4 - The Michigan Daily - Friday, December 3, 1999 Ube £irbigun &tig Everyone should lighten up and enjo 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 daily.letters@umich.edu Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan HEATHER KAMINS Editor in Chief JEFFREY KOSSEFF DAVID WALLACE Editorial Page Editors Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. Down and out 'U' must address fall in minority applications 'T hey come out every year. Last December it was the man who threat- ened to sue a local radio station because they were playing too many Christmas songs. A few years ago, it was the girl who rudely confronted a drug store manager about the cashier who had wished her a Merry Christmas instead of a Happy Holiday. "It just slipped out," said the cashierb afterward, very apologetic, as if he had used profanity or Jennifer insulted the girl's Strausz mother. "Honest. I'm really sorry." Now it's the woman at the book- store who is openly complaining about the Christmas decorations on the streets of Ann Arbor and in store windows. Like some of us, these people don't cel- ebrate Christmas. But unlike most of us, they are all worked up about it. They feel like they're being bombarded with Christmas spirit. They are tired of having it shoved into their faces. And they are frus- trated because they do not have the option to look away. Christmas is exactly where it always has been at this time of year. Everywhere. There are decorations lin- ing every street, Christmas specials domi- nating television air time. There are malls filled with Santa Clauses and Christmas lights and people buying those dancing Santa dolls that shake back and forth to the tune of "Jingle Bell Rock." There is a national obsession with Christmas. or at least the secular part of Christmas. The Santa part. His elves. Rudolph. The trees. The lights. The music. The frustration of the seasonal com- plainers is not hard to understand and it's probably pretty easy to sympathize with. But I dare to point out that there are other ways to spend time, doing things like sit- ting peacefully, which would be much more effective than doing things like think- ing negatively and expressing negative thoughts. By adding their negativity to America's Christmas, the complainers are making the situation worse, adding more awkwardness, creating something else to complain about. I really like Christmas. I think that Christmas carols are wonderful, Christmas lights are beautiful and mantles look per- fect when Christmas stockings are hanging down. I smile every time I read Francis P. Church's "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus," and I could watch "Miracle on 34th Street" four times in a row and enjoy it every time. It is easy for me to appreciate Christmas as an observer without feeling like it is pos- ing a religious threat. The parallel that comes to mind is eating at a restaurant where another family is cel- ebrating a birthday. You are in the same room as the family, but you don't have the same occasion to celebrate. At the end of the meal, when they sing to the birthday girl, the room fills up with the singing. And even though it is loud and it is not your cel- ebration, you can still look over and smile. The annual Christmas hype tends to last longer than the average birthday song, but the same principle applies. If you are pret- ty sure of who you are and what you are y December doing, then there is no need to feel threat- ened by someone else's celebration, even if it is in your face. You can look over, smile and continue your conversation, or even stop for a brief moment to cheer for the birthday girl as she blows out the candles on her cake. I admit that the seasonal complainers (who would feel threatened by the birth- day cake) actually have a few valid con- cerns. There are some Christmas songs that can get pretty annoying, especially ones like "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer," when you include the extra lyrics ("like a light bulb"). And some Christmas decorations are just plain tacky. But if we remember the pop songs that the radio stations play on repeat during the rest of the year, and if we keep in mind that there are some things around that are even more tacky than a grouping of life size glow-in-the dark plastic Santa Claus statues, we can keep these concerns iI perspective and under control. The complainers must have missed that day in elementary school when Miss Ferguson showed us that you shouldn't ever point at someone because three fingers will be pointing right back at you (four if you're double-jointed in the thumb). As the com- plainers point the blame at Christmas, tfe other fingers are pointing at us. It is not up to us to try to put a handle on Christmas. The solution lies in us, in our own atti- tudes, in our own religious identity. Tonight is the first night of Hanukkah] a relatively small Jewish festival that is rich in tradition and beauty. I'll picture the fin- gers pointing back at me tonight as I light the menorah and sit peacefully as the flick- ering candles burn down. - Jennifer Straus: can be reached over e-mail at jstraus:@umich.edu. A LooK BACK O nthe heels of a recent report indi- eating minority enrollment is decreasing in the University's prestigious medical school, a report of total enroll- ment in the University indicated a contin- ued decline in the number of underrepre- sented minority students. In the past four years, the percentage of underrepresented minorities - black, Latino/a and Native American students has dropped from 15 percent to a mere 11.3 percent. While Native Americans have seen the sharpest drop in enrollment percentage, the statistics should alarm everybody, regardless of their race or eth- nicity. Numerous questions come to mind as the report is viewed. The most signifi- cant: What does this say about the University's affirmative action policies? Despite the best efforts of the University to attract minority students, problems still place obstacles in the path of the tal- ented minority students the University desires to draw. The recent lawsuits challenging admissions practices are widely consid- ered the most significant setback to the University. Minority students may per- ceive the lawsuits as both threatening to their opportunities to succeed as well as to the prestigious reputation of the University. Stationed near the city of Detroit and its sizable population of black and Latino/a students, one would think that the University would take full advantage of the talent pool of minority students. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case. Some schools are recruited more heav- ily than others. The Detroit public school system has 28 separate high schools - the University should be recruiting vigor- ously at all of them rather than just Detroit's "elite" high schools. This fault must be more thoroughly addressed to alleviate concerns about admissions pro- cedures. Other obstacles to minority enrollment include rigorous admissions procedures and a lack of sufficient financial aid. The University should take a hard look at its admissions policies to identify as yet unknown factors that may discourage minorities from applying. One such barrier is the overemphasis on standardized tests. Wealthier students who can afford test preparation courses obviously have a great advantage taking these tests. Students who attend poorer schools with few computers or recent technology, no AP tests and none of the other luxuries of upper-class schools continue to suffer in the process. These considerations should be thought over carefully. The steady drop in minority applica- tions also could be due to how minority students feel they are being treated at the University. Word of any neglect is bound to spread to prospective minority stu- dents. In the wake of protests against increased security at minority-dominated functions at the Michigan Union and another protest by black students at the Fleming Administration Building, the University should be especially sensitive to minority concerns on campus. With so many people encouraging raises in the number of minority students on campus, the results over the past four years have been discouraging. MATT WIMSATT Advancing fairness? AP courses should not 4ny college's admissions process should attempt to evaluate appli- cants by the fairest standards possible. This means that each applicant should be judged on not only what they did in high school, but also whether they took advan- tage of the opportunities offered to them. If they take advantage of opportunities at the high school level, they will presum- ably do so again in college. The University of California at ".Berkeley and other California institutions f give large bonus credit in their admis- sions process to students who take Advanced Placement courses in high kschool even though many underprivileged _applicants do not have access to these courses. Giving extra weight to AP cours- es could have disastrous effects on an already declining population of under- privileged and minority students. While colleges do not have any control over the amount of AP courses a given applicant is offered, they should be more sensitive to students who don't have these advantages. This means that even those students who achieve outstanding high school GPAs and extra curricular records will automatically be at a disadvantage in the admissions process for not taking AP courses that were unavailable to them. Currently, a proposal has been sug- gested that rewards applicants a smaller amount for taking AP courses. In the cur- rent issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education, University of California at Davis psychology Prof. Keith Widaman give applicants an edge AP courses have an advantage over their less fortunate peers in that their GPAs are weighted by admissions officers. Awarding less bonus points, in conjunc- tion with suggestions for students to take AP level classes at community colleges and funding for more AP courses are all efforts in place that would help level the playing field - but they do not fix the immediate problem of bias against less privileged students. In the wake of a 1996 amendment to the state constitution prohibiting colleges from considering race in admissions, it is more critical for changes to be made in the near future that ensure underprivi- leged students the opportunities to attend Berkeley and other top California schools. It is particularly important that admissions officers consider the course load students take as compared to what is offered. This means that even if a student can't take AP courses, they will still be rewarded if they challenge themselves in the classroom. While certain students aren't able to take a wide variety of AP courses, they are finding other ways to challenge them- selves. These students are truly showing initiative and a desire to enhance their educational experience. After all, the most important aspect of evaluating can- didates should be how well they are able to take a lot from the school and give a lot back. Giving extra credit for things that certain students can't control, such as AP courses, makes the entire admissions Hazing is a character building experience TO THE DAILY: I am writing in response to Matt Muller's letter ("Sanz' view of hazing 'disturbing"' 12/1/99). It disappoints me to see Muller turn on everything that made him what he is. I would have appreciated some type of rebuttal defending his views on hazing; rather he choose to insult and dismiss a fellow service- man in the Armed Forces. As a side note, that was a major faux pas. I would never question his service to his country, nor the manner