16 - The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, April 22, 1997 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR i ROTC protects nation's freedom TO THE DAILY: This is in response to Ajit Thavarajah's story, "Student wants ROTC out of Arb" (4/11/97). 4pparently graduate student Ronald fIolzhacker doesn't feel that the University's ROTC unit merits the use of the Arboretum. It seems that Holzhacker was startled during a Spring jog by a woman in camouflage Ptilities and boots carrying a machine gun.' The Daily reported that he became angry when he pbserved the rest of the ROTC unit training in the Arb. First of all, what Holzhacker bbserved was a rubber rifle. More importantly, I think it is time that HIolzhacker and others who share his v'iew take a moment and think about what these young men and women are doing. It is because of these students 4nd people like them that he and oth- trs are able to act freely and safely in this country. Half an hour spent watching CNN instead of the nature channel could illustrate a few places Avhere people wish they could jog Through a park. While football and basketball players have million dollar +omplexes to train in, the ROTC does not. If the price of freedom comes at the cost of a double take while jog- ging through the woods, Holzhacker ;should consider himself a lucky man. vMany others would. BRIAN BRODERICK LSA JUNIOR, USMC SERGEANT Ignorance shrouds affirmative action Td THE DAILY: I always try to refrain from enter- ig into debates that deal with highly controversial issues such as affirma- tive action, but in cases where my opponents are obviously misinformed about what it is they are arguing, I feel compelled to respond. I have realized that there are a number of individuals on this campus and in this country as a whole, who do not understand affirmative action, it's pur- pose, nor the methods in which it is implemented. This fact alone is enough to disap- point me, bringing me to the realiza- tion that I live on a campus that is not onlyignorant to minority issues, but insensitive to them as well. Those .pople who know anything about affirmative action know it's advan- tages and possible disadvantages. The purpose of this letter is, rather, to say that I see affirmative action dying soon all over the country because of the misunderstanding and ignorance surrounding its purpose. I don't know what process Chris Metinko used to choose who he would interview for his article ("Proposal would 'hide' college appli- cants names," 4/10/97), but I would have appreciated more educated responses from students on such a serious issue, not the comments of ill- informed first-year students who are obviously clueless when it comes to minority issues. I would really like to know what school accepts students solely on the basis of race without regard to academics. Even more important, I would like to know what school will give me "a free ride for just being a minority," because if such a place exists, then I need to be there so that I can save myself the thousands of dollars I had to borrow in order to attend this uni- versity. I am offended that people actually believe or even think that!1 am here simply because of the color of my skin. I am just as capable of success as anyone else at the University, if not even more so, and the fact that I am black has nothing to do with that. The fact that I work my butt off, sometimes even twice as hard, has everything to do with it. What Ms. Shaw, Mr. Freidman, and a lot of other people seem not to understand is that academics is always a factor in admissions poli- cies. Universities may accept a cer- tain amount of students from a cer- tain minority group, but those stu- dents still have to meet the same requirements that every other student must meet. Minority students are accepted into universities because they have high GPAs, high test scores, past co- curricular involvement in high school. Ask any minority student on campus what his/her high school GPA was. Inquire about his/her test scores. I guarantee you that most of the minorities here came from the very top of their classes. They are here because they deserve to be here, because of their academic excellence, not because of their skin color. Affirmative action just makes sure that universities seek out and recog- nize these outstanding students and give them the opportunity they right- ly deserve. I have yet to encounter someone who was rejected from a university because of an affirmative action policy. I can't even understand how one would determine that as the cause of rejection. From what I understand, if a student is not accept- ed, then it is due to their failure to meet the requirements. Oftentimes, students just want to use affirmative action as an excuse for their own misfortune. The Daily really upset me with their coverage of such an important topic. I don't want to call it racist, because I don't believe that racism is the problem. Its coverage on this topic just makes it seem that way. This arti- cle just showcases the ignorance and insensitivity