The Michigan Daily - Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 5A The demolition of the old Democratic order? Last Tuesday, for the first time since the New Deal Era, a sitting president's party regained control of the Senate in a midterm election. The Democratic Party's poor performance has left many analysts questioning both the long-term health and the short-term relevance of the party. VIEWPOINT A defeat - not a demise Condy for Prez in 2008? Talking to William Safire JOHANNA HANINK P AIANCE OF UR TIME BY JON BOOK On election night 2000 when Flori- da was still listed as a Gore win and Republicans around the country were sulking into their beer mugs, the surest way to get stern looks and harsh retorts was to say "Look, we did our best and people just didn't see it our way this time. The inference most people made from such a statement was that if "we" had done our best, then surely this defeat meant the Republican Party was dying off in this country. George W. Bush went on to win that night, and if there was any doubt about the health of the Republi- can Party in this country, it was blown away over a week ago. Now, the shoe is on the other foot, and many in this dates i!n favor of well known and pop- ular moderates. These recruitment efforts tell the real tale of why so few open seats vacated by Republicans failed to become viable Democratic targets. Moreover, good recruitment managed to threaten some of the more left-leaning Senators, such as with the Coleman-Wellstone (later Coleman- Mondale) race. The Republicans put forth a well planned effort from start to finish and it paid off. The Democrats need not worry that their party is in decline over this mere loss. The bigger threat to the Democra- tic party right now lies in the Democra- tic response to this defeat. Already we have seen Dick Gephardt step down as the House Minority leader. In his place the heir apparent is Nancy Pelosi. If Everyone makes per- formative grammatical slip- ups. But not everyone gets to have William Safire catch her at it. If there's any- body whom I will tolerate correcting my speech, it's the proverbial Source. William Safire, the most widely read writer on (not in) the English language, appeared in Ypsi- lanti on Monday during a fundraiser for the Washtenaw County Jewish Federation. I got a chance to talk to him dur- ing a small press briefing (three reporters, including me) that was held prior to the event. So what does one ask a lifelong, internationally renowned, conserva- tive pundit who seems to know (and have an opinion on) everything, someone who reads Thomas Paine for fun? Jo Collins Mathis, a reporter and columnist for the Ann Arbor News, was the first to hit the obvious: (paraphrased) What hap- pened with the midterm elections? Safire, when he heard this ques- tion, seemed to take on a "where to begin?" sort-of look. He chose to start with what he called the "con- ventional wisdom:" The Democrats had no message and moreover, they had no messenger. Because of this fatal coupling of fatal errors, "they're all wringing their hands now and flagellating themselves." But it's not as simple as all this, Safire seemed to qualify. Tom Daschle ("I like Daschle ... he knows ... how to tug his forelock and look innocent"), Richard Gephardt, Bill Clinton ("he enlivened my life") and Al Gore did, indeed, hit the campaign trail (but granted, not nearly as hard as Presi- dent Bush). However, their platform was hazy: they "sort of oppose the President on the war," but on this issue, are still "dragging their foot." The Democrats were lost in an ambiguous stand on the hot topic. The mistake that Safire clearly identified as "a foolish exercise" on the part of Democratic National Com- mittee Chairman Terry McAuliffe was the over-investment, in terms of finance, time and effort, in Florida's gubernatorial election. McAuliffe and others tried to make a test of Florida, believing that if they were able to show that the Democratic candidate, Bill McBride, could earn the mandate of the people over incumbent Jeb Bush (largely blamed for the 2000 election debacle), that vote would make a sweeping statement: The presi- dential elections were not legitimate, thereby rendering President Bush an illegitimate president. McAuliffe and the DNC gambled and lost. Safire, however, put this Novem- ber's Democratic defeat into the per- spective that seems to have lost itself in the post-election analyses and fatalistic predictions: The elections were "not a sweep." There was a two-seat switch in the Senate, which, granted, changed a lot by virtue of the January majority/minority party swap. In terms of raw numbers, how- ever, two out of 100 is not a dooms- day omen. Me, I hope that it's enough of a sign to warn the Democrats to get their act together. During the course of the conver- sation, Safire made two surprising comments. The wackier: When asked if Hillary Clinton would ever make a vie at the presidency, Safire predicted ("Usually I do very well, I get four or five out of 20 predictions right every year") that Hillary will not run in 2004, but in 2008 will lose the presidential election to the governor of California (dramatic pause here), who will be Condoleez- za Rice, currently President Bush's National Security Advisor. The second of these left-field comments involved the drawing of an interesting connection between American and Israeli politics (which he had hinted at in Monday's column in The New York Times). He won- dered to us whether the Democrats would follow suit (if not exactly in action, in principle) with Israel's Labor Party, which left the governing coalition earlier this month because of irreconcilable differences with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's pro- posed budget. Will the Democrats fall in