4A - The Michigan Daily - Monday, April 22, 1996 ig1w irbihtu &dttlg 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan ;,. ; .: ': ;. , ".< "% .. . .. RONNIE GLASSBERG Editor in Chief ADRIENNE JANNEY ZACHARY M. RAIMI Editorial Page Editors NOTABLE QUOTABLE 'The goal is to bring awareness to violence against women and women's oppression.' - Dorsia Smith, afirst-year graduate student in Public Policy, explaining the purpose of the "Take Back the Night" march- Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of the majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. FROM THE DAILY JIM LASSER I LI41 SHARP AS TOAST A thorny Rose MSA president walks At Friday's University Board of Regents meeting, Fiona Rose - the newly- elected president of the Michigan Student Assembly - spoke to the regents in MSA's biannual address. While the address was an impressive display of her oratorical finesse, kose's speech contained more rhetoric than substance. Both Rose's tone and the few concrete statements within her address should set off warning signals to the student population - Rose must not forget her con- stituency. Overall, the address was slick and polit- ical. Such qualities are often necessary to possess when addressing the regents. However, Rose went overboard in her cam- paign-type approach; she attempted to appease both the administration and the stu- dent-body, and in doing so, inadvertently contradicted herself. Rose has already been elected - a second campaign is not neces- sary. Rose attacked the University's curricu- hum and the global community's disrespect for academia. She implied that the University is a kind of vocational factory - providing students with "skills-only" degrees to venture out into a world that does not value a "human" education. Rose's attacks on technological training - supple- mented with anecdotes of her positive edu- cational experiences in the humanities - -insult the students who came to the University specifically for that type of edu- cation. Rose's idea of the ultimate educa- tional experience is a worthy vision until she presumes to define all students' ideas of this experience. As MSA president, Rose is responsible for representing -not defining - students' needs and wishes. Rose proceeded to criticize the tightrope in speech University's research-oriented professors. She criticized the University's "star profes- sors," accusing them of dedicating insuffi- cient time to instruction, shirking classroom duties and forgetting their responsibility to students. Rose's blanket criticism paints an unfair portrayal of the quality of instruction at the University - not all of the University's research professors are inac- cessible, nor do they all provide inadequate instruction. The regents balked at Rose's generalization; Provost J. Bernard Machen chastised her statement as "unfair and inac- curate." Rose misrepresented students once more when she praised the living-learning pro- grams. Administrators - such as Vice President for Student Affairs Maureen Hartford - have been promoting mandato- ry requirements for first-year student par- ticipation in the living-learning programs. Mandating the programs would be detri- mental to the University experience - the only way to keep the programs from per- vading the residential hall experience is to keep them optional. Rose should discour- age the administrators' relentless mission to expand the living-learning program - instead, her praise fed their fire and drew beaming smiles from Hartford and other administrators. Students will grow increas- ingly intolerant of Rose's politicking if she continues to pander to the administration while sacrificing their interests. Rose is a charismatic and well-versed leader. She is capable of representing the student population well - provided she does not saturate her presidency with her own personal agenda. The regents do not need their egos massaged - but the stu- dents do need a representative. I I EET HD LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Dollars and sense. City Council should consider income tax 'T ast week, a resident committee recom- L U mended that Ann Arbor seriously con- -ider implementing a city income tax to replace property taxes as the main source of ,ity revenue. The Ann Arbor City Council 'would be wise to concur. There are several limitations on the city's ability to raise money through the property tax. Also, an income tax would be a fairer way to raise revenue. Ann Arbor should continue to study the feasibility of a city income tax, and should move toward implementing such a plan. The Budget Review Committee, com- ,prised of nine Ann Arbor residents, was charged with determining how to improve the city's financial situation. Its report made two main proposals. The first was for the city government to streamline its operations and introduce efficiency measures to save money. These are worthy suggestions, but they are not enough to ensure fiscal securi- ty for the city in the future. As a result, the panel also suggested the city conduct further study on the idea of replacing city property taxes with a city income tax - the committee's tentative proposal was for a 1-percent tax on resi- dents, and a 0.5-percent tax on non-resident workers. For each category, the plan would include a personal exemption of up to $2,500, thus protecting most students from tax liability. A city income tax is necessary because the property tax is rapidly losing its viabili- ty as a source of revenue. The state's Headlee Amendment limits the growth of property taxes to a level below the inflation rate. Proposal A, which passed a few years I. .. statutes make it difficult for a city that relies on a property tax to raise sufficient revenue. Moreover, voters must approve all millage increases - which means that city taxes must compete with school and county taxes for popular support. An income tax would not be subject to these restrictions. One of the biggest problems with Ann Arbor's reliance on the property tax is that the University is exempt, by law, from pay- ing it. The University owns 40 percent of the taxable land in the city - this is a major drain on city finances. A city income tax would collect money from employees of the University. Thus, the city would receive some of its fair share from the University. Moreover, a city income tax is the fairest way to collect money. Income, not property, is the best determinant of wealth. An income tax would be progressive - it would take more money from those who are better able to pay. Wealthy renters would no longer be exempt from city taxes. On the other hand, homeowners who have finan- cial problems would see a tax reprieve. Not only would an income tax be better than the property tax for the city's coffers, it also would benefit many residents. Reliance on property taxes poses large problems for Ann Arbor. The city should move to follow the advice of the Budget Review Committee and move toward a city income tax. The city would free itself of the statewide restrictions on raising revenue through property taxes, and the University would cease to be such an enormous fiscal drain on Ann Arbor. Moreover, an income tax would be more fair than the present sys- tem. Ann Arbor needs to maintain revenues Post article skews Israeli intentions TO THE DAILY: I have been in Ann Arbor since 1990, and have never found it necessary to respond to a Daily article until now because no matter what, I thought the Daily was fair and accurate. Until now. Your April 19 article reporting on the Israeli bombing of a U.N. camp in Lebanon was the most one- sided piece of "news" I have ever seen ("Israeli shells hit U.N. compound"). I under- stand that it was taken from The Washington Post, and the Daily editors could therefore take the easy route and toss responsibility aside, but in the name of good reporting, I hope you will not do that. Nowhere in that article did it mention the fact that the bombs were in response to a series of Katushyah rockets sent into Kiryat Shmonah from a mere 300 meters from the U.N. camp. Nowhere did it mention that during Hezbollah's attacks on Israel for more than a decade, Israel has resisted respond- ing, trying only to knock out the Katushyah launchers. Nowhere did it mention that it was a mistake that the Israeli bombs landed in the camp, as opposed to the launchers they were aiming for. The fighting in Southern Lebanon is unfortunate and extremely sad. I hope that it can come to an end before any more people, soldiers or civilians, Israeli or Lebanese, have to pay with their homes and lives for the battle. But that hope does not override my knowledge that a country has a right to protect its citi- zens from a religious military faction backed by Syria, Iran and Lebanon. Israel wants nothing more than peace. I ask the Daily to remem- ber that there is more to a story than what appears on the first few moments of CNN, and to please try to be more informative and equal in its coverage. CARRIE NEWTON LAw SCHOOL Cole is a symbol of diversity TO THE DAILY: The University students that are opposing Johnnetta Cole speaking are displaying their ignorance and close- mindedness. If she is a member of such controversial organiza- ditch attempt to educate stu- dents on the many different people that are successful in higher education. We are insulted by the suggestion that Cole is not qualified enough to speak at this "pres- tigious" school, despite the fact that she is president of her own highly prestigious school. These students need to welcome the chance to hear a non-traditional (non-white) speaker, and perhaps learn a little bit about the historically black colleges. She may not be main- stream for the many students at this university, but because she is speaking at our gradu- ation, we will stand a hell of a lot prouder during the cere- monies. My suggestion to the stu- dents that are offended by Cole is that they do not par- ticipate in graduation, which is something we considered when there was the possibili- ty of another cartoonist, like the author of "Cathy," speak- ing at our graduation. SHEILA MACK WINDY WATSON LSA SENIORS Israeli attack unlawful and inhumane TO THE DAILY: As a reader who is not always impressed with the diversity of views expressed in the Daily, I want to con- tribute my view of the recent violence in Lebanon. While the press often seems to excuse Israel's inhu- mane policies and outright theft (of land and water) in the Middle East, I hope that it will stop this injustice in light of Israel's infractions in Lebanon. Israel has not only disre- garded U.N. Resolution 425 by maintaining a presence in Lebanon, but they have bro- ken international law by bombing an ambulance. Although they claim that the driver was a member of Hezbollah, international law forbids the bombing of any ambulance, even an Army ambulance carrying soldiers. At least five civilians were killed by this illegal bomb- ing. The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Tabarah, expressed the simplicity of this situation in an interview on CNN. Israel is the occupier, he explained, one has no right to ask the retaliators to stop defending themselves against an occupi- er, one must ask the occupier to end the occupation. Please do not excuse this horrible injustice. It really is nnit cina r hnnna Music listing offensive, inappropriate TO THE DAILY: I was reading the Daily, scanning the upcoming week- end events, when I came across something that really angered me. I am not a per- son who is easy to offend, but this really ticked me off. I am writing in response to some smart ass comment in the description of the Ravi Shankar concert on Saturday, April 13 ("The List: Ravi Shankar,"4/11/96). It said, "Probably the most famous Indian musician in the United States, the 75- year-old will be living it up at Rackham at 8 p.m." This part was fine. It was the next line that was ridiculous and inappro- priate. "Go now, he should be dead soon." Was that intended to be some funny joke? I don't think it was at all - it was absolutely tasteless. Is that all that the writer had to say about one of the most prominent, talented, respected musicians in the world? Pretty pathetic, I must say. And just for that writer's information, Ravi Shankar is in good health. Next time, leave out the rude comments ... please. SAPNA VYAS LSA SENIOR Cartoonist consistently slams Greek system TO THE DAILY: As a member of the Greek system, I am writing to express my outrage over the recent barrage of attacks on my people that have appeared in the abjectly prej- udiced Michigan Daily. Lasser's cartoon, which consistently stereotypes and attacks members of my group, is an affront, not only to members of the Greek sys- tem, but to members of any group on campus. The perva- sive anti-Greek sentiment in the Daily is clearly a symp- tom of the institutionalized hatred of "Greeks" in our society. Of course, the Daily will attempt to defend itself by claiming that members of the Greek system are both wel- comed and presently employed by the paper. Do not be fooled! A few token fraternity brothers is just not going to cut it. Until the Daily pub- ,: . , . . TE DOUBLX After four years atmosphere of oppression at 'U' is improving I t was more than four years ago now. I was discussing my choice of col- lege with a friend who had made a ra ically different choice - a smaI northeastern liber- al arts college. He felt the need to validate his choice of college by insulting mine. He said he'd read in a college guide that the emphasis on the white male was so strong at the University that KATEF everyonetwho was EPSTEiN not white, and/or was not male, felt left out and disen- franchised. Without any experience of college, I didn't know enough to tell him I was, n't listening to opinions about a school from someone who hasn't gone there., But now, with only two weeks left un!,I my graduation, I'm as qualified to rate the University's treatment o f oppressed groups as I'll ever be. I'm best qualified to rate tle, University in terms of gender-based oppression because of my own experi ence. Things have changed here since: the days when women weren't permit- ted to set foot in the Union. I am a woman, and in four year I've rarely felt held back by my double X chro- mosome. I've been able, by choosiz my classes carefully and working har at them, to learn a lot in the classroom setting. I've almost never felt in thk classroom that my gender undermines my authority. There may be fewer female professors than male, and fewer than there should be, but I've had enough same-sexl role models among my professors that I'm consid- ering training for their career someda Outside of academics, as insi them, I've had some strategizing to do that I wouldn't if I were male as well as white; but I've come out successful. I've been able to find fAends of both sexes who respect me as much as they would if I were a man. The bulk of the women, with whom I've become friendly, comfortably identify as femi- nists. The student groups I've been in have all had significant female partic- ipation and recognition - throu_ titled positions - of female participa- tion. True, women are subject to sexual violence in the same staggering num- bers on this campus as on any other in the country, and the University's poli- cies are abysmal at dealing with this kind of abuse by instructors. True, as l reported in this space, women dopy seem to participate as much as menin the University's larger classes. "9 True, in English, I have chosen a dis- cipline with a longer history of female participation than some of the more technical fields, and that has made for a more positive experience than the average woman's. True, in my first year I followed the required' course "Great Books," a.k.a.ibooksdby dead Greek men, with the optional "Great Books by Women." Supposedly books by women are only "great" if we elin inate books by men from consider tion. But things have changed for white women at this school, and they will change more. If I were filling out a report card like the ones I got in ele- mentary school, I would check "I" for "Improving" in the area of gender- related oppression. None of this is, to say that we can rest on our oars. But the report card wouldn't look good in terms of other kinds of oppres- sion. As an able-bodied white hetero- sexual with an upper middle-class background, it is harder for me to see oppression related to identities other than gender - or related to the com- bination of gender and identities other than gender - than it is to see sexism. I can only guess from what I see. The one or two people of color in my class. es often seem to band together and no talk to anyone else - they also oft participate in class even less than white women. Gay, lesbian and bisex- ual people are even quieter, since their complexions don't speak for them. I don't even know, with a few excep- tions, who among the people I come in contact with are gay, lesbian or bisex- ual. Even by the most conservative estimates, it's more people than I know about. The silence means it has r been as safe to be gay as it is to straight, or non-white as it is to be white. I know even less about the University's atmosphere in terms -of oppression related to economic class and to disability. This amounts to more