4A - The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, September 8, 1998 UII e £lidr~ilafg 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan ::.Nr,A , LAURIE MAYK Editor in Chief JACK SCHILLACI Editorial Page Editor 'Charging is not the same as conviction, so that's a harder issue. ... I would rather err on the side of making sure our students are safe.' -University Regent Phillip Power; on the administrations suspension of Daniel Grange, who would have started classes today A LOOK BACK M ATT W A* Clinton ' trubles tell S more about ourselves than they do about him T hough allegations and rumors of extramarital affairs and excessive hanky-panky have followed President Bill Clinton throughout his political career, the problems before 1998 were little more than pro- logue to the scandal. . that has ravished the nation from top to bottom since January. After "friend" Linda Tripp announced h r a Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY 6 until when? S,'TES6 PNt.JI!IkLS1KC REP1URES KEEP KILLINGC CVC OTHER, ovE -T1115 r4AMe oF -1NHI5-1Nlr4G GAMED.. RlIG vKN ~~(S)foATS RIGHT 1 'U' should not block Granger's matriculation 1N15 RELIGIJON MU)ST BE O ne of the bedrocks of American soci- ety lies in the assurance that all per- sons accused of a crime have the right to trial before they are punished. The recent case of Daniel Granger - a Grosse Pointe North High School graduate who intended to attend the University this semester - has dragged the administration into the middle of the public spotlight where the hypocrisy of its own administrative deci- sions is open to scrutiny by all. The problems started when a picture of Granger - the president of his senior class - with his genitals exposed appeared in the 1997-98 yearbook. A school investiga- tion resulted in allegations that Granger and other students had enganged is sexual acts with several other students. Granger soon found himself charged with third- degree criminal sexual conduct, or what amounts to statutory rape because the girls allegedly involved were under the age of consent. On Aug. 27, Granger's problems grew when he received a letter from Vice President for Student Affairs Maureen Hartford informing him that he had to attend a hearing to discuss his future at the University. Last Tuesday, Provost Nancy Cantor sent him another letter, informing him he would be suspended at least until winter term, pending the findings of a University investigation. Despite the University's statement that its actions are an "admissions review," the entire predicament smacks of past prob- lems engendered by the University's Code of Student Conduct. The Code is a three- page document that attempts to create a shadow of a legal system over campus, at the same time ignoring many of the rights basic to citizens. The administration's actions seriously tbreaten some of the most basic building blocks of the criminal justice system, not the least of which is the belief that the accused are innocent until they are proven guilty. Granger has not plead guilty; no judge or jury has ruled as to his guilt. The possible threat to the University student body is unclear, if existent at all. The administration has thrown the presumption of innocence to the wind for its convenience. Further, by punishing Granger without sufficient investigation or procedure, the University has violated his right to due process. The administration is casting an aura of guilt on the 18-year-old without giving him a chance to defend himself. Even if the University's premises had some meat to them, Granger's actions would fall beyond the University's juris- diction. First of all, it took place beyond the confines of the University's campus. The administration evidently feels that its brand of justice should be omnipresent in student lives - a proposition that is patently foolish. Even if the University's authority is accepted as extending beyond campus boundaries, Granger allegedly committed the act last winter - long before he would have become a student - thus putting the acts well beyond the scope of the University. The University should not attempt to impose itself in lieu of the legal system. If Granger's guilt can be proven, then he will not be able to attend the University because he likely will be in prison. Hartford and Cantor's actions are a chal- lenge to Granger's civil liberties - and a serious threat to those of all students. If it must delve into the matter, the University should allow Granger to attend school dur- ing the investigation. Supposition and pre- mature reaction have supplanted the inves- tigative processes that normally take place. The University should recant its actions, and let the legal system do its job. } UR AO(- NI. N. - This cartoon originally ran in the Feb. 15, 1996 Daily VIEWPOINT Life scinces play m 1 importint role at the 'U' Unfrindlysies Northwest should acknowledge pilots' sacrifices' t seems like only yesterday that high-pro- and they don't work more than 14 days a file politicians were desperately calling month, Northwest executives argue? Pilots for President Bill Clinton to end the United are skilled workers who hold hundreds of Auto Workers strike through federal arbitra- lives in their hands every time they start up tion. But now, amid the second largest strike the engine. Northwest marginalizes the crit- of 1998, officials are begging Clinton to ical role pilots play in the entire operation send the Northwest pilots back to work under by saying that their pilots don't deserve the the guise of an old labor law that would put going rate common in the industry. the strike off for 60 days. But intervening in Northwest has presented propaganda to the Northwest pilots' strike will not resolve win the support of the public through skewed the fundamental problem at hand - that numbers and claims that fail to address Northwest has mistreated its workers. important facts about the industry. They say With 6,000 pilots on the picket line that with the raise they have proposed, the instead of in the cockpit, 1,700 flights have pilots will be making more than other pilots been cancelled so far and three major cities at top airlines. While in part true, pilots at Detroit, Minneapolis and Memphis - American, United and Delta Airlines all are are without their primary airline service. in line for their own contract negotiations, For many people who had to change their negating Northwest's claim. After years of flights or opt for a different mode of trans- concessions, the other airlines' compensa- portation, the strike has presented as a bur- tion packages will all likelihood provide far deri on the country and the economy. greater wages than in any package Clearly, both sides of the equation need to Northwest has offered its employees. work together to help alleviate future prob- In addition to better pay, the pilots are lems them strike will cause. asking for a number of concessions. Northwest's management should not forget Retroactive pay for years of concessions is how the pilots saved the airline from bank- not unreasonable, nor is a stock option plan rdpicy in 1993 by taking a 15.7-percent pay comparable to other airlines. In a time when cIt; While the inconvenience created by the skilled jobs are becoming scarce for work- strike is significant, it would have been much ing Americans, consumers should stand up Worse if the entire airline had folded. Also, the for laborers and view advertisements with fact that Northwest has amassed record prof- skepticism. Just as the United Parcel it- since 1993 must be brought into strike Service and UAW strikes were successful negotiations. Instead of attacking the pilots for displays of the power of labor, the inconvienencing passengers over the past Northwest pilots are reminding us of who week, their critics should recognize their com- drives corporations - the workforce. meitment to their customers for working under Keeping this in mind, both Northwest and alow wage contract for the past five years. the pilots should work together to produce a How could these pilots be unhappy when contract that will be beneficial for manage- BY GILBERT S. OMENN Each academic year renews the organic cycle of learning and teaching that energizes the University community and excites our intellect, emotions and sense of commitment to personal goals and our larger society. For those of you new to Ann Arbor, I'm particu- larly eager to extend a warm welcome, since I myself came here just a year ago, after 28 years in Seattle at the University of Washington. The University and Ann Arbor are a wonderful combination, with a diverse population, a broad range of great musical, dramatic and arts offerings, and attractive natural settings in the Matthei Gardens, the Arboretum and the campus. Learn about the history of the University, including the prominent names recognized on buildings and in learned and artistic works. Be curious about prominent alums and faculty: Arthur Miller, W.H. Auden, Robert Frost, Harold Shapiro, Albion Walter Hewlett, James Neel, Francis Collins, Keith Black, Tom Harmon, Charles Woodson, Gerald Ford, Marina Whitman, Madonna, Mike Wallace and many, many others. I will focus my remarks on the life sci- ences, which will attract many of you in your undergraduate, graduate and professional edu- cation. Advances in the life sciences are shap- ing our lives and our concepts of ourselves in philosophical, sociological, humanistic, legal and ethical contexts. Advances in the life sci- ences are reshaping our thinking and our research in medicine and related health fields, in agriculture, ecology, anthropology and psy- chology. Genetic algorithms and directed evo- lution are being applied in chemistry and in engineering and architectural designs. In turn, life sciences depend upon developments in numerous other fields, from mathematics and information theory to engineering, physics, behavioral and social sciences, and business. This past spring, President Lee Bollinger appointed a special Commission on the Life Sciences, with 19 prominent faculty members from across the campus, the majority from outside the health sciences. Provost Nancy Cantor and I are confident that this group, with input from students, staff and faculty throughout the University, will propose a bold framework and ambitious recommendations for the life sciences here and nationally. We want to look beyond the present acceleration of knowledge and techniques in neuro- sciences, genetics, immunology and cancer biology - over the present horizon, one might say, to anticipate what might be excit- ing in the period five to 20 years from now. If you have ideas you'd like the Commission to consider, please share them! All of you should think of ways to learn about the life sciences. Some of you will be aiming for majors in biological, psychologi- cal, chemical and health sciences areas. Others will be looking for diverse academic experiences as part of the distribution require- ments. Some will be keen about the social and philosophical ramifications or the applica- tions in engineering and complex systems. I urge you to make a special effort to talk with students with these diverse reasons for being curious and getting immersed in some aspect, to broaden your own education and your and their views of the connections of concepts and of scientific methods. Meanwhile, many of you are embarking on periods in your lives independent (in space, if not finances) of parents and family. You have a special opportunity to form and sustain good personal habits that will give you a better chance of a healthy and enjoyable life. I've learned on coming to Michigan that the gener- al population health risk profile is not favor- able - compared with the rest of the country, Michigan residents are more likely to be phys- ically inactive, overweight, smokers, diabetic, have high blood pressure or high cholesterol, use alcohol excessively, and be dilatory in hav- ing their children or themselves immunized against preventable diseases. No wonder med- ical care costs are relatively high! Learn about healthy personal behaviors, and develop them for your own benefit; learn about unhealthy personal behaviors, and build your own resistances to them. Help your peers; avoid unattractive peer pressures. Use the ath- letic facilities; take the stairs. Use the University Health Service to your advantage, including counseling about coping with very common feelings and problems that represent uncertainty or depression or anxiety, much of it well grounded! You should know that the University has one of the premier medical care, medical research and medical education centers in the nation and an excellent health management organization, MCare. There are opportunities for students to volunteer in our hospitals and health centers, as well as in numerous commu- nity social agencies and initiatives in which our employees are commonly volunteering, too. There are research opportunities for undergraduates across a remarkable range of laboratory, clinical, technological, social, behavioral and policy areas. And there is superb medical care, should you or your fami- lies or friends need such services. Many of our activities are collaborative with other schools and colleges throughout the University, espe- cially in the health sciences, of course. Finally, give yourselves a lot of opportuni- ties to lighten your mood, lighten your load, smile, laugh. As Norman Cousins and Art Buchwald say, "Humor is therapeutic." Have a good time - there are many venues here, from sports, drama, music, open lectures and resi- dence halls to community activities. Meet lots of students from other backgrounds. Encounter and engage your teachers of all kinds. Make the most of your time at this great University. Go Blue! Gilbert S. Omenn is the executive vice president for medical affairs, chief executive officer of the University Health System, and a professor of medicine, genetics and public health that she had record- ed onica Lewinsky - a . coquettish former JACK White House intern SCHILLACI - admitting to an affair with the pres- ident, all political hell broke loose. For months, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post and every other news media outlet in the world has been awash with stories of the embattled Clinton presidency. And oh, what a thrill it was when said news sources would stumble upon the latest minutia with which to obsess. I can still clearly remember the excitement in Lynne Russell's voice as she announced Lewinsky's new haircut on "CNN Headline News." I won't delve into the up-to-the-minute yet not-surprisingly redundant reports about the ying-yang battle between Ken Starr and Lewinsky over immunity for her testimony. Nor the monotonous latest legal briefings on what some federal judge somewhere said about executive or attorney-client privilege. Nor the not- quite-tear-jerking pleas of Tripp as she complained about the cheap shots mem- bers ofithe media made at her. Nor the he-said- be-said accusations between White Ilouse spokespeople and the inde- pendent prosecutor. It was almost as if there was nothing else happening in this country. Finally, after months of dodging the subject, .Clinton expressed his mea culpa and acknowledged that he had had "inappropriate relations" with the former intern. None to be satisfied with anything, his critics harped on the sub- ject to the point that he stated last Friday that he was "... sorry about it" and that it was a "bad mistake." But what exactly did he do? He had an extra-marital affair, an all-too-com- mon occurrence in this country. He is not the first commander in chief to commit such an offense, but he is the first to have his fling outed to the American public during his term in office. Did he lie to the American people? Probably - at the very least, he took an all-too-literal usage of the phrase "sexu- al relations" too seriously. Like the pres- idents before him who had kept secrets like this from the public, he figured that his privacy would be respected rather than violated. And while that doesn't excuse his actions, it does go a long way toward explaining them. The charges of obstruction of justice and perjury are vague and mired in legalese. Clinton's actions are open to a million different interpretations - only a few of which imply criminal intent. So what of these indiscretions? Many of Clinton's critics have said that his actions seriously challenge his character and the respect with which the president's office should be held. But the president, by definition, is a political leader, not a religious one like, say, the pope. His job is to shape and enforce policy and guide the development of the nation, not to set the moral status quo. While his behavior may call into question the stability of his mar- riage and other issues affecting only his private life, it does not mean he is inca- pable of discharging the duties of his office. It should be noted that despite the mounting pressures on all sides, Clinton has managed to keep doing his job throughout the controversy. The respect that a public official deserves should be based on how he or she does his job, not where he or she spends his nights. Though it is devastating to a family, extra-marital affairs are all too common today. As noted feminist Gloria Steinem wrote in an op-ed piece for The New York Times, Clinton is really guilty of - little more than "frat-boyishness." Maybe he should rush Beta. But what the Clinton-Lewinsky scan- dal means for our society's intrusive ten- dencies is significantly worse. When : news media icons like Peter Jennings and Tom Brokaw are covering the same topics with the same zeal as the hosts of "Hard Copy," something has gone seriously wrong. When a tabloid-esque investiga- ; tion leads to an invasion of an individual's " privacy, it's a shame. But when that inves- tigation is brought about by a public body : and sanctioned by drooling American television viewers, it's disgusting. Label me too liberal if you want, but Uj LETTERS POLICY The Michigan Daily welcomes letters from all of its readers. Letters from University students, faculty, staff and admin- istrators will be given priority over others. All letters must include the writer's name, phone number, and school year or University affilia- tion. The Daily will not print any letter that cannot be verified. Ad hominem attacks will not be tolerated. Letters should be kept to approximately 300 words. The Michigan Daily reserves the right to edit for length, clarity and accuracy. Longer "viewpoints" or "point-counterpoints" may be arranged with an editor. Letters will be run according to order received and the amount of space available. Letters endorsing candidates for political office or for the Michigan Student Assembly should be kept to approximately 200 words. Every effort will be made to print all letters and to print related endorsement letters together. Letters should be sent over e-mail to daily.letters@umich.edu or mailed to the Daily at 420 Maynard St. Editors can be reached at 764-0552 or by sending e-mail to the above address. - - Jack Schillaci Editorial Page Editor A.k~ I. ~ i,.~%~LL ~%P A A &a..t .~.J ~ ~.&E..dA. '..i a.~ U.a~..f a~.SA~~VAS~.5. - W ~.* ~' ~