i 4 - The Michigan Daily - Tuesday, March 21, 1995 ciue ffiidtigan iail JEAN TWENGE THE ERASABLE PEN 1 1 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan MICHAEL ROSENBERG Editor in Chief JULIE BECKER JAMES NASH Editorial Page Editors The myth and reality of Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of a majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters, and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. S: Vote Students' Kovacs, Deringer offer best leadership W hile LSA-Student Government may get lost in the dust of the Michigan Student Assembly, the election of officers this Wednesday and Thursday is an impor- tant choice. This year's election gives LSA students a choice between Michigan Party candidates Richard Bernstein and Steve Madhavan and Students' Party candidates James Kovacs and Sara Deringer. In both their leadership styles and their positions on relevant issues, Kovacs and Deringer are superior to their opponents and have earned the Daily's endorsement. On every topic, the Students' Party candi- dates take the most reasonable position. They support pushing the pass/fail deadline back to give students time to make their decisions. The Michigan Party candidates take a similar position - but come at it from a cockeyed perspective. Michigan Party presidential can- didate Bernstein says, "Students at a univer- sity are consumers. The University should act according to student satisfaction." While he is correct in demanding more accountabil- ity from the University, he errs in equating the University with a corporation. It serves a higher purpose than simple bean counting. Kovacs and Deringer also have clear vi- sion on the foreign language requirement. They acknowledge the obvious importance of such a program. And they understand that student input must guide their actions. Bernstein, however, loses his focus on this issue, taking off on "consumer notion" tan- gents. He asserts that it is not students' duty to reform the foreign language department. The Students' Party believes that the credit hour determination system must be reformed. LSA must weight classes by the level of difficulty, not the number of hours spent in class per week. Again, Bernstein could only reiterate his consumer theory on the issue. Other tenets of the Students' Party plat- form include the expansion of the list of classes that fill the ROE requirement, and moving the focus of ROE away from West- ern cultures. Kovacs and Deringer echo the student sentiment that the Communication Department is a shambles, and would push the college to improve the restructured de- partment. These positions represent the best formula for improving LSA. Bernstein departs from central issues and into sheer irrelevance by claiming that stan- dardized tests should have less importance in graduate school admissions. He plans to ap- proach the regents and is convinced that the administration will agree that the high qual- ity of University classes makes the require- ment unnecessary. If Bernstein takes his idea to public comments, he will likely be laughed out of the regents' room. The Students' Party slate offers a bal- anced ticket with more experience than their opponents. Kovacs has served two years in the student government, Deringer 1 1/2 years. In contrast, neither Bernstein nor Madhavan has spent time on LSA-SG. Bernstein has a broad range of knowledge about LSA, but his running mate appears ill-informed about the most important issues facing the student gov- ernment. Kovacs and Deringer both are well- versed on LSA issues with complementary areas of expertise. While Bernstein appears extremely en- thusiastic, it is doubtful that he will be able to build consensus within LSA-SG. Kovacs and Deringer take an understated yet energetic approach. Their ticket has made a point of soliciting opinions from LSA students - and they appear willing to carry this commit- ment beyond the election. They neither be- come defensive when speaking nor involve themselves in petty opponent-bashing. From any standpoint, the only viable op- tion for LSA-SG president and vice president goes to Students' Party candidates James Kovacs and Sara Deringer. They both have the leadership skills, the focus on issues and the experience that LSA-SG needs to continue to perform its valuable service to LSA stu- dents. Kovacs and Deringer represent the most level-headed, effective candidates. They should be elected. 