8A - The Michigan Daily - Monday, September 22, 1997 THE INAUGURATION OF PRESIDENT LEE BOLLINGER Text of Bollinger's inaugural address s It is somewhat difficult to know what to say at an inauguration - especially one's own. One has the feeling the context yearns for the profound, which only insures that any self-conscious effort to meet the expectation will be mediocre. In the opening scenes of Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway, one of the books I treasure most in life, a mysterious motorcar with shades drawn, and a dove grey interior, appears suddenly on Bond Street, and a crowd gathers believing they may be as near to greatness as they'll ever get (Is it the Queen? Is it the Prime Minister? people ask). "Mystery had brushed them with her wing ..." Simultaneously, a plane overhead begins "making letters in the sky" that all assume will sig- nify the greatness of the moment. But the limousine disappears, and it turns out the plane is much like those that fill the skies over Michigan Stadium every Saturday, in this case spelling out the word "toffee." "It was toffee; they were advertising toffee," some- one says matter of factly, and the anticipation of the moment as a great portent is wholly deflated. And so I fear that at the end of this you too will feel as it if you had just heard the word "toffee" Nature, of course, has its kindnesses for exactly this sort of thing. Fortunately, we have means of pro- tecting ourselves rather effectively against our own failures to live up to our expectations. The most common cause of writer's block is having nothing to say, and yet all of us writers are inclined to interpret the blockage as a proof of kinship with the agony of genius. And just at the moment when our bodies splotch and wrinkle and engage in their own famous version of continental drift, our eyes go bad. Happily, it would seem, our capacity for self-obser- vation and self-reflection is rarely any better than, and generally inferior to, our IQ. In all probability, therefore, I won't even know that you're thinking you've just heard "toffee." I should also like to say something at the outset about the timing of this ceremony, since some of you may be thinking, given that I have been in the posi- tion for over eight months already, that I am a little like the guest who would never seem to leave - in my case, the president who never seems to begin. The reason we chose September rather than last April was to maximize both the chances of good weather and the distance from examinations (when everyone gets a little grouchy). I hope this beautiful day augurs well for our plans in the future. Now, some things that need to be said today are absolutely clear. I want to acknowledge and express my love and affection for several people, beginning with my wife,. Jean. Jean and I '"it is wise thatwesyhvabn S IOW6 Syhave been that these married for flOW tnearly 30 pressures must behyears.We have a resisted." strong reIa- - Lee Bollinger and are as University president devoted to each other as any couple I know. There is great joy in our fam- ily - and hard work. Jean and I have both spent so much time and effort in trying to improve each other you would think by this point we would each be quite extraordinary people. Alas, that is not the case. It is only fair that I acknowledge today that my tak- ing this position imposes inevitably burdens on Jean, especially on her efforts to develop her own career as an artist. And so I say: For resisting a world that is too slow to catch up with our ideals of social fair- ness, I am deeply admiring. For patiently and gra- ciously enduring some of what we cannot change, I am empathetic. And for voluntarily embracing with enthusiasm and elegance so many parts of my life, I am forever grateful. I would like to recognize: Our children, Lee and Carey, and to say how each of them shines so bright- ly in our eyes and proves how your children's suc- cesses and capacities are so uniquely of their own making. My parents, Lee and Pat, who taught me that the essence of nurturing is self-sacrifice. And members of my family, two of my four brothers, Mark and his wife Debbie, and Brad; and my sister, Tami. Whenever I use the term family metaphorical- ly, I think it derives from its highest form. I would also like to recognize Jean's family: her father, Marco, who had he not chosen to be an extremely successful businessman, would have, I believe rivaled Bo Schembechler as a coach. Jean's brother, Marco, and his wife Sheila, with their chil- dren, Marco, Michael and Matthew. And Jean's sis- ter, Patti, and her partner, John. And Jean's cousin, Paul. Jean's mother Darlene, who passed away a few years ago, remains a pervasive presence in all our lives, especially today. Let me say to Bill Bolcom how honored I am by the Fanfare and recognize Nancy Cantor for all the out- standing qualities she brings to the position of Provost. Finally, I would like to thank Harold and Vivian Shapiro for their presence here today, and in doing so, because time is so precious this morning, all of the other people and prior presidents responsible for this event. It was 10 years ago, in 1987, when I met Harold in .what I believe, but am not completely sure, is the same office I now occupy. (One of the charms of the administration building; it provides a perpetual sense of disorientation.) I was meeting Harold as part of an interview process for the posi- tion of Dean of the Law School. I distinctly remem- ber him asking me how I felt about the possibility of an administrative turn in my career, to which I dis- tinctly remember answering something like "I don't really know." That, I guess, must have seemed in those disoriented quarters, like a pretty good answer. Fortunately for me, it turned out to be good enough, and I have been able to pursue a side of professional academic life that has been immensely fulfilling. It Here are the principles I recommend: The Principle of Suspension of Belief A university is and does many good things for a democratic society. It carries forward human knowl- edge and culture from one generation to the