on this campus when it comes to minority issues, as well as the unwillingness to expand knowl- edge on important topics such as affirmative action. It is my sincere hope that in the future, the Daily will find more quali- fied reporters to cover important issues, especially if the article is going to be on the front page of the newspa- per. I hope the Daily seeks out accu- rate information on minority issues and seeks the opinions of informed students. It is also my hope that this letter serves as an example of the strong need for the University to devote more time and effort into edu- cating itself on minority issues, because if the only reason I am here is to help diversify the University com- munity, then maybe I need to go to another university. OZELL HAYES LSA FIRST-YEAR STUDENT 'U' should attract influential speaker To THE DAILY: While the vast majority of my experiences here as a student at the University have been positive, I am currently a very, very disappointed, graduating LSA senior. I am disap- pointed because, as a top university in the world, we should have a universal- ly recognizable, fascinating leader speak as our guest (in addition to the University president) at our com- mencement. S/he should be someone who has influenced society greatly and would like to influence us, as graduates, through their commence- ment speech. President Bollinger is a fine, upstanding "community" leader who will surely give a great speech, but he, as president, traditionally speaks in addition to our guest speaker. President Bollinger, since his inaugu- ration, is a member of our communi- ty, not an outside guest. He should speak at our commencement with a special guest ... this is also tradition (not just a newly inaugurated presi- dent speaking solo in his/her first year of office). The class of 1997 has funnelled hundreds of millions of dollars (at least) into the University for tuition - we can certainly atord a pivotal, influ- ential and entertaining guest speaker. I am disappointed that our University does not respect its students enough to treat us to a speech from an honorable, non-university affiliated, guest speak- er. After all, we are leaving the University to try and make an influ- ence on society outside the University, we should be spoken to from someone outside the University in addition to the president. While it may be said that it is tra- ditional for the president to give the keynote to commencement speech during his first year in office, since s/he would speak anyhow, this tradi- tion sounds like a disappointing effort at a cop-out for getting a nationally or internationally respected speaker. Let's not forget about the tradition that says that our top-quality University gives the best of every- thing to its students. Aren't we sup- posed to be the "leaders and best?" This tradition, which our esteemed University touts, would lead me to think that we could and should attract special leaders as guest speakers to deliver our keynote addresses. What do you think? What about Hillary Rodham Clinton, President Clinton, Vice President Gore, Donna Shalala, Lloyd Bentsen, Richard Gephardt, Phil Gramm, Colin Powell, or former President Bush? What about all of our other current and former top govern- ment officials and leaders? How about international leaders? What about alumni such as Arthur Miller and James Earl Jones? Of course, I could list thousands more. On May 3, the entire commencement audience at Michigan Stadium will be wondering where the above people are and why they aren't complementing the fine speaking of President Bollinger. I, and most other graduates, are as disappointed as we've ever been in the University's decision to have President Bollinger speak alone. Most, if not all of the students in the class of 1997 wanted and still want a universally (not University) recog- nized leader to deliver our keynote address. Once again, the University bureaucracy automatically wins over students' opinions. Hmm, isn't this bureaucracy that Bollinger said he opposed when he spoke about listen- ing to student opinions more and moving the administration closer to the students the other week? Or was that just another bureaucratic ploy by the administration to associate with students? I guess some things about our University never change. When the class of '97 leaves this May 3, one thing that we'll remember most about our college experience is the University's dominant, overpowering bureaucracy that remains insensitive to its students' wishes and concerns. What a shame to end a mostly enjoy- able college career on such an amaz- ingly sour note. JOSHUA EHRENFRIED LSA SENIOR Arb should enforce rules for use To THE DAILY: I welcome the letter by Larry Ammerman and his concerns for vari- ous activities occurring in Nichols Arboretum and their potential to inflict harm on this sensitive space ("Dogs, bikes do more harm to Arb," 4/18/97). In my public comments to the University Board of Regents on April 17, 1 stated that the Director of the Arboretum, Prof. Harry Morton, has raised additional management