4 - The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, February 3, 1998 ate 3idAigun 1&Ilg 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan LAURIE MAYK Editor in Chief JACK SCHILLACI Editorial Page Editor .ry;.. Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial boani. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY Students should take advantage of 'U' events 'Were Sadaam Hussein to attack ... Israel, or any of the other neighboring countries, our response would be swift and resounding.' - Secretary of State Madeleine Albright YUKI KUNIYUKI GROUND ZERo Pa S 43 b*t T CC~ne~bear. f-l bull s Cme o{ ftra lie H; el bur , hard 2 ET/TRSH- LETTERS TO THE EDITOR t a time when affirmative action and race relations occupy much of the University's attention, Black History Month and Chicano History Week offer many ways to improve students' understanding of the contributions African and Mexican Americans have made to culture and society. Advocates of marking the coming weeks with these designations hope it will empha- size the important impact these cultures have had on the United States. The activities and programs scheduled on campus and around Ann Arbor will provide an excellent oppor- tunity for the community to better under- stand the rich, diverse cultures that comprise the United States. Participating in the various discussions and listening to the speakers is valuable because a greater knowledge of the black and chicano communities in the histo- ry of the United States will work against big- otry and discrimination. One of the most important goals of the upcoming events is to change the misconcep- tions one might take from a traditional edu- cation. Students have the opportunity to explore black culture by taking courses offered by the University's Center for African American Studies. The center provides a vari- ety of classes in departments such as history, music and English. These courses may illu- minate the misunderstandings regarding African Americans that often arise from a more narrow education. But the special focus on black history will undoubtedly allow students that do not take a course from the center to learn more about cultures the mainstream classrooms or com- mercial mediums often misrepresent. Attending the discussions and educational forums sponsored by the various African and Mexican American student groups will sig- nificantly enhance students' learning experi- ences. The activities scheduled this month are undoubtedly among the best opportunities to improve one's understanding of black and chicano history. LaRonda Brown, the African American coordinator in the Office of Multiethnic Student Affairs, and Steven Hernandez, a member of the student group Movimiento Estudiantiantes Chicano/a De Aztlan, emphasized the necessity for students from all cultural backgrounds to participate. Although the events certainly will enable African and Mexican American students to learn more about their own heritage, the pro- grams are meant to enlighten all, regardless of ethnicity. Student organizations also have planned to discuss less conventional aspects of their cultures' history. For example, the Queer Unity Project will more critically analyze the issues surrounding gay racial relations and how this more narrow category of black history fits into the larger concept of African American heritage. Additionally, forums will explore the role jazz, rock 'n' roll and other forms of popular music have played in shaping the experiences and images of American culture. Regardless of specific interests, students ought to take advantage of the planned events. By promoting a better understanding of diver- sity in American society, the scheduled Black History Month and Chicano History Week events could help the University community achieve greater equality. Crosing the lin Clinic bombing goes beyond right to protest uring the past few weeks, the nation has celebrated the life and legacy of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a visionary dedicated to non-violent protest. Last Thursday, in the wake of these celebra- tions, the bombing of an abortion clinic in Birmingham reminded the country that King's ideas have not been understood by all. The incident does not boil down to a pro-choice versus pro-life issue - it is a woman's legal right to get an abortion; she should be able to act on this right without risk to her own life. In the bombing, officer Robert D. Sanderson died as he was working as a guard at the front door. Emily Lyons, a nurse at the clinic, sustained serious injuries to her face and legs. Perhaps most harmful is the indelible mark this act of cowardice has left on the national psyche. This is an atrocious act of terrorism that goes well beyond the abortion debate. The right to protest and the right to free speech are two staples of American life - instilling fear and threatening lives are a far cry from these concepts. What happened to writing congressional representatives and picketing? Who decided that killing inno- cent bystanders in the name of saving lives is rational? This is not the first bombing of an abor- tion clinic. Last year, two bombs were det- onated at an Atlanta clinic, but nobody was seriously injured. Officials have not ruled out a connection between this bombings and the Birmingham attack. But the ques- tion remains: How can one justify killing innocent people who are exercising one of their rights as Americans? This does not work out logically - but terrorism rarely makes sense. As the law stands in Alabama, abortion is 1ca1 inside secified clinics It is had a possible threat to their lives. Even when it is legal, abortion can sometimes be nearly as dangerous today as it did back in the days of back-alley surgeries. For the past 200 years, picketing and let- ter-writing has proven to be much more effective than violent riots and, most recent- ly, bombings. The genius behind such peaceful protest is that through one's fight, an educational process takes place. Through this dialogue, not only can the media pick up and spread a variety of ideas, but average people around