4 -- The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, November 30, 1999 420 Maynard Street HEATHER KAMINS Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editor in Chief daily.letters@umich.edu Edited and managec by students at the University of Michigan Moo'. JEFFREY KOSSEFF DAVID WALLACE Editorial Page Editors 'Jnless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority offthe Dailys editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Dailv. FRO THE AILY Givw us a break .Students would benefit from a fall vacation Formula One for A s. l ish orging ourselvs on Thanksgising lefto ers, we'll put the dishes away. Hand me that half-eaten bowl of stuffing. Really, if you've had enough. let it go. Put the drumstick down. Take away the bowl of beets, the masheds potatoes, the mushy yams. Wash the gravy off the table- cloth. What's this'? Something left on the table for you? Of course, there's something on the table for you. Term papers. Fat. obstinate term papers who look like they feasted D on several courses of Wallace turkey and mashed potatoes and washed them down with a pitcher of gravy. They've gotten bigger and fouler looking. That's because we let them loose. They've had months to eat since we first heard of them. They have fed on our pro- crastination and have snacked on our anx- iety. Now they've finally grown to full size as they polished off Thanksgiving with you. All our time. devoured. Now we've got several of the angry varmints running circles around us and causing the kind of widespread panic not seen since the Cuban Missile Crisis. What can we do'? Search through table scraps for that wishbone and give it a pull. Eat some more of that 24-hour fruit salad and see if it keeps you up 24 hours. If it does, eat some more. You're gonna need it. This time of the year would be more tol- term papers: Write now! erable if everyone were in our same gravy ation. Those reasons are like Portugal on boat. But they're not: In every class. the Iberian Peninsula of our pressured there's some no-good do-gooder already time. done with the term paper. Get this: He's The larger chunk stems from perfection- been doing a little bit each week. Or she ism and paranoia. Like a Formula One wrapped it up over the Thanksgiving holi- crew tackles a car in the pits, so do we day while the tryptophan in your blood- revise our papers when they're in the pits. stream left you prone like a mainframe We don't want this paper hitting the wall in leveled by Y2K. turn four. so we've got to check the tires. I believe Mulder and Scully should open And we don't want to run out of gas with a an X-file on these people. Something's not lap left, so we've got to add some fuel. quite right. Most people collapse through We take it right up to the limit until ou4 the doorways of their apartments after last read-through equals the time of a Mika spending more than 12 hours at classes Hakkinen tire change. "Wow, 15 seconds, and then work. After a hard day, I hit the he's outta there fast!" We floor the gas and canvas faster than a stooge in a Don King off we go to turn in those papers. fight. What's keeping them going? Coffee, Even if I could change the way most of Coca-Cola, cocaine? I want a full investi- us do our papers - and eliminate all that gation, and then maybe I'll have what stress - I'm not sure I would. Sometimes they're having. the pressure pushing us to our limit makes It's not just those students handing in us better. In sports, it's called coming their papers in November making it tough. through in the clutch. It's the complete variance of when papers In the real world, it's called normal. If are due. Because invariably your room- the boss wants something done, he or she mate's papers are due on different dates wants it done now. AtSI? Dilbert. When than yours, and things get ugly. car trouble arises, it can't wait. How often Your roommate says, "Oh, you've got a do you see adults out of college with big paper due tomorrow. Glad I'm not you. months to plan how they'll tackle their Mine's due next Friday." I believe this problems? Rarely. Taxes, maybe, but statement occurs frequently throughout notice most of them wait until April 14 to campus and leads to relationships strained do them. on par with Latrell Sprewell and P.J. If it were tip to me, I'd eliminate the Carlesimo. looming prospect of term papers from our Then the plague continues as your syllabi. I might be crazy, but if most of ui roommate savors watching television, tak- don't do them until the last few days ing time to eat and having the nerve to they're due, why not just assign them the sleep while your fingers suffer over a key- first day of class - due the next week - board. You're like Tantalus, and the god and save us the nagging worries building you offended is time; everything you want all semester? Too much last-minute pres- so close, but just out of reach. sure? Most of us spent high school train- But I think for a lot of us, our procrasti- ing for it anyway. nation stems from factors other than sits- - David Wallace can be reached over ply putting the