4 - The Michigan Daily - Wednesday, March 2, 1994 Fe ,rIidiga n idQ "Someone's opinion of you doesn't have to be a reality." -Felman Malveaux, LSA junior and member of the men's varsity track team 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan JESSIE HALLADAY Editor in Chief SAM GOODSTEIN FLiNr WAINEss Editorial Page Editors The Rz'E F I EMR4N T.~ Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of a majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters, and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. --- -- -- Celebration? Where? U' falls short in recognizing women's history IW ithunseasonablywarmweather, March apparently no interest - in commemorat- V has come in a lamb, as the time-hon- ing Women's History Month. The burden ored fairy tale goes. And while the month is has fallen again on the Women's Studies dedicated nationally to commemorating the Program to organize and raise funds for the importance of women's his- events, with only token sup- tory, the University's Ann port from the Office of Stu- Arborcampus-instarkcon- WOMES dent Affairs. trast toitsFlintcampus-has H:STORY MONTH It is incumbent on Vice again dropped the ball by fail- President for StudentAffairs ing to recognize the impor- Maureen A. Hartford to take tance of making this month a a leadership role. She can- celebration of women in our not merely rely on her staff history. members to ensure adequate The Flint campus has University support. If Hart- scheduled more than 100 ford has time to supervise events for Women's History the code and make propos- Month, from lectures to a als to the regents, than she video series on numerous top- certainly has time to do rec- ics, all under the theme "Sex, Power and ognize the importance ofcelebratingwomen's Violence." In fact, University community achievements. members have been asked to participate in the Moreover, the slate of events at the Flint Flint campus events - because there are no campus demonstrates that, with initiativefrom comparable events here in Ann Arbor. the administration, women's issues can re- That the Ann Arbor campus would all but ceive the attention they deserve. ignore the month, paying cursory attention But the blame cannot be placed solely on only, justifies concerns that women's issues administrative inaction. Responsibility for are not well represented on campus. Further- celebrating this month also rests with stu- more, the University's lack of commitment dents, who have not demanded events, as flatly contradicts its admirable seriesof events well as with the MSA Women's Issues Com- and lectures that havetraditionally highlighted mission, which has not actively worked to Black History Month in February. A detailed rectify the situation. listing of events, programs, posters and flyers As another March drifts in and out, every- displayed the University's commitment to one throws up their hands and laments: "I bring speakers and reflect on the month's don't know why more isn't done at the Ann importance. Arbor campus." Neither do we. But it is time Yet, the small hodgepodge of events for that administrators and students - far too Women's History Month reflects the reality content to wring their hands and wait the that far too often on this campus, women's month out - realize the importance of cel- issues take a back seat to other University ebrating Women's History Month. The Uni- concerns. Where is the Office of Student versity community - students, faculty, staff Affairs? They were quick to organize and and administration - must recognize fund events for Black History Month and women's history, and its importance to the Chicano History Week but hadno time-and University and the nation. Helping public schools Solution won't come from repairing buildings ~0 ,*I , _ r, 't-_ .r . : t. cr IMF' '"~ : - , V . 1 .. -"" . ... X11CHAS L_ JOIZ'DA WELL MIKE.... OUR NEX~ T' CAv I IN ASNEVILLE -TOmoiZ.RW.., 50 LEiT HI1T VUP HAM S STRIP 8A "J I Z LO\IF_ MIN~ORĀ° 0 L L I -I-_I ccvQX^1 RF 7 ii/! i l f~i(F 1 " 1 + O0nly eight percent of schools in the Mid- west region of the United States have been built since 1980. The average age of school buildings in Detroit is 65 years. Many of those schools were built before 1900. These are only a few of the findings in a recently released study by the American As- sociation of School Administrators (AASA) regardingthephysical condition ofthe nation's schools. The study, which has prompted ac- tion in both the U.S. House and Senate, found that schools nationwide have been unable to complete maintenance projects whose esti- mated total could top $100 billion. In response to this study, the House began debate last week on a plan to set aside $1 billion in low-interest, long-term loans to renovate the nation's poorest, most dilapi- dated schools. In the Senate, Carol Moseley- Braun (D-Ill.) is expected to introduce a plan for $600 million in direct grants to crumbling public schools. Both of these plans are excel- lent steps, and are much-neededby the nation's schools. For those who grew up in some of the country's most affluent school districts, it is sometimes difficult to imagine the sorry state of these disadvantaged schools. Betweenbro- ken heat, water pipes bursting and rats hid- ing in the walls, it is a wonder that students in these buildings are able to get any educa- tion at all. When a school's infrastructure is falling apart, it creates more than an inconvenience for teachers and administrators -it is detri- mental to students' learning processes. The AASA study found that students from such facilities can be expected to score more than five percent lower on achievement tests than students attending schools in "fair" condition, and up to 11 percent lower than students at