4 - The Michigan Daily - Wednesday, March 8, 1995 Ufe Sdia 1aig t DAVID WARTOWSKI STANDING ON THE I0 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan I I MICHAEL ROSENBERG Editor in Chief JULIE BECKER JAMES NASH Editorial Page Editors .. Lessons for the jobless, planlkss and futureless Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of a majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters, and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. Afrme ative action Prograns still needed to achieve balance It has become politically en vogue to attack affirmative action and the number of fed- eral and state programs that fall under that name. In Congress, Republicans are sound- ing the call for an end to federal affirmative action programs. In California, Republican Gov. Pete Wilson has declared his intention to abolish state affirmative action if a voter mandate supports it. If Wilson decides to run for president in 1996 -or even if he does not - it is expected to be a major issue on the Republican ticket. Here in Michigan, the idea of race-based scholarships has been contentiously debated. Gov. John Engler recently an- nounced his intentions to end a program that helps Native Americans attend public uni- versities, and many at the Uni- versity object to programs and w scholarships designed to recruit' and retain minority students. The overriding question in 1964: Lynd all these separate debates has been whether or not it is time to end affirma- tive action. The answer is an unequivocal no. Those who oppose affirmative action ar- gue that its programs harm qualified white males in order to benefit minorities and women. Despite scare-tactics denouncing "quotas,", affirmative action programs - including special recruitment and set-aside contracts - merely level the playing field W for all who compete. If 10 per- , cent of government contracts are set aside for women and minori- ties, that still leaves 90 percent up for grabs -and if a given competitor cannot obtain a con- tract from the remaining 90 per- cent, then he or she is obviously 1995: New on women are no longer such rarities in certain positions that they are stigmatized as "token" minorities. Affirmative action was conceived and implemented during President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, as a way of account- ing for the hundreds of years of discrimination against AfricanAmericans. The programs have been expanded over the years to include other minorities and women, who have also his- torically been deprived of economic and so- cial power. Now, 30 years later, many have decided that history has been an- swered, equity has been achieved and affirmative action can end. Yet this decision has less to do Swithhistorical timing than with F political opportunism. Affirma- <' tive action is just one aspect of the new conservative backlash in the United States. The issue has become one of many in a n Johnson campaign against federal pro- grams such as attacked welfare, student loans, food stamps and service to immigrants. While slashing these programs would be detrimental to the nation, Republi- cans can at least begin to justify them on the basis of fiscal policy. However, the same cannot be said of affirmative action, which only costs the gov- ernment a tiny amount for ad- ministration. The drive to cut