4A - The Michigan Daily - Thursday, February 20, 1997 ale £(idigau &zil g 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Eted and managed by students at the JOSH WHITE Editor in Chief ERIN MARSH Editorial Page Editor University of Michigan Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Dailys editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY On thene 'U.' housing may soon be impractical. NOTABLE QUOTABLE 'I find it odd that someone in charge of College Republicans would pretend to be a member of the press.' - Press Secretary for the Michigan Republican Party Sage Eastman, commenting on allegations that Nick Kirk, president of the University chapter of the College Republicans, falsified credentials to gain access to the state Republican convention YUKl KuNI YUKI .R A45IweiSK "W41j. 1- TOr71E cc TD se A N F r Shut "c n FE -iNA44 -r r4TLE'KE N oT jAJ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Tf the University Board of Regents approves the proposed 4-percent increase in housing rates at its monthly meeting on Thursday, they will force stu- dents to dig deeper into their pockets to pay for closet-sized rooms and unappetizing cafeteria food. The University Housing and Division of Student Affairs have proposed a 4-percent increase to both traditional housing room- and-board rates and family housing rental rates for the 1997-98 school year. The increase would cover rising contractual costs such as food service, utilities and maintenance. However, the University's cal- culated inflation rate is only 3 percent. Therefore, the proposed increase, is 1 per- cent higher than necessary. The additional 1-percent increase is included to "meet debt service require- ments" for renovation projects at Alice Lloyd and Couzens residence halls. Yet last year's fee increase - which was 1.4 percent above the calculated inflation rate - was supposed to pay for the renovations. Students should not pay twice for the University's failure to stick to a budget. And once the renovations are done and paid for, it's a safe bet that the regents will not rec- ommend similar fee decreases. Since the 1991-92 school year, room- and-board rates have increased by 20 per- cent. Whereas in 1991 the cost of a double room was $4,084, next year's increase would place the rate at $5,342. The jump is exorbitant. Students can barely afford the current room-and-board prices. If fee increases continue to exceed the inflation rate, student housing will be priced outside the Ann Arbor housing market. If increased fees force first-year students out of University housing in favor of cheaper, roomier, more convenient, off-campus housing, the University will be denying stu- dents a valuable experience. Residence hall living is an opportunity to meet people - a daunting task at a large public university. Additionally, if the regents approve the 4- percent rate increase, Ann Arbor landlords will have another reason to increase rental rates. Students living off-campus - many of whom left the residence halls in the hope of finding affordable housing - may be strapped with higher costs as well. Realistic options are dwindling. The University must realize the far-reaching implications that increased rates will have for students. Instead of hiking fees, the regents should find a way to reduce costs. As any student who has lived in University housing can allege, the halls produce an exorbitant amount of waste. Cafeterias dispose of food in astonishing quantities; students rarely turn lights off behind them. If the University can find ways to lower utility and contractual costs, students will not have to shoulder such a heavy financial burden. Only after thorough investigation into such cost-cutting measures can the regents explain increases that exceed inflation. , This week's regents meeting will be the first over which new University President Lee Bollinger will preside. He and new Regents Olivia Maynard (D-Flint) and S. Martin Taylor (D-Grosse Ile), who took their posts last month, must understand the detrimental affect a housing rate increase would have on students. If approved, the residence halls may no longer be an afford- able option for University living. Unfriendly skies Government should assist good-faith bargaining T hanks to President Clinton, hundreds of thousands of Americans were able to keep their travel plans for President's Day weekend. Clinton invoked the Railroad Labor Act of 1926 to order a 60-day post- ponement of an American Airlines pilot strike. He will appoint a federal mediation board to make a non-binding recommenda- tion for a new contract. Given the circum- stances, Clinton's decision provides a sore- ly needed cooling-off period and assistance for progress. Nevertheless, Clinton must take every precaution to prevent weakening America's labor unions. Only a small gap separates the pilots' positions and the airline - their differences could be solved through rational and rea- soned negotiation. American has offered pilots, who already earn an average of $120,000 per year, a generous package con- sisting of stock options and a 10-percent wee hike over 4 years. But the pilots are more worried about losing some of their jobs to lower-paid commuter airplane pilots. The imminent strike is not a result of these policy differences - the lack of progress in negotiations has been largely due to hostilities between the pilots and American's top administrators. The federal mediation board's labor dispute expertise could relieve tensions and be a catalyst for compromise. American Airlines, as one of the nation's largest carriers, controls a large number of passenger air routes. In some cities, American is the only option for the majori- ty of flights. Shutting the carrier down would wreak havoc on the economy. Business travelers would be impeded, the busiest travel weekends of the year. Although Clinton's decision was appro- priate to this situation, he should invoke the Railroad Labor Act in only the most extreme circumstances. Labor's ability to strike provides leveraging power that has resulted in significant advances in pay, ben- efits and working conditions. Taking this trump card from the unions would leave employers with little incentive to bargain in good faith. Some strikes, like at American Airlines, affect the national infrastructure and the performance of the economy. For instance, automotive strikes often lead to thousands of layoffs in auxiliary industries. Strikes in railways, trucking and mining could bring the economy to its knees. Clinton must avoid using the Railway Act in most of these cases. Sometimes economic repercus- sions that result from organized strikes are not reason enough to halt a strike - the president must weigh whether the resulting deterioration in labor morale and employer relations will be more damaging than any adverse short-term consequences. At times, when the issue gap between unions and employers is large, a strike is the only way to invoke compromise. This is not true of the threatened American Airlines pilot strike because of the hostility in nego- tiations and the relative wealth of both par- ties. These circumstances, coupled with potential devastation to the economy, were good reason to use the Railway Labor Act for the first time in 31 years. Nevertheless, American Airlines' situation is rare and the president must continue to use the act spar- ingly. Preserving labor unions' power is Daily is unfair to MSA TO THE DAILY: It is becoming evident to me that the Daily is intent upon making MSA look bad regardless of what we do. First, when Vice President Probir Mehta's rules violation first came to light, the Daily blamed the assembly for even having the rules ("Inappropriate allocation," 2/6/97). Now, when we have voted just to investigate the incident, the Daily asserted that the integrity of the vote was questionable ("On shaky ground," 2/18/97). Personally, I changed my vote the second time around for two reasons: the negative reaction I received after our first vote, and Probir's active attempts to avoid his own investigation made me doubt his intentions. You see, when we voted the second time, Probir chose to vote against the investigation instead of abstaining, as would have been proper. 1 Furthermore, it must be noted that both our president and general council, Fiona Rose and Dan Serota, who are both leaders in the Michigan Party, did abstain from the vote. If either one of them had chosen to defend Probir, this investigation would not have begun. It seems to me that we chose to investigate Probir in spite of partisanship, not because of it. The Daily should stop questioning the assembly's integrity and stop calling this investigation a vendetta. Instead, perhaps the Daily should spend its efforts investigating this matter itself. DAVID BURDEN ENGINEERING SOPHOMORE, MSA REPRESENTATIVE Campus Jews should reject Half-Shekel campaign TO THE DAILY: As a member of the Jewish community, I do not feel it necessary for myself or any one of my fellow Jews to segregate ourselves from the rest of the University commu- nity. Therefore, I feel that the UJA's Half-Shekel campaign is detrimental to the true goal of "Jewish unity." I am sur- prised to say the least, that this campaign is supported by the likes of Michael Brooks. One of the main features of Judaism is that we do not go seeking out people to con- vert to the religion, nor do Jews onenlav ndertie I HAs Jews really that much in dan- ger where we need to wear identifying markers to make us feel better in a sense of community? No. I urge my fellow Jews not to partake in the UJA Half-Shekel drive if they feel that is the best way to sup- port the Jewish community. Why must we wear these badges that are not of honor, but of some sort of guilt? There are many ways a Jewish community is sus- tained, whether it be through religious practices, participa- tion in a Jewish club or oth- erwise. I don't want to feel that just because I do not support this campaign that I am any less a member of the Jewish community. But I feel that this campaign says that. They want eventual 100- percent participation, but count me out. I hope others in the community make the same ethical choice. DAVID TAUB LSA FIRST-YEAR STUDENT Character is key to team's success TO THE DAILY: In his column about the Michigan-Indiana men's bas- ketball game ("Spectacular first half precludes to horren- dous second for Blue," 2/17/97) Daily Sports Editor John Leroi stated, "If you thought Michigan looked really good in the first half, you were right." I beg to differ. I did not think the Wolverines looked at all good in the first half. despite their 18-point lead at its close. The team did not pass effectively and had no patience on offense. Their scoring depended on exploit- ing the individual advantages in size and quickness of Michigan over Indiana, rather than crisp passing and work- ing for an open shot. They exhibited several moments of individual offen- sive brilliance, with Baston, Taylor, Traylor and others dunking the ball home. Unfortunately, whereas the Wolverines played brilliantly as individuals, the Hoosiers played brilliantly together - as a team - in the second half. As a result, they did not have to improvise every shot, or depend on spectacular ath- letic ability to create a dra- matic "highlight reel" play. After the heartwrenching loss, Michigan fans once again left the arena wonder- ing how the heck we could have blown that game. I am familiar with that feeling, having first experienced it at Crisler Arena in 1990. The answer is not that the plavers coach must instill this value every day at practice and rein- force the concept by benching those "stars" who look at col- lege ball as a chance to show off for pro scouts. As a result, maybe we won't get a top-five recruiting class every year. Of course, that hasn't stopped Gene Keady from winning a bushel