prob- lems with the Arb. I hope that all concerned will agree that there should be a single set of rules which all individuals and groups respect to protect the Arb. This is the position that MSA took last week in their res- olutions related to the Arb. Arb staff, as well as biologists and botanists, are concerned about adverse use of the Arb. I understand Professor Morton's belief that controlling the behaviors of individuals in the Arb is a daunting task. Establishing and enforcing rules for University groups who use the Arb on an on-going basis should be easier. I am grateful for ROTC concerns for other users of the Arb and their concerns for the preservation of the plant specimens and natural features of the Arb. RON HOLZHACKER RACKHAM Daily unfairly represents the Greek system To THE DAILY: The Daily has denigrated, disre- spected and misrepresented the University's Greek system far to ' many times. I think the least you can do is get the names right. Accord ilg to the Daily ("Best of Ann Arbor," 417/97), not only were IFC electI ! held at "Alpha Zeta Delta:' this sup- posed sorority was also voted "st sorority to party with." Funny, I don't know where these votes came frft, seeing as there is no such sororityw,; this or any other campus in the Lit , States. Hello? Do you not think to check, these things out before you printthou- sands of copies? For a newspaperthat is supposed to know about what is happening on campus, you are pretty damn clueless.,,.d- But the cluelessness only begins with the misnaming - the real issue here is much more serious. Since4his mythical illusion of a sorority "Alpha Zeta Delta" does not exist, how the hell can you say that they have "tig* shirts and bare midriffs?" As a me. ber of what I believe to be the inte47 ed sorority, Alpha Xi Delta, I found, this absolutelj unnecessary, offensive and appalling. , ., It's ironic that a campus who , votes SAPAC as the best organization can also hold this stereotype for a large group of women in the Greek system. You obviously know absolutely nothing about the Greek system, so you have no right to assert these opinions. And by the way, why does the, campus have to vote on best hous",'to party with?" Why can't it be soe thing like "most charitable" or even. just "best house?" There is a lot more to Greek life than partying, not tha. you would know or care. I would just like to say, that if you cannot properly represent the Greek* system in the Daily, I and many others would prefer you leave us out com-- pletely. Like other groups on this campus, we are constantly battling against negative stereotypes. But unlike those other groups, the Daily has decided on joining in with that belittling and slandering, rather *xan, promoting open-mindedness toward Greek organizations. By the way, Phi Gamma Delta goes by FIJI, not FIGI. Either get your facts straight, or do not publicize the Greek system. We have a hard enough time breaking stereotypes, we don't need the student newspaper against us. LEAH LOCKUART LSA JUNIOR, CHAIR, ALPHA X OELTA PHILANTRC LUCha sacrificed respect when it. crashed recepti TO THE DAILY: In the April 4 Daily, there was a large headline blaring out the words of a presidential reception being "crashed" by a student group, namely, LUCha ("Student group crashes Bollinger reception," 4/4/97). The members of LUCha deserv to do better than that. If they trdTy have a complaint with this Univesity, than they have every right to express that gripe. Unfortunately, however, they decided that what they hadto say was more important than what other students on this campus had to say. For this reason, it was their dee sion to come off like a group of stu3 dents who did nothing but whine until they were pandered to. But they are: better than that. As much as anyone else, LUCha has a right to take part in the forma tion of policy on this campus. They know how that can be done without having to crash a meeting. This is a truly unfortunate fiasco for a group which represents a significant part of this University.° One of the things I truly love about the University is its level of diversity. I: never had the opportuinty to know so many different kinds of people until I came here. If thett is any place, in all my life, where1V have seen an obligation of respect: for each individual, it has been at this University. I believe that President Bollinger was chosen recently to lead this institution; in part because he also believes in this respect for the individual. He is gen- uinely interested in what the stu- dents want, and he is willing to lis- ten and help. My greatest concern is that a le$ imate group has given itself a bad name. I hope that they can think clearer the next time they decide'to; take action on an issue. This University does care abodt the needs of the students, and thereis Ill - 111 Think all bookstores are the same? WEIuE BUYING BACK MORE BOOKS AND GIVING MORE .CASH THAN EVER BEFORE. I Check us out before you sell your used textbooks off selected clothing! 0 tree ovies 'r^+ " TIN c Don't forget your Ca- & Gowns, -,1 ,.m