4 - The Michigan Daily - Monday, December 6, 1993 The £tdiian&lg 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan JosH DUBOW Editor in Chief ANDREw LEVY Editorial Page Editor f Unless otherwise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the majority opinion of the Daily editorial board. All other cartoons, articles and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. ER 5- .: WHJiATT2- Sorry, Ft$ t~for'y 61t iscoea.. 1v~ . LAJNAT IT1 WHikAT o ) sAY,\ Mrsze'y (12 '(l k/ f %~2 Rape mustre By JES ICA HELLMANN The statistics are unbelievable. So many women are raped every year in this country that we often forget how prevalent sexual assault is. Now a new story has come to light, and still we refuse to address the real problems behind the rape of women. We cannot ignore the rape of a University student. Violence against women is a horrendous crime that is often clothed in popular misconceptions, cultural denial and misinformation. First we must always recognize that under no circumstances, at no time, in no place is a woman ever asking to be raped. We have to question why certain people refuse to acknowledge this fact. For the chief of the Department of Public safety to insinuate that responsibility for preventing rape lies with women contributes more to the problems of rape than the solution. Further, if his statement has been taken out of context, why didn't he come forward quickly to clarify his remarks? We do not want or need a chief that is not sympathetic to victims of rape. The media also can ignore the fact that women don't invite rape. For Channel 50 to pick and choose among the facts and comments of police authorities is to instill an even greater fear in women. Fear perpetuates rape's firm grip on us all. Campus media has barely covered this story. Why was the original coverage of the incident by the Daily limited to a mere side headline? (The second article was at the bottom of the page.) Some students have bought into the idea of fear as well. Why were the women who were interviewed the very next day by the Daily so quick to profess their fears and not to come to the defense of a woman who was simply functioning as a free individual? Further, why was SAPAC's comment on how no woman who walks alone at night is asking for rape limited to only one statement near the end of the first follow-up article? What this University needs is to be well informed, so that instead of mourning the addition of another Hellmann is an LSA sophomore. define lines of dependency.* rape to the statistics, the community can rise up and face this problem head on. Let's place blame where it belongs - with the rapist. Let's give women and their issues the attention and respect they deserve in the media, so that we can raise awareness and work for real solutions. We must defend victims. We need to keep this particular incident in perspective, however. Rape by strangers is something on which female nightmares are often based, and we do need to learn to protect ourselves. On the other hand, we must recognize that acquaintance rape is far more frequent. Rape as a whole is one mechanism by which women's societal roles are maintained, and fear, not courage, is what keeps us there. Education, anger and demanding respect and equality will further our goals far better than will fear and dependency. We can never forget who a rape victim is, exactly that, a victim. It upsets me that more are not outraged that a student's life, independence and self-worth were violated just outside her own home, at her own car. She should not have called for an escort. She should not have needed assistance to lead her daily activities. She did not need someone to watch over her. What she needs is a University community that stands up for her rights as a person and the rights of all women who manage to live their lives in a society that tells them they should be afraid and dependent. Independent women deserve our respect and empathy, not our disapproval. We cannot live in fear of rape, and professing dependency on others for security will never stop the plague of rape. Organizations that provide escorts for women are important, and provide a needed service, but we cannot solely rely on them for safety. We have outgrown our childhood, and it is now time to face life's injustices and demand that collectively women be treated better. Making sure that one individual woman is well "protected" does not make any other woman less susceptible to rape. Walking with your friends is smart, but it will never solve the problem: (And women, can you imagine a campus where we are forced to be shuttled from place to place because our social position makes us too susceptible to violence?) Of course, we need to be street smart; we need to be conscious of our surroundings as we function as students on this campus. I'm not arguing that we should ignore the very real threat of rape, but fearing it will only make the problem worse. Rape is about power and violence. If we sacrifice what women deserve - freedom - by asking them to become dependent on others, we will be forcing them to regress to a state of helplessness. The solution to the problem of rape lies with the women's movement itself. The achievement of equality is the only thing that will alleviate the threat of rape. Women should demand to be treated better. The entire University community needs to rise up out of anger from this incident; we should not ask women to pledge dependency in the name of their own security. Women will not be secure as long as others see them as weak individuals asking to be oppressed. Women deserve better representation. Women's issues deserve better coverage. Women's concerns deserve more attention. And lastly, women's involvement in society is not something to be feared; it should be celebrated. I refused to be confined to my home as soon as the cloak of darkness arrives. For anyone to tell me that I am responsible for finding an escort every time I want to exercise- my independence is ridiculous. I would rather take the slim risk of rape by a stranger than admit to an oppressive patriarchy that I have been conquered. I will continue to keep my eyes open as I walk across campus at night. I will continue to attend parties with friends. But I will never be told how to function as a woman or as a student. I choose,;K instead of living in fear, to work toward the equality that will bring women out of the societal hole that makes them susceptible to sexual violence. College Roundup..Z V I.. *us san U.S. ust top aimigofwome A bill recently introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives gives Congress a rare opportunity to ensure women no longer are subjected to a disfiguring cultural practice known as female genital mutilation. FGM involves the partial or com- plete removal of the clitoris - a pri- mary organ stimulated during sexual intercourse - and the outer and/or inner lips of the vagina. The procedure usually is performed in Middle Eastern and North African countries on girls around the age of 7, they want to undergo FGM, then they should do so once they have achieved adulthood by returning to their native The procedure and Its permanent consequences are undoubtedly painful and grotesque, causing needles pain for the women who undergo it. people of Middle Eastern descent to the Detroit area has led health offi- cials to study the degree to which FGM takes place, but they have been unable to discover any officially documented cases. This fact is alarming because it points to the possibility that FGM is more commonly taking place "unof- ficially," in nonmedical and prob- ably unsanitary conditions. The cultural preconceptions sur- rounding FGM are that a woman is too sexual and wanton - that the Blacks can be racists To the Daly: We are writing in response to Natosha Morris's letter "No Such Thing as Reverse Racism" (12/1/93). To say that there can be no such thing as reverse racism is ludicrous. According to her, any act of violence perpetrated by a Black person against a white person cannot be considered racism, but rather an expression of anger against a racist society. This stems from a claim that racism is a "systematic oppression of one race by another." This definition completely discounts individualistic thinking, implying that no one person could be racist by himself or herself, needing the backing of an entire race. True, whites have never been enslaved and tortured by another race as heinously as Blacks have, but her definition requires that it is the white race as a whole responsible for an white, there are good white people and bad white people. There are good Black people and bad Black people. Racism exists throughout it all. She recognizes that there are racist white people, but refuses to acknowledge that there maysbe racist Black people. Natosha, racism transcends race. JOEL SHAPIRO ERIC SKLAR LSA Seniors Rape is never the victim's fault To the Daily: We were appalled by Department of Public Safety Chief Leo Heatley's comment that appeared in. Wednesday's paper regarding the rape behind South Quad. Your quote read, "(The attack could have been prevented) if she had walked with someone, if she had called out escort the underreporting and the extent of the trauma is that, still today, the police say the victim could have prevented it -it's the victim's fault. Blaming the victim is easy and far too common. But when are we going. to realize that victim-blaming is more than a display of insensitivity, that it perpetuates the insidious rape culture of our society? It is one thing to encourage students to avoid walking alone and to take extra safety precautions. It is quite another to use language which dismisses a violent crime as something that was the victim's fault. Rape is the responsibility of the rapist, not the victim. Legal and social change is needed - a good place to begin here in a University setting would be by addressing the attitudes and assumptions held by those in positions of authority, especially our police force. We wonder, does Chief Heatlev ever walk to his car or take