Friday Novernber 8, 2002 michigandaity.com sportsdesk@umich.edu PeRTicSigan ailp 5 - - - - --- - --------------- Death ol Canham condones Michigar sanctions; condemns Fisher fan era NAWEED SIKORA By Chris Burke Daily Sports Writer If Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman and Athletic Director Bill Martin were hoping for positive feed- back for the report that they filed with the NCAA concerning the men's bas- ketball team relationship with Ed E Martin, they need look A no further than the University's former Ath- letic Direc- tor Don Canham. "I think what they did was exactly right and' exactly what they had to do," Canham said. "I really don't know what the hell the NCAA Infractions Committee could do in addition." Canham also offered his support for another former athletic director at the University, Tom Goss, who was chas- tised heavily while he held the post - it was a reign that lasted from just 1997-2000. "Tom Goss fired (Steve) Fisher right away, which was a good move," said Canham of the former athletic director "People were in such an uproar over that, they wanted to fire Goss and rehire Fisher - he got off on the wrong foot, which was unfortunate because he was a good A.D. Starting with Goss, the University did exactly the right things." While Canham refused to place any of the blame for the Martin scan- dal on Goss, he did not have as posi- tive of a feeling about Fisher, the coach of the basketball team during the majority of the time when the Martin issues took place. "Anyone who looks at the violations probably understands that this is the worst violation in the history of college basketball," Canham said. "What Fisher has done to the basketball program and the University because he's incompe- tent is beyond belief. I don't think he cheated, but he's incompetent - it's a shame to see such a great basketball program ruined by incompetence. "Fisher had to know. When you have 10 guys driving around in $50,000 automobiles, you have to know that they don't all come from home." The athletic director position was given to Canham in 1968, and he said he was involved with the NCAA Infrac- tions Committee. Canham's belief was that Michigan had punished itself more than was to be expected, and the Infrac- tions Committee would agree. "The one thing I found on Infrac- tions Committees is that they are very fair - they could put on longer pro- bation or take away scholarships, but I think they'll say Michigan did the right thing." While he did believe that all the right steps had been taken by the people in charge beginning with Goss and contin- uing through Coleman and Martin's actions yesterday, Canham also stressed one suggestion for making sure the pro- BUT NOT FO RGOT TE N 1992: APRIL 4, O: DE.C I 5.7, 914-. 19, 21, 2, 29, 30 ' "N 1 9 9 2 J AN . 2 7 , 9 , E ' 1 , 1 02 2 02 26 ,22 , . 31 . E 2, 7, 10, 14 17, 2(, 2& 31C; '2.7 10, 13, 19, 21. 26, 2& Af*RIL3, 5 1995: NOV. 15. 17 22, 24 27 29; g n ., Dr.' 2, a9, 16,1.&,26-30 s Y1996: N,3 6, 3. 21, 23 2&,FEB, 3,10, V, 8,22, 24;27: Muesf1 3. , 9, l3 Nov, 2 0 DIC. 2, , 8 1, 15. 21,28,2930 1997 . 2,4,9 11,1, 1921, 25, 2& IPEk3 1, 6,16, 0, 23, 2 5; Y[ K R 1 5, 11 a 20,25, 7; Nv, V' 2430:D 36. 8, & 13, 17, 20, 24.25, 26 31 FE 15, 7. it, 17> ,2225, 28; MARCIT 2 5, 30;) a _ E3. 9, 12. 22, 27,30 1999: 2 -9 16. 20, 23 28, 30; F 3,4. 7.9, 16, 21.24, 27: MA C 4,:5 gram's problems will not be repeated. "I think you need a faculty board in control of athletics," Canham said. "We had it from 1918 until (Bo) Schem- bechler left the A.D. job in 1990, and we never had a problem; that was done away with by (former University presi- dents) James Duderstadt and Lee Bollinger. So then we have presidential control and you get the biggest viola- tion in our history." Despite his frustration with the change in the faculty board policy and Postseason ban best left Fisher's leadership, Canham continued to reiterate how pleased he was with the way the sanctions against the basketball team and the report sent to the NCAA was handled by Coleman, Martin and basketball coach Tommy Amaker. "Michigan has suffered and Tom Amaker has been penalized beyond belief," Canham said. "It was more than I thought that they'd do, and I think the Infractions Committee will see it that way - everyone involved has done a great job." up to NCAi n yesterday's press conference announcing the self-imposed sanc- tions Michigan will put on its bas- ketball program, University President Mary Sue Coleman made one thing very clear: "I am determined that noth- ing like this will ever happen again at Michigan," she said. "Let me say loud and clear: Integrity is our top priority." Coleman is right. Integrity should be one of Michigan's top priorities, and by punishing its basketball program, the University is demonstrating its commit- ment to winning the right way. It is the correct course of action. But Michigan stands for more than just integrity. It also stands for loyalty and dedication to its student-athletes - two qualities that did not show up when the University decided to ban its basket- ball team from postseason play this year. This particular sanction showed a lack of loyalty toward its current team members - particularly seniors LaVell Blanchard, Gavin Groninger and Rotolu Adebiyi - who lost the opportunity to ever play in the NCAA Tournament. Even though a ban may be necessary to properly punish the program, Michi- gan should have remained faithful to its current players by not taking the post- season away from them. "Even though this is the right thing to do, I want to personally apologize to our three basketball players who are graduating seniors," Michigan Athletic Director Bill Martin