4 - The Michigan Daily - Friday, September 13, 1996 UIje Sidlgatn PaiIg 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the ' , ° ss RONNIE GLASSBERU Editor in Chief ADRIENNE JANNEY ZACHARY M. RAIMI University of Michigan Editorial Page Editors 'Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily : editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY a The c Of pporis City, KKK should re-evaluate positions A nn Arbor erupted into violence June group's freedom to protest, desp 22, when the Ku Klux Klan came to inconvenience such freedom may bri town to rally. Angered by the Klan's views, The KKK's response the National Women's Rights Organizing The KKK is not quietly accept Coalition and the Ann Arbor Organizing city's actions. In fact, the KKK has Against the Klan staged a counter-demon- ened to sue the city of Ann Arbor f stration. Emotions flared and violence million. Klan National Imperial Wiz erupted. Now, several months after the Berry told The Michigan Daily that t incident, the city is opening the issue Arbor police did not provide adequa again. tection. Berry's wife was injured by Paying the bill throwing protester during the incider Officials billed the KKK and NWROC The KKK chose Ann Arbor, w --'for services rendered. The city spent in known for its liberal and tolerant excess of $72,000 on the more than 250 phere. The KKK must have expected police officers at the scene. As a result, the ological clash, at least, as well as a hi city billed the KKK and NWROC more sion level. Hence, the Ann Arbor than $36,000 each. Department prepared for the rally b City Administrator Neal Berlin told The ering local, county and state law e > Ann Arbor News that the city's action is jus- ment agents to provide for the safet tified because the fines are ''... basically an participants and spectators. Moreov assessment of the responsibility for the police escorted the Klan around the amount of involvement that the city had." unmarked vans and allowed the K Berlin also said that "both groups con- hold its rally on the patio of City tributed significantly to the level of city better protect its members. NOTABLE QUOTABLE,, 'I almost died after the first class.' -Agata Dichev, explaining her reaction to Jonathan TVmans ' new power Yoga class Jim LASSER SHARP As TOAST TF WE IIVF THEM FTE HAD -OUTS THEY'LL NEVER DEVELOP A WRK ETH C! .s e o o -o PESS CLIPPINGS High tuition threatens education SMOKE .& MRORS The benefits of. tabloid culture Showi me a hero and I will write y'ou a tragedy) - F Scott Fitzgerald With these words, Fitzgerald may V have captured the essence of popular culture in America, both in his era and today. It seems that our s called heroes are built up, praised and admired, and then they are demon ized and destroyed. Some deserve it; others do not. .'' ' As we watch : : ite the ing. ing the threat- or $1.6 ard Jeff he Ann ate pro- a rock- nt. hich is atmos- an ide- gh ten- Police y gath- nforce- y of all ver, the city in Klan to Hall to this process, we focus on the char- acters and their 7" A /"L! A nw involvement and services." The KKK's views are - obviously - controversial. However, the First Amendment guarantees any group or per- son the right to free speech and assembly. Moreover, the city has an obligation to pro- tect its citizens and visitors without charge - this includes protesters. After all, police protection is a public service and charging the groups for the cost of the riot goes against the pathos of public service. If the the city can charge the KKK and NWROC for exercising their First Amendment rights now, they can use this incident as an example to charge future demonstrators. The city must respect the Hence, the KKK's lawsuit seems unfounded. The police went to great lengths to provide a safe environment; they should not be blamed for the eruption of violence. While the KKK's anger is understandable, a million-dollar lawsuit is not. A more rea- sonable sum of money - such as $36,000 - and legal fees would be more appropri- ate, if the KKK pursues a lawsuit at all. The city is punishing the KKK for exer- cising its First Amendment rights; however, the Klan's large countersuit is unjustified. The police were not negligent. It would behoove both sides if they work together to resolve their dispute; this would save time effort and aggravation. BY MATr FERGUSON During the first week of classes, students have many things to worry about, such as getting phone numbers from recently moved friends, pick- ing classes for the next four to five months, decorating pathetically small apartments with the most basic of human necessities and spending their last few hours of warm weath- er in the basement of the bookstore. For many students, one worry that overwhelms these smaller dilemmas is the rising cost of tuition. A recently issued report by the United States General Accounting Office said that tuition at four year public institutions rose nearly three times as much as median household income from 1980 to 1995. The increases over the last decade and a half have stemmed from higher school expenditures and shrinking percentages of state funding. We are not immune to this problem. The 1997-1999 bud- get passed last week by the (University of Wisconsin's) Board of Regents has the potential for a 10-percent hike in tuition over the next few years. Though college remains the best investment for a secure future, rising costs of tuition will price many qualified and diverse students out of a college edu- cation. University officials have made these decision in order to cope with the changing financial and competitive demands of public and private This article was printed recently in the University of Wisconsin s The Badger Herald. institutions. Public universities cur- rently receive far less support from state governments than in 1980, through the number is still