100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 30, 1998 - Image 15

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily, 1998-03-30

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

ROWING
M#vichigan eight rains on Virginia

The Michigan Daily -- SportsMonday - March 30, 1998 -78

Baid Alfred
F&r theDaily
BELLE VILLE - It's hard to believe
that any sporting event has ever seen a
craizier day in terms of weather. Early
Saturday morning, the Michigan rowing
team b~egan its second meet of the season
postponing races against North
olina and Virginia due to a torrential
downpour,, practically zero visibility and
even a tornado.
.But after a three-hour delay, the sky
cleared up, and with the sun shining
bright, the Wolverines were anxious to
compete.
"When the storm came through, we
h~id -to cancel races and change the
schedule,' coach Mark Rothstein said.
;When asked if the weather had any
~ect on his team's performance,
~thstein said, "No. Not at all."
Rothstein seemed to be correct, as the
first-boat varsity eight upset third-
ranked Virginia in what was considered

the main event of the afternoon. The vic-
tory was the Wolverines' second in two
weeks over Virginia.
The force behind coxswain Belinda
Koo's first-boat varsity eight is supplied
by a mixture of powerful rowers. Seniors
Lisa Labadie, Kate Mackenzie and Tina
Stutzman, along with juniors Michelle
Wolbert and Jeni Kinon, provide depth
and experience to the boat. Sophomore
Jamie Stilson and freshmen* standouts
Kate Johnson and Alison Hickey make
up the youth of the boat.
The win was due in part to the team's
winter training, as well as focus and con-
fidence.
Michigan and North Carolina actually
led off the varsity eight races earlier in
the day. The Wolverines overcame strong
winds and high waves to move into a
convincing lead just halfway through the
2,000-meter race.
Unfortunately for Michigan, North
Carolina experienced difficulty when its

boat became "swamped" with water and
started to sink. The race ended up being
scratched.
Michigan's second-boat varsity eight
contributed by splitting its two races.
The Wolverines dominated North
Carolina, winning by more than 30 sec-
onds to make up for a 7.62-second loss
to Virginia. Both of the women's varsity-
four boats placed second in their respec-
tive races.
Although the regatta did not have any
NCAA implications, the Wolverines
boosted their hopes to gamner their first-
ever invitation to NCAAs, to be held
May 30 in Atlanta.
Michigan travels to San Diego next
weekend to compete in the Crew Classic
against, among others, top-ranked
Washington.
"We have proven to ourselves and to
the rowing community that we can beat
Virginia, so we don't see why we can't
go after No. 1 Washington;" Koo said.
Michigan's first
group overcame
weather condi-
tions on Saturday
to upset third-
ranked Virginia
straight time. The
f. Wolverines take
n ~on top-ranked
. Washington next.
LOUIS BROWN/Daily

t

Rowers vs. Nature overshadows
Michigran vs. Virginia, Tar Heels

By Josh Klinbaum
Daily Sports Writer
BELLEVILLE - In a battle of
wills,- Mother Nature edged out the
North Carolina
rowing team. R wn
This was the R wn
Win event in Commentary
uray's double. ________
dual regatta - not
bNp. ,5 Michigan's upset over No. 3
Virginia in the varsity eight race.
And, not surprisingly. Mother Nature
won.
'fie: Tar Heels sent their shells onto
Belleville Lake at about 10:30 a.m..
Aad. for a while, it didn't look like
the~re would be a problem.
AW t Mother Nature went for the
ocout on her first punch, sending
a 4tornado -- yes, a tornado -- onto
tlo take. And havoc reigned.
~Four shells capsized. Rowers had
to" be rescued from the water. The
shells had to be towed in.

And Mother Nature celebrated by
sending a two-hour version of Noah's
biblical flood on Belleville.
The Tar Heels were down, but they
were far from out,
After the rescue mission was com-
plete, a coaches' pow wow decided
that they could- beat Mother Nature,
and so the races were scheduled to
resume at 2 p.m.
But as the clock ticked, Mother
Nature devised a strategy of her own.
Instead of going for the quick
knockout, she came up with a new
plan.
When 2 pm. came around, all
looked calm. The sun was out, the 40
days and 40 nights had ended and the
races were getting underway.
And Mother Nature waited, biding
her time, holding out for the Tar
Heels.
So when the varsity-eight race
between Michigan and North
Carolina was ready to begin, so too

was Mother Nature.
The race began without a hitch.
The heavily-favored Wolverines
jumped out to an early lead, and after
about 400 meters, Michigan led by a
boat-length.
But that's when the problems
began for the Tar Heels. The water
was choppy and waves started splash-
ing up into the bow of the shell.
Soon. enough, the shell was
swamped and started to sink.
Tar Heels' coxswain Sam Hermitte
frantically tried to motivate her team
to row through it, but it was futile.
And as Mother Nature laughed, the
official waved his orange flag, stop-
ping the race.
The media boat had to go in for the
save, picking up the two Tar Heels
closest to the bow while the rest of
the North Carolina team bailed water
out of its shell.
Final score: Mother Nature 2,
North Carolina 0.