said. But was this the right thing to do? Was it necessary for Martin, Coleman and Tommy Amaker to pull Michigan out of the postseason before the NCAA could make a ruling, especially when no current player or coach is in any way connected with the crimes? Ever since rumors about the basket- ball program began to surface in 1996, the University has made a comprehen- sive effort to examine the allegations. The program was investigated three times and two coaching changes were made. Even though nothing was proven until the federal government got involved, the University made an honest effort to uncover the problem. "No one wanted to sweep these prob- lems under the rug," Coleman said. "Bill Martin has done all the right committee things to make it clear to everyone in the department that integrity is our top priority." If Michigan has done all the right things, as Coleman says it has, then it should not feel obligated to punish its current players and coaches. The Uni- versity's duty in this case is to punish the program by separating itself from the legacy left by Chris Webber, Robert Traylor, Maurice Taylor and Louis Bullock. It should take down the banners. It should pay the NCAA back for the money it was given. It should forfeit those games and it should be placed on probation. It should not turn its back on its cur- rent seniors by taking away their last chance at postseason play. If the NCAA needs to do this to Michigan, let it. The NCAA might feel a one- or two- year postseason ban is necessary for this program to truly be punished seri- ously. In fact, with the magnitude of this scandal, a ban should be put in place to punish the program. But let the NCAA slap this penalty onto the list of sanc- tions. That way, at least Michigan's complete devotion to its current players cannot be questioned. The University did have motives in banning its team from the postseason. It's the one concrete punishment that transcends the passage of time and actu- ally affects the current state of the pro- gram. It also might be an effort on the University's part to discourage the NCAA from imposing any additional sanctions when Michigan brings its case in front of the Infractions Committee. "These are very serious sanctions," Coleman said. "We considered these carefully in light of the gravity of the violations and the consistent approach the NCAA has had towards such prob- lems at other universities." These reasons are understandable, but not acceptable. The Michigan bas- ketball program most probably deserved to get banned from the post- season, but its current players did not deserve to have their own school take it away from them. NaweedSikora can be reached at nsikora@umich.edu. Sanctions won't affect M' recruiting By Seth Klempner Daily Sports Writer Yesterday morning, the Michigan men's basketball program took a major step forward in resolving the Ed Martin scandal. To some, the suffering will begin this year when they see the championship banners taken down - an asterisk added to six seasons in which all wins will be taken away. But in fact, the Wolverines have been suffering ever since speculations began. Opposing coaches would use the threat of sanctions to steer recruits away from Michigan and toward their school, resulting in a negative stigma around the Michigan pro- gram. But now, with the self- imposed sanctions, Michigan can move past the scandal. Recruiting analysts feel that the self-imposed sanctions will not hurt Michigan's recruiting efforts and that the future for Michigan coach Tommy Amaker is starting to clear up. "Let's say it does affect them, who cares," HoopScoop analyst Clark Francis said. "They've already got (the players that) they need. If (the NCAA extends the postseason ban until) next year, then maybe it hurts them a little bit more. But I think they're in great shape. I think they're a year or two away from turning the corner and being a great team in college bas- ketball." Despite this cloud hanging over the program, Amaker's recruiting efforts have been very successful. In his first year as coach at Michi- gan, he brought in one McDonald's All American - Daniel Horton - as well as several other nationally recognized talents to form what is considered to be one of the best freshman classes in the nation. One of the fears that came with sanctions was that perspective recruits would void their verbal commitments. But Amaker said that he called his commitments for the 2003-04 season and reassured them that scholarships would still be available for them. After Friday's Wayne State exhi- bition, Romulus High School star and Michigan commitment Ronald Coleman met with Amaker to dis- cuss the status of his scholarship and to reassure the coach that he still plans on attending Michigan. Even if the NCAA does lengthen Michigan's postseason ban by a year, Coleman, who is set to enter Michigan for the 2004-05 season, will not be affected. "Ron said that he's going to FRESH PIES B3RFAil C ROLL S (JomssLm ANNARBOR EALL ARRANEMENTS Tm: MARK.FLSNow Ow^NN Sal m days & Wednes days Start your hoflidis tradition~s here' at thekFarmrus'\Market " ^~' Michigan," Coleman's coach Nathan Oates said. "The only thing he was concerned about was if they were put on probation and had no scholarships, but coach Amaker assured us that there would be a scholarship available for him. "That's where he's going, and he's pretty fired up that if (self-imposed penalties were) the only penalties. Obviously he's disappointed for the current guys - but if this is it, which is what the coaching staff has told us, then he's still coming to See RECRUITS, Page 7 ............... Cal( Beth Israel Congregation 2000 Washtenaw, Ann Arbor m m