papers off for fun or relax- e-mail at davidinsrmwutmich.edtt. s the taste of turkey lingers on the tongue, students trudge back to Ann Arbor from the fall semester's first and last four-day weekend. With only two weeks left until the beginning of final exams and the start of a healthy binge of study, the recently completed vacation may be students' last time for intensive rest and relaxation before celebrating the holidays. The Thanksgiving vacation is far too short and late' in the semester to count as a significant break from rigorous study. The University needs to institute an earlier, more substantial holiday to com- bat college stress. Thanksgiving is criticized for being the first break of the school year because it falls after most of the academic semes- ter has passed. Often it is the only time students who live far from Ann Arbor receive enough vacation time to excuse a trip home. Two and a half months are a long time spent away from family and hometown friends and many take advantage of the shortened week in November to travel home. The Thanksgiving break is too late to be the only vacation from school, espe- cially since most will once again go home between semesters. Too often, schoolwork consumes every aspect of students' lives. The University is far from a commuter school, and students frequently immerse themselves in the cul- ure of college life. Yet, a great irony of tife in Ann Arbor is that although the city -s brimming with cultural and education- 1 opportunities, students have neither the time nor the energy to participate in them. A midterm fall semester break gives students choosing to stay in Ann Arbor the ability to explore the depths of the city, not to mention time to relax, sleep or work without the interruption of classes. The University is often a leader in higher education innovation, but this time it must take the lead of other colleges and create a true fall break. Many schools - including Princeton, Notre Dame and New York University - have breaks ear- lier than Thanksgiving and failed to expe- rience any visible decrease in academic standards. Though other colleges' actions alone should not dictate the University's conduct, the fact that other prestigious institutions value a midterm break in the fall gives validity to any argument for such a holiday. Creating a fall semester break necessi- tates compensationfor days lost. Starting the semester earlier can make up for vaca- tion time spent away from classes. For example, this year classes started after the Labor Day weekend on Sept. 8. Departments like the Medical School and the School of Dentistry start classes in the middle of August. A break in the middle of a semester is more substantial than a few days lost in the large gap between winter and fall semester. Breaks reinvigorate students. They give hope in an academic system that sometimes seems bleak and never-ending, while making a college semester much easier to stomach. It is difficult to find a person willing to turn down a sanctioned vacation. The benefits of a midterm fall semester holiday outweigh the slight inconvenience of starting school a few days earlier. These arguments all pose the question: Why does the University need a break in March and not in October? iETTERS TO THE EIO WTO policies do CHIP CULLEN GRINDINC E N IB " _ __ Free installation DIA should not censor art exhibit M aya Angelou, J.D. Salinger, Elvis Presley and the Beatles -- what do these people have in common'? Besides' being legendary artists in their respective fields, they are bound by a more dubious connection. All of these artists have been the object of censorship at some point in their careers. Censorship is a persistent threat to the artistic community, and it recently hit home when the Detroit Institute of Arts decided to postpone the showing of "Art Until Now," by Jef Bourgeau due to its questionable content. Because the DIA censored the installation on account of its provocative content, the DIA's actions open the door to silencing important artistic voices. Granted, Bourgeau may not be an artist on par with the Beatles or Angelou. His installation, which includes a vial of urine from Andres Serrano's photograph of a submerged crucifix, a piece called "Bathtub Jesus" with a doll wearing a condom and a video dealing with men- struation, would likely disgust many viewers. But that does not mean the DIA should censor it. More than Bourgeau's show, a greater principle is at stake. By successfully censoring one artist's work, the door is open to further censorship. And the next act of censorship may be against an artist on par with great artists who have been censored in the past. In postponing Bourgeau's show, the DIA does not mean to promote censorship, but that is the result. Furthermore, by refusing to show Bourgeau's installation, the DIA ignores that art is meant to be provocative. Art provokes reaction and evokes feeling - sometimes in disgust. As Bourgeau him- self admits in Nov. 20 issue of The Detroit News, "I'm playing with ideas about provocative art drawn from our culture." That these