4 - The Michigan Daily - Wednesday, January 12, 1994 izrt £rbijjun &td e 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan JOSH DUBOw Editor in Chief ANDREW LEvy Editorial Page Editor L. Unless otherwise note4 unsigned editorials reflect the majority opinion of the Daly editorial board. All other cartoons, articles and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. . ,., ' ,. ,t l ;illilv3 r . . ' :;, " ..,,., r t( ' x ,A~) L. GAT r 0 Music reviewer has a lot to learn To the Daily: This is a letter regarding Matt Carlson's review of Green Apple Quick Step's album "Wonderful Virus." (1/8/94) Matt, are you a college student probably nineteen or twenty? You would never be able to tell with your immature labelling of this band. It must have taken you a few hours to pull all the nicknames out of your ass. "Gross Apple Quid Stew, Green Asshole Quiche Seep, Grave Affront Crap Stew" to name a few. A few wasted hours that you could have spent listening to the album instead of trying to figure out another way to put down an aspiring group. Do you think that the Seattle music scene died just because the so- called "grunge" style is past its prime? You are probably right and all the people in Seattle no longer listen to music and instead have returned to their homes to Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, and Nirvana records and try to remember the good old days. You are probably right in saying that because "grunge as a legitimate style died," groups in Seattle should stop playing the music they want to play. I am sure that all people from Seattle would like to thank you for providing them with insight that their city's music means absolutely nothing. Did you actually see them at the Blind Pig or did you just ask someone what they were wearing? Are you that shallow when it comes to music? Do you buy all of your music at Tower based on their hot picks? Sure sounds like you did. The best music out today is the music that is not heard on corporate radio but heard about by word of mouth, magazines, and college radio stations. This is the music of the future. These groups are the ones that people will be sick of hearing about in a few years. I do not think that Green Apple Quick Step is the best band in the world but they have talent and enough guts to release an album "two years after Nirvana...and two years after Pearl Jam." If they had released this at the same time, maybe there would be some basis to your point that they jumped on the "bandwagon." As far as the idea that the clothes they wore at the concert "show they know fashion," just proves that you are all set to jump into the melee of corporate rock where how you look and where you are from is more important than what you sound like. They were wearing flannels. Wow, imagine that a group who lives in Seattle would wear flannel. Do you think that groups such as Pearl Jam and Nirvana wore flannel to start a national fashion craze? Do you think that a band would expect to make it big just because they wear the right clothes? Obviously you do and this is why there is no place for people like you in the music industry. By the way, Matt, take a peek at the inside covers of Nirvana's "Nevermind" and Pearl Jam's "Ten" and tell me if you see any hint of flannel on the boys. I would tell you to look at "Bleach" but you would probably go under the sink and pull out a bottle. I did see them open for X at the Blind Pig and I liked them. I had no clue where they were from and didn't really care. They rocked the Pig and the lead guitarist, either Daniel Kempthorne or Steve Ross, I'm not sure which one, was the most entertaining guitarist I have seen in a while. By the way, having a female bassist/vocalist, Mariann Braeden, sure does put them in the same category as Pearl Jam and Nirvana. Thank you for clearing up for me that Chris Novoselic and Jeff Ament are female. I would have gone through life confused. Hey Matt, why not go talk to Heather Phares or try to find Scott Sterling from last year and learn the trade of music reviews. RANDY ANTIN LSA sophomore Men should recognize victimization of women To the Daily: I am responding to David Seto's letter, "Don't blame all men for the actions of one man," (1/6/94) which itself was a response to another letter written by a Ms. Hollenbeck. Mr. Seto took great offense to Ms. Hollenbeck's statement which suggested that men begin thinking with one head (upper) rather than with the other (lower). As crude and ill-chosen as this statement may seem, it voices a certain truth. Whether men can't stop thinking with their lower heads (personally, I think it's impossible) is not really an issue. Nature will generally have its way in the long run. It is the thinking in the upper head that needs to be increased. Mr. Seto is a prime example of how those who are not commonly victimized are completely ignorant to the viewpoints and perspectives of the victims. I say "prime" because he and all men who believe that the world is a place constructed on the basis of individual choice and freedom are ignorant to the existing rules and roles that society dictates for us. Come on little men, the first truly progressive step in change is for those who are in control to admit that they do indeed have this control at their disposal. Check criminal statistics since this country's conception and you will see who has consistently been violated.. Understand, little man, that it isn't you who walks out into the night in fear of being groped and even raped by someone acting freely and through his own will. He is a man and his victim is a woman and this is all that need be known for a revolution to begin. JASON BUQUE LSA junior Lack of observance makes MLK holiday unnecessary, To the Daily: Martin Luther King was truly a great man. He tried to show a racist America how to love, not hate, by example. Though I sincerely appreciate his accomplishments, I don't think taking a day off from classes to pay homage is such a good idea. I read of when we needed a day off, when blacks were more unified on campus because they had to be. We got together and studied our history and current situation, which was academically and financially terrible. Now, discernible racism in the classroom, on campus etc. is basically gone. Plus, we are in a liberal University that is arguably interested in our welfare, and financial aid compensates for any economic disadvantages we are faced with, so why do we need a special day? Many parents work hard to send their kids to school, and the day off for Martin Luther King day is, in a sense, a waste of time and money. The average day of classes costs $40, or $100 for out-of-state tuition. This money is thrown away for just a handful of festive marchers. Tolled together, students lose an aggregate of $2,320,000 in one day! No one even attends the day like a few years ago, when we first got it. Why have a day of unity for blacks when most blacks are laying at home popping Tylenol because of a hangover; or sleeping in from partying too hard at the Dymonz gig the night before. The University finally let us dedicate a day to hear our politically active leaders address movements and oppressive situations in our communities. This will probably the only opportunity of the year to find out what's really goin' on at the "crib," and we see Monday as the perfect study day. The University has shown black students a lot more support for our struggles and needs than we have shown ourselves! In conclusion, we don't need it, we don't acknowledge it, so let's nix it! MIKE SMITN LSA first-year student 0 0 01 Put tuition waivers on hold at UMN The University of Minnesota administration's decision to pay tu- ition for two student government lead- ers is an example of right idea, wrong method. These tuition waivers must be put on hold until students can have input into the process. Otherwise, the idea ofstudent self-government on this campus will become a farce. Last quarter, administrators ap- After six months of consideration, administrators decided the two student leader positions deserved free tuition. While they were at it, University offi- cials decided they'd cover the cost of the tuitions this year and then turn funding responsibilities over to MSA and GAPSA. Only then will students, in the form of the Student Services 'Fees Committee, have a say in the the student fees committee to do its job? Would University officials have felt the same sense of responsibility for student leaders who were more con- frontational with the administration? Perhaps University administrators thought no one would notice or care about their backroom tuition waiving. After all, only a few thousand dollars is involved and out of 38,000 students, a