the country can learn about both sides of the issue. The only outcome to be expected from a violent bombing is tragedy, shock and disdain for the criminal. One issue that remains unaddressed in many ways is the rise in domestic terrorism in the United States. In the past few years, Americans have witnessed churches burn- ing, federal buildings bombed, and pack- ages exploding in recipients' faces. Violent and rash measures should not be a vehicle to gain attention. Federal agents claim that they are going to track down and convict the killers in this case. This is the least that they should do. The next step is making sure that women - who under the law have a right to choose whether or not to have an abortion - can safely go to abortion clinics. The bombing in Birmingham has taught Americans a new lesson' about mutual respect and how it can be abused. Bombing a clinic with the intent of harming human life under the aegis of protecting unborn children should not be tolerated. Pro- choice and pro-life groups have spoken out against the recent actions. But this does lit- tle, considering that people who would go so far as to set a bomb are not affiliated with these nencies These horrible acts BYOB policy is only IFC's first step To THE DAILY: I am writing in response to the Daily's editorial "Who's Buying?" (1/28/98). The Daily misunderstood the goals of the "bring your own beverage" policy. This policy alone certainly will not curb underage drinkers, but was not necessarily meant to address that issue. The prob- lem of underage drinking presents one that by no means can be solved in an all-encompassing legislative act. This policy addresses the liability issue. With hosting organizations moving to BYOB functions, liability shifts from the organizations involved to the individual who purchases and consumes the alcohol. Not only does this protect the hosting orga- nization from a non-Greek member attending a party, but it protects it from a delin- quent member of the Greek system. In lieu of the many diffi- cult aspects in dealing with the problem of irresponsible drinking, the Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic Association are attempting to create a safer social environ- ment by addressing the prob- lem with a two-fold process. The BYOB policy is the first step. The next logical step involves educational pro- grams on the dangers of alco- hol consumptionand how to drink responsibly. Both IFC and the Panhellenic Association recognize that when students come to the University, they are adults and should be responsible for their own actions. The Greek system hopes to educate them on how to master this new responsibility safely and effectively. Treating this problem in a two-fold fashion should help in achieving the ultimate goal of curbing ille- gal and irresponsible drink- ing. Contrary to what the edito- rial said, the IFC policy does restrict the fraternities to have BYOB parties with signed sororities. The Daily was cor- rect in saying that fraternities will not supply alcohol. But the Daily failed to recognize that this is a trial period. The participating 10 sororities and 20 fraternities have agreed to host BYOB functions. Each organization will fill out an evaluation form that will be submitted to the BYOB Committee, composed of past and present chapter presidents as well as other interested Greek system members. When the trial period ends on March 31, the committee will propose changes to the alcohol policy, to prove that our Greek com- munity upholds the University's theme, "The leaders and best." BRADLEY HOLCMAN IFC PRESIDENT KINESIOLOGY JUNIOR CEO's study was 'pseudo- scientific' TO THE DAILY: The claim of the Center for Equal Opportunity that whiteqapplicants to U of M are 174-times less likely to be admitted than their African American counter- parts with equivalent grades, test scores and high school class rankings ("Study finds racial preferences," 1/27/98) reveals far more about CEO's agenda than it does about the University's admis- sions policies. I have not yet learned the details of how they cooked up this number, but it is clearly absurd. Consider a white student whose numbers are "shaky" enough that, based only on the factors cited, one would predict a 5- percent chance of admission. Clearly, it is mathematically impossible for anyone to be 174-times as likely to be admitted as this student, since the best chance the hypothetical minority com- petitor could ask for is a 100- percent chance of admission! One way the claim could be true would be for every African American applicant to score lower than every white applicant whose test scores and grades are high enough to expect a 0.5-per- cent or better chance of being admitted (thesewhite stu- dents would not count in the ratio since under this sce- nario there would not be any "equally-qualified" African American competitors), and the rest following the 1/174 figure. As I'm sure even state Sen. David Jaye (R-Macomb) would concede, at least some minority applicants score above the bottom 0.5 percent of white applicants, which drives down even further the threshold at which the 1/174 figure might become valid. Reality would have to be even more far-fetched than my ridiculous example for CEO's claims to hold up, at least as they have been reported. Had the center claimed that white students are "dis- advantaged" by a factor of, say, five in admissions proba- bility relative to certain minorities, I could at least find a way to understand where it comes from (though I would certainly disagree with their implicit equation Amendment will hold MSA accountable TO THE DAILY: I often hear complaints about the lack of Michigan Student Assembly accountabil- ity to the University's graduate students. This complaint is clearly based in reality. Those running for MSA can obtain all the career benefits possible by only serving one term. For this reason, voting someone out of office does not hold the same threat in MSA as it does in other elected positions. MSA's constitution claims its power is derived from the students, but there is no accountability. Fortunately, a