OP/ED 4A - The Michigan Daily - Thursday, September 11, 2003 urbe , iu a 420 MAYNARD STREET ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 letters@michigandaily.com EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SINCE 1890 LouIE MEIZLISH Editor in Chief AUBREY HENRETTY ZAC PESKOWITZ Editorial Page Editors Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. NOTABLE QUOTABLE <"If the percentage of minorities in your state has anything to do with how you connect with black voters, then Trent Lott would be Martin Luther King." - Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean responding to a question during a Tuesday debate in Baltimore, as reported on Slate.com. SAM BUTLER T SOAPBOX ' --- , ere. 4 0 Bush the new Duke of American heroes? LAUREN STRAYER IN THE ACTIVE VOICE 44 "This kind of war, you've gotta believe in what you're fighting for." - John Wayne in "Back to Bataan" kA rguably, we've E abeen at war for two years. Sept. 11 incited America's expansive War on Ter- ror - through which we've already over- thrown the Taliban and Sadaam. We're slowly battling al-Qaida and we're consider- ing the cases against North Korea and Iran. As a nation, we've justified these actions with an impregnable vision of good, evil, and avenging justice. Collectively, we've nar- rowed our understanding of right and wrong and we've dutifully made a robust, heroic leader out of our president. We've done all this hoping that we can rid the world of ter- rorism and ride happily into the sunset. In other words, we want the post-Sept. I1 world to play out like a western with John Wayne in the saddle. As Americans looked to the Duke's one-dimensional, red-blooded characters for comfort and stability through- out much of the 20th century, our current reverie in hero-worship is explicable - if juvenile and ill-fated. In many ways, Wayne's gruff perfor- mances - in westerns and military films alike - established the standard for Ameri- can heroes both on and off the screen. Almost invariably, Wayne portrayed a plain- spoken protagonist struggling to right egre- gious wrongs. His characters possessed a cloudless and simplistic set of morals paired with a powerful desire to see justice served in the most basic sense. A Wayne hero, strong and unyielding in his presence, has little patience for rhetoric or weakness and is prone to intense but judicious violence. Essentially, whether portraying a cowboy or a soldier, Wayne repeatedly glorified the American hero and in wartime, soothed our suffering national psyche. With this sort of stalwart legacy, is it any wonder we've conveyed the attributes of one cowboy onto another? Given that President Bush has an analogous image of straight-talk and vigorous health and that the tragic events of Sept. 11 gave him immediate righteous- ness, his rise to hero status is not surprising. Even though he's a desk jockey instead of cowpoke, Bush enjoys undeniably compara- ble circumstances to those the Duke often navigated successfully. Accordingly, our strong desire for a wartime hero and faultless leader allowed us to further thrust Wayne's attributes upon Bush - whether they were warranted or not. The problem with this naive transference of heroics is that Bush does not live in a morally unambiguous western or military film. Americans may feel more secure with a reliable iconic president in office, but that feeling does not go very far in creating actual security and stability. The increased political strength and capital Bush enjoys only encourage him to further cultivate his heroic image - despite the serious hazards it pre- sents in the real world. For instance, as part of his newfound Dukedom, Bush makes his war cries with absolute conviction even though his world has no moral absolutes. He operates without qualification or nuance - two elements that ought to play heavily in decisions that risk the lives of soldiers and civilians. While the final consequences of Bush's fervor are unknown today, we can observe that his overzealous convictions have strained many important international friend- ships and preceded the loss of many military and civilian lives. Given the current situation, perhaps we should reconsider the value of a hero with such a lack of circumspection. In a time of distinct international instabil- ity and fear, we are finding irrational comfort in a simplistic illusion of a gun-slinging hero. Just as Wayne often alleviated much of the collective guilt and pain Americans felt in response to the wars of the 20th century, Bush provides us with a sense of irreproach- able unaccountability. It seems we can believe in the righteousness of the War on Terror simply because our Duke President has infallible judgment and moral fortitude. As a final disquieting thought on our current hero worship, consider that even Wayne wasn't always the hero America needed. In the 1949 film "The Sands of Iwo Jima," Wayne's marine colonel embodied the heroic characteristics described above but still could only win the battle - not the war. With the hard edges of his American heroism, Wayne could not lead America out of war and its aftermath. In the end, he could not be the lasting hero America need- ed. Can Bush? No. Heroes