sehnn in "excellent" condition. nize the importance of having good school conditions, it would be a grave mistake to assign the responsibility for these test-score disparities to infrastructure alone. The prob- lems of education inequality go much deeper than that. It has, for far too long, been a sad fact that in the United States students from the poorest school districts receive woefully inadequate educations, especially in comparison to their more affluent counterparts. Part of this can be attributed directly to financing. In Michigan, schools have for years been funded directly by property taxes, meaning that wealthy, suburban districts have consistently wound up with more money per student than urban or rural districts. And while plans for education reform are under way in Michigan, with intent to give more money to the poorest districts, neither plan being debated state- wide will come close to eliminating this in- equality. Yet funding reform is not the complete solution. Another overwhelming problem with schools in disadvantaged areas is that their students--witnesses every day to crime and violence - often need even more atten- tion than other students, to combat the debili- tating effects of the environment they face outside of school. This is the most compli- cated problem of all, one that will not be easily solved by House debates or neat fund- ing bills. The plans being considered in Congress for school repair are good ones, and should be passed and implemented as soon as possible. But legislators must not use these bills as a way to claim they have filled their "quota" of education legislation, or as an excuse to stop working toward further improvement. While these plans are good, they are only a first step on the lon nath toward adequate education Nice try To the Daily: Monday (2/28/94), when I turned to the opinion page to find out what my peers think about all the latest issues, I was deeply surprised by one letter to the editor. I read through Mr. Ravi Madan's letter with eyes wide, shocked to find that not only did he claim to like Jim Lasser's editorial cartoons, but that his friends did, too! I felt truly foolish when I read myself described as an "ignorant reader" who hates Mr. Lasser's work because I am "unaware of current events," like gun control, Olympic figure skaters, gun control, violent youth, gun control and violence. Also, seeing Lasser's work described as "extremely humorous" for the first time made me realize that, whereas I find him as funny and subtle as a sack of hammers, others may find him witty and incisive. Perhaps, all along, I have been wronging "this talented young man!" Certainly if someone loves him enough to write these glowing words... Before I would admit defeat, however, I followed a hunch. I pulled out the good of Student Directory and o and behold! Mr. Ravi Madan seems to live in room 3212 Hunt South Quad, while Mr. James Lasser occupies room 3216 of the same hail! Is it mere coincidence? I somehow doubt it. I suppose it would take at least some brains to ask someone who doesn't live next door to pat your back for you, but it's apparent that Mr. Lasser lacks even that. Give it up, Jim. JOSEPH HARPE LSA junior 'The ball remains in Syria's court' To the Daily: Has Syrian Hafez Assad decided to make peace with Israel? Or is he waging a new public relations campaign designed to put international pressure on Israel to make unilateral concessions? The jury is still out. Assad's statement that he is willing to have "normal relations" with Israel is indeed a positive step toward peace in the region. But how does Syria define "peace?" And what is Syria willing to give up as a result of it? As the leader of the Arab world, Assad is not just negotiating peace between Syria and Israel but between the Arab world and Israel, so to speak. And as the leader of the Arab world, Assad will need to offer a great deal more than vague platitudes to of long-range missiles from dangerous states like Iran and North Korea justify viewing Assad's peaceful proclamations with heavy skepticism. In addition to the security calculus, the U.S. and Israel must hold Syria accountable to the issue of human rights. Syria remains a brutal regime in which political opponents are still silenced and information regarding Israel's MIA's is still being withheld. Syria says it wants to have good relations with the West and Israel, yet anti-Western and anti-Israel animus still exists. To wit: at the Clinton- Assad press conference in January, Syrian officials barred Israeli journalists from attending - a far cry from normalization. In short, the ball remains in Syria's court. It is well and good to talk of peace to third parties who can do you favors (i.e., the U.S.), but Assad needs to present the Israelis with direct, specific commitments to peace, and he must back up his words with meaningful actions. DANIEL CHERRIN LSA junior Fanaticism won't bring peace To the Daily: As a Jew, Zionist, and human being I am extremely disgusted and disturbed by Baruch Goldstein's Feb. 25 attack on Palestinian worshippers in Hebron. That over 40 men, women and children were senselessly murdered and over a hundred others injured is in itself a tragedy of immense proportion. That Goldstein acted from a perverted and utterly sacrilegious misinterpretation of Jewish belief saddens me even further. Baruch Goldstein, a devotee of the deceased hate- mongering, religious/political fanatic, Meir Kahane, believed that in spraying bullets into a crowd of Palestinian worshippers he was serving G-d, Torah and the Jewish people. In reality, Goldstein and other settlers who follow ideologies of hatred, violate the essence of Jewish law and spirit. They - not Rabin and Peres, who have labored