil capitalist, Ray Ritchie (Gary Sinese). Ritchie never comes off quite as frightening as he should. Therein lies the fault of the entire movie; nothing has the meaning or Fit .Cocated in the hears f fMiracle Strip Where t he poet nevter cIases and t he fi.tt nevter ends! 'dour 1os~s: aohn & ftun Peet 12830 3wu,$ beach Road Panama City Beach, It 32407 j (850) 233-0028 TI email: pta~amofel~kntntuy~nef WWI The Department of Philosophy The University of Michigan THE TANNER LECTURE ON HUMAN VALUES 2003-04 Christine Korsgaard Arthur Kingsley Porter Professor of Philosophy ~~ Harvard University f.;"Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals" Friday, February 6, 4:00 p.m. rIIRackham Amphitheater, 915 E. Washington