ALDARA" (kmiuimod) cream 5%
.. Brief Summay-consult package insert for fhdl prescribing information.
w DESCRIPTION
Aldara" is the brand name for imiqumod wfilkh is an immune response nmodifier. Each gram of the 51 creamt contains 50 mg of imi uimod in an
otff-whte oil~in~ssatcr vaiihne ermaeatb.
INDICATIONS AND USAGE
Aldara Sri cream is indicated for the treatment of extemal gnital and penianal wamtswndylonta acumtinata in adults,
CONTRAINDICATONS
None knomn
WARNINGS
Aldara cream has not been evaluated for the treatment of urethral. intra-sagiru.nal.recital. or intra-anat human papilloma Ora.l distasc and is not
rconmmended for these conditions.
PRECAUTIONS
General
luaa skin reacions such as erythema. erosion. eccoiationilaking. an edema are common. Should severe lcal skin reaction occur. the cream should he
reimved 1wwashine the treatmient area with mild soap and watcr.'Ifcatnxnt with Aldara cream can be resumed after the skin reaction has subsided.
There is nio clinical Zspriene with Aldara cream therapy immediately Iiosine the treatment of genitalpietianal warts'siih other oiraneoush applied
drpe therefore-. Aldara cream adninistration is not recomnmended until genitatpernanal tissue is healed from any previous drug orsurcjic treatment.
Alaa has the potenial to ewarxrbate inflammatory conditions of the skin.
Information for Patients
Patients using Aldara 514 cream should nxvive the folkoine information and instructions: The effect of Aldara 5%z cream on the transnrission of
genitatperianal wart~s is unkno %n. Aldara 5(i cream mas ucaken condomis and saginal diaphragms. Therefore. concurrent use is not recommended.
I. This mediation is to he used as direocd by a physician. It is foxresiemal use onto. Eye contact should be avoided.
2. The treatment area should not he bandaged or otherwise covered or wrapped as to b occlusive.
3. Sexual (genital. anal. oral) contact should he avoided swiiks the cream is on the skin.
4. It is recommended that t,-l10 hoursfkineiigAldaraSa< cream application the treatment area he washed with mild soap and water.
5. It is common for patients to experience kcal skin reactions such as ersatema. erosion. ccoriationflakinz. and edema at the site of application or
summunding areas- Most skin reactions are mi to moderate. Severe skiin rctiortscan occur and shoulk'ihepanted promptis to the pn.'sinbing physiciant.
6. Unscirrmcised nmales treating warts under the foreskin should retract the foreskin and cean the area daily.,
7. Patients should he aware that ew warts may develop during therapy, as Aldaa is not a cure.
Carciogenit Mutacjenesis5 and Impairment of Fertility
Roent ca cino'enicits dtat r otavalable. Iniquimod was without effect in a series ofet iffe~~rent mut aeenicitv assays including Ames. mouse
lmphxoma. CH l hodmosomre abe<rration, human lsmphoc~rIc chromosome aberration.SHE all transformation, rat and hamster Ntine marrow
cslogenc tics.an mouse doiatlta et ~ivr!amnstration ofimiquimodl to rats, at doses up to S times the recommended human dose on
a mg m- basis throughout mating. gestation. parturition and lactation. demonstrated no impairent of reprodiuction.
Pregnancy
Prcerznanc Cateory)3: There are no adequate and wwl-otrolled studies in prem nant woment. Imiquimod was not found to he teratog~nic in rat or rabbit
teratolo,& studcs. ha rats at a Hig maternally ktoxi hse (2S times human dos on a mglmZ basis),. reduced pup swights and deled ossification were
observetin del opmental studis with offsring oftprgnant rats treated with imiquinmod (8 times human dose} tno adverse cffe'ts were demonstrated.
Nursing Mothers
It is not known whether topically applied imiquimod is excreted in breast milk.
PedlaticUse
Safety arid efficacy in patients below the age of 18 years havet not keen established.
ADVERSE REACTIONS
In controlled clinical triarls, the most frequently reported adverse reactions wcre those of lcal skin and application site reaction- some paetients also
repvrtcd systrenic reaction, these reactiortssvre ursually mld to moderate in intensity; however, severe reactions wwre re-prgedwth.3 week
appleitar Thse reactionswrer more frequent and mo~te intense with daily apirat than with 3X/rerI application. Oserahl in the 3Xwveek
application clinical studies. h2% (4,327) of the patients diswntinued ec toklcal .skiniapplication site reactions. The incidence and wwsrirs of local skin
reactions during controlledclinical trials are shown in the following table.
3X/ WEEK APPLICATION
WART SITE REACTION AS ASSESSED BY INVESTIGATOR
NIILDI/IODERATE SEVERE
FENIALES MALES FEMALES MIALES
Erthcma 0 _' 14 54%r'; % 41.; f11n 4(% V
Erosion 30% % u% I % t 1 0
E ,, IxcoriationFlaking 18%s8 25i8% 0% toc% 1% 0
Edema 17, s<< 1I i'1% Irk 0% 0% WT
Induration 5 % 77f - f i% ( 1% 04i 0%
Ulceration 1 1 4% 1r, 3% 0% 0/c % (JUri
Scabbing 4 Q10% 1311 3%r0 %01k Oe 01(
-Vesicles 3' r 0loc 21.i 0 % 0 i 0%c 0 /c 04
Remote site skin reactions sware also reporned in firnale and male patients treated 3Xwrk with imiquimod 5% cream. The severe remote site skin reactions
reparted for femaules ssere erythema Go3%), ucrationt (2%1)} and edema (Fl); and for males, erosion (2%). and eryahema. edema. induration, and
escatun )flacking (each 1%).
Adverse events judgeed to he prmbby or possibly related to Aldara reported by more than 5% of patients are listed below also included are soreness.
influcrezhlke ssmiptoms and mya10i.
3X1WEEK APPLICATION
FEM1ALES MALES
5% 5%
1.tq imod Vehicle Imiquimod Vehice

m

m

m

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan