4 -The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, February 6, 1996 _ I ibe £irilrn1 Eaigll 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan RONNIE GLASSBERG Editor in Chief ADRIENNE JANNEY ZACHARY M. RAIMI Editorial Page Editors Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of a majority ofthe Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FRoM THE DAILY Watch your back ACLU can protect students from new Code NOTABLE QUOTABLE, 'They don't even trust their own membership.' - Michigan Student Assembly member Dan Serota discussing his former allegiance, the Wolverine Party. He recently switched to the Michigan Party., hMUnTTWIMSATT MooquE's DILEMMA l11 - I4- 1~G 4FA LE4$lO ou have the right to remain silent. University students charged under the recently implemented code of non-academic conduct will not be informed of this legal right. Concerned members ofthe Washtenaw County chapter of the American Civil Liber- ties Union are offering students who are charged under the code advice, assistance and - within certain constraints - legal representation. The offer is timely and valu- able, particularly in light of the turbulent transition from the Statement of Student Rights and Responsibilities to this semester's infamous Code of Student Conduct. Administrators admit that implementing the Code has been difficult. Unsure of which code to use for cases brought on the border- line of transition, administrators have de- cided to try cases charged last semester under the old code. All cases charged this semester will be tried under the unprecedented Code. Before cases can be tried this semester, each of the University's schools must select the 60 students to serve on Student Resolu- tion Panels - the juries of Code proceed- ings. However, several schools have reported recruiting problems. Student governments are busy with other projects. Some schools do not have presidents or student govern- ments to mediate recruiting. The schools did not have enough time to properly select pan- elists. Widespread requests for volunteers went unanswered; e-mail pleas to student organizations were fruitless. In an effort to observe the deadline, some schools filled their panelist quotas by sacrificing the appli- cation process--as a result, many juries will consist of partially evaluated panelists. The University's hasty and haphazard approach to panelist selection is one of the many frightening aspects of its new brand of justice. Inadequate juries, the lack of case precedents and the omission ofessential rights such as Miranda warnings are alarming fac- ets of the new policy. Responding to these concerns, members of the Washtenaw County ACLU have of- fered students, who are charged under the code, a helping hand. The ACLU will review cases that students bring to it and offer advice or assistance if the case falls within its juris- diction. Attorney and ACLU member Jean King said: "We want to help anybody who's been affected by (the Code), so long as it fits in with our criteria." King also stated that although the ACLU holds regular monthly meetings, it may hold additional meetings if presented with a large number of cases. While students are invited and encour- aged to take advantage of this service, they should remember that the ACLU is not prom- ising legal representation to every student - the case must demonstrate clear civil rights infractions. They do, however, offer this piece of sound legal advice to all students facing a Code case: Speak with an attorney before saying anything to Code officials. Keeping quiet until seeking further council is not only legal, but it is students' best hope for salvag- ing justice. LEITERS TO THE EDITOR Indecent proposal Communications bill launches 'Net censorship L ast week the Internet was a huge uncen- sored form of communication - one that eventually could link the entire world, providing everyone with equal access to in- formation. Next week, a portion of society will have only limited access to the 'Net. Congress passed a bill that rewrote the nation's communications laws-at the same time, lawmakers added a clause to the First Amendment of the Constitution. The legislation regarding Internet restric- tion was tacked on to the end of this hotly debated bill. The section bans pornography over computer networks and sets penalties for those con- victed of distributing "in- decent" sexual material to minors. The pending legislation is poorly defined at best. Perhaps President Clinton or U.S. Rep. Lynn Rivers (D-Ann Arbor), supporters ofthe bill, canjudge "smut" when they see it-but each court will judge it differ- ently. But if "smut" were replaced with "ob- scenity," the legislation still would pose seri- ous problems. Many University students spend a signifi- cant amount of time surfing the 'Net. A portion of those probably take part in ex- changing "smut." If these students met and exchangedpornographic pictures, they would not be committing a crime. But Congress has decided if they did so over their computers, they could be fined and sent to prison. The government has put more restraints on the Internet than any other form of com- munication. From telephone lines to U.S. mail, public speaking to newsprint - free speech is one ofthe country's most important principles. Yet Congress has chosen to squash contend that Internet communication is not covered under the First Amendment, and therefore it should not be defined as speech. However, the Constitution - meant to be a flexible document - could not predict the invention of e-mail. No other means of com- munication can circulate one person's thoughts