7 ( 5tgender-based d D uring the 1800s, doctors gave women should women be forced into the sciences a solemn prescription. Do not exer- if they "freely" choose to involve them- cise, play sports or strain yourself in any selves in other activities? way, they said. If you do, you will never be The answer, simply, is that sex differ- able to have children: Vigorous exercise ences are not large enough to produce damages the reproductive organs. such large differences in the sex ratio of This is more than just a great excuse professions. In a meta-analysis of the avail- not to go to the gym. It is a parable for sex- able studies, Janet Shibley Hyde came to differences research in the 1990s - ex- two clear conclusions: Sex differences cept now the great, uncrossable gulf be- exist, but they explain such a small amount tween the sexes is not just in our bodies, of the variance that they are not useful in but in our minds, our thoughts and our prediction. Sex differences are like the souls. Wizard of Oz: They are great, powerful Men and women, we read on the and frightening until you see the minus- bestseller list, are from different planets. cule size of the effect behind the curtain. Media reports of science refer to "male In any sex-difference study, the simi- brains" and "female brains." Research on larities between men and women will al- spatial ability, verbal fluency, and other ways outweigh the differences; the over- sex differences in abilities abound. In a lap between the bell curves is always larger new study by Yale researcher Sally than the gaps. Men are taller than women Shaywitz, men and women under a Mag- on average, for example, but some women netic Resonance Imaging machine used are taller than some men. Yet if a statisti- different parts of their brain when doing a cally significant difference is found, it task as simple as talking. It's a wonder, comes out that we are dealing with two reading all this, that I can ask a male different entities - the "male brain" and human being for change and have him the "female brain," and never the twain know what I'm talking about. His anten- shall meet. nae didn't even move! It's also tempting to conclude that these This new trend of sex resegregation is differences between men and women are frightening in itself, but now some are inborn. However, the brain is a living beginning to argue that the new research organ, constantly changing as we learn justifies the low percentage of women in and adapt to different environments. A leadership positions and science majors difference in the brain is just as likely to be (e.g., "Agenda for Women heads down a learned, environmental program as it is the wrong path," Daily, 2/27/95). If men to be hard-wired. Considering the often- and women think differently and are good divergent developmental patterns of men at different things, they say, why shouldn't and women, some small differences in they have separate areas of expertise? Why brain function may not be surprising. But rfferences this means that the differences may be in the society, not in the biological program of development. Even if we accept the argument that female deficits in spatial ability preclude us from becoming engineers, we are left with another problem: What about those areas where women show an advantage? Women are more verbally fluent than men, but that didn't stop men from becoming great orators. Women are more aware of emotions and the intricacies of human relationships, but that didn't stop men from becoming great novelists. Women make better grades in high school and college, but that didn't (and doesn't) stop men from earning the majority of doctoral degrees. Others may argue that women just don't want to go into science and engineering - by their own "free will," they are inter- ested in different things. By their .own "free will," there were practically no women at all in graduate programs in the sciences in the 1950s; now women make up about 15 percent of graduate students in physics and nearly half of those in mathematics. Women's "free will" didn't change - society's expectations did. Eventually we may reach an upper bound- ary created by ability, but it hasn't hap- pened yet. Instead of trumpeting our differences, we should be grateful for how similar men and women are after all: Mars to Venus is an awfully long commute, and in the end we have to live on our fragile Earth to- gether. 0 JIM LASSER t ' , l // l . (( (. } A' .. . a. 'S +'C S}. SHARP AS TOAST Aat- .t" NOTABLE QUOTABLE "My friends tell me I'm contrary." - University Regent Philip Power (D-Ann Arbor), explaining his favor toward contrarian investments IVST A F C&OTm1 ...- ' t '' '' f J .1. 2 y 5 . } *. Vote 'Yes' on SLS Legal service deserves extra $2 per student LETTERS A nyone who has had a legal problem un- derstands the advantage of having access to sound legal advice. For this reason, Student Legal Services (SLS) provides a valuable service to students. It is especially helpful to students in a financial crunch, as there is only a token retainer for services provided. This is made possible by the amount allotted in the student fees portion of the tuition bill. To keep this service available and improve upon this resource, the $2.07 increase on this week's ballot must be approved. One function of SLS is to aid students where the Ann Arbor Tenants Union can no longer help. With Ann Arbor's notoriety for tenant-landlord disputes, many students find representation indispensable. SLS has pro- vided this admirably. The increase will allow protection to continue, shielding students against the many landlords who try to take advantage of inexperienced students. Ten- ants must have a viable recourse when cor- nered in a difficult legal situation. If