4 - The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, October 13, 1998 04tw SC[I iun FIgt}tt 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan LAURIE MAYK Editor in Chief JACK SCHILLACI Editorial Page Editor Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily ' editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY Voces in the city Students inject 'U' concerns into politics NOTABLE QUOTABLE 'It is becoming so bitter that we are looking to play another frat in the Mud Bowl.' - Jamie Whetzel, member of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, on his fraternity's relationship with Phi Delta Theta THOMAS KULJURGIS TEN TAP VEIN SPEAK ING FUN TNN S TO P oc CAMPUS: RiPE T, Lg LvAIoRS to t004Lko NALL. LET'TERS TO THE EDITOR A nn Arbor's mayoral election may not be quite as tumultuous as the race for gov- ernor this November, but University students will have a different type of candidate to con- sider on the municipal level - another stu- dent. Architecture and Urban Planning junior Elizabeth Keslacy might not appear to be a politically powerful or intimidating candidate to incumbent Ingrid Sheldon, but her place in the election is nonetheless vital. As a student, Keslacy has the ability to do what no middle-aged Republican or Democrat running for mayor can do: invoke the voice of her student peers on a variety of issues. Whether her positions as a Libertarian fall in line with a majority or a very small part of the student body, she has a unique perspec- tive as a University student. Regardless of her ideology, she will introduce student perspec- tive into the debate that have been overshad- owed in Ann Arbor's municipal government in recent years. Amidst the turmoil of the Vietnam War and other political conflicts from the late '60s to mid '70s, many progressive students ran for election and won municipal positions in Ann Arbor. By winning seats on the Ann Arbor City Council, these student activists impressed the progressive ideals ofAnn Arbor on the decision-making politics of the city. During a time in which old men were sending their boys off to war, it was especially neces- sary for students, many of whom were regis- tered for the draft, to voice their opinions. But students' opinions in 1998 are by no means any less important than their predecessors' opinions in 1968 -by running in the election for mayor this year, Keslacy could inject stu- dent issues and values back into the city's political structure. Despite the media's frequent claim that young people are apathetic and unmotivated to change the status quo, Ann Arbor remains a hotbed for political student activism. By merely taking a walk through the Diag on a sunny afternoon, one can see the dozens of groups that daily promote important causes. The main reason that students' ability to win municipal offices is very weak is that the district boundaries are biased against any who want to participate in city elections. In the 1970s, most students were clumped into a few districts, making it easier for student candi- dates to appeal to a familiar audience. But since then, the city council redrew the district lines to take power away from the students. The new lines in Ann Arbor cut the city into shapes resembling slices of a pie, plotting the University campus in the center and placing the University's residence halls into a number of districts. Thus, though East Quad and South Quad are about three blocks away from each other, students residing in those dorms vote in different districts. The district lines make it almost impossible for students to win seats on city council and have any notable influence. All Ann Arbor community members should support students running for municipal positions. One should not necessarily vote for a candidate just because he or she is a student, but rather because he or she is the best person for the job. If there is any issue that Keslacy can push for in the upcoming election, it is that students need a greater voice in govern- ment and that one of the ways to ensure this is to return to the old district lines. False sense AIDS statistics must be interpreted carefully A ccording to a report released last week by the Centers for Disease Control, the number of Americans dying from AIDS in 1997 dropped 47 percent from the previous year. The disease moved down from the nation's eighth largest killer to the 14th and is currently at its lowest death rate since 1987. Public health officials have attributed this sig- nificant decline to the impact of a wide range of new drugs that combat the HIV virus's abil- ity to multiply. By prolonging the time it takes for the virus to damage the immune system, HIV-positive patients are able to live longer lives. This CDC report is certainly great news in the fight against the terrible pandemic, but it must not give Americans a false sense of security about the dangers posed by AIDS. The CDC report simply touches upon the fight against AIDS in the people already infected with the HIV virus. It does not, how- ever, mention any statistics regarding the spread of the virus or the number of new cases. The number of people being infected by HIV is still increasing, especially among people in their teens and early twenties. This fact should be important to students when they think about the risk AIDS poses. HIV infection is also spreading more among low-income and minority Americans. In particular, many urban youth live in envi- ronments that pose more immediate threats to their well-being than a potential HIV infec- tion. Consequently, any AIDS awareness pro- grams currently being run in the public schools of these communities may be less effective in dealing with AIDS issues. Thus, it is especially important not to misrepresent this latest CDC report because doing so may eventually worsen the problem of AIDS awareness among young Americans, especial- ly those in high-risk communities. This report credits the drop in AIDS deaths to the use of new drugs. These drugs are expensive - about $10,000 a year to sus- tnna e n n T-TTmrn-ti- i-limrs Many low-income Americans are still being denied coverage for these life-saving drugs under Medicaid or other publicly funded assistance