provocative ideas promote dis- gust is not surprising. What is surprising is the DIA feels the public cannot handle such disgust. Ultimately, it should be the public who decides if Bourgeau's work deserves dis- play. By postponing Bourgeau's show, the DIA only increases the controversy sur- rounding the installation. If Bourgeau's exhibit is truly more disgusting than thought provoking, the public will quick- ly let the art gallery know with low atten- dance. Rather than letting one man or a board of directors decide which artwork to display, the public should serve as judge. Ultimately, censorship curbs quality artwork. Because art is meant to provoke, censorship discourages artists attempting to evoke strong feelings in their audience. There will always be a ready supply of "shock" art, but each individual deter- mines which pieces have value and which lack substance. By encouraging censor- ship, the DIA cannot eliminate tasteless art, but it can discourage quality art. The DIA's decision is understandable, if ultimately incorrect. Bourgeau's exhib- it may be as tasteless as the DIA insists. Even so, censoring the exhibit is the wrong solution to the problem. By cen- soring artwork, the DIA promotes censor- ship in the future, which could result in truly great works being overlooked. not promote democratic trade TO THE DAILY: All this week and into the next, dele- gates from the 135 member nations of the World Trade Organization are meeting in Seattle. The event has drawn 2100 observers from 775 iternational NGOs and as many as half a million protesters, repre- senting issues from labor to indigenous property rights to agriculture to biodiversi- ty. Even as you read this the dissonance of their individual voices and activities are united in a common goal: democratic trade. Since its creation in 1995, the WTO has worked under a banner of free trade to facil- itate ascorporate-managed prerogative it whichlshsort-ris profits dominate other al- ues. Free trade is championed by neoliberal economists as a means of maximizing effi- ciency in production and growth by reduc- ing trade barriers between autonomous states. But there is (as there always seems to be in an economic system notorious for cost externalization a certain irony in associat- ing the word "free" with this type of trade. Only a handful of bureaucrats are called upon to manage the trade affairs of much of the world in a body which exercises unchecked judicial power on the laws of nations. Members are not elected by the people of representative nations and hold no formal accountability for their actions. Rulings on challenges to laws deemed unfair to trade (such as health codes for food or emission standards on fuel as well as tariffs) are final. There are no conflict-of- interest rules, and the deciding panelists often have littleappreciation of domestic law or of governmental responsibility to protect workers, the environment or human rights. From a ruling that allowed theUnited States to impose trade sanctions on the EU for barring imports of hormose-treated beef, to the support of intellectual property rights laws on plants and animals that favor U.S. and European pharmaceutical corpora- tions' exploitation of indigenous knowledge and cultural resources in "underdeveloped" countries, to rulings against countries which oppose importing fish netted without sim- ple measures taken to protect sea turtles, we see a common theme emerge: Trade, in itself a multifunctional interaction that expresses an autonomous nation or culture's ethical, ecological and social as well as economic values, is reduced by WTO actions to narrow abstractions of growth and efficiency. In its practical application, neoliberal free trade can be summarized as such: "We will produce as much as we can to flood your markets with our goods and work as hard as we can to keep your goods out of ours"' This is not a system of trade that favors development, or equality, but the continued sequestration of capital wealth into the hands of a small few at the health, labor and environmental expenses of bil- lions. This concentration of power is frighten- ingly undemocratic. Every single environ- mental or public health law challenged at WTO thus far has been ruled illegal. Perhaps most disturbing of all, corporations have begun to use the mere threat of mas- sive lawsuits against governments to get them to repeal existing environmental, health and labor laws. These suits frame existing laws as trade barriers, and the money requested is for profits which would have been earned had the laws not been in existence. Free, indeed! Concerned students, activists and local citizens are joining their voices today with those in Seattle, and we encourage all University students and faculty to do the same! All day today on the Diag we will be distributing information to raise awareness on how the WTO operates and the issues at stake in the current round of negotiations. We encourage you come out to the noontime rally, and also to stop by to write letters and sign petitions to President Clinton and congressional