the fee does not go through, not only is SLS prevented from expanding but it may have to downsize its staff. This would limit the number of cases it can take on, effectively barring some students from legal counsel. Overall quality also would suffer if funding is not passed. For these reasons, students must vote to increase the SLS fee on March 22 and 23. MacKinnon's words twisted To the Daily: Your coverage of the panel discussion of March 9 ("Panel addresses Internet policy is- sues." 3/10/95) states that "American Civil Liberties Union associate director Barry Steinhardt questioned the va- lidity of her (Law Prof. Catharine MacKinnon's) opin- ions." How can that be? Mr. Steinhardt revealed in his open- ing statement his very ignorance of Prof. MacKinnon's opinions when he alleged (incorrectly), "As many of you know, it's been Prof. MacKinnon's theory that speech which puts women in postures or positions of sexual submission, civility or display. ought to be criminally punish- able." Even a cursory reading of Prof. MacKinnon's writing and interviews shows that one of her principal tenets on pornog- raphy is not that it should be criminally prosecutable: rather, pornography that meets certain criteria and is shown to have resulted in harm should be ac- tionable under civil law. Mr. Steinhardt's credibilitywent to was not she who kept bringing up pornography; but members of .the audience (and occasionally a panelist) who kept bringing it up. That she would respond when addressed on this issue was natu- ral and appropriate. A transcript of this event is available to all on the World Wide Web (url=http:// w w w.umich.e du/~umlaw/ mttlr.html). Many congratula- tions to the Michigan Telecom- munications and Technology Law Review for hosting this outstanding debate. All the pan- elists were interesting and pro- vocative, with perhaps the ex- ception of Mr. Steinhardt, whose blundering and defamatory er- ror serves to remind us all that one does not challenge another's opinions until one has heard or read them. Allan C. Chubb Engineering graduate student U.S. guilty of terrorist acts To the Daily: On March 14 the Daily edi- torial board wrote a piece called "Buck stops here" which con- demned Clinton's treatment of Gerry Adams, the leader of Sinn hypocritical to condemn only those "terrorists" who threaten U.S. interests, like Gerry Adams and Yasser Arafat, while sup- porting or doing nothing about terrorist regimes friendly to the United States, itself a country with a long list of terrorist ac- tions. The Daily doesn't want money to go to groups that are involved in "assassinations, drug dealing, arms trafficking, and the bombing of innocent civil- ians." The United States has attempted many assassinations, including attempts on Fidel Castro, the bombing of Qadaffi, and other leaders we dislike. Although the CIA denies it, many believe they were behind Salvador Allende's assassina- tion. The CIA has been heavily involved in drug dealing and arms trafficking (Iran- Contragate), and the United States is one of the world's lead- ing arms dealers. As to bomb- ing of innocent civilians, a hor- rible thing indeed, I believe our attacks on the people of Indochina speak for themselves. Central America is another won- derful example of the U.S. policy on terrorism, as the many U.S.-supported death squads, tortures, and disappearances at- test to. Remembering the Fab Five To the Daily: I know this season has been less than uplifting for Michigan basketball fans, especially those who entered as freshmen at the same time the Fab Five did. I knew this moment would come and yet I'm not able to accept it now that we blew a fantastic 38 minutes of signature Ray and Jimmy action. Let the sportswriters analyze the game, I just want to say as a fan -thanks for the memories. Thanks for the overtime game against Duke, the most exciting sporting event I have witnessed live. Thanks for the adrenaline, thanks for the brag- ging rights, thanks for the shorts, the socks and the attitude. As long as I live I will never forget meeting Chris Webber after the Duke game in my neighbor's room and actually playing Sega football with him and listening to him complain about the ACC refs who were brought in for the game. He talked trash about Sega, to me! Thanks for your legend. Thanks for the riots on South U. Thanks for the Final Four two years in a row. So now that the era is over, I Exercise your votin power Repeatedly readers hear voices railing, "Go vote!"Indulge a little whim to make the incessant urging stop. GO VOTE on Wednesday and Thursday. March 22 and 23. There are several issues where choices must be made: LSA-Student Government elections, Michigan Student Assembly elections and a ballot item on the Student Legal Services fee. Be wild and vote on all three issues. Even two would be nice. But by all means -GO VOTE. After all, it could only help. How TO CONTACT THEM 0 Sen. Carl Levin (D) 459 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-6221 Sen. Spence Abraham (R) B40 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-4822 Rep. Lynn Rivers (D)