4A - The Michigan Daily - Monday, January 13, 1997 apej ttĀ£titgrnz 'lQ 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of M ichigan RONNIE GLASSBERG Editor in Chief ADRIENNE JANNEY ZACHARY M. RAIMI Editorial Page Editors Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY Cold and disarmed City Council must find new homeless shelter iNOTABLE QUOTABLE 'She was always available. She helped me with home- work. I spent a lot of time in her room I guess. She was a great person. ... She was a very vibrant person.' - Engineeringfirst-year student Stacey Waxtan, describing Arati Sharangpani, who died in the Comair plane crash last week JIM LASSERSHARP AS TOAST HAMILTON, A PENNY FOFR_ YOcJR THOVC-+1T.5. CHARLES, YOU KND ONL Y T HIN K Fold 51X F1 U R E 5 ) LETTERS TO THE EDITOR L ast week, the Ann Arbor City Council voted to turn the former National Guard Armory building on East Ann Street into an apartment complex rather than a homeless shelter that the city desperately needs. Originally, the City Council consid- ered turning the building into a homeless shelter. After listening to local developers' plans, council members decided to allow the building to be used for apartments; developer Ed Shaffran will create apartment units inside of the armory. As a result, the City Council is ignoring the needs of Ann Arbor's homeless population. The city now has an obligation to promptly find a new location for a homeless shelter - this should be done as soon as possible. The location of the former armory build- ing seemed to be ideal for a homeless shel- ter, and many residents supported the move- ment to convert the location into a shelter. For example, resident Susan McGarry said at last week's meeting that the location, size and space of the armory are more than ade- quate for a homeless shelter. Moreover, the armory building is located in central Ann Arbor. This location would have proved easy to find, therefore provid- ing a close haven for the homeless. The armory is also vacant and ready to convert into a homeless shelter - it would have been a better solution than finding an empty lot on which to build or further renovating other existing buildings. Moreover, the current homeless shelters are crowded and incapable of serving the needs of the city's homeless population. The foundation of a new homeless shelter would have helped to get much of the population off the streets and out of the cold. And the city still would have received payment from the sale of the building. As the former armory becomes trans- formed into apartments, Ann Arbor's home- less population will continue to need a new shelter. Several vacant buildings and empty lots could serve as ideal locations for a new shelter. The council should turn its attention to finding a new location immediately. Council member Jean Carlberg (D-3rd Ward) indicated at last week's meeting that the council will work on the issue. Her com- ments are reassuring, but must be acted upon soon. Residential space would normally be a noncontroversial use of a building. But in this case, the city dropped the ball on a chance to improve the lives of citizens not in the middle class. With that decision under their belts, City Council members must now turn their focus to providing shel- ter for the area's homeless population. Injecting finality Death penalty reinforces social injustice A rkansas' state executioners put to death three men in three hours Jan. 9. Lethal injections brought to an end the 20- year death row stints of Earl Van Denton and Paul Ruiz, convicted after a murderous 1977 crime spree, and the nine-year prison stay of Kirt Wainwright, convicted for a 1988 murder and armed robbery. Though the executions may have appeased citizens craving eye-for-an-eye revenge against con- victed murderers, the cases of these men, in part, exemplify the reasons states should discontinue capital punishment practices. Appeals and re-trials enabled the three convicted murderers to elude execution for many years. Though legal tactics earned the men longer lives, they cost Arkansas a great deal in prosecution costs. Such judicial maneuvers characterize the cases of many death row inmates. In fact, a 1994 Supreme Court report found that the average con- demned prisoner avoids execution for 9 1/2 years through court appeals. Demonstrating the high cost of these appeals, a 1993 study showed that the execution of one death row prisoner costs $3 million to $10 million, while a life sentence costs only $500,000. .The legal expense makes the death penalty a financially inefficient mode of punish- ment. Given that death-penalty states have -murder rates similar to other states, capital .punishment has deterred murder no more effectively than life sentencing. Therefore, states employing capital punishment spend more money on a system that yields no appreciable benefit over the cheaper life- sentencing system. The problems of the death penalty extend beyond the financial realm. The current sys- tem of capital punishment reflects the racial bias of America's judicial system. A late 1995 Congressional Record report showed that blacks convicted of killing whites are 63 times more likely to be executed than whites who kill blacks. In fact, 92 percent of those executed in this country since 1976 killed white victims, though almost half of all homicide victims during that period were black. According to the figures, race plays a role in determining whether a court takes a person's life. Capital punishment policies enable judicial racism to take the harshest form possible: murder. Factors such as racial bias have rendered the country's judicial system imperfect, allowing erroneous rulings to seep out of courtrooms. Imposing an immutable pun- ishment, such as death, does not enable courts to accommodate for incorrect rulings once the convicted have been executed. A 1990 Congressional Record report showed that U.S. courts have sentenced to death at least 350 innocent people since 1900, resulting in the execution of at least 25 innocent people. In fact, a Mother Jones study estimates that courts will posthu- mously acquit at least seven people now condemned. Though courts often fail to rule accurately, the death penalty allows no room for error. The abolition of capital pun- ishment would prevent courts from taking more innocent lives. Though the monstrous crimes that the three executed Arkansas men committed warranted severe punishment, courts should not have imposed the death penalty. The financial inefficiency, the racial bias and the finality of this form of government- regulated violence make it an unfit form of punishment. As the only industrialized Western nation that has not abolished penal execution, the United States should follow the suit of other countries that have discard- ed the death penalty in favor of more prop- er forms of punishment. Daily printed RA's obituary before friends were ready TO THE DAILY: I am writing this letter just 15 hours after learning that my friend and co-worker, Arati Sharangpani, was aboard the fallen Comair jet. She was a beautiful per- son and strong leader. She touched the lives of everyone that she met. She will be missed dearly but remem- bered forever by all who knew her. While I was happy to see the positive article in the Daily on Friday ("Markley RA dies on Comair flight from Cincinnati," 1/10/97) filled with loving quotes that demonstrated her friends' respect and love for her, I do have some concerns. I understand the need to inform the student body of such a tragedy. Unfortunately, there was not enough time between 9:45 p.m. last night (Thursday) when some of us heard the news and 8 a.m. this morning (Friday) for all of her friends to be told. While the majority did know, there were some who found out about the death of a friend while flippingrthrough the Daily, waiting for class to begin. I feel that such news should be conveyed to friends in a sensitive, personal, pri- vate way. I guess I don't real- ly know what the solution is - to wait until Monday may have been too long from a news reporting aspect, but on the other hand, it would have ensured that those close to her were told in a more per- sonal way. Second, I was very upset that Daily reporters were attempting to interview some of Arati's residents just min- utes after they had been told about her passing. Arati was a model resi- dent adviser and thus had the love and respect of all of her residents. They were under- standably upset and in no mood to give a comment to the Daily. Also, we as a staff had a group meeting to express our grief and emo- tions but a few of the staff members were unable to par- ticipate because they had to attend to the Daily reporters and make sure that they did not harass the residents. The reporter kept asking for more details. I understand that it is your job to report- but please, what more did you want to know? All any of us knew was what we saw on television. The information that you needed for your article should not have taken more than an hour of interviewing with grief-stricken co-work- ers. I think that the Daily needs to take a closer look and perhaps change their methods of obtaining infor- mation in such tragic cases. I am grieving the loss of a friend and beautiful human being. RAJESHRI GANDHI SCHOOL OF EDUCATION City Council demonstrates priorities with armory vote TO THE DAILY: This letter is in response to your Jan. 9, 1997 article on the Ann Arbor City Council's vote concerning the armory ("City Council votes to rezone armory into apart- ments"). Ann Arbor has been ranked as high as fifth in this year's lists of best cities in the United States. Recently the city was rated as one of the safest and healthiest in the country for women. Last Wednesday's City Council vote on what to do with the armory proved that Ann Arbor is not safe or healthy for its homeless men and women. It is easy for our coffee merchants, shop keep- ers, and deli managers - in the name of profit and respectability - to turn away transients looking for an hour of shelter, but it is not so easy for this city's homeless to find rest. The City Council's 9-1 vote seemed easy enough for all but Tobi Hanna-Davies (D- I st Ward). Converting the armory into a shelter would have been a bad decision for a city concerned about its image. It would have threatened to populate the downtown area with people who have little disposable income, it surely would not have helped the city's bond rating, and our national ranking would slip. This January brings us the end of welfare and food stamps. With the Council's vote, it also signals the end of hope for many of this city's homeless. Where are our priorities as a community? Our City Council has answered for us. Move on and clear out! We will have no homeless in Ann Arbor. ADAM SNOW SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK CAM MIInY Cff"F Do Rules girls* have more fun? 66Tm, is this a joke?" I asked the "U friendly informative-type per son at Borders. "Hey, you guys." She waved to three more informative persons, all male. "This lady wants to know if this bo is a joke." She pointed to the copy was holding of "The Rules: Time- Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right," a New York Times best- : seller that has even spent some time in the No. I spot. All four of them burst out laughing. A good ADRIENNE sign, I thought. JANNEY : "No," one said, "but it's good that you think it is. The authors were serious' The authors are Elen Fein and Sherrie Schneider. Mrs. Fein and Mrs. Schneider would like to teach single girls how to snag a man and keep hi In other words, play hard tog because biologically a man loves a challenge and we don't want to take that away from him, do we girls? Or else he will break up with us! At this point in the column, Ia tempted to resort to profanity, but4 i%' the tradition of Rules girls everywhere, I will exercise some discipline. Not that Mrs. Fein and Mrs. Schneider advise us girls not to swear. Theydo, however, advise us not to ask him og not to call him, not to tell him what to do, not to stare, not to talk too mch not to open up too fast ... well, yo- can read the whole list m Cosmopolitan, American Woman and Woman's Own magazines. You cnv also take seminars in The Rules. Or you could just join a convent. It certainly would be more pleasant than following The Rules. But chastity, you protest? What's the difference 4 Rules girls can't have sex when they want to anyway. Nor can a Rules gir= tell a man what she likes in bed, or ask. a man what he wants. Or talk at all. Or show emotion about sex. "... The Rules way is not a hobby, but a religion" Ah, a religion. And mar riage is the institution and your has- band/prospective husband is the god; As I read on, the book turned from. funny to skin-crawling. If your parents and friends thin you're nuts, you are supposed to ignore them, stall them, but no dis- cussing. Just an island of Rules. Yu can't discuss it with anyone anti-Rule because "It's hard enough to do The Rules when you believe in them, it's even harder when you talk to people when they're downright against them." (Excuse me, but last I checked, I knew' how to think for myself, and sod' most of us little girls.) Mrs. Fein an Mrs. Schneider also advise followers not to read books about other methods, or counter to the Rules philosophy,. "particularly books that encourage; women to pursue other men or express their inner child." Now I, too, believe inner-children are a load of horsepuck-' ey, but I wouldn't want to stop anyone from reading those books any mor than this book. .Sound like cult brainwashing tec4 niques to you? Me too. The messages about women are another problem altogether. You can't discuss The Rules with your therapist, because he or she might try to talk you out of it. (Actually, the book trashes therapists at every, chance.) Your therapist might find The; Rules "dishonest and manipulative." (Small wonder.) Your therapist mig want you to take a more open ar communicative approach to relation- ships. And, your therapist certainly couldn't understand the hidden capac} ities of women "for forcing themselves on men who don't want them and try- ing to make relationships happen. If they only knew how we wandered around campus hoping to run into men.... A woman in love with a mativ who is not in love with her can be dan- gerous to herself and him. Her on hope is to do The Rules." Who buys into this stuff, anyway? Oh, right. Those who want results, girls! The rewards are a list of 20, ranging from a marriage proposal to your sweetie sitting right next to you in a restaurant booth. After marriage, "He gets angry when you don't, pay attention to him. He wants your con- stant attention and companionship:' Great. Demanding and angry. death do us part. "He gets involved in every aspect of your life. You don't bore him." I'm smothering here. "He wants the phone number of where you are ... ." Suspicious and jealous. "He doesn't like it when you go to bache- WHAT'S AFFECTING U' THIS WEEK J MONDAY Writer's Series Guild House, 802 Monroe St. TUESDAY MSA meeting 3909 Michigan Union 8:30-10 p.m. 7:30 p.m. SUNDAY MLK symposium Opening Performance, CeCe Winans Power Center 8 p.m. Want to be aDaily editorial page columnist? Prepare three original columns of 4,500 characters each and a brief column proposal. Bring all submissions to the Student Publications Building located at 420 Maynard St. 1 inaQ ri Aav T In ) A. How TO CONTACT THEM INGRID SHELDON ANN ARBOR MAYOR 100 N. FIFTH AVE. r '>' 11 _ 1