of John Wayne's iconic style don't exist and we have to stop creating them. We need to elect a new hero. Strayer can be reached at lstrayer@umich. edu. a 0 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR L 0UIE MEIZLISH / IN PRINT Don't blame students if proposal loses This Nov. 4 will be one the most impor- tant elections Ann Arbor has seen in recent memory. What's the big deal in this off-year elec- tion? The big deal is whether to approve a $30 million proposal to create what Mayor John Hieftje calls the "Greenbelt," a ring of greenspace around the city, where Ann Arborites would be free of modern housing, car exhaust and strip malls and thus put a stop to suburban sprawl. If the ballot proposal is approved by voters, it means (and this bothers a lot of conserva- tives) taxpayer dollars will pay for a govern- ment program whose explicit purpose is to counter economic development. "The quality of life in Ann Arbor is declin- ing because of all the construction that's going on our borders leading to sprawl and traffic congestion," says Councilman Robert Johnson (D-Ward 1). "It'll just make life in Ann Arbor better if we have open space, farms, fields, rather than just a continuous ring of houses around the city." It's a noble idea and should be approved, and that's why this election is important. But there's another issue here, and that's the process by which we elect our council members and the fact that students are not very involved in it. For years and years it has been the policy of the Ann Arbor City Council to draw wards - the council districts - in such a way that marginalizes the student vote. Instead of creating one or two wards that are near-majority student, the council has dis- persed the student vote across several wards, making it almost impossible for students to get elected to the council, though not for a lack of effort. In this city of which students comprise approximately one third of the population, not one sits on the council. Regardless, three students are making a go of it this year. If history is any indication, their chances are not good. It just so happens that the ballot proposal to raise money for the Greenbelt should be a close one, says Johnson. Unlike, say, a school or a nrkc~ndrer. tnllnoep this one is fornew type of program and vot- ers may be leery of it. Moreover, "We expect a pretty powerful and well-funded campaign from the oppo- nents," Johnson says. In other words, pro- Greenbelters need as many quasi-environmentalist, pro-tax-raising stu- dents as possible to offset the votes of conserv- ative property owners who don't want their taxes raised. So if the pro-Greenbelters lose, don't be surprised if some of them blame disinterested students for their loss. The truth, however, is that if the council really wanted students involved in city government and policy setting, it would have made it easier for them to get elected, and thus feel like they have more at stake in city governance. Was it not the 18th- century British Tories who made the argument that, even if American colonials did not elect members of Parliament, they were still repre- sented because all British officials had their interests at heart? Well, a lot of students won't be here more than four or five years. Feeling locked out of the process, is it unreasonable for them to conclude that city interests should not be their concern? The only interesting council race to watch this year will be in the 2nd Ward, where Councilman Michael Reid seeks a sec- ond term. The first-term Republican is being challenged by Democrat Amy Seetoo. Fact is, the 2nd Ward - the most heavily Republican ward of all - is majority Democrat, and is becoming, like the rest of Ann Arbor, more and more Democratic. Yet it manages to pro- duce Republican council members in odd-year elections. A loss for Reid this year would reduce the ranks of the Republican caucus down to one member. If Reid loses, look for a move to make Ann Arbor's municipal elec- tions - like those of most Michigan cities nowadays -nonpartisan. Contrary to Daiy's assertions, registering to vote is easy To THE DAILY: I was quite pleased with the Daily's edi- torial on student voting in Ann Arbor (Rep- resenting 'U', 09/09/03). As residents of this city, it is our right and responsibility to par- ticipate in the processes that decide how it runs. However, I would like to point out a problem with the article. It reads: "Many students come from out of town and are reg- istered in another state. For many, the process of changing their registration to Ann Arbor is too cumbersome." Fortunately, this statement is incorrect. Registering simply involves filling out a half-page form, which asks for little more information than local address and driver's license number. I work for the Youth Vote Coalition, which unites all kinds of organi- zations working to get young people politi- cally involved and aware. We've set:up a field site in Ann Arbor to do just this and anyone interested in filling out one of those forms and getting registered in Ann Arbor can email youthvote@hotmail.com for one of those forms. MOIRA BIRss RC senior New bus routes inadequate TO THE DAILY: I would like to express