sizable. U.S. public uni- versities derive 40 percent of their revenues from state funding, falling from 55 per- cent in 1980. The shrinking percentages are a reflection of states' rising costs and expen- ditures in Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, prison building and infrastructure. In short, shrinking demograph- ics in the college-age popula- tion have shifted spending to older and dependent popula- tions. Dwindling state support has not helped schools respond to a highly competi- tive atmosphere, forcing offi- cials to shift costs to students and their parents. Efforts to recruit and keep top-notch faculty and research profes- sionals and improve universi- ty building s and labs have fueled rising costs. The total faculty salary, as a percentage of university budgets, has nearly doubled because of aging educators and adminis- trators. Despite the increased spending, students often see the results of these costs with better educators, well-main- tained university gourds and technological improvements. Higher costs have unfortu- nately kept many qualified students from gaining the eco- nomic rewards of a college degree. Many students have compensated by seeking financial aid. Federally sup- ported finical aid for American's college students has swelled to $31 .4 billion, nearly three times as much in 1980. Some schools have devel- oped innovative programs to help parents and students pre- pare for college education. The state of Michigan and the University of Virginia have a program where parents can pay current tuition the year their child is born. Under this plan these uni- versities have greater flexibil- ity with their investments while students could more clearly see the benefits of their tuition when they actual- ly attend the university. The money is refunded if the child does not choose to attend uni- versity or is transferred to another sibling. These and other flexible financial plans are crucial to greater access to higher edu- cation. Universities with new and innovative tuition options are more likely to be con- cerned with rising and waste- ful administrative costs because of their responsibili- ties to future students. Rising tuition threatens manse students of today will likely harass future students more. Universities must main- tain slowly rising tuition costs, while providing high quality undergraduate educa- tion, attracting and keeping energetic and committed fac- ulty and maintain a positive out-of-classroom learning environment. A Board of Regents and administration committed to its students must be willing to keep costs reasonable. They can do so by identifying and eliminating wasteful pro- grams and excesses, hiring faculty with long-term com- mitments and continuing to privatize non-university man- dated functions, such as the hospital and food service. A voluntary mandate 'U' should not expand living-learning circumstances. LACHARY Actually, these M. RAIMI sagas provide us with a glimpse of our lives and values, both individually and as a nation. Over the last few years. we have wit- nessed the Nancy Kerrigan assault, the shocking Menendez family incident and the O.J. Simpson trial. Currently, however, Americans feel a void, The is no great tabloid story to follow,r trivial event that has captured our imaginations. I have felt this void lately, as the one year anniversary of the O.J. verdict rapidly approaches. Last year at this time, most Americans were glued to their TV sets, gearing up for the trial's closing arguments and the eventual verdict. I confess: I desperately miss the Trial of the Century. Don't get i wrong: I don't miss all the hubub over Marcia Clark's latest hairdo, Johnnie Cochran's rhetorical tantrums or Lance Ito's endless sidebars. I don't miss seeing Brian "Kato" Kaelin on every edition of "Hard Copy" and I don't miss Fred Goldman's moving, but hysterical, press conferences. What I do miss are the discussions about the underlying issues that th Trial introduced into the AmericW dialogue. It is customary for acade- mics and intellectuals to denigrate cir- cus-like events. On this campus, few students admitted to following the O.J. case, and even fewer admitted to its tremendous importance in our society. Yet the issues that lie at the heart of all the pomp and circumstance arethe very issues that members of university communities vigorously debate and study every day. Such spectacles, su tabloid-ish events, hold great - an greatly underestimated - value in'our society. The O.J. Simpson trial, for example, raised several important issues that gave our society a chance to assess itself. It's likely that no other event could have done the same thing. It brought racial issues to the forefront, and made us reevaluate the nation's racial relations. Have we ma progress since the civil rights move- ment'? The trial made us confront the plight of black people in America's criminal justice system. Can a black man get a fair trial? Are all police hopelessly racist, or are there just a few rotten ones? Will black juries convict black defendants? The trial raised other important issues as well, such as domestic vio lence. Americans had the opportun* to become better educated on the topic. Victims of violence gained important information and sources of help. Again, this could not have been accomplished so effectively if there were no trial. The O.J. Trial is not the only circus- like event of late to generate such important questions. In the winter of 1994, Americans watched the wj and wacky tale of Nancy Kerrigan a Tonya Harding. As you may recall, Tonya's supporters attacked Nancy, trying to prevent her from participat- ing in ice-skating events. Americans came to see Nancy as the good, middle-class girl. And Tonya was portrayed as the low-class, ciga- rette smoking brute who wanted to win at all costs. Beneath this sordid story