programs. The fact that many low- income patients are minorities compounds the problem. Those Americans who are least likely to benefit from AIDS awareness cam- paigns are also those who are least likely to have access to the drugs needed to save their lives if they get infected. The CDC report also covers the progress of AIDS in America exclusively when the greatest AIDS threats lie elsewhere. In sub- Saharan Africa alone, four million people were infected with HIV last year. Ten million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses there already - 90 percent of the world's AIDS deaths. And because of lack of access to new drugs, 20 million more Africans will almost certainly lose their lives to AIDS in the future. Similar lack of access to these drugs exists in other developing regions of the world facing skyrocketing increases in AIDS cases. The statistics of the CDC report only show how helpful these new drugs are in combating AIDS. Deaths here are dropping moderately while there is no end in sight to the alarming death rates in the third world. The numbers in this report do not hold any real promise that fewer people will contract this dreaded dis- ease, but they do show the new drugs' impact. The CDC report may in fact have some negative side effects. It may cause some public health officials to feel too confident about the struggle against AIDS. These decision-makers may be persuaded to not raise the funding of AIDS research, aware- ness and treatment programs when faced with headlines that weaken their fears about the potential deadliness of AIDS in this country and in the world. Therefore, it is crucial that Americans truly know what the statistics in this CDC report mean and how this report only demonstrates the need for mnr- rtnni a fitU+ n ia TTI 'U' handled Brooks case poorly To THE DAILY: I am writing with regard to the Oct. 2 article "Brooks sanctioned under Code." I have to express my disap- pointment and disgust at the handling of this case, particu- larly on the part of the University Athletic Department. The fact that Brooks has not only been allowed to remain on the football team but also was eligible to play in the Iowa game only about a week after "accepting responsibility," as the article said, for his actions, is absolutely unac- ceptable. This man, if he can be called that, committed a crime against the University community, not just the indi- vidual victim. U of M is our school and our home. The fact that an incident like this could occur right outside one of the largest residence halls is disturbing enough, but the fact that the perpetrator has been allowed to continue to have the sort of hero status afforded to the football play- ers shows a disregard for the victim's situation and reflects badly on the University. As the victim said in the article, Brooks forfeited his right to play on the team when he chose to assault someone. In a case like this, the priority of the Athletic Department should not be their own inter- ests; They need to come out in support of the victim and remove Brooks from the team. RACHEL STEIN LSA SOPHOMORE Weekend article was inaccurate TO THE DAILY: I welcomed your article about Shomari and Sean O'Neill ("'Shomari & Sean' set for another hard-hitting season," 10/8/98). However, I wish that it had not made the major error of describing our show as a comedy! For clear- ly it was not a comedy, although I have nothing against comic relief. Our show attempted to deal with serious issues and changing entertainment cur- rents. It covered many events on campus that might have gone unnoticed or received minimal attention, such as interviews with such national spokespersons as Cornel West, Ronald Takaki and Charles Ogletree. We drew the community's attention to such pressing issues as the what some might deem to be abuses of the Ann Arbor Police Department and DPS's community on campus a dis- service by characterizing it as a comedy. I can appreciate that a campus newspaper cannot be The New York Times in terms of accuracy and professional- ism. After all, it is run by stu- dents who have lots of heavy matters on their brain. Yet I can't help but feel that there is something stereotypical about the writer's description of this television show as a comedy. Given the issues and themes it addressed, comedy assuredly it was not SHOMARI TERRELONGE- STONE LSA JUNIOR Society says when killing is justified To THE DAILY: The Daily editorial "False advertising" was closed- minded. Comparing abortion and genocide is not ludi- crous, and both certainly are issues of rights. Many feel that a fetus has a right to life; although at what point the fetus gains that right is debatable. In abortion, a fetus is dehuman- ized so that one is only killing a underdeveloped human parasite. The Nazi's similarly dehu- manized Jews, Communists and the physically disabled to justify their killings. Finally, I would not take too much moral comfort in the deci- sions of the U.S. Supreme Court; genocide was protect- ed under Nazi law, and some U.S. laws earlier this century were nightmarish. Whether it's abortion, assisted suicide, the death penalty or war, society plays with the lines that defines when killing is justified. The Nazi comparison, although extreme, is simply a warning as to the consequences of playing with such lines. By the way, I am pro-choice; I am just also open-minded to fanatics with signs. JOHN CLYNE RACKHAM Anti-Klan groups should not dictate to campus TO THE DAILY: If the ideals of equality and justice for all are to be achieved, then it is time for the anti-Klan defendants must stepiup and finally take responsibility for their actions they are accused of. Just because the recipients of the riotous acts were the Ku Klux Klan does not excuse blame it on some vast racist government conspiracy that their phones were tapped or something of the ridiculous nature. Instead of childish name-calling, let the courts decide the guilt or innocence of the anti-Klan rioters. The student governments of this school cannot let this group of leftist radicals dic- tate social policy on this campus. Some of the mem- bers of their group don't even attend the University. It is similar to the KKK