my opinion on the new bus route for the Commuter Northbound. I know that the University intended well when it changed the route but I believe the change is unfair to residents of Mosher-Jordan and Stockwell residence halls. The way the bus route is set up now, there is no quick way of getting to North Campus in the morning. It is a bit of a walk to the closest bus stop and when it gets cold thatAs going to be very iuconve- nient and dangerous. Yes, we could take the Northwood, however the Northwood stops by C.C. Little after visiting the Hill area, thus taking a very long time to reach North Campus. Taking the Northwood already takes a very long time and during the winter even longer. Since there are already two buses that go by the Kresge building in the morning (Bursley-Baits and Northwood) I see no reason for the Northbound Commuter to go up Washtenaw Avenue and turn onto Ann Street and then go around Medical Center Drive. An alternate route could be to take Geddes Avenue to Observatory Street and then go around Medical Center Drive. This way you cover Mosher Jordan and Stock- well Residence Halls and still make it around Medical Center Drive. DOUGLAS J. KREMER Engineering junior 0 VIEWPOINT Gay initiation classes provide vital message BY JOE KORT For the past seven years, I've taught a course at Wayne State University for master's- level social workers on how to help their gay clients learn to be comfortable about their orien- tation. This class could be in jeopardy, if some folks here in Michigan have their way. Fuss over a course "How To Be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation," scheduled this fall at the University of Michigan, seems to be voiced loudest by Gary Glenn, president of the Michigan affiliate of the conservative American Family Association. Glenn wants "to stop let- ting homosexual activists use our tax dollars to subsidize this militant political agenda" to pro- mote "queer studies." His agenda is to stop Prof. David Halperin's class because he feels taxpay- ers shouldn't be "forced to pay for a class whose stated purpose is to 'experiment' with the 'initiation' of young men into self-destructive homosexual lifestyle." Could my class have been something he would have prevented? I teach my master's- level students in the field of social work to "ini- tiate" gays and lesbians into achieving healthy self-esteem and becoming positive, hard-work- ing, responsible people. Maybe Glenn over- looked my class because its title, "Social Work can woman politely raised her hand and said, "I had no idea I had enrolled in a gay studies class." She needed credits and my class was the only one available to her, adding that her Christ- ian beliefs did not support homosexuality and that it is a sin. But this was her last term and if she wanted to graduate in June, she had to stay in the course. Some of the other class members felt that because of her homonegative views, she shouldn't be allowed to stay. But she said she related to gays and lesbians because when she "came out" with her Christian beliefs on homo- sexuals, others discriminated against her, and she felt that my class did not want her. I assured her that I was open to her differ- ence of opinion. All I expected from her was that she learn the gay affirmative stance I teach, to help gays and lesbians overcome homopho- bia and heterosexism. In her papers and class discussions, she could show that she'd absorbed my input and could certainly add her own dis- agreements along the way. I urged the class to take the same stance - which they did. Our agenda was to honor everyone's opinions and not enforce our own, much less make any one of us feel "bad" or "wrong." Each week, she listened to my lectures and our guest speakers. She wrote two required papers on the "initiation" of gays and lesbians I didn't agree with her, but was able to see her outlook from her point of view. By the end of the semester, she demonstrated her full understanding of many facets of "initiating" gays and lesbians. She hadn't altered her moral or religious beliefs and still felt that homosexuality was a sin. But she did graduate (in both senses of the word) with a wider understanding of what gay people must go through and said the course "humanized her thinking of what gay people were like. She admitted she'd been horrified to learn that I was gay, surprised that I seemed so happy and well-adjusted - and troubled that I'd become so comfortable with "living in sin." I told her that she'd opened my eyes, too. What must it be like, to hold strong religious beliefs and not be able to express them freely, without others' discrimination? Again, I have no problem with her beliefs, or anyone's, only with what people do with their personal judgments. I told her I hoped that as a social worker, she'd never provide treat- ment for gays or lesbians because of her nega- tive judgments. How could she assist them and help them feel good about themselves, if she herself didn't approve of them? Much as she tried to help them, she would just be committing homophobia in her conviction that they were sinners. Thankfully, she agreed! If only those like G~lenn and the neonle in t Meizlish can be reached at