next; it adds to that knowledge and culture as it passes it along; it develops and applies standards of excel- lence for measuring what deserves to be included in the body of thought to be transmitted; and from its somewhat detached angle of vision it sometimes serves as a useful critic of society. A university does all these things and more. But its essential greatness, I believe, its most remarkable quality, lies in its dis- tinctive intellectual character - a living culture that values and expresses the joy in intellectual and emo- tional venturesomeness the university bears a simi- larity to the discomforting experience demanded in wilderness. The University of Michigan is the intel- lectual equivalent of Yosemite National Park. This special mentality is more than a posture of skepticism, more than a technique for discovering truth and less than an ideal way to live a whole life. The world of politics (and of life more generally) necessarily emphasizes commitment to beliefs rather than suspension of beliefs. This, too, has its virtues - of personal courage - and politics its enjoyment of openness to the unknown. But there is a very real difference of emphasis and degree, and one that matters. The university stands as a simple and hopefully helpful reminder to the political sphere that we must be continually wary of ideology and of the thin line separating commitment to belief and the totalitarian mind. As a living counter exam- ple, the university in its small way helps nurture a civic personality. It's also the case that we are not just of one mind on how to live a good life; in fact, we are of several minds, and sometimes we enjoy com- mitment and sometimes the suspension of belief. A good life should have several opportunities with dif- ferent emphases and the university offers one. The University of Michigan has been an epicenter of idealism especially in periods of deep social con- flict in America. The eras of the 1930's and the Oxford Pledge and the 1960's and the anti-war movement all originated on this campus. Such periods of political passions will occur again and, when they do, the pres- sures on the University to commit itself in the politi- cal turmoil will be intense. It is wise that we say now that these pressures must be resisted, not because a Swiss-like neutrality is necessary to institutional sur- vival, not because the university has no concern with politics of with political questions, and not because we in the university are uncaring about the conse- quences of political decisions. Rather it is because the special mentality of suspension of belief and constant exploration of complexity has itself a higher political and social significance, not least of which is to issue a continuous warning even for those who would grasp the standard of idealism and improve the society. For the ends we pursue do not inoculate us against the dis- ease of intolerance. The Principle of Publicness A public university is thought to be a distinct species in the United States. Michigan and Berkeley are commonly said to represent the best of that cate- gory. But what is the class, why does it endure, and is it worth having? These questions require steady thought and reflection. To be a public university is to be bound by the U.S. Constitution. It is to be more rooted, emotionally, in a locale. It is to be committed, not as a matter of choice but rather of permanent commitment, to offering and to developing opportunities for access to education without regard to divisions of class, parentage, or social status. And, it is also concerned with providing students with access to an education arising from interaction with as many segments ofAmerican life as is possible. And it is, at least at a Michigan, deter- mined to show that de Toqueville was wrong in believing that a democracy would not aspire to or achieve the highest levels of culture (in the best sense of the word) because ordinary citizens would not understand or appreciate it nor support that quest. Publieness, I would add today, also is in need of special protections, even constitutional protections, and here Michigan offers a very helpful example. There has been a working principle in this country that academic institutions, even though they are supported by the state, should not be subjected to political interference, at least with respect to basic decisions about what to teach and what to research and on general matters of educational policy. But this idea has had difficulty making its way into law. Two points need to be stressed. One is that this working principle needs to be extended to other public institutions of culture (I am thinking specif- ically about the National Endowments for the Arts The Principle of Faculty Autonomy In the minds of many people today, including some within higher education itself, the organization of the American university - in particular, the decentraliza- tion of decisionmaking and the autonomy of faculty with respect to teaching and research - is anachro- nistic and inefficient. Certainly, this system is contrary to the hierarchical organization structure prevalent in a a free market economy; it makes institutional change more difficult and, of course, there are some faculty, but very few, who take advantage of their freedom. But, to my mind, the most astonishing fact about our universities is the degree of personal responsibility, of personal engagement with one's work, that character- izes the overwhelming majority of our faculty. It is this kind of sense of personal empowerment within a large organization that is so hard to create and, that is, I believe, more likely to make and institution succeed over the long term, as other more hierarchical organi- zations come and go. In this particular characteristic, universities share some of the genius that inspires our commitment to a democratic form of government. The Principle of the Transparent Administration I share the view a few others have expressed that the greatest problem for the modern university is not its disordered, somewhat chaotic, structure but its tendency towards bureaucracy. Creativity