are important questions. Is there class division in America? Do mid4 class people get the benefit of the doubt? What does "middle class" mean, anyway? The Harding/Kerrigan affair made us reassess the role of sports in society. Does fierce athletic competition lead to a sense of disorder and violence? Is it possible to have friendly competi- tion when everything is at stake? Do we take sports too seriously? It may be a sad commentary l Americans most readily engage in these types of debates only when they are stimulated by trashy, tabloid-like sagas. But that's not really the point. types of events and milk everything w 'T he Division of Student Affairs believes that every first-year University student has got to live and learn - but in a shel- tered environment. A Student Affairs' task force recently proposed introducing several new living-learning programs into nearly every residence hall, touting these pro- grams as the wave of the future. Participation in these communities would not be mandatory, but strongly encouraged. Despite their voluntary nature, the plan would undermine the University's credo of diversity and academic exploration. Vice President for Student Affairs Maureen Hartford appointed the 17-mem- ber task force about a year ago. Hartford instructed them to create a proposal to design a new style of residence hall life. The task force released a proposal last spring that called for mandatory participa- tion in living-learning communities for first-year students. Some opposed the plan, objecting to forcing students into the com- munities. The task force wisely dropped the idea. The new proposal would create several new programs. For example, the University would create an "Invention and Creativity" theme in Bursley, a "Democracy and Diversity" motif in South Quad and a "Science and Mathematics" program in Mosher Jordan. These would be added to the six current programs, which enroll about 1,600 students. While the University's efforts to provide a nurturing environment for first-year stu- dents is encouraging, the creation of sever- al new communities of learning is not the right path to take. Grouping students on the basis of narrow interests undercuts the students have the opportunity to live with people from a variety of backgrounds - both ethnic and academic. The proposal would eliminate much of this diversity and erode the benefits of current residence hall life. Moreover, the plan would undercut the University's credo of self-exploration. Alan Levy, director of Housing public affairs, told The Michigan Daily that "education has to include the totality of experience." However, Levy and the task force sound as if they are advocating that the University take more control over students' lives. The task force failed to consider that students may want to explore areas of interests inde- pendently, and not under the guise of a liv- ing-learning community. The University should be investing more of its resources in independent exploration. The task force said living-learning pro- grams would become the "norm" at the University, envisioning that nearly every first-year student would participate in the programs. This, however, is troubling - many first-year might not want to partici- pate in them. The proposal did not provide enough explanation of what will happen to these students. They may feel isolated and alienated but the task force did not explain in enough depth what will happen to these students. If the Housing devotes most of its resources to the living-learning communi- ties, students who do not participate may get shafted. Currently, the University runs six pro- grams. Students who wish to participate in such communities can. The University should instead focus its resources on more pressing problems, such as improvement of LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Clinton helps to improve economy TO THE DAILY: In this, a political year, many different issues have come to the forefront regard- ing Bob Dole and President Bill Clinton. One that the Republicans have set to make the defining issue is that of the economy. Let's talk about the econ- omy. Since Clinton has entered office, the annual deficit has been cut from around $240 billion to $157 billion, the unemployment rate has been steady between 5 and 6 percent, the economy has had to be slowed down by the raising of interest rates and consumer confidence has risen. Four years ago. when Clinton introduced his eco- This was mostly due to the fact that the upper income bracket had almost a 50 per- cent tax decrease under Reagan and Bush. All this and the economy only went into a depression with seemingly no end in sight. Under Clinton, taxes on the upper class were increased about 6 percent, taxes on the middle class stayed the same, and taxes on the lower class actually decreased. Now, the economy is moving along steadily and only promises to do better. Now is not the time to have a Bob Dole presidency. Bill Clinton is by far the most qualified man for the job and deserves recognition for what he has accom- plished. LUKE H. KLIPP SCHOOL OF MUSIC Republican Party. But even for a liberal, I found his views on the GOP to be idiotic and lacking in ethics as well. How' dare youI refer to Republicans wanting back to the alleged days that blacks referring to their masters as "boss" and women remaining quiet. How is it that the doubly false claims, but ifa conserv- ative the same generalization (as wrong and unfounded as it may be) towards liberalss he would be crucified. And the main difference between Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Dole? Tact. While one realizes her role of not trying to outshine her husband presidential hopeful while continuing to do an upstanding job in the community, the other has attempted to push her social- ist, feminist hypocritical. white liberal guilt agenda