as fast and as wide. , Despite attempts to circumvent the issue, the bill is a form censorship. If Clinton signs it into law, Americans have no guarantee that censorship will stop here. Science is moving to eugenics To THE DAILY: I write this brief letter to bring to the attention of the general student population a piece of news I read about in the weekly science magazine Science News, volume 149, an article simply called: "Gene tied to excitable personality." What this article covers is that new research being carried out in genetics has produced evidence that the human personality's traits that govern "novelty seeking, looking for thrills, and new experiences.." have shown themselves to be governed by one gene, called D4DR Such testing has con- firmed what for many is a grave fear, and others a sacrilege - the idea of genetically engineering humans. Such attempts to seek out novelties and new experi- ences, in my opinion, also can be considered aspects of something more basic to humanity: curiosity. This vital aspect of human nature is the force which is one of the most responsible, if not the most, for all human advancement in every field of inquiry, and all changes in human culture that have occurred over the last 10,000 years. Now, for perhaps one of the first times in human history, governments and organizations have the possibility of being able to curb such curiosity and social development. Efforts like these could make possible the dreams of dictators such as Hitler and Stalin, namely that a society envisioned by one leadership becomes the only society for a people, and will last forever. Simply pause for a moment and consider life with only minimal change, and the people simply being disinterested in and unable to bring about any major change due to a lack of only one element in their lives. The ability to say, "I want something different." EDWARD CHUSID LSA FIRST-YEAR STUDENT Students' Party should select better candidate for VP To THE DAILY: i mitrtner toPvnrrltc we expect her to "feel the pulse" of the student body and make recommendations to the regents on policy and other vital student matters. It scares me to think that someone who is unwilling or feels poorly prepared to make decisions whose outcome can be linked to a specific individual's face is willing or feels sufficiently prepared to make decisions or possibly legislative suggestions on such a large and impersonal level. I am not pleased with (Michigan Student Assem- bly President) Flint Wainess (Michigan Party). His record has demonstrated his inability to represent the student body. However, I hope the Students' Party will look for a vice presiden- tial candidate that has not openly expressed incapacity or lack of training to make decisions that affect students' lives based on available evidence. The Students' Party needs to find a candidate that feels competent and sufficiently trained to analyze the available evidence and provide a course of action. It is extremely irresponsible for the Student's Party to nominate someone who "never" intended to be nominated within two weeks of that individual's public declaration of poor training or incompetence! CARLOS E. HERNANDEZ LSA JUNIOR The aliens in East Quad: Conservative invasion? To THE DAILY: I am writing in regard to Dean Bakopoulos's article, "Oh, the light of the left..." (2/1/96). In the article, Mr. Bakopoulos leaked highly confidential information regarding a pending invasion of East Quad. It is unknown at this time how sensitive information of this nature was leaked to media sources, but a probe has been launched to discover the perpetrator of this interna- tional crime. In order to squelch speculation concern- ing the raid, I have been authorized to release this intelligence briefing. A specially trained task force on alien activities has reported the presence of aliens throughout the East Quadrangle Residence Hall. It is their belief that East Quad is a haven for a thriving alien race bent on the destruction of the sun. After vast exploration of the catacombs located beneath the alien hot bed, they have concluded that the aliens have the capabilities of carrying out this heinous initiative, thus terminating life as we know it on the planet Earth. Spies for the task force on alien activities have penetrated the alien conclave and obtained detailed diagrams of the aliens' weapons of mass destruction. In another daring intelligence-gathering mission conducted at an unspecified date, comman- dos uncovered a thermo- nuclear ray directed at the molten core of the sun that will trigger the explosive meltdown. We, at this time, cannot divulge the precise location of the activator, but we would like to add that for the sake of mankind, we hope there are no Stanford Prison Experiment fans visiting the Halfway Inn in the immedi- ate future. Exact plans for the special forces raid on the premises are confidential at this time, but let me assure the citizens of Earth that a team of the best hi-tech super commando androids ever assembled has been briefed on the situation and is currently undergoing rigorous training in prepara- tion for the inevitable assault. Weask that no civilians "take matters into their own hands," and attempt any confrontation with the alien beings. Intelligence sources report that these alien beings are armed with deadly photon phasers, capable of vaporizing their intended victim, thus posing a serious threat to any misguided freedom fighter out there in media land. We would like to inform citizens that there is no cause for alarm, but because of the leak through Bakopoulos, we believed it is in the world's best interests to clear up any misconceptions and assure citizens that though we are under the serious threat of total global annihilation, measures are being taken to alleviate the problem. JAMES FIDLER LSA FIRST-YEAR STUDENT VMI stats incorrect TO THE DAILY: A recent letter ("Men's rights are ignored," 2/1/96) stated that Virginia Military Institute "gets about 2 percent of its funding from public coffers." This number is glaringly incorrect. VMI typically receives in excess of 32 percent of its funds from the state of Virginia each year. A. C. CHUBB RACKHAM STUDENT THE ERASABLE PEN In search of knowledge and a living wage If you're an undergraduate, you Imight be wondering just what's going on with the graduate students who teach many of your classes. Is there going to be a strike? Just what is the Graduate Employees Organi- zation, and why are its members picketing and handing you fliers in the Fishbowl? The answer is simple: CEO" members are ne- EA gotiating with the W University over wages, health care y.. and a number of other important issues, and it is crucial for under- JEAN graduates and the TWENGE rest of the Univer- sity community to understand our demands and why we are making them. So why should you, as an undergraduatecarabout these issues?k s First, undergraduates have the right to good teaching. Currently, GS Is do not make enough to live n - we make about $850 a month, and even the Financial Aid office admits that it takes at least $100 to $300 a month more than that to live in Ante Arbor. A GSI who must take an outside job to make ends meet doesn't have as much time to meet with students, prepare for class, cor- rect papers and do the many other things that good teaching.requires. A GSI who is worried about paying her bills may find it more difficultto, concentrate on teaching. A GSI who doesn't earn enough money to pay for health care may risk illness from a lack of preventative care - and possibly miss days of teaching. Second, graduate programs that pay a living wage attract the bes applicants, the bestsstudents,and the best teachers, ensuring a con- tinuing supply of qualified, bright GSIs. In addition, negotiations like this often have a ripple effect on other universities.Graduate pro- grams that find themselves losing their best applicants to other schoofs may reconsider their funding pack- ages; the wages at one school may improve wages at other schools. Tha means that if you decide to go to graduate school after college, the negotiations here may bring you better funding package-at Michi- gan and at many other universities. Most important, the University community should understand the importance of the demands in the contract. We are not demanding a wage increase for extravagances. We are demanding it because righ now a graduate student who works as a GSI has only three choices: take out costly loans, work a second job or borrow from already strapped parents, spouses and other relatives. Here are a few examples: A GSI with a 0.40 appointment (considered full support) writes: "I've had to take out an additional $4,500 in loans this year to be able to pay my rent, utilities and BASIC living costs. The University think. we're wasting our money on mov- ies and CDs - I haven't seen a movie since I moved here in Au- gust." The biggest expense for most GSIs is rent, but even moving to Ypsilanti doesn't solve the problem of a living wage. One GSI says,"I keep track of every penny I spend, and I can prove that without goin out to eat every night, I still ha about $1,200 per month in expenses, and that's living in Ypsilanti fdr cheaper rent, which requires that"I find a parking space somewhere around campus when I drive in. Typically, this is down around Burns Park." (GSIs, incidentally, have no campus parking privileges). Another GSI who came back to school to finish her degree is mar- ried and has a young child. "M4 appointment doesn't meet my bifls by about $100 to $200 per month" she says. "I've gone through my savings so now we are eating a lot of peanut butter and pasta. When J work temporary jobs to cover soie of the bills, my progress on the dis- sertation suffers. I'm a mom aiid wife; I cannot desert my family MW bury myself in data for a year or more to do this." A GSI with less than a 0.25 appointment receives no health cafe benefits. One GSI writes: "Unfortui- nately, I must have insurance, be- cause I am diabetic. My insurance costs $112 per month for me, which is 25 percent of my already in~d- MATT WIMSATT/Daily The Internet is complex and intimidating. Access to some Internet files, such as pornography, is relatively easy, and its large capacity presents a threat. Jake Baker's case unearthed one potential problem; a recent "conspiracy" case involving three students setting off a bomb echoes that concern. Both of these cases impli- cate defendants specifically for using the Internet. Baker could have spoken or pub- lished his obscenity; the students could have talked to each other directly after consulting the library about how to use household items to make a bomb. Instead of focusing on constructive ways to address new concerns, Congress followed the precedent set by the University's han- dling of its graduate journalism degree - it took the easy way out. But this time, the easy way out inhibits freedom of speech - a guaranteed right for Americans. Americans will use the "information su- perhighway" more than ever in the 21st cen- tury. Citizens should be free to express what they wish over the Internet, as most other forms of communication allow. But the gov- ernment appears to be holding its citizens on