love with minority status and come to cherish the position of the down- trodden dove, the principled margin, of American politics? "If that's what the Democrats want to do," Safire, a conservative-libertarian, answered himself, "then hey, great." The Democrats need to shape up. None other than my Greek pro- fessor commented last Wednesday morning that the Republican candi- dates during this election were, on the whole, younger and smarter than those whom the Democrats put forth. Safire noted that he likes Rush Limbaugh because he "added a touch of showbiz to right wing politics." If the Democrats are in the market for resuscitation, maybe it's time they stop taking the glam- orous thrill of left wing politics for granted. So what was my linguistic mis- take? Oh woe upon woe, during a split second of hesitation and a desperate grab at a conversation-filler I uttered a semantically vacuous "like:" that faithfully persistent enemy of the pre- scriptive grammanan. I was embarrassed, of course, but he was very kind and light-hearted about my slip-up. Might as well learn (or experience minor humilia- tion) at the hands of the, like, experts. country are won-' dering if it is the Democrats who are on the out. While this election was, in the end, something short of a catastrophe for the Democrats, the' Certainly, a shakeup is needed in the Democratic leadership. this sets the trend for the Democratic Party for the next few months, we may well witness the moderate estab- lishment of the Democratic Party built by Clinton, Johanna Hanink can be reached at jhanink@umich.edu. i fact of the matter is this was just a defeat. The Democratic Party is in as much danger of extinction as is the KFC genetically altered chicken. However, the Democrats do have much to fear in the next election. It is important to realize in retro- spect that this election was as much a win for the Republicans as it was a defeat for the Democrats. Certainly, Democratic strategists made many tragic mistakes in this election. Tom Daschle dragged his feet on the Iraq resolution so long that Republicans were able to make political hay out of it much longer than they should have. Dick Gephardt avoided this misstep, and instead relied on the economy as his issue. However, he never articulat- ed a cohesive Democratic counter- plan to Bush's economic program. Overall, Democratic "get out the vote" efforts were pretty lax, and failed to really mobilize key Democratic con- stituencies, such as the black commu- nity. Nevertheless, Republicans deserve a fair bit of credit for the results too. Republicans masterfully played their advantage on issues such as domestic security. President George W. Bush put the presidency on a near hold in order to put his high approval ratings to good use in tight races. But, most of all, the Republicans deserve praise for their stellar recruitment efforts in this election. This time around the party eschewed ultra-conservative candi- and key to his popular appeal in this country, completely dismantled. Cer- tainly, a shakeup is needed in the Democratic leadership. However, skewing the party even further to the left, and further away from the 35 per- cent of the electorate that identifies itself as independent and moderate, will do nothing but hurt the Democrat- ic Party and make '02 seem gentle in comparison to '04. The Democratic Party is at a cross- roads right now, much as Republicans were in 1992. With the defeat of Bush Sr., Republicans faced a government completely controlled by Democrats. Rather than make a shift to the right and blame moderates for their failures, the Republicans decided to endorse a popular plan and stage a comeback. By 2000 Republicans were in control of Congress, the hard-liners of the party were satisfied with victory rather than ideological purity, and a Republican was entering the White House. }It is time for the Democratic Party to follow suit. The Democrats must find a charismatic leader to keep the Naderites placated, a moderate who can relate with the public, and a clear set of issues on which to cam- paign. Nancy Pelosi is not that leader, and if Democrats fail to realize this, the Democratic Party may die of a self-inflicted wound rather than popu- lar preference. What Do These Leaders Have in Common? If you thought pharmacy was only filling prescriptions, think again. The University of Michigan College of Pharmacy has been Book is an LSA senior SZ E CDU AN l4 We invite you to join us in celebrating our 2Y! anniversary of fine Chinese cuisine! Szechuan, Hunan & Mandarin Specialties Dine-in or Carry-out Expires 12/15/02 Not valid with any other offer it y M-Th11:30-10 Fri & Sat 11:30-11, Sun 12-11 Last Half-Hour k Carry-Out Only Gwendolyn Chivers, Chief Pharmacist, University of Michigan Health Service Gayle Crick, Manager, Global Marketing, Eli Lilly & Co. Cynthia Kirman, Manager, National Managed Pharmacy Program, General Motors Corp. W.LIBERTY Z * II SZE *CHUAN ur BIG M WEST Stadum CAR0 WASH( W. STADIUJM 2161 W. Sta* i (near Stadium & Libert 769-3722 open 7 days a wee developing leaders for positions in business, biotechnology, health care, the pharmaceutical industry, education, engineering, law, and other careers for 125 years. It's one reason our College is consistently ranked among the world's best. You owe it to yourself to find out about the outstanding, high-paying career opportunities available to U-M College of Pharmacy graduates. To learn more about T TN A P1D-....-I l l rra mmww Peter Labadie, President, Williams-Labadie, LLC, a subsidiary of Leo Burnett Communications Albert Leung, President, Phyto-Technologies, Inc. Robert Lipper, vice President, Biopharmaceutics R&D, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Pharmaceutical Research Institute i MWIFIN wxlmlmmtj i. AM! I