of Big Ten champi- onships for Purdue (an honor that has eluded Michigan for 11 years). I am left to ponder three difficult questions: Should we not expect, as a minimum qualification for the privilege of playing for Michigan, respect for the values of dis- cipline and teamwork? And should we not demand, at the barest of minimums for the privilege of coaching at Michigan, the ability to teach, instill and reinforce these values? Do our players and coaches meet this mini- mum? Leroi also stated, "If you wondered what happened to the Wolverines in the second half, you're not alone." The answers are all too clear. JON MARGOLIN UNIVERSITY ALUMNUS Consider Nagrant to lead MSA TO THE DAILY: I read in the article "Mehta may vie for MSA presidency" (2/19197) that speculations have risen about LSA Rep. Michael Nagrant running for MSA President. This is a very heartening rumor, as Nagrant has proven that he is an effective student leader. His success in secur- ing city council appoint- ments, as well as his work as chair of the Campus Governance Committee, has demonstrated a solid concern for the student voice on cam- pus. So far, Nagrant has yet to purchase planners with assembly money or illegally allocate any student funds to groups he is involved in. Furthermore, Nagrant, according to the article, has left the Michigan Party - a very wise and commendable move. His accomplishments should not be overshadowed by the misrepresentation of students by Fiona Rose and Probir Mehta. I find it very dishearten- ing that the Michigan Party has nominated Probir to be their presidential candidate. Probir has had approximately one year to change this cam- pus and demonstrate a com- petent concern for students. If Probir was capable of changing this campus or impacting students' lives on a regular basis. he would have Fred Goldman: American hero Imagine for a moment, if you will, what it would be like to receive a call in the middle of the dark night from a police officer who tells you that your son is dead. Not just dead, but brutally murdered. Only a few days later, the suspected killer is located and charged. This man, whom y undoubtedly hate, turns out to be famous ex-athlete with a winning smile and more money than God. And he uses his money to buy the best legal defense in America, per- 4 haps the world The murder trial begins and the eyes of the uni- verse watch each ZACHARY M day's proceedings. RAIM As the trial pro- SMKE & gresses, justice _ _i_____ becomes more elusive while the lawyers wrangle and the judge lets things spiral out of con- trol. You see the memory of your dead son get lost in a legal game where pe ception is reality and reality is irrelO vant And you get frustrated. You lash out at the killer and the judge. You cry and whine. You have nowhere to turn. The cameras won t go away. You feel deeply angry and bitter. All you want is a little justice. And a majority of Americans think you are right; they agree that the defendant did it. But the only opinions you care about are from the 12 juro Unfortunately, these 12 foolish peop1 declare the defendant "not guilty" and it feels like you lost your son all over again. And despite the terrible pain, you have a family and a life. You must carry on. But how? For Fred Goldman, this was not a distant scenario - it has been his life for nearly three years. Despite the hor- rible tragedy that struck his family ! June 1994, when Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson were found murdered, Fred has summoned the courage and sense of purpose to con- tinue with life. His will to survive and improve a judicial system that let hii down is remarkable. In fact, Fred has come to embody a 90s-style American hero. He is emo- tional in public, yet he is not unrea- sonable in his demands. He is famil minded and civil. He understands tr suffering, but does not let it deter him from accomplishing his goals. We all can learn from his story. Throughout the criminal trial, Fred never let the public forget who the real victims were: his son and Nicole. The defense tried to paint O.J. as a victim of a police conspiracy, but Fred,- through his frequent press confer- ences, articulated the voice of reas* and outrage - he, like most- Americans, believed O.J. was a "mur- derer" who "butchered" his son. When the trial was over, it became fashionable to bash the prosecution for its incompetence. Although he had more of a right than anybody, Goldman did not jump on the band- wagon; instead, he supported the pub- lic servants who fought for justice. This was a noble action, one th t reveals integrity. Instead of giving up, Fred immedi- ately began to prepare for the civil trial. Although some felt he should have dropped the case, Fred did the right thing. He believed in his gut that O.J. was the murderer and that evil people should be held accountable for their evil actions. When the civil jury found O.J. liable, Fred breathed a sigh of relief; he fink ly had closure. The jury decided award the Goldmans millions of dol- lars for Ron's death. But Fred, from the beginning, said he was not in it for the money. He demonstrated this with a touch of class recently when he offered to let O.J. keep the money if the ex-athlete would publish a signed confession for the double homicide. Again, Fred demon- strated that he is a man of principle and integrity, values that today's pub figures often lack. Fred's crusade did not end with the civil trial. He recently quit his job of more than 30 years to become a spokesman for Safe Streets, an interest group dedicated to fixing the criminal justice system. Even in the face of tragedy, Goldman has kept true to his ideals. This past Monday, Fred and his farL ily appeared on CNBC's "Rivera LitW with Geraldo Rivera. At the end of the show, Geraldo called Fred a great father; this label, Geraldo said, is the greatest accomplishment he can bestow upon Fred. It was a poignant moment - Fred, his daughter Kim