grass roots effort has begun to put a constitutional amendment on the MSA election ballot March. This proposed amendment will hold MSA accountable to all schools. With the passage of the "Schools & Colleges Accountability" amendment, MSA will no longer be able to impose itself upon any school with impunity. MSA will be held accountable. I have had the privilege of signing the petition for the ballot question. I encourage all students, both undergradu- ate and graduate, to sign this petition and support the amendment on the March ballot. Let's hold MSA accountable. Sign the petition and vote for this historic amendment package. NICK VASQUEZ MEDICAL SCHOOL Clinton lacks integrity TO THE DAILY: There have been a number ofjokes going around regard- ing the latest debacle in the White House. One that stuck in my mind in particular said, "2,000 American women were asked in a poll if they would sleep with the president. Ninety-four percent said, 'Never again."' Unfortunately, there seems to be more truth to this than meetsrthe eye. In a very real sense, President Clinton has been unfaithful to the nation and has breached our trust. Several years ago, Clinton said, "There is a difference between the character of the president and the character of the presidency." This is a revealing quote and most clear-thinking people should see the absurdity of it. If the person seeking (or in) the office can't match the charac- ter of the office, then they do not belong there. The presiden- cy represents not just the views of the citizenry, but also the ideals represented in society's Violencedoes not offer resolution to abortion debate W hen a bomb ripped through the quiet, early morning in Birmingham last week, it took one life and nearly two. There is no doubt that if the engineer of the explosive had his or her way the bomb would havekilled maimed plenty more. The bomb, aim at a family planning clinic that per- formed abortions, exploded at 7:33 a.m. on Thursday, and it was put there to kill and for noth- ing else. It seems we have renegades out there fighting a war - a war against the O SH Constitution, a war WHITE against women and a JUMPlNG war against rationali- I E Ct(UN ty. They kill in the name of a cause in which they believe, and they are indiscriminant; they kill any- thing in their path. Unfortunate for two innocent people, that pathruns through every abortion clin- ic in the nation, including one Birmingham. That path ran through an off-duty police officer and a nurse who were both either doing their jobs or on their way to work. The officer was killed for nothing more than performing his job, the nurse injured for nothing more than showing up early for work, There is clearly something wrong with this whole scenario, as is obvious - I find it hard to imagine how one could justify killing another person the name of the abortion argumer , regardless of which side you support. Killing in the name of the pro-life movement? Jumbo shrimp anyone? The fact of the matter is that just a week after people nationwide celebrated the anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that granted women abortion rights, someone decided that the Supreme Court wasn't good enough for them and that the laws of this nation didn't apply their little bomb (which incidentally sha - tered windows a block away). Where do these people come from? I would like to think that I don't know anyone like those who would kill others over anargumentsuch as abortion rights - what I fear is that I do. Perhaps these are the people who sit next to us in class, who stand next to us in line and who work with us on a daily basis. Perhaps they are our friends or relatives- sad truth about a bombing such as tI one is that we may never know who they are because they were too cowardly to face their decision and they were too crazy to think correctly enough to stop it ahead of time. The really sick part of this whole incident is that it probably was not the work of just one person but of many. To be completely honest, I abhor abor- tion. I think it is terrible, disgusting and wrong; I think it is overused as a form birth control and I know that it can extremely dangerous - even life-threat- ening - for women who decide to have it performed on their bodies. But I, like most people out there who decide to have an opinion on this issue, don't have even an inkling of a clue what abortion is real- ly about. I am not a woman and will never be faced with waking up in the morning and learning that I am pregnant. I hope abortion will never directly affect me or my friends - but it already has affect several people I know. I have the leisure of speaking to an issue I will never face on a personal level, and I bet the person who set that bomb is in the same position. Given all of that, I support the pro- choice movement. I support choice because I know that my opinion about abortion is not the right opinion, and I know that no one else knows the "right" opinion either. This is about one thin civil liberties. ' See, those who want to kill the doc- tors who help women take stock in their lives and who help women make the most difficult decisions they will ever encounter don't understand personal choice. They don't understand that one woman's abortion is one woman's abor- tion - it is her problem, her situation, her decision, no one else's. It doesn't affect me, it doesn't affect you, and it certainly doesn't affect the bomber. John Salvi shot a few people Brookline, Mass., just outside of Boston, a few years ago. He shot them in the name of the same cause the bomber killed with. From one clinic to the next, he mercilessly shot at innocent people who were either working at or going to planned parenthood services. They think they are better than the law, they think they are better than society, and they clearly think they are better than you.* What I find exemplary is that peop e on both sides of the issue condemn such actions, as Randy Tate, executive director of the Christian Coalition, openly stated Thursday. But there are people out there who truly believe that killing others will