advising Congress on immigration policy! It's time the rest of the students of U of M and the Ann Arbor community step up and not let a smalltminori- ty of people overstep their bounds and dictate to the whole what is right, what is wrong and what is a govern- ment conspiracy. And if you are an anti- racist, doesn't that make you a biggot against racist peo- ple? DAVID TAUB LSA JUNIOR Peltz's arguments were poor To THE DAILY: Micah Peltz wrote in objection to a viewpoint regarding Palestinian human rights ("Viewpoint was dam- aging to efforts for peace," 10/7/98). He challenged the writers' use of what he deemed "fighting words" Specifically he objected to the term "machine-gun-toting racists" used to describe the Israeli Defense Forces. Do or do not these soldiers "tote" guns?As for the term "racist," I do not suppose I can attest to the inner state of mind of every soldier in the Israeli army, but racism is more than an attitude held by individuals, it is an institu- tionalized system in which one ethnic or racial group has special rights and privileges that are denied to others. Would Peltz deny that Israelis have more privileges than do Palestinians in the occupied territories? I agree with Peltz that Palestinians have a justified cause. Maybe he can under- stand why they are so angry about the denial of their rights. How can others under- stand their pain when Peltz and others would tell them that to express their views is damaging to the peace process? Finally, on the issue of the use of the word "holocaust." The authors of the viewpoint piece did not say that the Palestinians are experiencing a holocaust. The are appeal- ing to us to not turn our backs on the situation of the A return to hedonism begins 6 at Studio 624 he University campus is notorious- ly clique-ish. Sororities and frater- nities, athletes, minorities, Rackham students, engineers - we all belong somewhere, but definitely not every- where. It's so ridiculous that throughout the course of a normal workweek - a reg- ular Monday through Wednesday - I can go about. my business and never bump into anyone outside my rergop peer group Walking through campus 'I'll never see Drew HensonSARAH not to mention get L CA R the opportunity to ask him out. Sitting X'1t1.E# through class on the rare occasions of attendance I'll stare at faces only like mine. Running around the bar like a drunken fool, it's almost guaranteed thatIewon't see anyone new. If I do have the rare privilege of an introduction, in no less than 10 seconds I'll also be informed of all the vital sta- tistics: who they hang out with, what year, where they are from and the most important, who they were or still are hooking up with. To remedy this situation, a severe change is needed. We need a new bar. But not your run-at-the-mil bar we need a haven of hedonism, a place where everyone is welcome not only to the bar but also to each other, and where escaping from our tiring peer groups s easy. A\ place akin to the infamous@ Studio 54 of New York City. A giant metropolis of bliss where famous faces danced with nobodies. Think about it: Why should our parents be the only lucky ones to enjoy such fun? The majority of the baby boomers had the best generational lineage of all time. Born in the pleasantries of the post-war 1950s, our parents grew up during the dawn of rock-n-roll and had the opportunity to protest the political pundits of their time. They had Woodstock, free love and mul- titudes of mind-altering substances. They partied in the '70s without consequence and made money in the '80s without problems. But we're the ones now suffering from their play days. We don't have places that allow us to say "whatever feels good is good:' The partying situation at the University is pathetic. We shouldn't drink for fear of alco-0 holism and loss of brain cells. We shouldn't do drugs - it has been since discovered that they are not only bad for you but also addictive. I mean, come on; we can't even have sex without thinking of the million things that could go wrong. The only positive benefits the baby boomers left us are the sweet sounds of Led Zeppelin, the Rolling Stones and countless other bands, To remedy this sad situation someone needs to purchase the old Pizza House property at 624 Church Street and create the new hedonistic palace - Studio 624. It has to happen - we deserve a new playground on campus. We are in dire need of a new attraction, or rather, a new distraction. But to create the atmosphere so surreal like the original, all the key elements mst be in place. We need an ever-inspiring king of hedonistic bliss, a big-time bounc- er in charge of deciding who stays and who goes, a successor to the late Steve Rubel. This would ensure that a perfect mix of people - New Yorkers and Michiganders, blacks and whites, Latinos/as and Asians - would be upheld.Studio 624 would not be a place where black pants are mandatory, not to mention IDs strictly from New York. Nor would it be a place controlled by bouncers who seem to follow the mantra of "friends0 enter free, cute girls need no ID." Second, picture-perfect, Playgirl-status bartenders, those in charge of making and keeping everyone happy would obviously have to be imported because God-knows there's no one that good looking at the University. These heavenly bodies would have the sole mission of making the rest of us believe, no matter what (substance) it takes, that we look just as good as they do. Now, to attract the desired crowd, full of all types of students is a challenge. In order to make Studio 624 a hit, it needs a line outside. We all know that no bar is worth going to unless there is a line sug- gesting that it is the place to be. Once the patrons at Rick's or Touchdown's find out that there is a new bar with an even longer wait, they are sure to come running. Like at Studio 54, dancing (and of course some illegal aphrodisiacs) would be the key to getting everyone together. With the right mix of sorority summer mixes, frat-boy workout tapes, athletic jock jams, alternative techno noises, R&B bump and grind sounds and disco. samplings, we're all sure to be pleased. If all of these elements were com- hined (and some others that can't he