in which he performed it. He should pay the same courtesy to others. I did not like the hazing I received in my time. Everyday I thought of ways to get back at the people who made my life hell. It was degrading, demoralizing and often against the "rules." However, when it was all over with, the feeling of accomplishment and pride was more than I could describe. It was a mix of "I made it, I beat you and nothing can get me down again." You can believe than when the time came for me to inflict the same hardships on others, I was right there in the forefront. I suspect, Muller subscribes to the new theory of military training, where we all sit down and talk about character, duty, etc. We discuss it, vote on it, and modify anything we don't like. Men and women training together (except in the Marine Corps) in a happy envi- ronment. Your squad leader doesn't yell at you; instead he discusses with you what you did wrong and how you can change it. This all sounds great, but it doesn't work. We just don't realize it because we haven't had a real conflict since the Vietnam War. Besides the people on peacekeeping missions across the world, most servicemen these days drill, chip paint and clean weapons - hardly tasks that require strong moral character. I'm happy to know that there are still places in the military - Service Academies, various boot camps, special forces training - where hazing still goes on. Used in conjunc- tion with rigorous training, hazing produces results far more valuable than any other type of character building exercises. Think of haz- ing as building train tracks - it's hard, excru- ciatingly slow and you can't see the whole job while you're doing it. But when it's all done, you have a great train line that will last decades if it was done right the first time. By keeping the tradition of hazing alive, we are ensuring that future generations of officers and enlisted men alike will share a common bond that ensures trust, fidelity and above all, a sense that they can accomplish anything even when their body says stop. CHRIS GEORGANDELLIS LSA SENIOR Students should take an interest in basketball team TO THE DAILY: 1 x r ,- { . / , o r , ,,,, f R1 R x a / f 5 b ,j/4 w # Vb ' L Iy , 3 ,y k lY' f r,,,r . ' ' "' / K .i. .,. .o'^ , ,.. students at our school would wear them to support him. He no longer does this, but one of our extremely talented first-year student does. Jamal Crawford wears a headband dur- ing the games this year, and to support the team, the student body should all done similar headbands. Not only will this pump up the team and unify the students, but it will send a message to Duke when they come to town. REID WAINESS LSA SOPHOMORE Union's policies are not racially discriminatory TO THE DAILY: As a fellow student at this University, and as an employee of the Union, let me please say with all my heart that we do not have "a discriminatory union" here on our campus as the Daily's so-titled editor- ial insinuated on 11/22/99. Allow me to refute a couple of points: 1. Events targeted to black or latino/a events have been monitored with a much stronger police presence than those domi- nated by white students. False. Dance parties that fall under the policy's criteria and target any student organization require DPS presence. These officers are assigned more than a month before the actual event, based on the host's expected turnout. If you expect 400 people to come to your dance, then we assign you four officers (one per 100). If only 100 show up that night, 4 officers still show up. 2. Black or Latino/a students are often subjected to wristbands and ID verifica- tion. True. So is anyone else attending a party. The capacity of a dance is either set by the student organization, or fire code. Some groups open their parties to anyone. Others open them only to University stu- dents. The latter case means the Union ticket office must ID students before sell- ing them tickets. 3. Sometimes black and Latino/a stu- dents have to leave via the side door. Fal.UIz1nless the- tuident npartiesz have majority of dances that fall under the pol- icy's criteria are booked by minority events. Last year we booked 30 dances under the policy: 14 "black," six "Latino/a," three "Indian," three "Asian" and four other interracial events. Also, events such as open houses (Michigras), dinner receptions and week- end-long conferences do not fall under the Dance Policy. They do not require DPS presence. Let me conclude by saying I agree the dance policy needs changing. Many peo- ple who work in the Union do. But this need for change is certainly not motivated by an old policy that is racist. I simply * would not work for an organization that had discriminatory practices, nor would 1. enforce a policy that I felt was discrimi- natory. MATT HEALY ENGINEERING SENIOR STUDENT BUILDING MANAGER THE MICHIGAN UNION Reader has seen Nike labor violations first-hand TO THE DAILY: Nike's most recent advertisement advised people to respond to critics of their labor con- ditions by saying, "I'll believe it when I see it" Well, I've seen it. I saw it this past summer, while examining apparel factories in Mexico, I investigated a Nike subcontract facility. I found there the employment of child laborers, intimidation of workers by management, and poverty level wages. A child worker explained to me that the factory owner hid her and sev- eral other underage workers in the factory warehouse on the day of an announced facto- ry inspection. Nike boasts "the most comprehensive independent labor monitoring programs of any company in the world," yet I, a college student working on a shoestring budget, was able to find several violations that Nike'. high-priced monitors missed. Clearly some- thing is fundamentally wrong with Nike's monitoring system. Workers who spoke can- didiv to rme aot uworkcnhwp e viltio af~id I