4A The Michigan Daily - Monday, March 17, 1997 ixh E 9Utir1 rgtttt tti1 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan NOSHi WHITE Editor in Chief ERIN MARSH Editorial Page Editor ii NOTABLE QUOTABLE 'I don't even know if it's going to be that much fun. I don't really like to drink during the day. I get tired and pass out by 9 o'clock.' - LSA senior Roman Rozenblywn, explaining why he shirks "traditional" St. Patricks Day celebrations Modern 4 Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. Al other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY Court n troube 'U' must come clean with NCAA JIM LASSER 'N' ""--. . 3.1 A s an economically healthy, financially independent faction, the University ath- letic department rarely refers to the University's central administration on its institutional matters. However, recent allega- tions surrounding the men's basketball team demonstrate that the athletic department is not above the law. Potential sanctions could affect the University through its most visible and high-profile connection with the gl6bal community: its sports programs. Last week, the University admitted to sev- eral NCAA violations involving the men's basketball program and Detroit-area booster Ed Martin. The University - unable to locate willing sources - abandoned its short investigation and attempted to lay the matter to rest. A few days later, the Detroit Free Press found the sources that the University did not and determined that the violations did not end with free birthday cakes and attempted security deposit payments. The newspaper reported a barrage of allegations - reportedly confirmed by unnamed sources close to the team - including regu- lar gifts, favors and cash payments from Martin to players. The Free Press's reported findings indicate that the University's inves- tigation was unacceptably incomplete, at best. NCAA officials rnust now enter the scene to uncover what the University athletic department cannot or will not. Categorized as one who derives pleasure from befriending promising young basket- ball players, Martin has a toe in every notable high school basketball program in Detroit and is a familiar mentor for many of the city's top young players. University men's basketball coach Steve Fisher said that maintaining cordial relations with boosters like Martin is essential in playing competitively for top recruits. However, Martin had more ins with the University's program than he should have - he fre- quently received free tickets for games and was a regular visitor to Crisler Arena. As a University booster, any ties with players is expressly forbidden by the NCAA. Fisher should have drawn the line, restricting Martin from Crisler and from pursuing improper contacts with his team. However, while Fisher should have kept Martin out of games and practices, he - and other coaches - cannot ban the Ed Martins of the college basketball world. Critics call for Fisher's dismissal, but until investigators can prove his express permission and knowl- edge of the violations, his position should remain secure. Presently, the only crime of which Fisher is guilty is neglect. His players, on the other hand, should know better. Accepting gifts - or even assuming the appearances of impropriety _ is unacceptable behavior for University rep- resentatives. Many of the University players anticipate rewarding careers as professional athletes, but for now, they must be content as amateur players and University students. Like all other students, student-athletes. need money for the incidental expenses of college. However, the NCAA recently approved an amendment to allow student- athletes - even full-scholarship players - to hold part-time jobs to cover normal, out- of-pocket expenses. Players are also permit- ted to work in the off-season and during the summer. If student-athletes need money - besides the tuition they receive for playing - they should get it the way other students do: Earn it. Student-athletes have no excuse for jeop- ardizing sports programs and tarnishing the University's reputation by accepting illegal. gifts. Likewise, coaching staffs and athletic administrators must demonstrate that they can handle their programs. The University's lack of institutional control necessitates a complete, objective NCAA investigation. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Sold out Bollinger unfavorably W hen warm weather makes its way to Ann Arbor, many students become more attracted to a day on the Diag than to a day of classes - faculty and students alike experience this 'spring fever' each year. However, according to quotations he gave to The New York Times, University President Lee Bollinger might not believe that apathetic mindsets at the University are simply a seasonal occurrence. In a Times story this past Thursday, Bollinger said that even on college campus- es, "social idealism is dead or dormant," and maintained that the lack of vision or of a social agenda contributes to growing apa- thy towards politics within the nation. His comments - spurred by a discussion about President Clinton's campaign finance scan- dals and public apathy about political affairs - painted a picture of indifference among the University's student body. While this year's national elections marked a low point for voter participation, it is too soon to jump to conclusions regard- ing increasing indifference toward politics. The fervor of the '60s and '70s is long gone - the America of the '90s is a different place. Presently, the United States is not involved in a major international war and polled Americans agree that today's politi- cal and ethical questions pale beside the Watergate scandal. The country is, for the most part, politically comfortable and most University students enjoy a protected lifestyle. However, to generalize the public, . rT , . , represented students student body with no social agenda was rash, considering his brief time as president of the University. Not only is campus more politically active than many factions of the private sector, but the University's commit- ment to social service is unrivaled. Programs such as the Office of Community Service Learning, the Greek System and the English Composition Board increase awareness among students and orchestrate countless community service and outreach projects. Project Serve alone links more than 1,500 students to 150 community organizations every year. Students demon- strate that they are not comfortable riding on the University's prestige; there is a gen- uine commitment to community improve- ment and social responsibility. This type of promise to the community leads to national awareness. Bollinger should re-acquaint himself with the University's student community before mis- representing it to a national audience. He needs to know where to look for such activism. The University's student body is one of the finest in the country. Perusing organiza- tions' banners in the Diag, attending meet- ings of one of the hundreds of campus orga- nizations or talking to a few of the thou- sands of bright, aware and active students at the University is evidence that campus is very socially aware. Student activism employs different methods than those of the past. Bollinger should not write off U supports student activism TO THE DAILY: In response to the nea- tive reactions that have devel- oped regarding President Bollinger's comments regard- ing social idealism, d like to do the unusual job of defend- ing the University adminis- tration and their support of students, student groups and student activism. Having been active and dealt with the University administration, I think that they truly want to help student groups make a difference as much as possi- bl e. The extent to which they fail is not due to a lack of concern or a feeling of ambi- guity toward students, student groups and student activism rather, it's due to not knowing how better to support stu- dents. They are, perhaps, out of touch to an extent, but they are not ambivalent or unsupportive of student activism - quite the oppo- site is true. I believe that President Bollinger resonates with that sentiment. I think if you take a good look at all the administration already does to support student groups, you'd be impressed. There is much yet to be -done in terms of the adminis- tration's support of student groups, but I think it's unfair to disregard the substantial amount of support that they have lent in the past and pre- sent. CORY FRYLING LSA JUNIOR Solicitations are not 'gifts' TO THE DAILY: The University does not understand the spirit of gift- giving. This was most recent- ly illustrated to us by the arrival of elegant off-white envelopes in our mailboxes last week. The cards inside asked graduating seniors to show their "school spirit" by participating in the Senior Pledge Program. They ended by informing us that a University representative (i.e., a paid student caller from Michigan Telefund) would be calling in the near future to solicit our "gift." To us, this "gift" insults the whole idea of recognizing the University's excellence through a gift. By giving a gift, one acts upon inspira- tion. That inspiration comes from being endeared to something or someone to such an extent that one is moved to give by one's own debt, the same people who will solicit our "gifts" have been soliciting our parents since the very day that we enrolled. If we were in a position at this time to donate, we would certainly know who to address the check to and would not need such solicitation. We oppose the University's organized effort through Telefund to solicit "gifts" from graduating seniors. While giving through Telefund may seem to show one's gratitude towards the University, this should not be the only way seniors can sup- port the University. We resent being solicited and will be sure to have our answering machines on for the inevitable call. POLLY SMOTHERGILL JACK MANIKO LSA SENIORS School of Social Work overlooked TO THE DAILY: Why does the Daily con- tinue to overlook the School of Social Work? The School of Social Work at the University of Michigan has been ranked No. I by U.S.- News and World Report for the past several years. The School of SocialIWork has been highly ranked by other polls as well. The Daily miss- es all these polls and surveys concerning the School of Social Work. The University has a No. I program right under its nose and yet the Daily seems to go out of its way to ignore it. Why doesn't the School of Social Work ever get men- tioned in the Daily? It doesn't seem like the Daily even acknowledges that there is a School of Social Work at the University. Articles in the Daily have reported on the Law School. the Business School and, most recently, the Medical School. That very same U.S. News and World Report sur- vey rated the School of Social Work at the University No. 1. In the future, can the Daily give the students at the School of Social Work some recognition. RICK MASTROIANNI SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK Editorial used incorrect terminology TO THE DAILY: As a freuent online read- er of the Daily, a University grad and an employee of the Michigan House of Representatives, I need to raise a nitpicking point about the editorial on the student regent campaign fee ("Buying a vote," 3/12/97). It referred to