.4 4A - The Michigan Daily - Thursday, October 18, 2001 OP/ED albe £irbgzu i4aiftlj 420 MAYNARD STREET ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 daily. letters@umich.edu EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SINCE 1890 GEOFFREY GAGNON Editor in Chief MICHAEL GRASS NICHOLAS WOOMER Editorial Page Editors Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. NOTABLE QUOTABLE When things were in our control, we used to love to think that they were out of our control.... Now that things are outside our control, they tell us to take control. I'm trying. I'm trying." - Maureen Dowd in her Wednesday column in The New York Times. Q 4 ctt ha- S olwellan~d go YN n4Vow )i -4iere,'s oi \ o b , eet in CinC~hta'.- l 4) t' l ; .; - *1 Those BAM-N commies! They're FBI operatives, says I JOSH WICKERHAM THIs wpm WORLD 0 've got this little tape of Che Guevara songs I brought back from Mexico. I listen to it practi- cally nightly, one because I want to keep up my Span- ish, two because it reminds me of Che's steadfast inde- pendence and idealism and three because it's a pleasant distraction. As a cultural production, this cele- bratory and mournful eulogy to one fallen revo- lutionary is too far removed from my modes of behavior to seem real. Communism? "Chuh," says the Gen-Y package opener. Che talked about mass movements, militan- cy and revolutionizing the established order. That's something I'd be in favor of, but it's just too much work. It's something BAM-N (the By Any Means Necessary affirmative action group, for those who've been in a hole) talks about too. But it's just so much silliness. In the words of Homer Simpson, "You know our Bart's a little miracle, with his little button nose, his fat little stomach. He reminds me of me before the weight of the world crushed my spirit." I have no problem with socialists. Commu- nists don't really bother me either. They're like flies on the wall. If we wanted to eradicate every last one of them, it wouldn't be that tough. It was a little harder to kill communists in Che's days. His revolutionary ideals seemed much more potent and simple back then. But no one seems quite up to seizing the means of pro- duction these days, and with good reason. Com- munists squandered their chance. No one seems threatened by them. If anything, we University students get practically orgasmic knowing there are still commie operatives out there fighting the class war. So what are the communists doing trying to steal the show away from affirmative action supporters? Those communists. It seems all we hear about are the communists and their ties to the Revolutionary Worker's League. I say, to quote The Michigan Review's great El Senor Guipe, "Fooey!" There is something much more sinister going on here. It's clear that BAMN has greater motives than simply bringing affirmative action to its rightful place in higher education. I say the top dogs in this "student organization" are not really communists, nor do they really care about affirmative action. It becomes obvious to anyone who's watched as many "X-Files" episodes as I did in my youth (gee, I sound old) that some of BAM-N's leading members are working for the FBI. Luke non-student, mic-grabbing, "I'll- challenge-you-to-a-debate-any-time" Massie of the Detroit-based RWL and one of the intricate- ly-tied BAM-N higher-ups on campus, has been arrested many times over the years, yet has got- ten off every time. His daddy isn't a judge. How does he do it? Massie said he volunteers 60 hours a week for BAM-N, but doesn't get paid. He told the Daily he lives off an inheritance and occasional- ly works as an investigator for the Detroit law firm Scheff & Washington. "Shuh!," says I! That sounds like what Arnold Schwarzenegger said to his wife in "True Lies" when he was really going off to fight neo-Commie scuzzle- bugs for the government. Luke's sister Miranda works, but one would think she'd benefit from the inheritance just like her brother and wouldn't have to work. Why doesn't Mr. Massie have to work? BAM-N leader Jessica Curtin has been a student here for at least five years. I hear FBI scholarships pay well. A Jessica Curtin is not human. I'm utterly convinced she's from the same planet as Steve Forbes. Just as Michael Moore pointed out in "The Big One" that Forbes regularly speaks for two minutes or more without blinking, Curtin regularly speaks for two minutes or more with- out breathing. Confronting her in conversation is like confronting a projectile vomitist who has just downed a bottle of syrup of ipecac. This much I know to be true: The FBI, or the NSA, or any other acronym-guided gov- ernment agency with clearance, has a legiti- mate interest in discrediting leftist organizations. They have an interest in burrow- ing themselves deep and reporting back to the Dick Cheneys of the world. And from BAM- N's history, it's obvious that they're quite adept at breaking up student group meetings, something else law enforcement takes an inter- est in. Just look at Michigan State, which last year put in a full-time cop just to monitor stu- dent groups. We have no reason not to think we're already being watched. I see through BAM-N and their rhetoric. What century do they think they're in? Commu- nists had their chance and U.S. history makers selected them for extinction. The U.S. govern- ment wouldn't so blatantly fund a communist organization unless it was just a front for their own needs. Marxism makes sense only when applied in a purely theoretical world where power relations aren't involved. Giving a Marx- ist power makes as much sense as handing the constitution over to a right-wing theocracy. Oh crap. I forgot. That already happened. When it's all fantasy, the government can be as tyrannical as our minds will allow. As soon as it becomes real, we've already capitulated. Josh Wickerham can be reached via e-mail atjwickerh@umich.edu.Tune in next week for: "How one more terrorist action will send us spiraling into martial law, "or, "How the airlines got me to visit a boyfriend in New York with $90 plane fare. " V LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Albright's 'half-truth' really full truth To THE DAILY: I am writing in response to Tara Javidi and Idin Motedayen-Aval's "Albright deliberately deceptive" contribution to Wednesday's Daily (10/17/01). They refer to Madeline Albright's use of a "subtle half-truth" in reference to Albright's mention of the Iraqi government's use of chemical weapons against its own Kur- dish citizens. They cite the fact that this atrocity occurred during the Iran-Iraq war, when the United States was actively supporting Iraq. I fail to see how the omission of this fact (I don't con- test that it is a fact), renders Albright's mention of it a "half-truth." Not having attended the lec- ture, I am confused by how the mention of an established fact can be a "subtle half-truth." They also say that the American media was barely visible during this period, citing the appearance of only four New York Times sto- ries between 1984 and 1987 on such crimes. While this may be true of the Times, I specifi- cally remember a Time cover story about the gassing of Kurdish villages in northern Iraq right after the worst of these attacks. I believe it was 1987, although I was young, so I can't recall with certainty. What I do recall with cer- tainty, were the pictures, particularly one of a Kurdish women, dead in the street, holding her baby. Both lay in the gutter, faces swollen and sickly green, struck down by mustard gas deliv- ered by their own government. This image was burned into my memory, and it's what I think of every time I see Saddam Hussein. And I knew perfectly well that the American government supported his government, a fact the American .media managed to communicate to me at the age of twelve. Regardless of what deception Albright may have used regarding the role of American sanc- tions, no stretching of the truth is necessary to show that the current government of Iraq has butchered legions of its own people. JESSE JANNETTA Alumnus Kung-fu movies aren't about plot To THE DAILY: I am writing the Daily to address Tricia Donelan's misguided review of "Iron Monkey" as printed in the October 16th issue. While a review is purely a subjective viewpoint, and any person is entitled to not like a film, Donelan does not do the substance of the film justice in her writing. While a review should highlight the strong and weak points of a film, over half of the article is a summary of the plot. Now, any regular viewer of Hong Kong-made martial arts films knows the plot is, for the most part, insignificant. The entertainment lies in the action and excitement of the physics-defying kung-fu, made famous to American audiences in "Crouching Tiger," and to a lesser degree, "The Matrix." On this point, Iron Monkey sur- passes almost any other film of the genre. The martial arts are fantastic, and the wire-work is unparalleled. Donelan fails to address this, men- tioning the action in passing as "not enough to make the viewing experience of 'Iron Monkey' worthwhile." Why else does one go see a mar- tial arts movie? Furthermore, the humor and tone of the film is purely intentional, contrary to Donelan's sarcastic criticism of the film's lighter moments. The headline says "'Iron Mon- key' corrupts the martial arts Genre." This is tantamount to saying "'The Godfather' does a disservice to the gangster genre." I urge readers to dismiss Tricia Donelan's uninformed, disin- terested, and misguided review of "Iron Mon- key" and see it, as it stands to this very day on its own self-evident merits as one of the best kung-fu films ever made. DAVID VICTOR NCFD senior V VIEWPOINT Hatred of U.S. stems from hate in schools BY DAVID LIVSHIZ In the aftermath of the tragedy in New York and Washington many attempts have been made to show that the root causes of this terror were the U.S. policies in the Middle East. Unfortu- nately, these arguments fail to grasp at the real source of terror emerging from the Middle East: The hate that is propagated in the Middle East through schools, the press and the leaders of these countires. While I agree that U.S. sanc- tions on Iraq or support of autocratic regimes represent flaws in U.S. policy, it is also impor- tant to note that U.S. policies raise concerns and anger all over the world. For example, citizens of Eastern Europe, and especially those of Rus- sia and Serbia were incensed by the U.S. actions in Serbia/Kosovo and similarly, citizens of east textbooks, which preach the virtues of jihad and hatred of the Anerucab infidel. A report pre- pared by the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace points out that with the educational materials such as those used in Syrian and the Palestinian Authority's schools it is little won- der that people from these countries hate the U.S. or that they are willing to blow themselves up in an effort to kill Americans. In fact, the textbooks are so poisonous that a member of the European Parliament is taking action against countries which have financed the publications of these textbooks because the textbooks violate European anti-Racism laws. It is precisely this message of hate, which is taught to Arab chil- dren from the earliest possible age that leads to acts like the massacres of Sept. 11, not some miniscule flaws in U.S. policies. The unfortunate fact that there is no freedom of press in the Arab Middle East means that these messages of hate are the only ones available to the millions of citizens residing in these regimes. These citizens are often flustered with the corruption of the regime under which they live and need someone to blame. Understanding this, the shrewd Arab regimes use their monop- oly over the media to demonize the U.S. and deflect critisism of their own countries. It is these messages of hate that make the Middle East different from the rest of the world, not U.S. policies in that region. With these messages of hate being prevalent through the Middle East, is it any wonder that people there cheer when 6,000 Americans die? Moreover, as long as these messages continue to be displayed at every opportunity by the I