representatives calling for more democratic trade reform. This evening at 6 p.m. in 2024 Dana, Prof. Ian Robinson will be giving a lecture on the WTO's history, problems and alternatives. We urge all of you to attend these events, to follow media coverage of the negotiations and the protests and to join us in working toward equality, justice and democracy in global trade! JOSEPH GROENKE SNRE AND LSA SENIOR Facts discredit stereotypes of terrorists TO THE DAILY: In' Rabeh Soofi's letter to the editor "Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee 'whines"' (11/24/99), she argues that since the group called "Arab Muslims" "composes the largest terrorist threat to American security ... the world (is justified) to pass such quick judgement on Arab Muslims as a whole" when there are suspicions of terrorist activity. For some reason it is still necessary at this point in history to show that ignorance and stereo- types are wrong. If my memory serves me right, a white man with ties to Michigan named Timothy McVeigh killed more Americans than any Arab terrorists. Workplace vio- lence is a far greater threat to the average American than any Arabs. Also, accord- ing to the State Department's last report on terrorism (1998), other regions in the world had many more anti-American acts of terror than the Middle East (http:w//ww'u'it.state.gov/wwit,,'t/globau/terror- ismil). Stereotypes conveniently neglect facts. Soofi's argument is justifying stereo- types in general. We all know stereotypes have a grain of truth in them; that does not mean they are acceptable bases for policies, media coverage or the worldviews of the college-educated. Each of these require slightly sophisticated understandings (you would hope). Simplistic notions such as "well since some do, assuming they all are capable is fine" should not fly in an acade- mic environment. She makes the accusation that "the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee are apologists of Arab Muslims around the world." First, she groups a highly diverse, multi-sectarian, multi- national. multi-class group into one conve- niently monolithic category ("Arab Muslims") as if there is homogeneity. This is the result of ignorance. Second, to be an 5HOUu-D --- ( t t'1 Nl/C k apologist of a broad and diverse group such as Arab Muslims, means that the group is accused or can be found guilty of some crime. What is the crime ADC is apologetic about? What is a crime, that a a group, Arab Muslims have committed' Perhaps it is the great crime against humanity that conservatives have been fighting against: being different. Soofi suggests that the crime this broad group is guilty of is that "Arab Muslims ... further their causes through death and terrorism." That is news to me. ADC is an organization with Arab Muslims (and Christians) and has not killed or terrorized anyone, although we have received terrorizing e-mails from others. I could point her out to thousands of Arab Muslim organizations in the Arab World that work hard for human and civil rights by building schools, running hospi- tals, lobbying politicians and other civil methods. However, their activities are not deemed newsworthy. It is easier for the media to report news that fits into the associations people already hold (Arab = terrorist) rather than challenge ignoran assumptionswith contrary ideas.g a What about the Christian fundamental- ists who bomb abortion clinics and shoot doctors? Does this mean we should be on the look out for White Christians? Soofi makes an absolutely puzzling defense of stereotypes based on statistics quantified meaninglessly with such vague terms as "endless," "countless" and "numerous." Yet, the total percentage of Arab Muslims willing to actively engage in acts of terrorism is less than one ten-thou sandth of 1 percent. And according to the State Department, anti-American terrorist acts in the Middle East amounted to five out of Ill world-wide. It should be noted that Western Europe accounted for 13 and that in the period from 1993 to 1998, this imbal- ance is equally disproportionate. Soofi speaks so highly of "facts" but completely ignores them. They do not mesh with her severely limited understanding of group she so adamantly and unjustifiably chastises. I suggest that we must try to build more complicated views of the world through education and open-mindedness. We should discard the simplistic associa- tions that we use to process world events because they tend to lead to severely lim- ited conclusions such as in Rabeh Soofi's letter. If we filter news about Arabs and Muslims with the association of them as terrorists, we will make the same mi4 takes we did after the Oklahoma City Bombing, TWA flight 800 and on a regu- lar basis when Arabs try to fly anywhere. However, if we understand that the vast majority of Arabs and Muslims are not terrorists, the negative repercussions that arise from ignorance - hate crimes, prej- udice, discriminatory policy and violated rights - will be avoided. WILL YOUMAN LSA SENIOR 'M geiRRY, StR, 8tIN Tl~t,5'l L.. ZEE C"Cu,"-w "' -" .o PR -'A 6~ 51'GmM ~