abhors a bureaucracy. Our efforts to focus our attentions on a reality of declining resources have been necessary and against good. But in such a world there is a risk of taking on the mentality of the miser, of upsetting the balance between trust and accountability, of mis- taking incentives for values or of importing certain values into the community under the guise of incen- tives, of falling into a mindset in which it is prefer- able to just say no rather than to ask what is the qual- ity of your idea and, if it's good, what can we do to make it happen. It is critical, I believe, that we understand the function of an administration within the university is to take the attitude that we will do everything we can to make ourselves and the system, whatever it happens to be, transparent or invisible to our faculty and students, as they set about suspend- ing belief and pursuing complexity. When someone comes to us with an idea that seems good, our response should not be first and foremost what will it mean for our school, our department, or our group. Instead, there ought to be a generosity of spirit, a predisposition to assist, a university perspective at heart, and a sense of pride in helping make things happen without anyone hav- ing to know how it happened. We must remember at all times that the very quali- ties we talk about and regard as at the core identity of a university - the sense of intellectual venturesome- ness I referred to at the outset, the desire to nurture students, these qualities are not, and never will be, created by incentives. Incentives for these qualities are, indeed the last gasp of an academic institution in trouble. A capitalist or free market economy has its own internal value system, good and appropriate for the production of goods and services. But it is not a value system coextensive with that in the academy. And, while there must be a system for allocating resources within the university, everything will depend upon the character of our administrators, who will be most successful if they operate as much as possible on a system of trust and cooperation and on a principle that we serve faculty and students best when what we do is invisible to the academic eye. The Principle of Making Our History Visible I have spoken repeatedly, and I will continue to do so in the future, of the importance of recapturing, of embracing, the illustrious history of the University of Michigan. I have noted how this university in particu- lar has let too much of its heritage slip by the wayside. This is, in many ways, an American problem. One would never know in Florida that one of the greatest poets of the century, Wallace Stevens, wrote a good part of his poetry there, drawing on images from that special environment. While one might find cloying and too domesticating the references in England's Lake District to Wordsworth or Coleridge and Potter, we have a long ways to go before we will encounter that problem. At Michigan we are a bit like Florida. Fortunately, this is something we can correct, with time. It is vital that we come to understand, to truly appreciate, that to make one's history visible is part of taking oneself seriously. To make all of these principles concrete, I want to close with an example: Arthur Miller wrote his first play during his sophomore year here while living at 411 North State Street. Coming from New York, with a poor high school record and even fewer funds, Michigan gave him the chance to prove himself and to join a student body as diverse, as "democratic," he says, as any in the country. Dedicated to exploring what he did not fully understand, he remained in Ann Arbor over spring break and, working day and night, wrote his first play in five days. In Timebends, his autobiogra- phy, he says that playwriting was, for him, "an act of self-discovery from the start," "a kind of license to say the unspeakable." He knew he "would never write anything good that did not somehow make me blush." He says: "From the beginning, writing meant freedom, a spreading of wings, and once I got the first inkling that others were reached by what I wrote, and assumption arose that some kind of pub- lic business was happening inside me, that what per- plexed or moved me must move other." And, so, nur- tured by his professors and an environment - most notably the Hopwood Awards - that valued creativ- ity, Miller wrote, and then gave the play to a friend, whose family owned the house and who worked at the University theater. Through Jim's positive response, Arthur Miller realizes that he has seen and Erastus Otis Haven 1863-1869 Minister and professor of English, history and Latin 0 Blacks were admitted for the first time Presidentialhistory Henry Philip Tappan 1852-83 2 The University was founded in 1817 but the first president wasn't hired until 35 years later S Minister and philosophy professor a Was fired from the office after disagreements with the regents James BurriAngell 1871-1909 8 Former president of the University of Vermont 8 University grew to 5,000 students and 400 faculty S Organized athletics 4 Harry Burn Hutchins 1897-4898, 19094920 University graduate, dean of the University's Law School U Supported students organizing Michigan Union in 1919 r, *. 41 Marion Leroy Burton 1920-1925 Minister and president, University of Minnesota w Secured state funding for Yost ° Field House, Angell Hall and East Engineering Only president to die in office Clarence Cook Little 19251929 # President of the University of Maine Did genetics and cancer research At age 37, he was the youngest man to be appointed to the University presidency. Alexander Giant Ruthven 19294951 Zoology professor and museum director Restructured administration to decentralize responsibility among deans and directors Harlan Henthorne Hatcher 1951-1967 3 Professor of English and vice president of Ohio State University U Established North Campus and j the Flint and Dearborn Campuses Robben Wright Fleming 19684979 Chancellor, University of Wisconsin Law professor 3 During his tenure, the Administration Building is taken over and people are arrested - ~,