courageously for peace - have betrayed Jewish faith and people. I hope only that Goldstein's attempt to drown the peace process in a sea of blood will not succeed. It is time that Prime Minister Rabin, Israelis and world Jewry make a strong stand against Goldstein and his ilk - and if that requires the dismantling of antagonistic settlements such as Kiryat of murder and distrust. I take great pride in my faith, culture, and people and believe in the necessity of the state of Israel - as well as a Palestinian state. With these convictions comes a strong passion for justice and duty toward reconciliation with the Palestinian people. Above all comes a love for peace and a disdain for Goldstein's brand of fanaticism and the violence it breeds. DANIEL SHERE RC first-year student 'Daily isn't even good as toilet paper' To the Daily: I thought that the purpose of journalism was to provide a service, to tell people what's going on in a mature and professional manner - not to insult, disgust or simply make one madder-than-hell. After reading Chris Leply's "review" of "Dead Alive," I came to a quick conclusion. Either my idea of journalism is wrong, or Leply would be better off supergluing his face to the nose of a 747. Why am I upset? As a New Zealander, I was quite offended by his claim that besides Kiwi Fruit, he'd be "hard pressed to come up with something else worth while that's come from that isle (New Zealand)." I won't waste your time going by into detail about how wrong he is. There's a lesson I learned a long time ago, and I'd like to share it with Chris - If you don't know what you're talking about, shut up. While I'm in a bad mood, I'd like to kick your "paper" around a bit more. I was surprised and offended that the review of the new 2 Tone compilation "A Checkered Past," was written without the words "rudeboys," "rudegirls," "mods," "skinheads" or "Vespa." The implication that second generation ska "spawned" new wave (yuck!) had me frying 12 egg omelettes on my head. You didn't kid me - I've had the CD for a while, and that review was taken right out of the booklet that comes with it. In her review of the Germs' "MIA: The Complete Anthology," Heather Phares claimed that because guitarist Pat Smear has been touring with Nirvana and appeared with them on MTV, "the Germs' punk virus is definitely not MIA." Actually, it proves the complete opposite. And just who does this "cartoonist" of yours think he is? I've seen funnier stuff coming out the back of my dog. Can't you get any decent articles by yourselves? All the higher education rationale If you aren't yet acquainted with the attempted destruction of Prof. David Goldberg last year and the continuing scandal of the failure of the University to chal- lenge and respond adequately to that injustice, hunt up a copy of Geoff Earle's column "Unfin- ished Business" in the Daily's Weekend, Etc. section of Thurs- day, Feb. 10. It's the best brief and informed account of the mat- ter. Why is it important for stu dents, as well as faculty, to be aware of this injustice and its bear- ing on the conduct of the Univer- sity? And why should members of administration desist from pretend- ing that all is well or can be made so if all adopted the right attitude? Prof. Goldberg was insulted, harassed and vilified for perform- ing exactly the demands of hi calling: the pursuit and profession of truth. It's not an issue of "free speech." It's an issue that relates directly to the very rationale of an institution of higher learning. As such, it is mandatory (a mandate at last!a real one) that the facts be confronted directly, and not evaded by ineffectual palliatives.A E1 The Dean of LSA, Edie Goldenberg, has to her credit re- sponded to repeated demands for College notice of this affair (Uni- versity Record, Feb. 14). I be- lieve she is right in advocating the view that disagreement can foster discussion and learning, and if her letter is intended as a sign of willingness on the part of the Uni versity to carry on discussion of this particular matter it is most welcome. If, on the other hand, it is intended as the final word or clos- ing of the books on this case, it is wholly inadequate. It is not sufficient to say that investigation of the charges brought against Prof. Goldenber produced "no finding" of racism or sexism on his part, or that the charges were "not substantiated." The proper question to look into is how such an outrage could have been countenanced at all. The con- duct of the former departmental chair is presented in Dean Goldenberg's letter as exemplary but in fact it was far from that an the question of the climate or con- ditions that allowed for such gross malfeasance is what needs investi- gating. First, a fair reading of the "evi- dence" proffered as well as Prof. Goldberg's course materials makes it clear that the students who charged him with racism and sex4 ism offered as basis for their claim a total misunderstanding of the ideas being propounded. Were they, then, perhaps incapable of grasping the concepts? Or were they merely willful disregarding them? It seems relevant to say that the sole rational (and signed) de- fense of their actions made the two points, first, that charges had to b anonymous since reprisal would surely follow from adverse public criticism and, second, that while some students might be able to understand ideas presented in an ironic or abrasive manner, other students, less familiar with diverse styles in higher education, had to be "handled" differently, their men{ tal development being apparently unequal to the challenge. Is not such a "defense" an insult to these students as well as to all in the community? It is not a professor's duty to flatter the sensibilities of 01 0 0 M 01 0 01 I II