the fact that no 'congressperson" had been willing to sponsor legis- lation to move the issue for- ward in the Michigan Legislature. Congressperson and congressional representa- tive are terms only applied to U.S. representatives and U.S. senators, who are elected to the two bodies comprising the Congress of the United States. In Michigan, we have a State House of Representatives and a State Senate, forming the State Legislature. Its members are either state representatives or state senators, collectively known as "legislators." I don't expect that every- one be familiar with the dis- tinction, but the student paper of a great university should do its bit for civics education by using the appropriate term. DAVE MONFORTON UNIVERSITY ALUMNUS Candidates must run on issues TO THE DAILY: Two weeks ago I sent out, by mass e-mail to every can- didate for every seat in MSA, an offer for free publicity. I am running a non-partisan, Web-based candidate infor- mation site called "inform" (http:aww umich. edu/~inform). Any candidate may post pretty much any- thing he or she wants there. This letter is not directed toward the 15 candidates (as of March 13) who have replied to my offer. It is, instead, directed toward the over 50 candidates who haven't. My challenge is this: Do you have any message at all? Are you running on any issues? Do you have any leadership experience? Or are you nothing but a pretty face on an inane poster? To the voters: Many wor- thy candidates have respond- ed to my call and produced clear, pointed reasons for you to elect or re-elect them. Please read what they have written and cast an informed vote this Wednesday and Thursday. RAYMOND ROBB MSA REPRESENTATIVE, RACKHAM St.Patrick s~ celebrations betray history K iss me, I'm Irish. No, really, I am. Today, in case the rather green appearance of everyone on the street didn't sink in, is St. Patrick's Day, the day when every- one, supposedly.- is Irish. Shamrocks dangle from ceilings across the country and beckon from windows of bars, everyone 4 pretends there actually is some MEGAN mythical lan- SCHIMPF guage of "blar- pcssap IONS ney" that requires only a poor Irish accent to be fluent, leprechauns are regarded as more than simple trolls pursuing pots of gold, and green beer flows like, well, regular-colored beer. It is easy to condemn the debauchery4 of St: Patrick's Day and criticize bars and breweries for making a mockery of what began as - and remained in Ireland until about 40 years ago - a religious' holiday. St. Patrick's Day is no0 longer what it once was - and for more reasons than a change in color over thousands of years: Irish celebrat- ing St. Patrick's Day originally wore blue instead of green. But what is not so easy to compre- hend is the underlying truth of what the distortion of St. Patrick's Day means. Just as March 1 7 is the day Ivhen everyone adds an O0' to the beginning of their last name, we com- memorate and toast our cultural her- itage with symbols and traditions that, over the centuries, generations and oceans, have lost much of their origi- nal meaning. Collectively, our ancestral identity4 has been perturbed, even by those intending to honor their cultural past, to a level of preconceived notions of what it means to be Irish, Japanese, Greek or anything else. For this, history deserves to shoulder some of the blame. Persecution, for any one of countles reasons, drove most American immi grants to leave their native countries tO fulfill a dream-across an ocean. In the' process, many traditions were altered to save lives and allow them to contin- ue in some manner. Slavery destroyed thousands of proud traditions. Ellis Island changed thousands of ethnic names into English "equivalents" that were easier to pronounce and spell. Living conditions in slums and ghettos and prejudice in the United States fur- thered the evolution. So what we started over with was not what we had once started with. We are left with definitions of culture based on traditional foods, selected holidays, piecemeal history lessons about battle seroes and tourist campaigns and slo- gans.- To find the truth requires slipping hack through hundreds of years and miles. There we find the portion of the responsibility we shoulder. Otherwise, we celebrate on the surface without understanding the reasons. While this is not inherently evil, it is accepting only the first layer of expla- nation. It is as if we were to accept everything we were taught without ever asking a question. It is taking the easy way out. But it could also be regarded as tak- ing the American way out. This inlvolves the "melting pot" more than the lazy chair, a "tossed salad" more than a remote control. As the only nation that has been shaped almost entirely by immigrants, the essence of coming here was to start over, to find a new - hopefully better -- life. People who came wanted to be Americans, not citizens of Italy, Russia or Mexico. And the people who came were those who were determined to shape a better world for their children. In some places, anyone who could, left. From the very beginning, immigrat- ing was a compromise between what they left and what they created anew. Our cultural identity, as it evolved away from its roots, blended into a common perception of what it means to be German or African into a com- mon perception of what it means to be American. Compromise necessarily entails los- ing every now and then. But it also involves winning. As our modern cul-1 trlidentity becomes dependent on current events, entertainment and ath- letics, it is dangerous to forget where we started. It is equally dangerous to rest entire- ly on what we perceive to be real. W 01